Predicting Hydromodification in Streams Using Nonlinear Memory-Based Algorithms in Southern California Streams
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144, Issue 1
Abstract
Hydromodification is a serious management concern in semiarid regions and is expected to become worse with land use and climate change. Potential stream channel responses range from increased or decreased sediment loads, incision, and dramatic nonequilibrated channel enlargements. The prevalence of hydromodification, particularly in semiarid regions, creates a need for new predictive tools that can support decisions aimed at reducing or mitigating hydromodification effects in a large geographical region. Existing models to screen and predict hydromodification are limited in terms of performance and require time and data. This paper examines three nonlinear learning algorithms—support vector machines, artificial neural networks, and random forests—for predicting changes in stream channel morphology as an indicator of hydromodification. The authors explore the ability of each algorithm to rank the important variables that explain the degree of channel response for streams located in Southern California. Results suggest that variables pertaining to the stream bank morphology, such as bank angle, maximum bank height, and bottom widths, rank high in their ability to predict hydromodification. Among the three algorithms, random forest performance is robust compared to artificial neural networks and support vector machines, given its ability to accommodate small data sample sizes and minimal data preprocessing. The study shows that for complex responses, such as hydromodification of stream channels, preprocessing will continue to be a necessary step for nonlinear algorithms. With proper guidance, there is potential for using nonlinear algorithms to assess stream reaches vulnerable to hydromodification and inform management decisions to manage streamflow and runoff in Southern California.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Abu-Mostafa, Y. S., Magdon-Ismail, M., and Lin, H. T. (2012). Learning from data, Vol. 4, AML Book, New York.
Bledsoe, B. P., Hawley, R. J., Stein, E. D., and Booth, D. B. (2010). “Hydromodification screening tools: Field manual for assessing channel susceptibility.”, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA.
Bledsoe, B. P., Stein, E. D., Hawley, R. J., and Booth, D. B. (2012). “Framework and tool for rapid assessment of stream susceptibility to hydromodification.” J. Am. Water. Resour. Assoc., 48(4), 788–808.
Bledsoe, B. P., Watson, C. C., and Biedenharn, D. S. (2002). “Quantification of incised channel evolution and equilibrium.” J. Am. Water. Resour. Assoc., 38(3), 861–870.
Boix-Fayos, C., Barberá, G. G., López-Bermúdez, F., and Castillo, V. M. (2007). “Effects of check dams, reforestation and land-use changes on river channel morphology: Case study of the Rogativa catchment (Murcia, Spain).” Geomorphology, 91(1), 103–123.
Booth, D. B., Dusterhoff, S. R., Stein, E. D., and Bledsoe, B. P. (2010). “Hydromodification screening tools: GIS-based catchment analyses of potential changes in runoff and sediment discharge.”, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA.
Bull, W B. (1997). “Discontinuous ephemeral streams.” Geomorphology, 19(3), 227–276.
Cardinale, B. J., et al. (2012). “Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.” Nature, 486(7401), 59.
Coleman, D., MacRae, C., and Stein, E. D. (2005). “Effect of increases in peak flows and imperviousness on the morphology of southern California streams.”, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA.
Dayhoff, J. E., and DeLeo, J. M. (2001). “Artificial neural networks.” Cancer, 91(S8), 1615–1635.
Dunkerley, D., and Brown, K. (1999). “Flow behaviour, suspended sediment transport and transmission losses in a small (sub-bank-full) flow event in an Australian desert stream.” Hydrol. Processes, 13(11), 1577–1588.
Dust, D., and Wohl, E. (2012). “Conceptual model for complex river responses using an expanded Lane’s relation.” Geomorphology, 139, 109–121.
Dust, D., and Wohl, E. (2014). “Response to commentary by Huang et al. regarding ‘Conceptual model for complex river responses using an expanded Lane’s relation’.” Geomorphology, 209, 143–146.
Eng, K., Carlisle, D. M., Wolock, D. M., and Falcone, J. A. (2013). “Predicting the likelihood of altered streamflows at ungauged rivers across the conterminous United States.” River Res. Appl., 29(6), 781–791.
Govindaraju, R. S., and Rao, A. R. (2000). “Introduction.” Artificial neural networks in hydrology, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1–5.
Hawley, R. J. (2009). “Effects of urbanization on the hydrologic regimes and geomorphic stability of small streams in southern California.” Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO.
Hawley, R. J., and Bledsoe, B. P. (2011). “How do flow peaks and durations change in suburbanizing semi-arid watersheds? A southern California case study.” J. Hydrol., 405(1), 69–82.
Hawley, R. J., and Bledsoe, B. P. (2013). “Channel enlargement in semiarid suburbanizing watersheds: A southern California case study.” J. Hydrol., 496, 17–30.
Hawley, R. J., Bledsoe, B. P., Stein, E. D., and Haines, B. E. (2012). “Channel evolution model of semiarid stream response to urban-induced hydromodification.” J. Am. Water. Resour. Assoc., 48(4), 722–744.
Hawley, R. J., MacMannis, K. R., and Wooten, M. S. (2013). “Bed coarsening, riffle shortening, and channel enlargement in urbanizing watersheds, northern Kentucky, USA.” Geomorphology, 201, 111–126.
Hsu, K. L., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process.” Water Resour. Res., 31(10), 2517–2530.
Huang, H. Q., Liu, X., and Nanson, G. C. (2014). “Commentary on a ‘Conceptual model for complex river responses using an expanded Lane diagram by David Dust and Ellen Wohl, Geomorphology, 139–140, March 2012, Pages 109–121’.” Geomorphology, 209, 140–142.
Joachims, T. (2002). “Support vector machines.” Learning to classify text using support vector machines, Springer, New York, 35–44.
Kuhn, M. (2008). “Building predictive models in R using the caret package.” J. Stat. Software, 28(5), 1–26.
Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L., Tsoi, A. C., and Back, A. D. (1997). “Face recognition: A convolutional neural-network approach.” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 8(1), 98–113.
Liaw, A., and Wiener, M. (2002). “Classification and regression by Random Forest.” R News, 2(3), 18–22.
Liu, X., et al. (2013). “Semi-supervised node splitting for random forest construction.” Proc., IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Oregon Convention Center, Portland, OR, 492–499.
Merritt, D. M., and Wohl, E. (2003). “Downstream hydraulic geometry and channel adjustment during a flood along an ephemeral, arid-region drainage.” Geomorphology, 52(3), 165–180.
Nezlin, N. P., and Stein, E. D. (2005). “Spatial and temporal patterns of remotely-sensed and field-measured rainfall in southern California.” Remote Sens. Environ., 96(2), 228–245.
Ogden, F. L., Raj Pradhan, N., Downer, C. W., and Zahner, J. A. (2011). “Relative importance of impervious area, drainage density, width function, and subsurface storm drainage on flood runoff from an urbanized catchment.” Water Resour. Res., 47(12), W12503.
Paul, M. J., and Meyer, J. L. (2001). “Streams in the urban landscape.” Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 32(1), 333–365.
Poff, N. L., and Zimmerman, J. K. (2010). “Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: A literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows.” Freshwater Biol., 55(1), 194–205.
Puckridge, J. T., Sheldon, F., Walker, K. F., and Boulton, A. J. (1998). “Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers.” Mar. Freshwater Res., 49, 55–72.
R version 3.0.1 [Computer software]. R Core Team, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richter, B. D., Warner, A. T., Meyer, J. L., and Lutz, K. (2006). “A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations.” River Res. Appl., 22(3), 297–318.
Schumm, S. A. (1997). The fluvial system, Vol. 338, Wiley, New York.
Shmilovici, A. (2005). “Support vector machines.” Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook, Springer, Boston, 257–276.
Statnikov, A., and Aliferis, C. F. (2007). “Are random forests better than support vector machines for microarray-based cancer classification?” AMIA Annual Symp. Proc., American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, MD, 686.
Statnikov, A., Wang, L., and Aliferis, C. F. (2008). “A comprehensive comparison of random forests and support vector machines for microarray-based cancer classification.” BMC Bioinf., 9(1), 319.
Stein, E. D., et al. (2012). “Hydromodification assessment and management in California.”, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA.
Stein, E. D., and Bledsoe, B. P. (2013). “Modeling and managing hydromodification effects: Summary of available tools and decision-making approach.”, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA.
Svetnik, V., Liaw, A., Tong, C., Culberson, J. C., Sheridan, R. P., and Feuston, B. P. (2003). “Random forest: A classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.” J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43(6), 1947–1958.
Tooth, S. (2000). “Downstream changes in dryland river channels: The Northern Plains of arid central Australia.” Geomorphology, 34(1), 33–54.
Trimble, S. W. (1997). “Contribution of stream channel erosion to sediment yield from an urbanizing watershed.” Science, 278(5342), 1442–1444.
Tucker, G. E., and Bras, R. L. (1998). “Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology.” Water Resour. Res., 34(10), 2751–2764.
Utz, R. M., et al. (2016). “Ecological resistance in urban streams: The role of natural and legacy attributes.” Freshwater Sci., 35(1), 380–397.
Vietz, G. J., Walsh, C. J., and Fletcher, T. D. (2016). “Urban hydrogeomorphology and the urban stream syndrome.” Processes Phys. Geogr., 40(3), 480–492.
Vörösmarty, C. J., et al. (2010). “Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.” Nature, 467(7315), 555.
Watson, C. C., Biedenharn, D. S., and Bledsoe, B. P. (2002). “Use of incised channel evolution models in understanding rehabilitation alternatives.” J. Am. Water. Resour. Assoc., 38(1), 151–160.
Zhang, B., and Govindaraju, R. S. (2000). “Prediction of watershed runoff using Bayesian concepts and modular neural networks.” Water Resour. Res., 36(3), 753–762.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 144 • Issue 1 • January 2018
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 18, 2016
Accepted: Jun 13, 2017
Published online: Nov 10, 2017
Published in print: Jan 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 10, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.