Erratum for “Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming to Support Water Resources Management in the Ziya River Basin, China” by Claus Davidsen, Silvio J. Pereira-Cardenal, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Dan Rosbjerg, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
You are viewing the correction.
VIEW THE CORRECTED ARTICLEThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141, Issue 3
Some units in Table 1 were inadvertently changed during composition from to . Table 1 with the correct units appears next.
| Input data | Value | Unit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial water demands | |||
| Hai River basin | 6.6 | Berkoff (2003) | |
| Area of Hai River basin | 318,866 | Moiwo et al. (2009) | |
| Area of Ziya River basin | 52,299 | — | |
| Area upstream reservoirs | 26,048 | — | |
| Total water demanda | 1,083 | — | |
| Downstream demanda | 543 | — | |
| Upstream demanda | 539 | — | |
| Industrial water values, curtailment costs | |||
| Urbanb | 6.4 | World Bank (2001) | |
| Ruralb | 4.3 | World Bank (2001) | |
| Average | 5.3 | — | |
| Domestic water demands | |||
| Hebei Province | 123 | l/person/day | NBSC (2011) |
| Shanxi Province | 106 | l/person/day | NBSC (2011) |
| Total population inside basin | 25.0 | M people | Bright et al. (2008) |
| Upstream population | 5.8 | M people | Bright et al. (2008) |
| Downstream demand | 864 | — | |
| Upstream demand | 223 | — | |
| Water demand Beijingc | 1,000 | Ivanova (2011) | |
| Domestic water values (curtailment costs) | |||
| Urbanb | 3.2 | World Bank (2001) | |
| Ruralb | 3.2 | World Bank (2001) | |
| Average | 3.2 | — | |
| Curtailment cost Beijingb | 5.5 | Berkoff (2003) | |
| South-North Transfer Project, middle route | |||
| Inflow from Yangtze | 9,500 | Water-technology.net (2013) | |
| Water demand 100 cities | 7,400 | Wang and Ma (1999) | |
| Arable land on the NCP | 179,500 | Liu et al. (2011) | |
| Water for NCP users in Ziyad | 1,307 | — | |
| Ecosystem water demand | |||
| Minimum diversione | 100 | — | |
| Reservoir storage | |||
| Dongwushi | 152 | HWCC (2012) | |
| Gangnan | 1,570 | HWCC (2012) | |
| Huangbizhuang | 1,210 | HWCC (2012) | |
| Lincheng | 180 | HWCC (2012) | |
| Zhuzhuang | 436 | HWCC (2012) | |
| Aggregated reservoir storage | 3,548 | — | |
| Hydropower production | |||
| Maximum turbine capacityf | 1,500 | HEBWP (2013) | |
| Electricity priceb | 0.40 | China Daily (2012) | |
| Installed turbine capacity | 69 | MW | Aggregateh |
| Hydropower benefitsg | 0.036 | — | |
Note: All prices have been converted to 2005 CNY with the consumer price index based on World DataBank (2013).
a
Demands scaled with the areas.
b
Converted to 2005 prices.
c
Based on plan described by the People’s Government of Hebei Province (2012).
d
Remaining SNWTP water distributed evenly to NCP arable land and scaled to the downstream Ziya River basin.
e
Estimated demand of Baiyangdian Lake based on Honge (2006). Model ecosystem diversions fixed to July.
f
Capacities from Huangbizhuang, Zhuzhuang, and Dongwushi Reservoirs scaled to the remaining reservoirs.
g
Estimated from maximum production, maximum turbine capacity, and current electricity price.
h
From HEBWP (2013), HWCC (2013), Baidu Encyclopedia (2012, 2013a, b).
ASCE regrets the error.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141 • Issue 3 • March 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 21, 2014
Accepted: Nov 21, 2014
Published online: Dec 19, 2014
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015
Discussion open until: May 19, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.