Technical Papers
Jul 17, 2014

Uncertainty Segregation and Comparative Evaluation in Groundwater Remediation Designs: A Chance-Constrained Hierarchical Bayesian Model Averaging Approach

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141, Issue 3

Abstract

Groundwater remediation designs rely on simulation models that are subjected to various sources of uncertainty. This study introduces a hierarchical Bayesian model averaging (HBMA) method to segregate sources of uncertainty in a hierarchical order and conduct comparative evaluation of BMA models for remediation designs. A BMA tree of models is developed to understand the impact of individual sources of uncertainty in the remediation design. The HBMA method is applied to chance-constrained (CC) formulation for an aquifer remediation design that aims to reduce concentration at a selected control point using scavenger wells. Thirty-six (36) flow and transport models for concentration prediction are developed to analyze the impact of three sources of uncertainty on the remediation design. An essential step in HBMA is to calculate posterior model probabilities as model weights. The best simulation model has the highest model weight. The results show that although using the best simulation model requires the least pumping rate for the scavenger well, it underestimates prediction variances of concentration. The scavenger well pumping rate increases as more sources of uncertainty are considered. The HBMA enables the chance-constrained formulation to consider both model parameter and model structure uncertainties for aquifer remediation designs. The contributions of prediction variance from individual sources of uncertainty to the total prediction variance can be evaluated, which provides an understanding of the impact of individual sources of uncertainty and their corresponding propositions on remediation designs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1045064 and by the U.S. Geological Survey under award number G10AP00136.

References

Ataie-Ashtiani, B., and Ketabchi, H. (2011). “Elitist continuous ant colony optimization algorithm for optimal management of coastal aquifers.” Water Resour. Manage., 25(1), 165–190.
Babbar, M., and Minsker, B. (2006). “Groundwater remediation design using multiscale genetic algorithms.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 341–350.
Beven, K., and Binley, A. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Processes, 6(3), 279–298.
Box, G. E. P. (1976). “Science and statistics.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 71(356), 791–799.
Bredehoeft, J. D. (1997). “Fault permeability near Yucca Mountain.” Water Resour. Res., 33(11), 2459–2463.
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, Springer, New York.
Chan, N. (1993). “Robustness of the multiple realization method for stochastic hydraulic aquifer management.” Water Resour. Res., 29(9), 3159–3167.
Chan, N. (1994). “Partial infeasibility method for chance-constrained aquifer management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 70–89.
Chang, Y. L., Tsai, T. L., Yang, J. C., and Tung, Y. K. (2007). “Stochastically optimal groundwater management considering land subsidence.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 486–498.
Chan Hilton, A. B., and Culver, T. B. (2005). “Groundwater remediation design under uncertainty using genetic algorithms.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 25–34.
Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. (1959). “Chance-constrained programming.” Manage. Sci., 6(1), 73–79.
Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. (1963). “Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints.” Oper. Res., 11(1), 18–39.
Chitsazan, N., and Tsai, F. T.-C. (2014). “A hierarchical Bayesian model averaging framework for groundwater prediction under uncertainty.” Groundwater, in press.
Coello Coello, C. A. (2002). “Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art.” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 191(11), 1245–1287.
Draper, D. (1995). “Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty.” J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 57(1), 45–97.
Fairley, J., Heffner, J., and Hinds, J. (2003). “Geostatistical evaluation of permeability in an active fault zone.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(18), 1962.
Farmani, R., and Wright, J. A. (2003). “Self-adaptive fitness formulation for constrained optimization.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 7(5), 445–455.
Farmani, R., Wright, J. A., Savic, D. A., and Walters, G. A. (2005). “Self-adaptive fitness formulation for evolutionary constrained optimization of water systems.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 212–216.
Feyen, L., and Gorelick, S. M. (2004). “Reliable groundwater management in hydroecologically sensitive areas.” Water Resour. Res., 40(7), W07408.
Gailey, R. M., Crow, A. S., and Gorelick, S. M. (1991). “Coupled process parameter estimation and prediction uncertainty using hydraulic head and contaminant concentration data.” Adv. Water Resour., 14(5), 301–314.
Guan, J., Kentel, E., and Aral, M. M. (2008). “Genetic algorithm for constrained optimization models and its application in groundwater resources management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 64–72.
Harbaugh, A. W. (2005). “MODFLOW-2005: The US geological survey modular ground-water model-the ground-water flow process.” U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., and Volinsky, C. T. (1999). “Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial.” Stat. Sci., 14(4), 382–401.
Hsieh, P. A., Freckleton, J. R., and Barbara, S. (1993). “Documentation of a computer program to simulate horizontal-flow barriers using the U.S. Geological Survey’s modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model.” Rep. No. 92-477, U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA.
Kasenow, M. (2002). Determination of hydraulic conductivity from grain size analysis, Water Resources Publication, Littleton, CO.
Li, X., and Tsai, F. T.-C. (2009). “Bayesian model averaging for groundwater head prediction and uncertainty analysis using multimodel and multimethod.” Water Resour. Res., 45(9), W09403.
Luyun, R., Momii, K., and Nakagawa, K. (2011). “Effects of recharge wells and flow barriers on seawater intrusion.” Ground Water, 49(2), 239–249.
Mahdavi, M., Fesanghary, M., and Damangir, E. (2007). “An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problems.” Appl. Math. Comput., 188(2), 1567–1579.
Mahesha, A. (1996). “Control of seawater intrusion through injection-extraction well system.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 314–317.
Minsker, B. S., and Shoemaker, C. A. (1998). “Dynamic optimal control of in-situ bioremediation of ground water.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 149–161.
Morgan, D. R., Eheart, J. W., and Valocchi, A. J. (1993). “Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chance constrained programming technique.” Water Resour. Res., 29(3), 551–561.
Nadiri, A. A., Chitsazan, N., Tsai, F. T.-C., and Moghaddam, A. A. (2014). “Bayesian artificial intelligence model averaging for hydraulic conductivity estimation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 520–532.
Neuman, S. P. (2003). “Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of uncertain model predictions.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 17(5), 291–305.
Olea, R. A. (1999). Geostatistics for engineers and earth scientists, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Poeter, E., and Anderson, D. (2005). “Multimodel ranking and inference in ground water modeling.” Ground Water, 43(4), 597–605.
Poeter, E. P., and Hill, M. C. (2007). “MMA: A computer code for multi-model analysis.” U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods TM6-E3, Reston, VA.
Raftery, A. E. (1995). “Bayesian model selection in social research.” Soc. Method., 25, 111–164.
Refsgaard, J. C., Christensen, S., Sonnenborg, T. O., Seifert, D., Højberg, A. L., and Troldborg, L. (2012). “Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling.” Adv. Water Resour., 36, 36–50.
Refsgaard, J. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Brown, J., and van der Keur, P. (2006). “A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error.” Adv. Water Resour., 29(11), 1586–1597.
Reichard, E. G., and Johnson, T. A. (2005). “Assessment of regional management strategies for controlling seawater intrusion.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 280–291.
Rojas, R., Feyen, L., and Dassargues, A. (2008). “Conceptual model uncertainty in groundwater modeling: Combining generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation and Bayesian model averaging.” Water Resour. Res., 44(12), W12418.
Rojas, R., Kahunde, S., Peeters, L., Batelaan, O., Feyen, L., and Dassargues, A. (2010). “Application of a multimodel approach to account for conceptual model and scenario uncertainties in groundwater modelling.” J. Hydrol., 394(3–4), 416–435.
Sawyer, C., and Lin, Y. (1998). “Mixed-integer chance-constrained models for ground-water remediation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 285–294.
Seifert, D., Sonnenborg, T. O., Refsgaard, J. C., Højberg, A. L., and Troldborg, L. (2012). “Assessment of hydrological model predictive ability given multiple conceptual geological models.” Water Resour. Res., 48(6), W06503.
Sharifi, S., Murthy, S., Takács, I., and Massoudieh, A. (2014). “Probabilistic parameter estimation of activated sludge processes using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.” Water Res., 50, 254–266.
Sibson, R. (1981). Interpreting multivariate data, 5th Ed., Wiley, New York, 21–36.
Singh, A., Mishra, S., and Ruskauff, G. (2010). “Model averaging techniques for quantifying conceptual model uncertainty.” Ground Water, 48(5), 701–715.
Singh, V. P., Jain, S. K., and Tyagi, A. (2007). “Monte Carlo simulation.” Risk and reliability analysis, 437–485.
Stone, C. J. (1981). “Admissible selection of an accurate and parsimonious normal linear regression model.” Ann. Stat., 9(3), 475–485.
Troldborg, L., Refsgaard, J., Jensen, K., and Engesgaard, P. (2007). “The importance of alternative conceptual models for simulation of concentrations in a multi-aquifer system.” Hydrogeol. J., 15(5), 843–860.
Tsai, F. T.-C. (2010). “Bayesian model averaging assessment on groundwater management under model structure uncertainty.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 24(6), 845–861.
Tsai, F. T.-C., and Elshall, A. S. (2013). “Hierarchical Bayesian model averaging for hydrostratigraphic modeling: Uncertainty segregation and comparative evaluation.” Water Resour. Res., 49(9), 5520–5536.
Tsai, F. T.-C., and Li, X. (2008a). “Inverse groundwater modeling for hydraulic conductivity estimation using Bayesian model averaging and variance window.” Water Resour. Res., 44(9), W09434.
Tsai, F. T.-C., and Li, X. (2008b). “Multiple parameterization for hydraulic conductivity identification.” Ground Water, 46(6), 851–864.
Tung, Y. K. (1986). “Groundwater management by chance-constrained model.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 1–19.
Venkatraman, S., and Yen, G. G. (2005). “A generic framework for constrained optimization using genetic algorithms.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 9(4), 424–435.
Vukovic, M., and Soro, A. (1992). Determination of hydraulic conductivity of porous media from grain-size composition, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO, 83.
Wagner, B. J. (1999). “Evaluating data worth for ground-water management under uncertainty.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 281–288.
Wagner, B. J., and Gorelick, S. M. (1987). “Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 23(7), 1162–1174.
Wagner, B. J., and Gorelick, S. M. (1989). “Reliable aquifer remediation in the presence of spatially-variable hydraulic conductivity-from data to design.” Water Resour. Res., 25(10), 2211–2225.
Ye, M., Neuman, S. P., and Meyer, P. D. (2004). “Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of spatial variability models in unsaturated fractured tuff.” Water Resour. Res., 40(5), W05113.
Ye, M., Neuman, S. P., Meyer, P. D., and Pohlmann, K. (2005). “Sensitivity analysis and assessment of prior model probabilities in MLBMA with application to unsaturated fractured tuff.” Water Resour. Res., 41(12), W12429.
Yeh, W. W.-G., and Yoon, Y. S. (1981). “Aquifer parameter identification with optimum dimension in parameterization.” Water Resour. Res., 17(3), 664–672.
Zheng, C., and Wang, P. P. (1999). “MT3DMS: A modular three dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; documentation and user’s guide.” Rep. SERDP-99-1, Vicksburg, MS.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 141Issue 3March 2015

History

Received: Sep 8, 2013
Accepted: May 8, 2014
Published online: Jul 17, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 17, 2014
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nima Chitsazan [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., 3418G Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. E-mail: [email protected]
Frank T.-C. Tsai, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., 3418G Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share