Case Studies
Jun 7, 2023

Enhancing Neighborly Relations through Participatory Regeneration: A Case Study of Shanghai

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149, Issue 3

Abstract

This study investigates neighborly relations affecting mechanisms in participatory regeneration, based on cases of three typical types of urban neighborhoods in Shanghai: traditional Lilong residence, work-unit compounds, and commodity estates. We find that participatory regeneration affects neighborly relations through the collaboration and the physical improvements of the communal space. Although collaboration and physical improvements positively contribute to the enhancement of neighborly relations in traditional residence and work-unit compounds, neighborly relations are similar between neighborhoods with and without participatory regeneration because they have intense existing neighborly relations. Although the physical improvement of the communal space tends to decrease neighborly relations, the overall neighborly relations in commodity estates with participatory regeneration are stronger than the comparison group due to the contribution of collaboration. This study emphasizes the vital role of collaboration as affecting neighborly relations in commodity housing and generates practical implications for urban regeneration strategies in commodity estates and in urban planning in future.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education in China (under Grant Number 20YJCZH231); Guangdong Province Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund for Youths (under Grant Number: 2019A1515110989); and Guangzhou Social Science Planning Fund for Youths (under Grant Number: 2020GZQN22). The authors thank those who participated in this research and contributed their valuable time to support this study.

References

Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative governance in theory and practice.” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18: 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Bjorklund, E. M. 1986. “The danwei: Socio-spatial characteristics of work units in China’s urban society.” Econ. Geogr. 62 (1): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/143493.
Bonilla, M. H. 2013. “The significance and meanings of public space improvement in low-income neighborhoods ‘colonias populares’ in Xalapa-Mexico.” Habitat Int. 38: 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.09.003.
Bray, D. 1997. “Space, politics and labour: Towards a spatial genealogy of the Chinese work-unit.” Asian Stud. Rev. 23 (3): 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03147539708713124.
Brody, S. D. 2003. “Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 22 (4): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03022004007.
Brown, J., and A. Barber. 2012. “Social infrastructure and sustainable urban communities.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Eng. Sustainability 165 (1): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2012.165.1.99.
Buonfino, A., and P. Hilder. 2006. “Neighboring in contemporary Britain: A think-piece for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Housing and Neighborhoods Committee. Accessed December 10, 2020. www.jrf.org.uk/publications/neighboring-contemporary-britain-think-piece-joseph-rowntree-foundation-housing-and-ne.
Burage, H. 2011. “Green hubs, social inclusion and community engagement.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 164 (3): 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.900030.
Burby, R. J. 2003. “Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 69 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976292.
Central People’s Government of China. 2001. “Regulation on urban housing demolition and relocation.” Accessed December 10, 2020. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2005-06/06/content_4252.htm.
Charmaz, K. 2000. “Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist method.” In Handbook of qualitative research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 509–535. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clampet-Lundquist, S. 2010. ““Everyone had your back”: Social ties, perceived safety, and public housing relocation.” City Community 9 (1): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01304.x.
Festinger, L., K. W. Back, and S. Schachter. 1950. Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Fleming, R., A. Baum, and J. E. Singer. 1985. “Social support and the physical environment.” In Social support and health, edited by S. Cohen and S. L. Syme. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Forrest, R., and N. M. Yip. 2007. “Neighborhood and neighboring in contemporary Guangzhou.” J. Contemp. China 16 (50): 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560601026736.
Francis, J., B. Giles-Corti, L. Wood, and M. Knuiman. 2012. “Creating sense of community: The role of public space.” J. Environ. Psychol. 32: 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002.
Friedmann, J. 2007. “Reflections on place and place-making in the cities of China.” Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 31 (2): 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00726.x.
Glaser, B. G., and A. Strauss. 1967. Discovery of grounded theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Goodlad, R., P. Burton, and J. Croft. 2005. “Effectiveness at what? The processes and impact of community involvement in area-based initiatives.” Environ. Plann. C: Gov. Policy 23: 923–938. https://doi.org/10.1068/c45m.
Hazelzet, A., and B. Wissink. 2012. “Neighborhoods, social networks, and trust in post-reform China: The case of Guangzhou.” Urban Geogr. 33 (2): 204–220. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.2.204.
He, S. 2015. “Homeowner associations and neighborhood governance in Guangzhou, China.” Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 56 (3): 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2015.1095108.
He, S., and F. Wu. 2007. “Socio-spatial impacts of property-led redevelopment on China’s urban neighborhoods.” Cities 24 (3): 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.001.
Hui, E. C., T. Chen, W. Lang, and Y. Ou. 2021. “Urban community regeneration and community vitality revitalization through participatory planning in China.” Cities 110: 103072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103072.
Hutchison, A., L. Johnston, and J. Breckon. 2011. “Grounded theory - based research within exercise psychology: A critical review.” Qual. Res. Psychol. 8 (3): 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903304527.
Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2004. “Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century.” Plann. Theory Pract. 5 (4): 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170.
Kleinhans, R., and A. Kearns. 2013. “Neighborhood restructuring and residential relocation: Towards a balanced perspective on relocation processes and outcomes.” Hous. Stud. 28 (2): 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.768001.
Li, S., and Y. Song. 2009. “Redevelopment, displacement, housing conditions, and residential satisfaction: A study of Shanghai.” Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 41 (5): 1090–1108. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4168.
Li, X., E. C. Hui, T. Chen, W. Lang, and Y. Guo. 2019. “From habitat III to the new urbanization agenda in China: Seeing through the practices of the “three old renewals” in Guangzhou.” Land Use Policy 81: 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.021.
Li, X., F. Zhang, E. C. Hui, and W. Lang. 2020. “Collaborative workshop and community participation: A new approach to urban regeneration in China.” Cities 102: 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102743.
Liu, Y., and W. Breigung. 2012. “The social networks of new-generation migrants in China’s urbanized villages: A case study of Guangzhou.” Habitat Int. 36 (1): 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.08.008.
Liu, Y., F. Wu, Y. Liu, and Z. Li. 2017. “Changing neighborhood cohesion under the impact of urban redevelopment: A case study of Guangzhou, China.” Urban Geogr. 38 (2): 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1152842.
Logan, J. R. 2011. Urban China in transition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Mann, P. H. 1954. “The concept of neighborliness.” Am. J. Sociol. 60 (2): 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/221507.
Menzel, S., M. Buchecker, and T. Schulz. 2013. “Forming social capital: Does participatory planning foster trust in institutions?” J. Environ. Manage. 131 (15): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.010.
Pestoff, V. 2012. “Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence.” Voluntas 23: 1102–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7.
Seo, B., and R. L. H. Chiu. 2014. “Social cohesiveness of disadvantaged communities in urban South Korea: The impact of the physical environment.” Hous. Stud. 29 (3): 407–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.803519.
Strauss, A. T., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage.
Talen, E. 2000. “Measuring the public realm: A preliminary assessment of the link between public space and sense of community.” J. Archit. Plann. Res. 17: 344–360.
Thorpe, A. 2017. “Rethinking participation, rethinking planning.” Plann. Theory Pract. 18 (4): 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1371788.
Tian, L. 2016. “Behind the growth: Planning education in China during rapid urbanization.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 36 (4): 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15618014.
Verdini, G. 2015. “Is the incipient Chinese civil society playing a role in regenerating historic urban areas? Evidence from Nanjing, Suzhou and Shanghai.” Habitat Int. 50: 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.09.008.
Vervoort, M. 2012. “Ethnic concentration in the neighborhood and ethnic minorities’ social integration weak and strong social ties examined.” Urban Stud. 49 (4): 897–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011408141.
Wu, F. 2012. “Neighborhood attachment, social participation and willingness to stay in China’s low-income communities.” Urban Aff. Rev. 48 (4): 547–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411436104.
Xu, F. 2013. “Space sharing, territoriality, and situational environments in Shanghai’s high-rise gated developments.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
Xu, Q., and J. C. Chow. 2006. “Urban community in China: Service, participation, and development.” Int. J. Social Welfare 15 (3): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00419.x.
Yin, R. 1989. Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
Yue, Z., S. Li, X. Jin, and M. W. Feldman. 2013. “The role of social networks in the integration of Chinese rural-urban migrants: A migrant-resident tie perspective.” Urban Stud. 49 (11): 2434–2457.
Zhu, Y., W. Breitung, and S. Li. 2012. “The changing meaning of neighborhood attachment in Chinese commodity housing estates: Evidence from Guangzhou.” Urban Stud. 49 (11): 2439–2457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011427188.
Zhuang, T. Z., Q. K. Qian, H. J. Visscher, M. G. Elsinga, and W. D. Wu. 2019. “The role of stakeholders and their participation network in decision-making of urban renewal in China: The case of Chongqing.”’ Cities 92 (Sept.): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.014.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 3September 2023

History

Received: Jan 4, 2022
Accepted: Aug 18, 2022
Published online: Jun 7, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Associate, Elaborated Urban Governance Institute, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji Univ., 1239 Siping Rd., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Urban Planning and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Room T4-608, HIT Campus of University Town of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-0638. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share