Technical Papers
Jun 23, 2022

A Decision Support Toolkit for the Design of Children-Oriented Urban Outdoor Learning Environments

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 3

Abstract

Urban rapid development has created poor open spaces and fewer outdoor learning environments for children. This issue highlights the quality design of urban public and open spaces that can significantly help children’s healthy growth and development. The urban plaza is one of the potential urban open spaces that positively affect the development of talent and creativity in children and develop their physical, social, emotional, and cognitive skills. As public art is an encouraging landscape medium, integrating public art in urban plazas can aid substantially in achieving this goal. The lack of a decision support tool for designing inclusive learning environments at urban plazas has persuaded us to develop the children-oriented urban plaza design (COUP) Toolkit. The COUP Toolkit is a universal tool that can aid design professionals and children’s therapists in assessing and evaluating the impact of urban plaza design on children’s skills growth. By applying the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method, it was found that the Urban Oasis type of urban plaza contributes the most to skills development in children (WAlt.3 = 0.336), compared to other types (i.e., street plaza, corporate foyer, transit foyer, street, and grand public place). The COUP toolkit has 14 features for designing the urban plazas embedding the public art. Applying AHP indicated that performance art (W2.2 = 0.106), interactive instrument art (W2.3 = 0.106), and spatial composition (W1.1 = 0.103) are most vital in the design of a children-oriented urban plaza. The COUP toolkit was validated through a case study, the Musical Swings (i.e., 21 Balancoires) urban plaza in Montreal, Canada. The COUP toolkit is a rating system and proposes four grading labels based on the scores earned during the assessment process: gold, silver, bronze, and not-certified. The COUP toolkit determined that Musical Swings is ranked as silver; hence, it needs minor improvements, particularly in providing fountains (WSMC2.5 = 0.57) and wading pools (WSMC2.6 = 0.60) to create a proper learning environment for children.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Acar, H. 2013. “Landscape design for children and their environments in urban context.” In Advances in landscape architecture, edited by M. Özyavuz, 291–324. London: IntechOpen.
Adams, S., S. Savahl, M. Florence, and K. Jackson. 2019. “Considering the natural environment in the creation of child-friendly cities: Implications for children’s subjective well-being.” Child Indic. Res. 12 (2): 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9531-x.
Alonso, J. A., and M. T. Lamata. 2006. “Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach.” Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowlege-Based 14 (4): 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488506004114.
Aziz, N. F., and I. Said. 2012. “The trends and influential factors of children’s uses of outdoor environments: A review.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 38: 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.341.
Barnes, M., M. Courtney, J. Pratt, and A. Walsh. 2003. “Contemporary child health nursing practice: Services provided and challenges faced in metropolitan and outer Brisbane areas.” Collegian 10 (4): 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60071-2.
Ben-Joseph, E., and S. B. Warner. 2011. “Child streets.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (4): 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000082.
Black, E. 2008. “Green neighborhood standards from a planning perspective: The LEED for neighborhood development (LEED-ND).” Focus 5 (1): 11.
Carroll, P., K. Witten, L. Asiasiga, and E. Y. Lin. 2019. “Children’s engagement as urban researchers and consultants in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Can it increase children’s effective participation in urban planning?” Child. Soc. 33 (5): 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12315.
Charles, C. 2009. “Children and nature.” Museums Soc. Issues 4 (2): 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2009.4.2.159.
Chen, L., D. Qi, and D. L. Yang. 2020. “The urbanization paradox: Parental absence and child development in China—An empirical analysis based on the China family panel studies survey.” Child Indic. Res. 13 (2): 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09697-5.
Cooper Marcus, C., and C. Francis. 1998. People places: Design guidelines for urban open space. New York: Willey.
Dudek, M. 2005. Children’s spaces. London: Routledge.
Fegter, S. 2017. “Urban childhoods and subjectification: Perspectives and practices of children on their way to school.” Child. Soc. 31 (4): 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12204.
Ferwari, M. S., R. Salman Wadi, O. Ferwati, A. Keyvanfar, and A. Shafaghat. 2020. “Emerging factors shaping identity of indigenous urbanism concurrently adopting modernity in Qatar: The application of diffusion theory.” ACE: Archit. City Environ. 14 (42): 8362. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.14.42.8362..
Ferwati, M. S., M. Al Saeed, A. Shafaghat, and A. Keyvanfar. 2019. “Qatar sustainability assessment system (QSAS)-neighborhood development (ND) assessment model: Coupling green urban planning and green building design.” J. Build. Eng. 22: 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.006.
Francis, M. 2003. Urban open space: Designing for user needs. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Freeman, C., and P. Tranter. 2012. Children and their urban environment: Changing worlds. London: Routledge.
Gablik, S. 1992. “Connective aesthetics.” Am. Art 6 (2): 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1086/424147.
Gibson, H., and J. Canfield. 2016. “Pocket parks as community building blocks: A focus on Stapleton, CO.” Community Dev. 47 (5): 732–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2016.1220965.
Giraldi, L., E. Benelli, R. Vita, I. Patti, J. Filieri, and F. Filippi. 2017. “Designing for the next generation. Children urban design as a strategic method to improve the future in the cities.” Des. J. 20 (Suppl. 1): S3068–S3078. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352814.
Goltz, H., and T. Brown. 2014. “Are children’s psychological self-concepts predictive of their self-reported activity preferences and leisure participation?” Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 61 (3): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12101.
Gupta, K., P. Kumar, S. K. Pathan, and K. P. Sharma. 2012. “Urban Neighborhood Green Index—A measure of green spaces in urban areas.” Landscape Urban Plann. 105 (3): 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.003.
Hallam, J. L., D. Hewitt, and S. Buxton. 2014. “An exploration of children’s experiences of art in the classroom.” Int. J. Art Des. Educ. 33 (2): 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2014.12022.x.
Jennings, J. 2012. “Measuring neighborhood distress: A tool for place-based urban revitalization strategies.” Community Dev. 43 (4): 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.645047.
Khaza, M. K. B., M. M. Rahman, F. Harun, and T. K. Roy. 2020. “Accessibility and service quality of public parks in Khulna City.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 146 (3): 04020024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000589.
Lamit, H. B., A. Shafaghat, M. Z. Abd Majid, A. Keyvanfar, M. Hamdan, B. Ahmad, T. A. Malik, R. B., Zin, and M. Yadollahi. 2013. “Application of the Path Walkability Index (Pawdex) model: A case study of retail walking pattern recognition in Taman University Skudai, Johor, Malaysia.” Adv. Sci. Lett. 19 (10): 3021–3024. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2013.5067.
Landi, P. J. 2012. “Public art-purpose and benefits: Exploring strategy in the New England city of Pittsfield.” Master Thesis, Landscape Architecture, Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst.
Lifang, Q., Z. Yichuan, and C. Wei. 2008. “Evaluation of urban river landscape design rationality based on AHP.” Water Sci. Eng. 1 (4): 75–81.
Lo, S. M., C. Y. Yiu, and A. Lo. 2003. “An analysis of attributes affecting urban open space design and their environmental implications.” Manage. Environ. Qual. 14 (5): 604–614.
Marcus, C. C., and C. Francis, eds. 1997. People places: Design guidelines for urban open space. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Marler, R. T., and J. S. Arora. 2009. “The weighted-sum method for multi-objective optimization: New insights.” Strct. Mltdscp. Optmz. 41 (6): 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7.
Mayall, B. 2008. “Conversations with children: Working with generational issues.” In Research with children: Perspectives and practices, edited by P. Christensen and A. James, 109–124. London: Routledge.
Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “Case study research in education.” San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Myllyntaus, O. 2012. “Visual arts education reasoning the acquisition and placement of public sculptures—Case of the public sculptures of the Jyväskylä City Art Collection in 1977–2007.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 45: 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.598.
O’connor, J. A. 1992. “The public art process in Gainesville, Florida: A case history or how a model process went sour.” J. Arts Manage. Law Soc. 22 (3): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.1992.9944404.
Olberding, J. C., and W. McIntyre Miller. 2018. “Building community together: A study of inter-neighborhood collaboration and development in Cincinnati, Ohio.” Community Development 49 (2): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2017.1419272.
Oloumi, S., M. Mahdavinejad, and A. Namvarrad. 2012. “Evaluation of outdoor environment from the viewpoint of children.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 35: 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.108.
Parsons, A. 2011. “Young children and nature: Outdoor play and development, experiences fostering environmental consciousness, and the implications on playground design.” Doctoral dissertation, Landscape Architecture, Virginia Tech.
Percy-Smith, B., and C. Carney. 2011. “Using art installations as action research to engage children and communities in evaluating and redesigning city centre spaces.” Educ. Action Res. 19 (1): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.547406.
Pollastri, S., C. Boyko, R. Cooper, N. Dunn, S. Clune, and C. Coulton. 2017. “Envisioning urban futures: From narratives to composites.” Des. J. 20 (Suppl. 1): S4365–S4377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352933.
Prakash, T. N. 2003. Land suitability analysis for agricultural crops: A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approach. Kolkata, West Bengal: ITC.
Rasmussen, K. 2004. “Places for children —Children’s places.” Childhood 11 (2): 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568204043053.
Remesar, A., X. Salas, S. Padilla Llano, and D. Esparza. 2012. Inclusion and empowerment in public art and urban design. On the w@ terfront, 2012, num. 24, 30–32. Accessed May 8, 2022. http://www.raco.cat/index.php/ Waterfront/article/view/259235.
Robinson, G., W. Tyler, Y. Jones, S. Silburn, and S. R. Zubrick. 2012. “Context, diversity and engagement: Early intervention with Australian aboriginal families in urban and remote contexts.” Child. Soc. 26 (5): 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00353.x.
Saaty, T. L. 1994. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24 (6): 19–43.
Saunders, M. N. 2012. “Choosing research participants.” In Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges, 35–52. New York: SAGE.
Savahl, S., S. Adams, M. Florence, F. Casas, M. Mpilo, D. Isobell, and D. Manuel. 2020. “The relation between children’s participation in daily activities, their engagement with family and friends, and subjective well-being.” Child Indic. Res. 13: 1283–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09699-3.
Shackell, A., N. Butler, P. Doyle, and D. J. Ball. 2008. Design for play: A guide to creating successful play spaces. Cheshire, Chester: The Dept. for Children, Schools, and Families (DCSF) and the Dept. for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).
Shafaghat, A., K. S. Jing, A. Keyvanfar, A. Jamshidnezhad, H. Lamit, and M. Khorami. 2019. “An urban river park restoration assessment model using analytical network process (ANP).” J. Environ. Treat. Tech. 7 (1): 92–102.
Shafaghat, A., M. M. Ghasemi, A. Keyvanfar, H. Lamit, and M. S. Ferwati. 2017. “Sustainable riverscape preservation strategy framework using goal-oriented method: Case of historical heritage cities in Malaysia.” Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 6 (1): 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.03.003.
Spencer, C., and H. Woolley. 2000. “Children and the city: A summary of recent environmental psychology research.” Child Care Health Dev. 26 (3): 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00125.x.
Szczepańska, A., and K. Pietrzyk. 2020. “Evaluation of public spaces in historical centers of small towns: Case study.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 146 (1): 05019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000542.
Vanhaeght, A.-S., and J. Bauwens. 2016. “That’s my art: A case study on children’s views of cultural policy.” Child. Soc. 30 (6): 478–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12156.
Velasquez, M., and P. T. Hester. 2013. “An analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods.” Int. J. Oper. Res. 10 (2): 56–66.
White, R., and V. L. Stoecklin. 2008. “Nurturing children’s biophilia: Developmentally appropriate environmental education for young children.” Collage: Resources for early childhood educators 1–11. Kansas City, MI: White Hutchinson Leisure & Learning Group.
Yeo, H.-J., W.-S. Bak, M.-C. Yoo, S.-C. Park, and S.-C. Lee. 2014. “Evaluation of patients’ queue environment on medical service using queueing theory.” J. Korean Soc. Qual. Manage. 42 (1): 71–79. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2014.42.1.071.
Zebracki, M., R. Van Der Vaart, and I. Van Aalst. 2010. “Deconstructing public utopia: Situating public-art claims within practice.” Geoforum 41 (5): 786–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.011.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 3September 2022

History

Received: Oct 30, 2021
Accepted: Mar 22, 2022
Published online: Jun 23, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 23, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ali Keyvanfar, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Dept. of Construction Management, College of Architecture and Construction Management, Kennesaw State Univ., Marietta, GA 30060. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Construction Management and Dept. of Architecture, College of Architecture and Construction Management, Kennesaw State Univ., Marietta, GA 30060 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-936X. Email: [email protected]
Noor Azliena Lieana Rosli [email protected]
Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Univ. Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • COVID-19-Adapted Multi-Functional Corniche Street Design Assessment Model: Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) and Adaptability Analysis Methods, Sustainability, 10.3390/su141710940, 14, 17, (10940), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share