Two-Stage Dynamic Optimization on Station-to-Door Delivery with Uncertain Freight Operation Time in Urban Logistics
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 3
Abstract
In the field of modern urban logistics, the development of door-to-door freight transport through rail–road combined transportation is a necessary approach to achieve modernization and smartness of railroad freight transportation. As the last step of door-to-door rail–road joint transportation, station-to-door transportation determines the quality and efficiency of services. Meanwhile, the operation time of goods assembly is uncertain in the freight center station, freight handling station, and in transit, which largely limits the efficiency of rail–road combined transportation delivery at the stage of station-to-door. To address the aforementioned problems, we proposed a forward-looking matching strategy (FL) that jointly considers the set of goods orders that can be fulfilled in the current decision stage and the set of goods orders that can only be fulfilled in the future stage to improve the matching effect. Then, we built a two-stage stochastic dynamic programming model that jointly considers matching between goods orders and distribution path optimization. At the same time, we simplified the complex model by using a Bayesian approach to update the goods’ operation time in real time. Finally, we designed an improved differential evolution algorithm based on order similarity and distribution for solving the optimization. The algorithm we designed reduces 34.69% in transportation cost and 31.37% in waiting time cost compared with the actual delivery plan implemented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 716011163, 61703351, 71671100, 52072314, 52172321, and 52102391), China Shenhua Energy Science and Technology Program (Project No. CJNY-20-02), China National Railway Group Co., Science and Technology Research Program Project (Project No. P2020X016, 2019F002), the General Project of Key R&D Program of Jiangxi Province (Grant Nos. 20192BBG70076 and 20203BBG73072), and key research-based for the National Engineering Laboratory of Integrated Transportation Big Data Application Technology, China. Zhiyuan Li designed a model and algorithm and proposed research ideas. Chenhao Wang was responsible for data analysis. Ni Dong wrote the first draft of the study. Minghua Zeng, Pengpeng Xu, and Zongying Song revised the study and corrected the algorithm defects.
References
Agatz, N., A. L. Erera, M. W. P. Savelsbergh, and X. Wang. 2011. “Dynamic ride-sharing: A simulation study in metro Atlanta.” Procedia Social Behav. Sci. 17: 532–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.530.
Chang, T.-S., Y.-w. Wan, and W. T. Ooi. 2009. “A stochastic dynamic traveling salesman problem with hard time windows.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 198 (3): 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.10.012.
Cordeau, J.-F., and G. Laporte. 2003. “A tabu search heuristic for the static multi-vehicle dial-a-ride problem.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 37 (6): 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00045-0.
Duan, L., and Q. Peng. 2011. “Discussion on the construction of railway express cargo collection and distribution system.” Railway Transp. Econ. 33 (12): 11–15.
d’Orey, P. M., R. Fernandes, and M. Ferreira. 2012. “Empirical evaluation of a dynamic and distributed taxi-sharing system.” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf., on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Anchorage, AK: IEEE.
Erera, A. L., J. C. Morales, and M. Savelsbergh. 2010. “The vehicle routing problem with stochastic demand and duration constraints.” Transp. Sci. 44 (4): 474–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1100.0324.
ECA (European Court of Auditors). 2016. Rail freight transport in the EU: Still not on the right track. Special Rep. No 8. Luxembourg: ECA.
Feng, L., E. Miller-Hooks, P. Schonfeld, and M. Mohebbi. 2014. “Optimizing ridesharing services for airport access.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2467 (1): 157–167. https://doi.org/10.3141/2467-17.
Furuhata, M., M. Dessouky, F. Ordóñez, M.-E. Brunet, X. Wang, and S. Koenig. 2013. “Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 57: 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.08.012.
Gruson, D. 2018. “New solutions for the sample transport and results delivery: A digital lab.” EJIFCC 29 (3): 210–214.
Ho, S. C., W. Y. Szeto, Y.-H. Kuo, J. M. Y. Leung, M. Petering, and T. W. H. Tou. 2018. “A survey of dial-a-ride problems: Literature review and recent developments.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 111: 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.001.
Hosni, H., J. Naoum-Sawaya, and H. Artail. 2014. “The shared-taxi problem: Formulation and solution methods.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 70: 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.09.011.
Islam, D. M. Z., K. Laparidou, and A. Burgess. 2016. “Cost effective future derailment mitigation techniques for rail freight traffic management in Europe.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 70: 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.06.017.
Lampinen, J. 1999. “Mechanical engineering design optimization by differential evolution.” In New ideas in optimization, edited by D. Corne, M. Dorigo, and F. Glover, 127–146. London: McGraw-Hill.
Liotta, G., G. Stecca, and T. Kaihara. 2015. “Optimisation of freight flows and sourcing in sustainable production and transportation networks.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164: 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.016.
Mendoza, J. E., B. Castanier, C. Guéret, A. L. Medaglia, and N. Velasco. 2011. “Constructive heuristics for the multicompartment vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands.” Transp. Sci. 45 (3): 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1100.0353.
Miller-Hooks, E. D., and H. S. Mahmassani. 2000. “Least expected time paths in stochastic, time-varying transportation networks.” Transp. Sci. 34 (2): 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.34.2.198.12304.
Nourinejad, M., and M. J. Roorda. 2016. “Agent based model for dynamic ridesharing.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 64: 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.07.016.
Onwubolu, G., and D. Davendra. 2006. “Scheduling flow shops using differential evolution algorithm.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171 (2): 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.043.
Qian, B., L. Wang, D.-x. Huang, W.-l. Wang, and X. Wang. 2009. “An effective hybrid DE-based algorithm for multi-objective flow shop scheduling with limited buffers.” Comput. Oper. Res. 36 (1): 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2007.08.007.
Santos, D. O., and E. C. Xavier. 2015. “Taxi and ride sharing: A dynamic dial-a-ride problem with money as an incentive.” Expert Syst. Appl. 42 (19): 6728–6737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.060.
Stiglic, M., N. Agatz, M. Savelsbergh, and M. Gradisar. 2015. “The benefits of meeting points in ride-sharing systems.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 82: 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.07.025.
Wang, W., and Y. Wu. 2013. “Modeling and solving large-scale vehicle routing problem with practical constraints.” Control Decis. 28 (12): 1799–1804.
Wikum, E. D. 2017. “Controlling algorithmic blocking: Calibration and cost redistribution approach to real-world operational railroad application.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 76: 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.006.
Xu, H., and J. Wen. 2012. “Differential evolution algorithm for the optimization of the vehicle routing problem in logistics.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf., on Computational Intelligence and Security, 48–51. New York: IEEE.
Zahrani, H. K., M. H. Nadimi-Shahraki, and H. R. Sayarshad. 2021. “An intelligent social-based method for rail-car fleet sizing problem.” J. Rail Transp. Plann. Manage. 17: 100231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2020.100231.
Zhiwei, C. 2017. Research on disruption management of open vehicle routing problem based on customer time window. Shanghai, China: Donghua University.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 31, 2021
Accepted: Mar 1, 2022
Published online: Apr 20, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 20, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.