Some features of the ASCE Shopping cart and login features of the website will be down for maintenance on Sunday, June 16th, 2024, beginning at 12:00 A.M. ET and ending at 6:00 A.M. ET. During this time if you need immediate assistance at 1-800-548-2723 or [email protected].

Case Studies
Aug 11, 2021

Examining the Dynamics of Residential Location Choice in Metropolitan Areas Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

In recent years, significant changes have occurred in land usage and residential buildings due to population growth and urbanization. The residential location choice is a key component of the urban economics that ensures the dynamics of the settlements. Residential choice determination is a complex process that includes several indicators such as location and physical characteristics. These require perspectives from various disciplines. Presently, evaluation of residential buildings has become more important due to rapid urbanization, especially in metropolitan areas. This study aimed to identify the critical factors of residential location choice using the analytic hierarchy process, which is a multicriteria decision-making method. In this context, environmental quality, safety, and accessibility were determined as major factors in residential decisions. The study’s results can contribute to the development of a model for determining residential location choices. The present study can play a crucial role in urban development, urban policy, and its practical implications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the reviewers and editor for their valuable and constructive comments, which led to improving the quality of the paper.

References

Acheampong, R. A. 2018. “Towards incorporating location choice into integrated land use and transport planning and policy: A multi-scale analysis of residential and job location choice behaviour.” Land Use Policy 78: 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.007.
Ai, P. 2005. Residential land value modelling. Enschede, Netherlands: Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the Univ. of Twente.
Alexander, M. 2012. Decision-making using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and SAS. IML® (Paper SD-04). Baltimore: Social Security Administration.
Al-Saggaf, A., H. Nasir, and T. Hegazy. 2020. “An analytical hierarchy process-based system to evaluate the life-cycle performance of buildings at early design stage.” J. Build. Eng. 31: 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101364.
Balta, M. Ö., and H. Ü. Yenil. 2019. “Multi criteria decision making methods for urban greenway: The case of Aksaray, Turkey.” Land Use Policy 89: 104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104224.
Bender, A., A. Din, M. Hoesli, and S. Brocher. 2000. “Environmental preferences of homeowners: Further evidence using the AHP method.” J. Prop. Invest. Finance 18 (4): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780010345391.
Bunruamkaew, K. 2012. How to do AHP analysis in Excel. Tsukuba, Japan: Univ. of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Division of Spatial Information Science.
Da Rocha, P. M., A. P. De Barros, G. B. Da Silva, and H. G. Costa. 2016. “Analysis of the operational performance of Brazilian airport terminals: A multicriteria approach with De Borda-AHP integration.” J. Air Transp. Manage. 51: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.11.003.
Dos Santos, P. H. Neves, S. M. Sant’Anna, D. O. De Oliveira, C. H. Carvalho, and H. D. 2019. “The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications.” J. Cleaner Prod. 212: 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270.
Escobar, M. T., J. Aguarón, and J. M. Moreno-Jiménez. 2004. “A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153 (2): 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00154-1.
Fan, X., S. Qiu, and Y. Sun. 2020. “Land finance dependence and urban land marketization in China: The perspective of strategic choice of local governments on land transfer.” Land Use Policy 99: 105023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105023.
Glaeser, E. L., and B. A. Ward. 2009. “The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston.” J. Urban Econ. 65: 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003.
Hayford, S. A. K. 2004. Design of a land value information system to support land reform programme. Enschede, Netherlands: Univ. of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation ITC.
Ho, C. Q., D. A. Hensher, and R. Ellison. 2017. “Endogenous treatment of residential location choices in transport and land use models: Introducing the MetroScan framework.” J. Transp. Geogr. 64: 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.021.
Hongyan, D., M. Yongkai, and A. Yunbi. 2011. “The impact of land policy on the relation between housing and land prices: Evidence from China.” Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 51 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2010.09.004.
Hsu, C. I., and S. P. Guo. 2006. “CBD oriented commuters’ mode and residential location choices in an urban area with surface streets and rail transit lines.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 132 (4): 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:4(235).
Huang, H., and Y. Tang. 2012. “Residential land use regulation and the US housing price cycle between 2000 and 2009.” J. Urban Econ. 71: 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.08.001.
Ighravwe, D. E., and S. A. Oke. 2019. “A multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting a suitable maintenance strategy for public buildings using sustainability criteria.” J. Build. Eng. 24: 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100753.
Johnstone, V. 2004. “Guidelines for the use of automated valuation models for UK. RMBS Transactions.” Standard and Poors.com. Accessed August 6, 2013. http://www.standardandpoors.com/prot/ratings/articles/en/us/?articleType=HTML&assetID=1245330509010.
Kim, D. S., and H. W. Chung. 2005. “Spatial diffusion modeling of new residential area for land-use planning of rural villages.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131 (3): 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:3(181).
Kok, N., P. Monkkonen, and J. M. Quigley. 2014. “Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: An intra-metropolitan analysis.” J. Urban Econ. 81: 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004.
Longley, P., G. Higgs, and D. Martin. 1994. “The predictive use of GIS to model property valuations.” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 8 (2): 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799408901995.
Michael, L. F., Z. Z. Noor, H. N. Zardari, and F. J. M. Meza. 2013. “Analytical hierarchy process application in urban sustainability indicators prioritization.” Resour. Environ. 3 (5A): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5923/s. re.201309.01.
Nzau, B. 2003. “Modelling the influence of urban sub-centres on spatial and temporal urban land value patterns: Case study of Nairobi, Kenya.” Master’s thesis, Urban Land Administration Specialisation, International Institute for Geo-Information and Earth Observation.
Ong, S. E., and T. I. Chew. 1996. “Singapore residential market: An expert judgemental forecast incorporating the analytical hierarchy process.” J. Property Valuation Invest. 14 (1): 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635789610107499.
Orford, S. 1999. Valuing the built environment: GIS and house price analysis. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Öztürk, A. 2019. “Gayrimenkul değerini etkileyen kriterlerin belirlenmesinde analitik bir model önerisi; Gaziantep örneği.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Aksaray Univ.
Parry, J. A., S. A. Ganaie, and M. S. Bhat. 2018. “GIS based land suitability analysis using AHP model for urban services planning in Srinagar and Jammu urban centers of J&K, India.” J. Urban Manage. 7 (2): 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.05.002.
Payyanapotta, A., and A. Thomas. 2020. “An analytical hierarchy based optimization framework to aid sustainable assessment of buildings.” J. Build. Eng. 35: 102003.
Pouya, S., H. Turkoglu, and U. Arpacioglu. 2020. “Using the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate sustainability factors in watershed planning and management.” Urbani Izziv 31 (1): 78–88. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2020-31-01-002.
Rachmansyah, A., and L. F. Halim. 2019. “Sustainable development approach to residential planning in the rapid growth urban area: A case study in Singosari District. Malang Region, East Java Province.” Geogr. Tech. 14: 3–12.
Saaty, T. L. 1977. “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.” J. Math. Psychol. 15 (3): 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.
Saaty, T. L. 1990. “Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48: 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90073-K.
Saaty, T. L. 2008. “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.” Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1 (1): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
Saaty, T. L., and L. G. Vargas. 2001. “How to make a decision?” In Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process, 1–25. Boston: Springer.
Saaty, T. L., and L. G. Vargas. 2012. Vol. 175 of Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston: Springer.
Safian, M., E. Ezwan, and A. Hadi. 2011. “The evolution of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as a decision making tool in property sectors.” In Vol. 6 of Int. Proc. of Economic Development & Research, Munich, Germany: Munich Personal RePEc Archieve (MPRA). Accessed May 6, 2020. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/39442/.
Schniederjans, M. J., J. J. Hoffman, and G. S. Sirmans. 1995. “Using goal programming and the analytic hierarchy process in house selection.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 11 (2): 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098660.
Serra, M. V., D. E. Dowall, D. Motta, and M. Donovan. 2004. Urban land markets and urban land development: An examination of three Brazilian cities: Brasília, Curitiba and Recife. Institute of Urban & Regional Development IURD. Working Paper Series Paper WP 03. Berkeley: Univ. of California.
Shahin, A., and M. A. Mahbod. 2007. “Prioritization of key performance indicators. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manage. 56 (3): 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400710731437.
Somwung, K. 2001. Land valuation model for taxation purpose: A case study in Cebu City, Philippines. Enscheda, Netherlands: International Institute of Geo-Information Science & Earth Observation.
Srinivasan, V. C. 1994. “Using the analytic hierarchy process in house selection.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 9 (1): 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01153589.
Suen, I. S. 2005. “Residential development pattern and intraneighborhood infrastructure provision.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:1(1).
Thapa, B. R., and Y. Murayama. 2010. “Drivers of urban growth in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal: Examining the efficacy of the analytic hierarchy process.” Appl. Geogr. 30: 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.002.
Tuladhar, A. M. 2002. Property valuation and computer assisted valuation. GIM 2/3 2002 Module 7 Lecture Notes. Enscheda, Netherlands: ITC.
Unel, F. B., and S. Yalpir. 2019. “Valuations of building plots using the AHP method.” Int. J. Strategic Prop. Manage. 23 (3): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2019.7952.
Wong, J. K. W., and H. Li. 2008. “Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems.” Build. Environ. 43 (1): 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019.
Wyatt, P. 1996. “The development of a property information system for valuation using a geographical information system (GIS).” J. Prop. Res. 13 (4): 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/095999196368826.
Yau, Y. 2012. “Multicriteria decision making for homeowners’ participation in building maintenance.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138 (2): 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000108.
Zoral, P. 2011. Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmanın Mekansal Planlama Pratiğine Aktarılması: Sürdürülebilirlik Değerlendirilmesi ve Türkiye Uygulaması, 1–127. Ankara: Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Anabilimdalı.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 4December 2021

History

Received: Feb 5, 2021
Accepted: May 11, 2021
Published online: Aug 11, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of City and Regional Planning, Uşak Univ., Uşak 64200, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5818-4023. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Ahmet Öztürk [email protected]
Geomatics Engineer, Construction and Technical Dept., GIBTU Univ., 27010 Gaziantep, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share