Abstract

This study contributes to research and practice by demonstrating the use of a composite measure, a bikeability index, to facilitate the use of and improve the performance of direct demand models for bicycle traffic, especially when only limited observation is available. The city of Austin was selected as a case study to develop the model using bicycle volume from 44 intersections. Existing knowledge and data were leveraged to develop the bikeability index that encompasses multiple built environment features (bicycle route length, comfort, connectivity, destination density, and transit coverage) to quantify the bike-friendliness of the network. In addition to the index, the demand model contained five demographic and land use variables. Some of the variables provided unique insights into bike travel behavior within the city, such as the significant and positive influence of the presence of bike signals and bike-accessible bridges. Along with the improved scalability and transferability of the modeling approach, the results and discussion are expected to facilitate and/or guide informed strategies and educational programs to increase nonmotorized activity in Austin as well as other regions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Safety through Disruption (Safe-D) National University Transportation Center, a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation's University Transportation Centers Program (Federal Grant No. 69A3551747115). The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. The US Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The authors would like to thank the City of Austin for its assistance in furnishing data required for this research. The authors would also like to acknowledge TTI editor Dawn Herring for her editorial review. The authors also thank to three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their insightful feedback.

References

ACS (American Community Survey). 2019. “Commuting characteristics by sex, 2019 ACS 1-year estimates.” Accessed February 10, 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=Commuting%20Characteristics%20by%20Sex&tid=ACSST1Y2019.S0801&hidePreview=false.
BCycle. 2018. “Austin B-cycle expands service to UT Campus and West Campus neighborhoods.” Accessed February 14, 2018. https://www.bcycle.com/news/2018/02/14/austin-b-cycle-expands-service-to-ut-campus-and-west-campus-neighborhoods.
Behnam, J., and B. Patel. 1977. “A method for estimating pedestrian volume in a central business district.” Transp. Res. Rec. 629: 22–26.
Bower, D., R. Geller, L. Ginenthal, D. Igarta, M. Lear, and J. Waltz. 2007. “Portland’s platinum bicycle master plan: Existing conditions report.” Accessed September 27, 2020. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/369982.
Buehler, R. 2019. “A first look: Trends in walking and cycling in the United States 2001–2017.” In National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Data for Transportation Applications Workshop, 1–20. Washington, DC: National Household Travel Survey Workshop Committee.
Capital Metro. 2017. The best month on two wheels. Austin, TX: Capital Metro.
Chan-Lau, M. J. A. 2017. Lasso regressions and forecasting models in applied stress testing. IMF Working Paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Chen, P., J. Zhou, and F. Sun. 2017. “Built environment determinants of bicycle volume: A longitudinal analysis.” J. Transp. Land Use 10 (1): 655–674. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.892.
City of Austin. 2014. “2014 Austin bicycle plan.” Accessed January 15, 2020. http://austintexas.gov/page/austin-bicycle-plan.
City of Austin. 2018a. “The City of Austin Transportation Department 2018 annual report.” Accessed January 15, 2020. https://1d0d7cb9-bfde-4667-8eeb-20a5ee919bd6.filesusr.com/ugd/956239_455271f084 ea4a4d9caf7bb098fb18ab.pdf.
City of Austin. 2018b. “Austin mobility news.” Accessed May 4, 2021. https://mailchi.mp/austintexas/mobilitynews_09172018.
City of Austin. 2019. “The Austin Strategic Mobility Plan (ASMP).” http://www.austintexas.gov/asmp.
City of Austin. n.d. “Pedestrian environmental quality index data collection manual.” Accessed January 15, 2020. http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=182245.
City of Austin Planning and Zoning. 2019. “Demographics.” Accessed January 20, 2020. http://www.austintexas.gov/demographics.
City of Austin Public Works Department. 2017. “Mopac mobility bridges.” Accessed January 20, 2020. http://austintexas.gov/page/mopac-bicycle-and-pedestrian-bridge-project.
City of Austin Transportation Department. 2016. “South Lamar corridor improvement program.” Accessed January 20, 2020. https://austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Transportation/CorridorStudies_ SLamar_Final_4-4-16_reduced.pdf.
Clifton, K. J., P. A. Singleton, C. D. Muhs, and R. J. Schneider. 2016. “Representing pedestrian activity in travel demand models: Framework and application.” J. Transp. Geogr. 52: 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.03.009.
Cui, Y., S. Mishra, and T. F. Welch. 2014. “Land use effects on bicycle ridership: A framework for state planning agencies.” J. Transp. Geogr. 41: 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.10.004.
De Nazelle, A., et al. 2011. “Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment.” Environ. Int. 37 (4): 766–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003.
Desyllas, J. D. D., E. Duxbury, J. Ward, and A. Smith. 2003. Pedestrian demand modelling of large cities: An applied example from London. London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis.
Dill, J. 2009. “Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure.” J. Public Health Policy 30 (1): S95–S110. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.56.
Eco-Counter. 2019. “Products.” Accessed January 19, 2020. https://www.eco-compteur.com/en/produits/multi-range/urban-multi/.
Emery, J., C. Crump, and P. Bors. 2003. “Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads.” Am. J. Health Promot. 18 (1): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.38.
Fitzpatrick, K., R. Avelar, and S. M. Turner. 2018. Guidebook on identification of high pedestrian crash locations. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Forsyth, A., J. M. Oakes, K. H. Schmitz, and M. Hearst. 2007. “Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity?” Urban Stud. 44 (4): 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601184729.
Frank, L. D., T. L. Schmid, J. F. Sallis, J. Chapman, and B. E. Saelens. 2005. “Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 28 (2): 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001.
Geller, R. 2009. “Four types of cyclists.” Accessed January 19, 2020. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/44597?a=237507.
Goodyear, S. 2012. “Walk score launches bike score: How bikeable is your city?” Accessed January 19, 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-05-14/walk-score-launches-bike-score.
Gosse, C. A., and A. Clarens. 2014. “Estimating spatially and temporally continuous bicycle volumes by using sparse data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2443 (1): 115–122. https://doi.org/10.3141/2443-13.
Gu, P., Z. Han, Z. Cao, Y. Chen, and Y. Jiang. 2018. “Using open source data to measure street walkability and bikeability in China: A case of four cities.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (31): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758652.
Gutierrez, C., S. Gu, L. Karam, D. Lee, and T. Thomas. 2017. “Measuring and evaluating bikeability in San Francisco.” Accessed March 23, 2017. http://sustainablecities.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/3/3/12335040/stanford_sustainable_cities_bikeability_report.pdf.
Handy, S. 2019. “Making US cities pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly.” In Transportation, land Use, and environmental planning, edited by E. Deakin, 169–187. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Hankey, S., G. Lindsey, X. Wang, J. Borah, K. Hoff, B. Utecht, and Z. Xu. 2012. “Estimating use of nonmotorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, MN.” Landscape Urban Plann. 107 (3): 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.005.
Hankey, S., T. Lu, A. Mondschein, and R. Buehler. 2017. “Merging traffic monitoring and direct-demand modeling to assess spatial patterns of annual average daily bicycle and pedestrian traffic.” In Transportation Research Board 2017 Annual Meeting, 1–13. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Harkey, D., D. W. Reinfurt, M. Knuiman, J. R. Stewart, and A. Sorton. 1998. Development of the bicycle compatibility index: A level of service concept—Final report. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. of North Carolina.
Hartanto, K. 2017. “Developing a bikeability index to enable the assessment of transit-oriented development (TOD) nodes.” Master’s thesis, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Univ. of Twente.
Hasani, M., A. Jahangiri, I. N. Sener, S. Munira, J. M. Owens, B. Appleyard, S. Ryan, S. M. Turner, and S. Ghanipoor Machiani. 2019 “Identifying high-risk intersections for walking and bicycling using multiple data sources in the city of San Diego.” J. Adv. Transp. 2019: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9072358.
Hedman, C., D. Elliott, T. Srini, and S. Kooragayala. 2017. “Austin and the state of low-and middle-income housing.” Accessed April 19, 2020. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/93781/austin_lmi_housing_0.pdf.
Howell, D. C. 1997. Statistical methods for psychology. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
Jacobsen, P. L. 2015. “Safety in numbers: More walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling.” Injury Prevention 21 (4): 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.3.205rep.
Jaffe, E. 2015. “The poor bike, the rich bike-share.” Accessed January 18, 2020. https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2015/10/the-poor-bike-the-rich-bike-share/413119/.
Kang, H., D. H. Kim, and S. Yoo. 2019. “Attributes of perceived bikeability in a compact urban neighborhood based on qualitative multi-methods.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (19): 3738. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193738.
Kim, N. S., and Y. O. Susilo. 2013. “Comparison of pedestrian trip generation models.” J. Adv. Transp. 47 (4): 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.166.
KLBJ. 2019. “City releases first safe routes to school infrastructure report.” Accessed January 18, 2020. https://www.newsradioklbj.com/austinlocalnews/city-releases-first-safe-routes-to-school-infrastructure-report/.
Krenn, P. J., P. Oja, and S. Titze. 2015. “Development of a bikeability index to assess the bicycle-friendliness of urban environments.” Open J. Civ. Eng. 5 (4): 451–459. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2015.54045.
Krizek, K. J. 2003. “Operationalizing neighbourhood accessibility for land use–travel behavior research and regional modeling.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 22 (3): 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X02250315.
Le, H. T., R. Buehler, and S. Hankey. 2018. “Correlates of the built environment and active travel: Evidence from 20 US metropolitan areas.” Environ. Health Perspect. 126 (7): 077011. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3389.
League of American Bicyclists. 2015. “New platinum, new gold bicycle friendly communities.” Accessed January 18, 2020. https://www.bikeleague.org/content/new-platinum-new-gold-bicycle-friendly-communities.
League of American Bicyclists. 2017. “Where we ride: Analysis of bicycle commuting in American cities.” Accessed January 18, 2020. https://bikeleague.org/sites/default/files/Where_We_Ride_2017_KM_0.pdf.
Lin, J. J., and Y. H. Wei. 2018. “Assessing area-wide bikeability: A grey analytic network process.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 113: 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.022.
Lindsay, G., A. Macmillan, and A. Woodward. 2011. “Moving urban trips from cars to bicycles: Impact on health and emissions.” Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 35 (1): 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00621.x.
Lindsey, G. H. 2011. “Forecasting use of nonmotorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, Minnesota.” In Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, 1–16. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Liu, X., and J. Griswold. 2009. “Pedestrian volume modeling: A case study of San Francisco.” Yearbook Assoc. Pacific Coast Geogr. 71 (1): 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1353/pcg.0.0030.
McNeil, N., J. Dill, D. DeVitis, R. Doubleday, A. Duncan, and L. Weigand. 2017. Manual on pedestrian and bicycle connections to transit. Rep. No. 0111. Washington, DC: Federal Transit Administration.
Mesa, V. G., and D. E. P. Barajas. 2013. “Cali bikeability index map: A tool for evaluating public investment and future needs.” J. Transp. Geogr. 4 (1): 5–8.
Miranda-Moreno, L., and D. Fernandes. 2011. “Modeling of pedestrian activity at signalized intersections: Land use, urban form, weather, and spatiotemporal patterns.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2264: 74–82. https://doi.org/10.3141/2264-09.
Munira, S., and I. N. Sener. 2017. Direct-demand modeling in estimating nonmotorized activity: A literature review. Austin, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
National Center for Safe Routes to School. 2010. “Safe routes to school travel data: A look at baseline results from parent surveys and student travel tallies.” Accessed January 18, 2020. http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/sites/default/files/SRTS_baseline_data_report.pdf.
National Center for Safe Routes to School. 2017. “Walking to school: Trends, issues and evidence.” Accessed January 18, 2020. http://www.walkbiketoschool.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Walking-to-school-research-1.pdf.
NCSA (National Center for Statistics and Analysis). 2019. 2018 fatal motor vehicle crashes: Overview. Rep. No. DOT HS 812 826. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Nordback, K., W. E. Marshall, B. N. Janson, and E. Stolz. 2013. “Estimating annual average daily bicyclists: Error and accuracy.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2339 (1): 90–97. https://doi.org/10.3141/2339-10.
Ortuzar, J. D. D., and L. G. Willumsen. 2011. Modelling transport. 4th ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Owen, N., E. Cerin, E. Leslie, L. du Toit, N. Coffee, L. D. Frank, A. E. Bauman, G. Hugo, B. E. Saelens, and J. F. Sallis. 2007 “Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 33 (5): 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025.
Pulugurtha, S. S., and S. S. Repaka. 2008. “Assessment of models to measure pedestrian activity at signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2073: 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3141/2073-05.
Pushkarev, B., and J. Zupan. 1971. “Pedestrian travel demand.” Transp. Res. Rec. 377: 37–53.
Shaheen, S., and A. Cohen. 2019. Shared micromobility policy toolkit: Docked and dockless bike and scooter sharing. Richmond, CA: UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center.
Song, M. K., F. C. Lin, S. E. Ward, and J. P. Fine. 2013. “Composite variables.” Nurs. Res. 62 (1): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182741948.
Stipdonk, H., and M. Reurings. 2012. “The effect on road safety of a modal shift from car to bicycle.” Traffic Inj. Prev. 13 (4): 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2012.660661.
Tabeshian, M., and L. Kattan. 2014. “Modeling nonmotorized travel demand at intersections in Calgary, Canada: Use of traffic counts and geographic information system data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2430 (1): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.3141/2430-05.
Turner, S., C. S. Shafer, and W. P. Stewart. 1997. Bicycle suitability criteria for state roadways in Texas. Austin, TX: Texas Dept. of Transportation.
Turner, S., et al. 2017. Synthesis of methods for estimating pedestrian and bicyclist exposure to risk at areawide levels and on specific transportation facilities. Washington, DC: DOT.
Van Dyck, D., G. Cardon, B. Deforche, N. Owen, J. F. Sallis, and I. De Bourdeaudhuij. 2010. “Neighborhood walkability and sedentary time in Belgian adults.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 39 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.004.
Van Dyck, D., E. Cerin, T. L. Conway, I. De Bourdeaudhuij, N. Owen, J. Kerr, G. Cardon, L. D. Frank, B. E. Saelens, and J. F. Sallis. 2012 “Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with adults” transport-related walking and cycling: Findings from the USA, Australia and Belgium.” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 9 (1): 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-70.
Vanwolleghem, G., S. D’Haese, D. Van Dyck, I. De Bourdeaudhuij, and G. Cardon. 2014. “Feasibility and effectiveness of drop-off spots to promote walking to school.” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 11 (1): 136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0136-6.
Winters, M., M. Brauer, E. M. Setton, and K. Teschke. 2013. “Mapping bikeability: A spatial tool to support sustainable travel.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 40 (5): 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1068/b38185.
Winters, M., K. Teschke, M. Brauer, and D. Fuller. 2016. “Bike score®: Associations between urban bikeability and cycling behavior in 24 cities.” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 13 (1): 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0339-0.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: Jan 24, 2020
Accepted: Mar 16, 2021
Published online: May 26, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 26, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Austin 78752, TX. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-2628. Email: [email protected]
Research Scientist, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Austin 78752, TX (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5493-8756. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station 77843, TX. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-5409. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A systematic scoping review of methods for estimating link-level bicycling volumes, Transport Reviews, 10.1080/01441647.2022.2147240, (1-30), (2022).
  • Assessing bikeability with street view imagery and computer vision, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103371, 132, (103371), (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share