Case Studies
Mar 1, 2021

Residential Land Leasing and Price Under Public Land Ownership

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

Based on the district-level data for Shanghai, China, from 2004 to 2015, the factors that influence residential land leasing by the district government and residential land leasing price under public land ownership will be studied. Officials from the Departments of Planning and Land Authority in Shanghai, China, will be interviewed to obtain reasonable influencing factors, which will be used as the variables in the mathematical models. Then, a hedonic model will be used to discuss the relationship between residential land leasing price and the influencing factors, and the mathematical model for total residential land leasing area will be presented based on the ordinary least square (OLS) method. Whether the price and total area of residential land are correlated with land characteristics, district-level economic development, political tenure, city and district centers, public schools, and local public goods, will be analyzed. The regression results show some factors that the government concerns about when leasing residential land under public land ownership, and how residential land leasing prices are influenced by these factors. The policy implications for the government and people for residential land leasing are presented, and these could be applied to other large cities in developing countries.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
GDP and tenure of district mayor of 19 districts in Shanghai, China, from 2004 to 2015.
Land leasing data for residential land use in Shanghai, China, from 2004 to 2015.
Data for the distances in this study.
Data of subway stations, highways, main universities, key high schools, public parks, and industrial parks.
Other data supporting this study and related statistic methodology models.

References

Arabsheibani, R., Y. K. Sadat, and A. Abedini. 2016. “Land suitability assessment for locating industrial parks: A hybrid multi criteria decision-making approach using Geographical Information System.” Geog. Res. 54 (4): 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12176.
Beenstock, M., D. Feldman, and D. Felsenstein. 2016. “Hedonic pricing when housing is endogenous: The value of access to the trans-Israel highway.” J. Reg. Sci. 56 (1): 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12207.
Braimoh, A. K., and T. Onishi. 2007. “Spatial determinants of urban land use change in Lagos, Nigeria.” Land Use Policy 24: 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.09.001.
Buxon, M., and E. Taylor. 2011. “Urban land supply, governance and the pricing of land.” Urban Policy Res. 29 (1): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2011.537605.
Chen, T. T., W. Lang, and X. Li. 2020. “Exploring the impact of urban green space on residents’ health in Guangzhou, China.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 146 (1): 05019022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000541.
Chen, Y. W. 2017. “Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: A hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China).” Landscape Urban Plann. 157: 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.010.
Cheng, J. 2020a. “Data analysis of the factors influencing the industrial land leasing in Shanghai based on mathematical models.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2020: 9346863.
Cheng, J. 2020b. “Analyzing the factors influencing the choice of the government on leasing different types of land uses: Evidence from Shanghai of China.” Land Use Policy 90: 104303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104303.
Cheng, J. 2021. “Analysis of commercial land leasing of the district governments of Beijing in China.” Land Use Policy 100: 104881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104881.
Chernobai, E., M. Reibel, and M. Carney. 2011. “Nonlinear spatial and temporal effects of highway construction on house prices.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 42: 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-009-9208-9.
Cheung, S. N., and R. H. Coase. 2008. The economic system of China: With conference opening and closing remarks by Ronald Coase. Mount Pleasant, SC: Arcadia Press.
Deng, Y. H., J. Gyourko, and J. Wu. 2012. Land and housing price measurement in China. Working Paper No. 18403. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ding, C. R., and E. Lichtenberg. 2011. “Land and urban economic growth in China.” J. Reg. Sci. 51 (2): 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00686.x.
Du, J. F., and R. B. Peiser. 2014. “Land supply, pricing and local governments’ land hoarding in China.” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 48: 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.07.002.
Edadan, N. 2015. “Structural determinants of unregulated urban growth and residential land pricing: Case of Bangalore.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141 (4): 05014022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000236.
El Araby, M. M. 2003. “The role of the state in managing urban land supply and prices in Egypt.” Habitat Int. 27: 429–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00068-1.
Fu, Q., and N. Lin. 2013. “Local state marketism: An institutional analysis of China’s urban housing and land market.” Chin. Sociol. Rev. 46 (1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555460101.
Han, L., and J. K.-S. Kung. 2015. “Fiscal incentives and policy choices of local governments: Evidence from China.” J. Dev. Econ. 116: 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.04.003.
Hoshino, S. 2001. “Multilevel modeling on farmland distribution in Japan.” Land Use Policy 18: 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00048-X.
Janssen, C. T. L. 2003. “Estimating the effect of land leases on prices of inner-city apartment buildings.” Urban Stud. 40 (10): 2049–2066. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000116103.
Jin, H., Y. Qian, and B. Weingast. 2005. “Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style.” J. Public Econ. 89: 1719–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.11.008.
Levkovich, O., J. Rouwendal, and R. van Marwijk. 2016. “The effects of highway development on housing prices.” Transportation 43: 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9580-7.
Li, F. X., Y. A. Gong, L. Y. Cai, C. Y. Sun, Y. M. Chen, Y. X. Liu, and P. H. Jiang. 2018. “Sustainable land-use allocation: A multiobjective particle swarm optimization model and application in Changzhou, China.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (2): 04018010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000425.
Li, J. 2014. “Land sale venue and economic growth path: Evidence from China’s urban land market.” Habitat Int. 41: 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.001.
Li, L. H. 2011. “The dynamics of the Shanghai land market – An intra city analysis.” Cities 28: 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.05.004.
Lichtenberg, E., and C. R. Ding. 2009. “Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China.” J. Urban Econ. 66: 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.03.002.
Lin, G. C. S. 2007. “Reproducing spaces of Chinese urbanisation: New city-based and land-centred urban transformation.” Urban Stud. 44 (9): 1827–1855. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701426673.
Lin, G. C. S., and S. P. S. Ho. 2005. “The state, land system, and land development processes in contemporary China.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 95 (2): 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x.
Lin, H. Z. 2019. “An accessibility-oriented optimal control method for land-use development.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 145 (4): 04019011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000518.
Liu, J. M., R. Wang, and T. Chen. 2010. “Factors of spatial distribution of recreation areas in peri-urban Beijing.” J. Geog. Sci. 20 (5): 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-010-0808-3.
Liu, T., G. Z. Cao, Y. Yan, and Y. R. Wang. 2016. “Urban land marketization in China: Central policy, local initiative, and market mechanism.” Land Use Policy 57: 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.001.
Liu, Y. S., J. T. Li, and Y. Y. Yang. 2018a. “Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation.” Land Use Policy 74: 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.005.
Liu, Y. S., Z. W. Zhang, and Y. Zhou. 2018b. “Efficiency of construction land allocation in China: An econometric analysis of panel data.” Land Use Policy 74: 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.030.
Maskin, E., Y. Y. Qian, and C. G. Xu. 2000. “Incentives, information and organizational form.” Rev. Econ. Stud. 67 (2): 359–378.
Mitsuda, Y., and S. Ito. 2011. “A review of spatial-explicit factors determining spatial distribution of land use/land-use change.” Landscape Ecol. Eng. 7: 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0113-4.
MNR (Ministry of Natural Resources). 2004. Accessed February 11, 2021. http://www.mnr.gov.cn.
Mŭller, D., and M. Zeller. 2002. “Land use dynamics in the central highlands of Vietnam: A spatial model combining village survey data with satellite imagery interpretation.” Agric. Econ. 27: 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00124.x.
Murakami, J., and Z. Chang. 2018. “Polycentric development under public leasehold: A spatial analysis of commercial land use rights.” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 71: 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.05.001.
Ooi, J. T. L., C. F. Sirmans, and G. K. Turnbull. 2011. “Government supply of land in a dual market.” Real Estate Econ. 39 (1): 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00290.x.
Pan, H. X., and M. Zhang. 2008. “Rail transit impacts on land use: Evidence from Shanghai, China.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2048: 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3141/2048-03.
Shanghai Planning and Land Resources Bureau. 2004. Accessed February 11, 2021. http://ghzyj.sh.gov.cn.
Slaev, A. D. 2017. “The relationship between planning and the market from the perspective of property rights theory: A transaction cost analysis.” Plann. Theory 16 (4): 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216668670.
SMG (Shanghai Municipal Government). 1987. Measures of Shanghai Municipality on the compensatory transfer of land use rights.
SMG (Shanghai Municipal Government). 1997. Measures of Shanghai Municipality on the assignment of land use rights.
SMG (Shanghai Municipal Government). 2001. Trial measures of Shanghai Municipality on the tender and auction of land use right.
SMG (Shanghai Municipal Government). 2015. Regulatory plan of Shanghai.
Solé-Ollé, A., and E. Viladecans-Marsal. 2012. “Lobbying, political competition, and local land supply: Recent evidence from Spain.” J. Public Econ. 96: 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.08.001.
Statistical Yearbook of China. 2016. Accessed February 11, 2021. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2016/indexch.htm.
Sun, W. Z., S. Q. Zheng, and R. Wang. 2015. “The capitalization of subway access in home value: A repeat-rentals model with supply constraints in Beijing.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 80: 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.07.015.
Tan, R., V. Beckmann, L. van den Berg, and F. Qu. 2009. “Governing farmland conversion: Comparing China with the Netherlands and Germany.” Land Use Policy 26: 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.11.009.
Tao, R., F. B. Su, M. X. Liu, and G. Z. Cao. 2010. “Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities.” Urban Stud. 47 (10): 2217–2236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009357961.
Tiebout, C. M. 1956. “A pure theory of local expenditures.” J. Polit. Econ. 64 (5): 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839.
Verburg, P. H., and Y. Q. Chen. 2000. “Multiscale characterization of land-use patterns in China.” Ecosystems 3: 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100210000033.
Wong, K. K., and X. B. Zhao. 1999. “The influence of bureaucratic behavior on land apportionment in China: The informal process.” Environ. Plann. C 17: 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1068/c170113.
Wooldridge, J. M. 2013. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. 5th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western.
Xiao, Y., Z. J. Li, and C. Webster. 2016. “Estimating the mediating effect of privately-supplied green space on the relationship between urban public green space and property value: Evidence from Shanghai, China.” Land Use Policy 54: 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.001.
Xu, C. 2011. “The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development.” J. Econ. Lit. 49: 1076–1151. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.4.1076.
Yang, J. W., J. X. Chen, X. H. Le, and Q. Zhang. 2016. “Density-oriented versus development-oriented transit investment: Decoding metro station location selection in Shenzhen.” Transp. Policy 51: 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.004.
Yang, Z., R. R. Ren, H. Y. Liu, and H. Zhang. 2015. “Land leasing and local government behaviour in China: Evidence from Beijing.” Urban Stud. 52 (5): 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014529342.
Zhang, M., and L. L. Wang. 2013. “The impacts of mass transit on land development in China: The case of Beijing.” Res. Transp. Econ. 40: 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.039.
Zheng, S. Q., X. K. Hu, J. H. Wang, and R. Wang. 2016. “Subways near the subway: Rail transit and neighborhood catering businesses in Beijing.” Transp. Policy 51: 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.008.
Zheng, S. Q., and M. E. Kahn. 2008. “Land and residential property markets in a booming economy: New evidence from Beijing.” J. Urban Econ. 63 (2): 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.04.010.
Zheng, S. Q., and M. E. Kahn. 2011. Does government investment in local public goods spur gentrification? Evidence from Beijing. Working Paper No. 17002. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Zheng, S. Q., W. Z. Sun, and R. Wang. 2014. “Land supply and capitalization of public goods in housing prices: Evidence from Beijing.” J. Reg. Sci. 54 (4): 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12095.
Zhong, L., W. W. Zhao, Z. F. Zhang, and X. N. Fang. 2014. “Analysis of multi-scale changes in arable land and scale effects of the driving factors in the Loess Areas in Northern Shaanxi, China.” Sustainability 6: 1747–1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6041747.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: Mar 5, 2019
Accepted: Jan 11, 2021
Published online: Mar 1, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 1, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

School of Architecture, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing 100084, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7100-1180. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Station Layout Optimization and Route Selection of Urban Rail Transit Planning: A Case Study of Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Mathematics, 10.3390/math11061539, 11, 6, (1539), (2023).
  • The Improved Element-Free Galerkin Method for 3D Steady Convection-Diffusion-Reaction Problems with Variable Coefficients, Mathematics, 10.3390/math11030770, 11, 3, (770), (2023).
  • Social Stratification and Spatial Equity of Educational Facilities in a Complex Urban Core in Lanzhou, China, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4390, 149, 3, (2023).
  • The dimension coupling method for 3D steady convection-diffusion-reaction problems with variable coefficients, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.02.048, 151, (164-174), (2023).
  • A cellular automata-based approach for spatio-temporal modeling of the city center as a complex system: The case of Kastamonu, Türkiye, Cities, 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104073, 132, (104073), (2023).
  • Stability Evaluation of Medium Soft Soil Pile Slope Based on Limit Equilibrium Method and Finite Element Method, Mathematics, 10.3390/math10193709, 10, 19, (3709), (2022).
  • Research on the Mathematical Model for Optimal Allocation of Human Resources in the Operation and Maintenance Units of a Heavy Haul Railway, Mathematics, 10.3390/math10193707, 10, 19, (3707), (2022).
  • Analyzing the Passenger Flow of Urban Rail Transit Stations by Using Entropy Weight-Grey Correlation Model: A Case Study of Shanghai in China, Mathematics, 10.3390/math10193506, 10, 19, (3506), (2022).
  • Analyzing the Land Leasing Behavior of the Government of Beijing, China, via the Multinomial Logit Model, Land, 10.3390/land11030376, 11, 3, (376), (2022).
  • A Fast Element-Free Galerkin Method for 3D Elasticity Problems, Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 10.32604/cmes.2022.019828, 132, 1, (55-79), (2022).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share