Valuing Visitor Willingness to Pay for Urban Green Space Conservation: Case of Maria Luisa Park in Seville, Spain
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 3
Abstract
Urban Green Spaces (UGS) can be a source of ecosystem service provision that exerts a positive impact on the wellbeing of users. The present study assessed the willingness to pay (WTP) for the UGS of Maria Luisa Park, located in the city of Seville (Spain). Compared with previous case studies, this UGS is characterized by the importance of the tourist attractions inside the park and its significant heritage value for the city. WTP is a concept derived from welfare economics that is used in the economic valuation of environmental goods. The results showed that respondents had a mean WTP in the range of €1.92 (double-bounded dichotomous-choice method) to €2.08 per visit (open-ended question on the maximum WTP). Within the socioeconomic factors considered, the results showed that average income and residence location constituted significant variables in the explanation of respondents' WTP. In addition, the level of environmental awareness positively affected the elicited WTP. Finally, frequency of visit and its duration also represented significant determinants of respondents' choices, thus affecting WTP elicitation. The results contribute to the existing literature by identifying significant socioeconomic and perception factors that affect the WTP of UGS users. These findings will be valuable for urban-planning decision makers regarding the potential establishment of an entrance fee to cover the increasing conservation and maintenance costs of UGS.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Water, Environmental, Agricultural, and Resource Economics research group (SEJ-592).
References
ABC. 2016. “Adepa propone cobrar una entrada en los edificios municipals para sufragar sus gastos [Press release].” Accessed April 20, 2020. https://sevilla.abc.es/sevilla/sevi-adepa-propone-cobrar-entrada-edificios-municipales-para-sufragar-gastos-201612271233_noticia.html.
ABC. 2020. “El Ayuntamiento invierte otros 400.000 euros en acabar la repavimentación del Parque de María Luisa [Press release].” Accessed April 20, 2020. https://sevilla.abc.es/sevilla/sevi-sevilla-ayuntamiento-invierte-otros-400000-euros-acabar-repavimentacion-parque-maria-luisa-202004010748_noticia.html.
Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. “Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation.” Fed. Regist. 58 (10): 4601–4614.
Ayuntamiento de Sevilla. 2020. “Presupuesto Municipal 2020.” Area de Hacienda y Administración pública. Dirección General de Hacienda y Gestión Presupuestos. Accessed 1 February 2020. https://www.sevilla.org/ayuntamiento/areas-municipales/area-hacienda-administracion-publica/servicio-de-gestion-presupuestaria/presupuestos-municipales/presupuesto-2020.
Bertram, C., J. Meyerhoff, K. Rehdanz, and H. Wüstemann. 2017. “Differences in the recreational value of urban parks between weekdays and weekends: A discrete choice analysis.” Landscape Urban Plann. 159: 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.006.
Brander, L. M., and M. J. Koetse. 2011. “The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results.” J. Environ. Manage. 92 (10): 2763–2773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019.
Brandli, L. L., P. D. Marques Prietto, and A. Neckel. 2015. “Estimating the willingness to pay for improvement of an urban park in Southern Brazil using the contingent valuation method.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141 (4): 05014027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000254.
Camps-Calvet, M., J. Langemeyer, L. Calvet-Mir, and E. Gómez-Baggethun. 2016. “Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: Insights for policy and planning.” Environ. Sci. Policy 62: 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007.
Carson, R. T. 1991. “Constructed markets.” In Measuring the demand for environmental quality, edited by J. B. Braden, and C. D. Kolstad, 121–162. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Centro de Estudios Turísticos. 2019. Datos de actividad turística en la ciudad de Sevilla. Centro de Estudios Turísticos.
Chen, B., and X. Qi. 2018. “Protest response and contingent valuation of an urban forest park in Fuzhou City, China.” Urban For. Urban Greening 29: 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.005.
Czembrowski, P., and J. Kronenberg. 2016. “Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services.” Landscape Urban Plann. 146: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005.
Dallat, M. A. T., I. Soerjomataram, R. F. Hunter, M. A. Tully, K. J. Cairns, and F. Kee. 2014. “Urban greenways have the potential to increase physical activity levels cost-effectively.” Eur. J. Public Health 24 (2): 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt035.
Expósito, A. 2019. “Valuing households’ willingness to pay for water transfers from the irrigation sector: A case study of the city of Seville (southern Spain).” Sustainability 11 (24): 6982–7000. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246982.
Fisher, B., R. K. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. “Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making.” Ecol. Econ. 68 (3): 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
Gómez, F., J. Jabaloyes, L. Montero, V. De Vicente, and M. Valcuende. 2011. “Green areas, the most significant indicator of the sustainability of cities: Research on their utility for urban planning.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (3): 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000060.
Halstead, J. M., A. E. Luloff, and T. H. Stevens. 1992. “Protest bidders in contingent valuation.” Northeast. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 21 (2): 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0899367X00002683.
Hanemann, M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen. 1991. “Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation.” Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73 (4): 1255–1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453.
Hanemann, W. M. 1984. “Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses.” Am. J. Agric. Econ. 66 (3): 332–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800.
Hoshino, T., and K. Kuriyama. 2010. “Measuring the benefits of neighbourhood park amenities: Application and comparison of spatial hedonic approaches.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 45 (3): 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9321-5.
Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hunter, R. F., C. Cleland, A. Cleary, M. Droomers, B. W. Wheeler, D. Sinnett, and M. Braubach. 2019. “Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis.” Environ. Int. 130: 104923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923.
Jorgensen, B. S., and G. J. Syme. 2000. “Protest responses and willingness to pay: Attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement.” Ecol. Econ. 33 (2): 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00145-7.
Kalfas, D. G., D. T. Zagkas, E. I. Dragozi, and T. D. Zagkas. 2020. “Estimating value of the ecosystem services in the urban and peri-urban green of a town Florina-Greece, using the CVM.” Int. J. Sustainable Dev. World Ecol. 27 (4): 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1714786.
Latinopoulos, D., Z. Mallios, and P. Latinopoulos. 2016. “Valuing the benefits of an urban park project: A contingent valuation study in Thessaloniki, Greece.” Land Use Policy 55: 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.020.
Lefebvre, M., M. Pautrel, and P. Laille. 2019. Public preferences for pesticide-free urban green spaces: A socio-economic survey, final report. Paris: Ministry of Ecological and Solidary Transition.
Li, C. Z., and L. Mattsson. 1995. “Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: An improved structural model for contingent valuation.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 28 (2): 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1017.
Lo, A. Y., and C. Y. Jim. 2010. “Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong.” Urban For. Urban Green. 9 (2): 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.001.
Lo, A. Y., and C. Y. Jim. 2015. “Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: Implications for Contingent Valuation Method.” Ecol. Econ. 114: 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.012.
Madureira, H., F. Nunes, J. V. Oliveira, L. Cormier, and T. Madureira. 2015. “Urban residents’ beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal.” Urban For. Urban Greening 14 (1): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008.
Majumdar, S., J. Deng, Y. Zhang, and C. Pierskalla. 2011. “Using contingent valuation to estimate the willingness of tourists to pay for urban forests: A study in Savannah, Georgia.” Urban For. Urban Greening 10 (4): 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.006.
Meyerhoff, J., and U. Liebe. 2010. “Determinants of protest responses in environmental valuation: A meta-study.” Ecol. Econ. 70 (2): 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.008.
Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Poe, G. L., and C. A. Vossler. 2011. Consequentiality and contingent values: An emerging paradigm, 122–141. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Poudyal, N. C., D. G. Hodges, and C. D. Merrett. 2009. “A hedonic analysis of the demand for and benefits of urban recreation parks.” Land Use Policy 26 (4): 975–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.11.008.
Randall, A. 1986. “The possibility of satisfactory benefit estimation with contingent markets.” In Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method, edited by R. G. Cummings, D. S. Brookshire, and W. D. Schulze, 114–122. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
Ready, R. C., S. Navrud, and W. R. Dubourg. 2001. “How do respondents with uncertain willingness to pay answer contingent valuation questions?” Land Econ. 77 (3): 315–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147126.
Sabyrbekov, R., M. Dallimer, and S. Navrud. 2020. “Nature affinity and willingness to pay for urban green spaces in a developing country.” Landscape Urban Plann. 194: 103700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103700.
Saz-Salazar, S., M. A. García-Rubio, F. González-Gómez, and A. J. Picazo-Tadeo. 2016. “Managing water resources under conditions of scarcity: On consumers’ willingness to pay for improving water supply infrastructure.” Water Resour. Manage. 30 (5): 1723–1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1247-4.
Saz-Salazar, S. D., and L. G. Menendez. 2007. “Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter?” Land use Policy 24 (1): 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.011.
Strazzera, E., M. Genius, R. Scarpa, and G. Hutchinson. 2003. “The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 25 (4): 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025098431440.
Swait, J., and W. Adamowicz. 2001. “Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: A theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 86 (2): 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2941.
Waylen, K. A., and J. Martin-Ortega. 2018. “Surveying views on payments for ecosystem services: Implications for environmental management and research.” Ecosyst. Serv. 29: 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.007.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147 • Issue 3 • September 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 17, 2020
Accepted: Dec 23, 2020
Published online: Apr 28, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 28, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Luisa Sturiale, Alessandro Scuderi, Giuseppe Timpanaro, Citizens’ perception of the role of urban nature-based solutions and green infrastructures towards climate change in Italy, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1105446, 11, (2023).
- Xiu-Juan Qiao, Thomas B. Randrup, Willingness to Pay for the Maintenance of Green Infrastructure in Six Chinese Pilot Sponge Cities, Water, 10.3390/w14030428, 14, 3, (428), (2022).
- Dimitrios Kalfas, Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, Efstratios Loizou, Katerina Melfou, Willingness to Pay for Urban and Suburban Green, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14042332, 14, 4, (2332), (2022).
- Peng Hu, Ying Zhou, Jinhua Zhou, Guoxiang Wang, Guowei Zhu, Uncovering the willingness to pay for ecological red lines protection: Evidence from China, Ecological Indicators, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108458, 134, (108458), (2022).