Technical Papers
Apr 20, 2021

Optimal Block Size for Improving Urban Vitality: An Exploratory Analysis with Multiple Vitality Indicators

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 3

Abstract

The increasing interest in fine-grained blocks requires a deeper understanding of the impact of block size on urban vitality. To date, limited empirical tests of the underlying relationships at the city level have been conducted using the ordinary linear-squares method, assuming a linear relationship. However, urban vitality is a complex system, thus making the use of linear regressions unfeasible because the assumption of homogeneity of variance would be violated. Therefore, the constraint line method was introduced to deepen the understanding of the relationship between block size and urban vitality. This paper employed a kernel density estimation of small catering businesses, point of interest density, social media check-in density, and comment density as proxies of urban vitality. Wuhan is the largest megacity in Central China and has been selected for this case study. When the block size increased to almost 0.08 km2, the maximum kernel density estimation value decreased sharply from above 2.70 to 1.60; when the block size exceeded 0.30 km2, vitality values tended to decrease very slowly. The maximum urban vitality measured by the other three indicators dropped an order of magnitude when the block size increased to 0.06 km2, then gradually slowed down, and tended toward a plateau when the block size increased beyond 0.20. Therefore, the dynamic process can be divided into three phrases with multiple critical thresholds of block size. These are approximately 0.06, 0.08, and 0.20 km2 ranked from the best to worst. The study indicates that block size has a nonlinear and threshold effect on urban vitality by constraining the maximum urban vitality. In general, the positive effect of small block size over urban vitality was confirmed, and additionally, urban planners should propose urban planning schemes with smaller residential blocks below 0.06 km2.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Qingsong He for his valuable suggestions and help with this manuscript. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (ID 51778078), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (ID 2019M663438), and the fund of the Beijing Key Laboratory of Megaregions Sustainable Development Modelling, Capital University of Economics and Business (ID MCR2019QN07).

References

Bakillah, M., S. Liang, A. Mobasheri, J. Jokar Arsanjani, and A. Zipf. 2014. “Fine-resolution population mapping using OpenStreetMap points-of-interest.” Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 28 (9): 1940–1963. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.909045.
Carlson, J. A., B. E. Saelens, J. Kerr, J. Schipperijn, T. L. Conway, L. D. Frank, J. E. Chapman, K. Glanz, K. L. Cain, and J. F. Sallis. 2015. “Association between neighborhood walkability and GPS-measured walking, bicycling and vehicle time in adolescents.” Health Place 32: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.12.008.
Chen, J., S. T. Yang, H. W. Li, B. Zhang, and J. R. Lv. 2013. “Research on geographical environment unit division based on the method of natural breaks (Jenks).” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 3: 47–50. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-W3-47-2013.
Cook, R. D. 1994. “On the interpretation of regression plots.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89 (425): 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476459.
De Nadai, M., J. Staiano, R. Larcher, N. Sebe, D. Quercia, and B. Lepri. 2016. “The death and life of great Italian cities: A mobile phone data perspective.” In Proc., of the 25th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, 413–423: Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
Guo, Q., J. H. Brown, and B. Enquist. 1998. “Using constraint lines to characterize plant performance.” Oikos 83: 237–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546835.
Hao, R., D. Yu, and J. Wu. 2017. “Relationship between paired ecosystem services in the grassland and agro-pastoral transitional zone of China using the constraint line method.” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 240: 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.015.
He, Q., W. He, Y. Song, J. Wu, C. Yin, and Y. Mou. 2018. “The impact of urban growth patterns on urban vitality in newly built-up areas based on an association rules analysis using geographical ‘big data’.” Land Use Policy 78: 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.020.
Huang, S.-L., J.-H. Wong, and T.-C. Chen. 1998. “A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability.” Landscape Urban Plann. 42 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00054-1.
Jacobs-Crisioni, C., P. Rietveld, E. Koomen, and E. Tranos. 2014. “Evaluating the impact of land-use density and mix on spatiotemporal urban activity patterns: An exploratory study using mobile phone data.” Environ, Plann. A: Econ. Space 46 (11): 2769–2785. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130309p.
Jacobs, J. 1992. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
Jalaladdini, S., and D. Oktay. 2012. “Urban public spaces and vitality: A socio-spatial analysis in the streets of Cypriot towns.” Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 35: 664–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.135.
Jin, X., Y. Long, W. Sun, Y. Lu, X. Yang, and J. Tang. 2017. “Evaluating cities’ vitality and identifying ghost cities in China with emerging geographical data.” Cities 63: 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.002.
Kan, H. Y., A. Forsyth, and P. Rowe. 2017. “Redesigning China’s superblock neighbourhoods: Policies, opportunities and challenges.” J. Urban Des. 22 (6): 757–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1337493.
Liu, X., and Y. Long. 2016. “Automated identification and characterization of parcels with OpenStreetMap and points of interest.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 43 (2): 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515604767.
Long, Y., and C. Huang. 2019. “Does block size matter? The impact of urban design on economic vitality for Chinese cities” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 46: 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317715640.
Long, Y., and Y. Zhou. 2016. “Quantitative evaluation on street vibrancy and its impact factors: A case study of Chengdu.” New Archit. 1: 52–57.
Lynch, K. 1984. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Medinski, T. V., A. J. Mills, K. J. Esler, U. Schmiedel, and N. Jürgens. 2010. “Do soil properties constrain species richness? Insights from boundary line analysis across several biomes in South Western Africa.” J. Arid. Environ. 74 (9): 1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.03.004.
Miao, P. 2003. “Deserted streets in a jammed town: The gated community in Chinese cities and its solution.” J. Urban Des. 8 (1): 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480032000064764.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2016. Excerpts from “State Council Issues ‘Key Directives’ to Further Reinforce the Management of Urban Planning and Construction”. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOHURD.
Monson, K. 2008. “String block vs superblock patterns of dispersal in China.” Archit. Des. 78 (1): 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.608.
Montgomery, J. 1998. “Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design.” J. Urban Des. 3 (1): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418.
Rowe, P., and C. Guan. 2016. “Striking balances between China's urban communities, blocks and their layouts.” Time Archit. 6: 29–33.
Sulis, P., E. Manley, C. Zhong, and M. Batty. 2018. “Using mobility data as proxy for measuring urban vitality.” J. Spatial Inf. Sci. 16: 137–162.
Sung, H., and S. Lee. 2015. “Residential built environment and walking activity: Empirical evidence of Jane Jacobs’ urban vitality.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 41: 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.009.
Thomson, J. D., G. Weiblen, B. A. Thomson, S. Alfaro, and P. Legendre. 1996. “Untangling multiple factors in spatial distributions: Lilies, gophers, and rocks.” Ecology 77 (6): 1698–1715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265776.
Tobler, W. R. 1979. “Smooth pycnophylactic interpolation for geographical regions.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74 (367): 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10481647.
Waga, K., A. Tabarcea, and P. Fränti. 2012. “Recommendation of points of interest from user generated data collection.” In 8th Int. Conf. on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom), 550–555: New York: IEEE.
Wu, J., N. Ta, Y. Song, J. Lin, and Y. Chai. 2018. “Urban form breeds neighborhood vibrancy: A case study using a GPS-based activity survey in suburban Beijing.” Cities 74: 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.008.
Wu, L., Y. Zhi, Z. Sui, and Y. Liu. 2014. “Intra-urban human mobility and activity transition: Evidence from social media check-in data.” PLoS One 9 (5): e97010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097010.
Ye, Y., D. Li, and X. Liu. 2018. “How block density and typology affect urban vitality: An exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China.” Urban Geogr. 39 (4): 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1381536.
Yu, W., T. Ai, and S. Shao. 2015. “The analysis and delimitation of central business district using network kernel density estimation.” J. Transp. Geogr. 45: 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.008.
Zeng, C., Y. Song, Q. He, and F. Shen. 2018. “Spatially explicit assessment on urban vitality: Case studies in Chicago and Wuhan.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 40: 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.021.
Zhang, Y., Q. Li, H. Huang, W. Wu, X. Du, and H. Wang. 2017. “The combined use of remote sensing and social sensing data in fine-grained urban land use mapping: A case study in Beijing, China.” Remote Sens. 9 (9): 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090865.
Zhao, Y., J. Wu, C. He, and G. Ding. 2017. “Linking wind erosion to ecosystem services in drylands: A landscape ecological approach.” Landscape Ecol. 32 (12): 2399–2417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0585-9.
Zukin, S. 2009. Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: Jul 9, 2019
Accepted: Dec 22, 2020
Published online: Apr 20, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 20, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xiaoyu Gan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Lecturer, College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610064, China. Email: [email protected]
Ling Huang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400044, China. Email: [email protected]
Huiying Wang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Public Administration, Univ. of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China. Email: [email protected]
Yanchuan Mou, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400030, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Planning Dept., Chengdu Railway Construction Engineering Support Center, Chengdu 610000, China; formerly, Assistant Professor, Sichuan Univ. of Arts and Science, Dazhou 635000, China. Email: [email protected]
Ang Hu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610064, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Constraint effects among several key ecosystem service types and their influencing factors: A case study of the Pearl River Delta, China, Ecological Indicators, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109883, 146, (109883), (2023).
  • Applicable Framework for Evaluating Urban Vitality with Multiple-Source Data: Empirical Research of the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration Using BPNN, Land, 10.3390/land11111901, 11, 11, (1901), (2022).
  • Analysis of Urban Vitality in Nanjing Based on a Plot Boundary-Based Neural Network Weighted Regression Model, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10.3390/ijgi11120624, 11, 12, (624), (2022).
  • Coastal Waterfront Vibrancy: An Exploration from the Perspective of Quantitative Urban Morphology, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12101585, 12, 10, (1585), (2022).
  • Social media research trends in tourism city context, International Journal of Tourism Cities, 10.1108/IJTC-07-2021-0151, 8, 3, (779-798), (2022).
  • Vital triangle: A new concept to evaluate urban vitality, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101886, 98, (101886), (2022).
  • The six dimensions of built environment on urban vitality: Fusion evidence from multi-source data, Cities, 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103482, 121, (103482), (2022).
  • How the built environment affects the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vitality: A comparison among different urban functional areas, Computational Urban Science, 10.1007/s43762-022-00069-4, 2, 1, (2022).
  • Multidimensional Urban Vitality on Streets: Spatial Patterns and Influence Factor Identification Using Multisource Urban Data, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10.3390/ijgi11010002, 11, 1, (2), (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share