Abstract

Autonomous and connected vehicle technologies have the potential to bring profound changes in travel behavior and transportation network performance with moderate to significant market penetration rates (MPRs) within the next few decades. To better understand the long-term impacts of these technologies, this study predicts the network-level effects of privately owned autonomous vehicles (AVs) and connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) for the Triangle Region, North Carolina, in the year 2045. Market penetration scenarios of personal AVs and CAVs along with results from microscopic mixed-traffic simulations and travel behavior assumptions are incorporated into a regional travel demand model. Results indicate that a 75% MPR of personal AVs deteriorates the performance of the network, leading to a 5.4% increase in vehicle-hours traveled, and a 17.2% increase in hours of delay. The opposite holds for private CAV adoption, which is found to result in higher peak-period link speed and less congestion. The results of this research help planners and engineers to make informed transportation planning decisions and work toward harnessing the benefits of these technologies while minimizing any negative impacts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The authors are grateful to Joseph Huegy, Director of the Travel Behavior Modeling Group at the Institute for Transportation Research and Education at North Carolina State University for his significant assistance with the Triangle Regional Model. The authors are also thankful to Jamal Alavi, Director of the Transportation Planning Decision at NCDOT, for his valuable insights into this research. In addition, the authors are grateful to Professor Missy Cummings, Duke University, for her valuable feedback. The contents of this article reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of either NCDOT or the Federal Highway Administration at the time of publication.

References

Adebisi, A., Y. Liu, B. Schroeder, J. Ma, B. Cesme, A. Jia, and A. Morgan. 2020. Developing highway capacity manual (HCM) capacity adjustment factors (CAF) for connected and automated traffic on freeway segments. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Auld, J., V. Sokolov, and T. S. Stephens. 2017. “Analysis of the effects of connected-automated vehicle technologies on travel demand.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2625 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/2625%E2%80%9301.
Bansal, P., K. M. Kockelman, and A. Singh. 2016. “Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 67: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019.
Bierstedt, J., A. Gooze, C. Gray, J. Peterman, L. Raykin, and J. Walters. 2014. “Effects of next-generation vehicles on travel demand and highway capacity.” FP Think Working Group, Number 8, 1–10.
Chang, T.-H., and I.-S. Lai. 1997. “Analysis of characteristics of mixed traffic flow of autopilot vehicles and manual vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 5 (6): 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(97)00020-X.
Childress, S., B. Nichols, B. Charlton, and S. Coe. 2015. “Using an activity-based model to explore the potential impacts of automated vehicles.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2493: 99–106. https://doi.org/10.3141/2493-11.
Cottam, B. J. 2018. “Transportation planning for connected autonomous vehicles: How it all fits together.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (51): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118756632.
Fagnant, D. J., and K. Kockelman. 2015. “Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 77: 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003.
Gucwa, M. 2014. “Mobility and energy impacts of automated cars.” In Proc., Automated Vehicles Symp. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2014/AutomatedVehicleSymposium2014Proceedings.pdf.
Harper, C. D., C. T. Hendrickson, S. Mangones, and C. Samaras. 2016. “Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 72: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003.
Harper, C. D., C. T. Hendrickson, and C. Samaras. 2018. “Exploring the economic, environmental, and travel implications of changes in parking choices due to driverless vehicles: An agent-based simulation approach.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (4): 04018043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000488.
Hjorthol, R. 2013. “Attitudes, ownership and use of electric vehicles—A review of literature.” Accessed July 15, 2020. http://www.toi.no.
Kim, K., G. Rousseau, J. Freedman, and J. Nicholson. 2015. “The travel impact of autonomous vehicles in metro Atlanta through activity-based modeling.” In Proc., 15th TRB National Planning Applications. https://www.trbappcon.org/oldsite/2015conf/sponsors.html.
Kockelman, K., et al. 2017. An assessment of autonomous vehicles: Traffic impacts and infrastructure needs. Technical Rep. No. 0-6847-1. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research.
Koopman, P., and M. Wagner. 2017. “Autonomous vehicle safety: An interdisciplinary challenge.” IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 9 (1): 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2016.2583491.
Krueger, R., T. H. Rashidi, and J. M. Rose. 2016. “Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 69: 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.015.
Le Vine, S., Y. Kong, X. Liu, and J. Polak. 2019. “Vehicle automation and freeway ‘pipeline’ capacity in the context of legal standards of care.” Transportation 46 (4): 1215–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9825-8.
Litman, T. 2018. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions implications for transport planning. Victoria, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Lopez, P. A., M. Behrisch, L. Bieker-Walz, J. Erdmann, Y.-P. Flotterod, R. Hilbrich, L. Lucken, J. Rummel, P. Wagner, and E. WieBner. 2018. “Microscopic traffic simulation using SUMO.” In Proc., 21st IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2575–2582. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Lu, M., M. Taiebat, M. Xu, and S. C. Hsu. 2018. “Multiagent spatial simulation of autonomous taxis for urban commute: Travel economics and environmental impacts.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (4): 04018033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000469.
McCauley, R. 2017. “Driverless shuttle program kicks off in California to tackle first mile/last mile mobility obstacle.” Accessed June 20, 2020. http://www.govtech.com/fs/driverless-shuttle-program-kicks-off-in-california-to-tackle-first-milelast-mile-mobility-obstacle.html.
Meyer, J., H. Becker, P. M. B. Osch, and K. W. Axhausen. 2017. “Autonomous vehicles: The next jump in accessibilities?” Res. Transp. Econ. 62: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2017.03.005.
Milanés, V., and S. E. Shladover. 2014. “Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 48: 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001.
Minderhoud, M. M., and P. H. L. Bovy. 1999. “Impact of intelligent cruise control on motorway capacity.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1679 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/1679-01.
Nair, G. S., F. F. Dias, N. Ruiz-Juri, J. Kuhr, and C. R. Bhat. 2018. Travel modeling in an Era of connected and automated transportation systems: An investigation in the dallas-fort worth area center for transportation research project title: Transition period from today to fully autonomous. Rep. No. D-STOP/2016/143. Austin, TX: Data-Supported Transportation Operations & Planning Center.
NC General Assembly. 2017. North carolina house bill 469 session Law 2017-166. Raleigh, NC: General Assembly of North Carolina.
Ni, D., J. Li, S. Andrews, and H. Wang. 2010. “Preliminary estimate of highway capacity benefit attainable with IntelliDrive technologies.” In Proc., 13th Int. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 819–824. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Petersen, E., and P. Vovsha. 2006. “Intrahousehold car-type choice for different travel needs.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1985 (1): 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198500123.
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers). 2018. SAE international releases updated visual chart for its levels of driving automation standard for self-driving vehicles. Warrendale, PA: SAE.
Schoettle, B., and M. Sivak. 2014a. A survey of public opinion about Autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., The U.K and Australia. Rep. No. UMTRI-2014-21. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Schoettle, B., and M. Sivak. 2014b. “A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Connected Vehicles and Expo, 687–692. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Shen, Y., H. Zhang, and J. Zhao. 2017. “Embedding autonomous vehicle sharing in public transit system: An example of last-mile problem.” In Proc., 96th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, 1–16. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Shepardson, D. 2019. “Toyota abandons plan to install U.S connected vehicle tech by 2021.” Accessed May 25, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-toyota-communication/toyota-abandons-plan-to-install-u-s-connected-vehicle-tech-by-2021-idUSKCN1S2252.
Shladover, S. E., C. Nowakowski, and X.-Y. Lu. 2014. Using cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) to form high-performance vehicle streams. Rep. No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2014-7. Berkeley, CA: California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology.
Shladover, S. E., D. Su, and X.-Y. Lu. 2012. “Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2324 (1): 63–70. https://doi.org/10.3141/2324-08.
Singleton, P. A. 2019. “Discussing the positive utilities of autonomous vehicles: Will travelers really use their time productively?” Transp. Rev. 39 (1): 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1470584.
Sivak, M., and B. Schoettle. 2015. Influence of current Non-drivers on the amount of travel and trip patterns with self-driving vehicles. Rep. No. UMTRI-2015-39. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Soteropoulos, A., M. Berger, and F. Ciari. 2019. “Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: An international review of modelling studies.” Transp. Rev. 39 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1523253.
Tientrakool, P., Y.-C. Ho, and N. F. Maxemchuk. 2011. “Highway capacity benefits from using vehicle-to-vehicle communication and sensors for collision avoidance.” In Proc., 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC Fall), 1–5. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
TRM 2016. Model technical documentation – Triangle Regional Model version 6. Prepared by Triangle Regional Model Service Bureau and Triangle Regional Model Team.
Truong, L. T., C. De Gruyter, G. Currie, and A. Delbosc. 2017. “Estimating the trip generation impacts of autonomous vehicles on car travel in Victoria, Australia.” Transportation 44 (6): 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9802-2.
Tsugawa, S., S. Kato, and K. Aoki. 2011. “An automated truck platoon for energy saving.” In Proc., 2011 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 4109–4114. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Vander Werf, J., S. E. Shladover, M. A. Miller, and N. Kourjanskaia. 2002. “Effects of adaptive cruise control systems on highway traffic flow capacity.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1800 (1): 78–84. https://doi.org/10.3141/1800-10.
VanderWerf, J., S. Shladover, N. Kourjanskaia, M. Miller, and H. Krishnan. 2001. “Modeling effects of driver control assistance systems on traffic.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1748 (1): 167–174. https://doi.org/10.3141/1748-21.
Wadud, Z., D. Mackenzie, and P. Leiby. 2016. “Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 86: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001.
Xiao, L., M. Wang, W. Schakel, and B. van Arem. 2018. “Unravelling effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control deactivation on traffic flow characteristics at merging bottlenecks.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 96: 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.008.
Xiao, L., M. Wang, and B. van Arem. 2017. “Realistic car-following models for microscopic simulation of adaptive and cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2623 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2623-01.
Zhang, W., and S. Guhathakurta. 2018. “Residential location choice in the era of shared autonomous vehicles.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18776062.
Zhang, W., S. Guhathakurta, and E. B. Khalil. 2018. “The impact of private autonomous vehicles on vehicle ownership and unoccupied VMT generation.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 90: 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.03.005.
Zhao, Y., and K. M. Kockelman. 2018. “Anticipating the regional impacts of connected and automated vehicle travel in Austin, Texas.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (4): 04018032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000463.
Zmud, J., T. Williams, M. Outwater, M. Bradley, N. Karla, and S. Row. 2018. Updating regional transportation planning and modeling tools to address impacts of connected and automated vehicles, volume 1: Executive summary. Rep. No. 20-102(09). Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 1March 2021

History

Received: Apr 3, 2020
Accepted: Sep 1, 2020
Published online: Dec 2, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 2, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5008-0318. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-4939. Email: [email protected]
M. Shoaib Samandar [email protected]
Research Associate, Institute of Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695. Email: [email protected]
Nagui Rouphail, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695. Email: [email protected]
George List, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695. Email: [email protected]
Director, Institute of Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27606; Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-1385. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share