Exploring the Feasibility of Mobility as a Service in Small Urban and Rural Communities: Lessons from a Case Study
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146, Issue 3
Abstract
Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is a concept that provides individualized choices for multimodal shared trips and has been extended with growing applications in large cities and metropolitan areas around the world. However, it is challenging to implement MaaS in small urban and rural areas that cover the vast majority of the land area in the US that have different user characteristics and availability of public transportation services. Using the state of Wisconsin as an example, this study aims to identify critical issues affecting the implementation of MaaS from both the demand side and the supply side as well as proposing strategies for these identified issues. An advisory committee of eight members representing Wisconsin agencies and organizations was employed to gain insights into problems and issues associated with the implementation of MaaS in small towns and rural areas in Wisconsin. Three advisory committee meetings were held to assist the research team in (1) background analysis, which explores sociodemographic, economic, and technological changes in Wisconsin (phase I), (2) problem identification, which defines the MaaS concept and conducts a feasibility analysis from policy and planning to implementation issues (phase II), and (3) strategy development, which develops potential strategies responding to the problems identified in phase II (phase III). Critical issues in small urban and rural communities include an aging population, lack of public transport travel experience, limited smartphone service availability, municipal boundaries, funding issues, staff availability, limited capacity, and technical capabilities. Corresponding to these critical issues, response strategies include collaboration between stakeholders, tailored service packages, user interface design, and pilot projects. The research findings could provide implications for other local governments, transportation service providers, and MaaS integrators in the country to develop MaaS schemes in small urban and rural communities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This paper extends the results of the research project entitled “Connecting Wisconsin of Tomorrow—Methods to Improve Public Mobility under Future Social, Economic and Technological Changes,” funded by the Tommy G. Thompson Center on Public Leadership located at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The authors would like to thank all the advisory committee members for their participation in the study.
References
Aapaoja, A., J. Eckhardt, and L. Nykänen. 2017. “Business models for MaaS.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Mobility as a Service. Tampere, Finland: N.p.
Anttila, S. 2018. “Ylläs Around and YlläsTiketti—piloting Maas, mobility and tourism-related services in rural Finland.” Accessed July 25, 2019. https://www.mambaproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/WP-2.2_Good-practice-cases_Yll%C3%A4s_FINAL.pdf.
Bittner, J., P. Fuchs, T. Baird, and A. Smith. 2011. Addressing elderly mobility issues in Wisconsin. Final Rep. No. 0092-10-19. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation Research & Library Unit.
Eckhardt, J., L. Nykänen, A. Aapaoja, and P. Niemi. 2018. “Maas in rural areas—Case Finland.” Res. Transp. Bus. Manage. 27: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.09.005.
Egan-Robertson, D. 2013. Wisconsin’s future population: Projections for the state, its counties and municipalities, 2010–2040. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Dept. of Administration Demographic Services Center.
Hensher, D. A. 2017. “Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: Are they likely to change?” Transp. Rese. Part A 98: 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.02.006.
Ho, C. Q., D. A. Hensher, C. Mulley, and Y. Z. Wong. 2018. “Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for Mobility as a Service (MaaS): A stated choice study.” Transp. Res. Part A 117: 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.025.
Hubbuch, C. 2018. “Census: Wisconsin incomes up, poverty down; digital divide yawns.” Wisconsin State Journal, July 22, 2019.
Hvid, C., N. B. Sørensen, and S. Rasmussen. 2018. “The story of “MinRejseplan”—A major step towards MaaS.” Accessed July 25, 2019. http://asp.vejtid.dk/Artikler/2018/ITSWC/9073.pdf.
Jittrapirom, P., V. Caiati, A. Feneri, S. Ebrahimigharehbaghi, M. J. A. González, and J. Narayan. 2017. “Mobility as a service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges.” Urban Plann. 2 (2): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i2.931.
Kamargianni, M., and M. Matyas. 2017. “The business ecosystem of mobility-as-a-service.” In Proc., 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
König, D., J. Eckhardt, A. Aapaoja, J. Sochor, and M. Karlsson. 2016. “Deliverable 3: Business and operator models for MaaS.” Accessed May 16, 2019. http://www.vtt.fi/sites/maasifie/PublishingImages/results/cedr_mobility_MAASiFiE_deliverable_3_revised_final.pdf.
Matyas, M., and M. Kamargianni. 2017. “Stated preference design for exploring demand for “mobility as a service” plans.” In Proc., 5th Int. Choice Modelling Conf. Cape Town, South Africa: Centre for Transport Studies (CTS) and Choice Modelling Centre (CMC).
Schweiger, C. 2017. Bringing mobility as a service to the United States: Accessibility opportunities and challenges. Washington, DC: National Aging and Disability Transportation Center.
Sochor, J., I. C. M. Karlsson, and H. Strömberg. 2016. “Trying out mobility as a service: Experiences from a field trial and implications for understanding demand.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2542: 57–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2542-07.
Sochor, J., and S. Sarasini. 2017. “Users’ motives to adopt and willingness to pay for Mobility as a Service.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Mobility as a Service (ICoMaaS). Tampere, Finland: N.p.
USCB (U.S. Census Bureau). 2011. U.S. Census 2010, Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics. Table DP-1. American FactFinder. Suitland, MD: USCB.
USCB (U.S. Census Bureau). 2018a. 2013–2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. American FactFinder. Suitland, MD: USCB.
USCB (U.S. Census Bureau). 2018b. 2010 Census urban and rural classification and urban area criteria. Suitland, MD: USCB.
Wells, P. N., M. Trompet, L. Morse, and D. Graham. 2019. “Filling in the service gaps: Spatial, temporal and demographic opportunities for flexible and on-demand Bus services using international examples.” In Proc., 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Wisconsin Department of Administration Demographic Services Center. 2013. “County age-sex population projections, 2010–2040.” Accessed July 25, 2019. https://doa.wi.gov/DIR/Proj_cofinal_2010_2040Web.xlsx.
Wisconsin DOT (Wisconsin Department of Transportation). 2020. Wisconsin public transit systems 2020. Madison, WI: Wisconsin DOT.
Wong, Y., D. Hensher, and C. Mulley. 2019. “Mode-agnostic mobility contracts: Identifying broker/aggregator models for delivering mobility as a service (MaaS).” In Proc., 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146 • Issue 3 • September 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 10, 2019
Accepted: Apr 10, 2020
Published online: Jul 13, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.