Technical Papers
Apr 3, 2020

Challenges of Spatial Decision-Support Tools in Urban Planning: Lessons from New Zealand’s Cities

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146, Issue 2

Abstract

Urban planning decision-makers face wicked problems and are required to make complex decisions regarding the functioning of cities. Spatial decision-support tools (SDSTs) have the potential to change the way decisions are being made and play an important role in shaping future cities. Yet decision-makers experience challenges around SDSTs. This article analyzes what lessons can be drawn for the wider community from New Zealand’s urban planning context and SDSTs developed for New Zealand’s cities on (1) how SDSTs might influence decision-making; (2) what the challenges are toward the appropriate adoption of spatial tools; and (3) how data, technical, and procedural issues may influence the adoption of SDSTs in planning practices. It contributes an integrated view, drawing from literature on complex systems, theories of sociotechnical interactions, and synoptic planning practices based on engagement, and a survey of urban planning stakeholders. The key challenges identified are around technological and user subjectivity and tailored recognition of local contexts. These can be addressed through flexible SDSTs developed with stakeholder engagement and by viewing SDSTs in a wider, spatial sociotechnical system to fully leverage their potential and ensure improved urban outcomes accounting for the local context.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge funding from New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment through the National Science Challenge “Building Better Homes, Towns and Cities: Ko ngā wā kāinga hei papakainga.

References

Attia, S., E. Gratia, A. De Herde, and J. L. M. Hensen. 2012. “Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design.” Energy Build. 49: 2–15.
Austin, P. M. 2016. “New Zealand urban research and planning: Changing urban governance in response to government policy orientation and earthquakes.” Urban Policy Res. 33 (4): 389–391.
Bagstad, K. J., D. J. Semmens, S. Waage, and R. Winthrop. 2013. “A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation.” Ecosyst. Serv. 5: 27–39.
Batty, M. 2009a. “Cities as complex systems: Scaling, interaction, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies.” In Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science, edited by R. A. Meyers, 51–58. New York: Springer.
Batty, M. 2009b. “Urban modelling.” In International encyclopaedia of human geography, edited by R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, 51–58. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Batty, M., and P. M. Torrens. 2005. “Modelling and prediction in a complex world.” Futures 37 (7): 745–766.
Bentivegna, V. 1995. “The contribution of evaluation to rationality and legitimation of planning.” Urbanistica 105: 165.
Boddy, M., C. Lambert, and D. Snape. 1997. City for the 21st century? Globalisation, planning and urban change. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Bottero, M., G. Mondini, and A. Oppio. 2016. “Decision support systems for evaluating urban regeneration.” Procedia 223: 923–928.
Campbell, N., and T. O’Reilly. 2005. “Establishing the design profession’s perspective on GIS.” In Decision support systems in urban planning, edited by H. Timmermanns, 40–55. London: E & FN SPON.
Carr, J., and M. R. Dionisio. 2017. “Flexible spaces as a ‘third way’ forward for planning urban shared spaces.” Cities 70: 73–82.
Chevalier, P., I. Thomas, D. Geraets, E. Goetghebeur, O. Janssens, D. Peeters, and F. Plastria. 2012. “Locating fire stations: An integrated approach for Belgium.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 46 (2): 173–182.
Christchurch City Council. 2019. “Property search.” District Plan. Accessed June 17, 2019. https://districtplan.ccc.govt.nz/PropertySearch/PropertySearchContainer.html.
Clarke, K., G. Hardstone, M. Rouncefield, and I. Sommerville. 2006. Trust in technology: A sociotechnical perspective. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Couclelis, H. 2005. “‘Where has the future gone?’ Rethinking the role of integrated land-use models in spatial planning.” Environ. Plann. A 37 (8): 1353–1371.
Coutinho-Rodrigues, J., A. Simão, and C. H. Antunes. 2011. “A GIS-based multicriteria spatial decision support system for planning urban infrastructures.” Decis. Support Syst. 51 (3): 720–726.
Dionisio, M. R., S. Kingham, K. Banwell, and J. Neville. 2016. “Geospatial tools for community engagement in the Christchurch rebuild, New Zealand.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 27: 233–243.
Donnelly, A., and M. Jones. 2013. “A decision-support system for sustainable urban metabolism in Europe.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 38: 109–119.
Eikelboom, T., and R. Janssen. 2017. “Collaborative use of geodesign tools to support decision-making on adaptation to climate change.” Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change 22 (2): 247–266.
English, M. R., and V. H. Dale. 1999. Next steps for tools to aid environmental decision making. Tools to aid environmental decision making. New York: Springer.
Environment Canterbury. 2019. “Canterbury maps.” Accessed June 17, 2019. https://canterburymaps.govt.nz.
Eyvindson, K., A. S. Kangas, T. Hujala, and M. Kurttila. 2010. “Effect of criteria selection on decision support tools.” Scand. For. Econ. 43: 21–33.
Faludi, A. 2007. “Making sense of the ‘territorial agenda of the European Union’.” Eur. J. Spatial Dev. 25: 1–21.
Gamper, C. D., and C. Turcanu. 2007. “On the governmental use of multi-criteria analysis.” Ecol. Econ. 62 (2): 298–307.
Gerber, P., G. Caruso, E. Cornelis, and C. Médard de Chardon. 2018. “A multi-scale fine-grained LUTI model to simulate land-use scenarios in Luxembourg.” J. Transp. Land Use 11 (1): 255–272.
Glackin, S., and M. R. Dionisio. 2016. “‘Deep engagement’ and urban regeneration: Tea, trust, and the quest for co-design at precinct scale.” Land Use Policy 52: 363–373.
Glackin, S., R. Trubka, and M. R. Dionisio. 2016. “A software-aided workflow for precinct-scale residential redevelopment.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 60: 1–15.
Glass, H., and A. Schiff. 2017. “Getting more value from data sharing: Some potential solutions.” Accessed November 2, 2017. http://datafutures.co.nz/assets/Uploads/DF-Final-Report-2.pdf.
Grêt-Regamey, A., J. Altwegg, E. A. Sirén, M. J. Van Strien, and B. Weibel. 2017. “Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning—A spatial decision support tool.” Landscape Urban Plann. 165: 206–219.
GRI (Geospatial Research Institute). 2019. “ESP.” Accessed June 17, 2019. http://www.esp.geospatial.ac.nz.
Herold, M., N. C. Goldstein, and K. C. Clarke. 2003. “The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling.” Remote Sens. Environ. 86 (3): 286–302.
Kamps, S., and C. Tannier. 2008. “A planning support system for assessing strategies of local urban planning agencies.” In 6th Int. Conf. of Territorial Intelligence: Tools and Methods of Territorial Intelligence, 1–9. Besançon, France: Université de Franche.
Kim, D. 2012. “Modelling urban growth: Towards an agent based microeconomic approach to urban dynamics and spatial policy simulation.” Doctoral thesis, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis Bartlett School of Planning Bartlett Faculty of Built Environment, Univ. College London.
Krizek, K., A. Forysth, and C. S. Slotterback. 2009. “Is there a role for evidence-based practice in urban planning and policy?” Plann. Theory Pract. 10 (4): 459–478.
Lane, M. B. 2005. “Public participation in planning: An intellectual history.” Aust. Geogr. 36 (3): 283–299.
Lombardi, P., and V. Ferretti. 2015. “New spatial decision support systems for sustainable urban and regional development.” Smart Sustainable Built Environ. 4 (1): 45–66.
Long, Y., and L. Liu. 2016. “Transformations of urban studies and planning in the big/open data era: A review.” Int. J. Image Data Fusion 7 (4): 295–308.
Loucks, D. P. 1995. “Developing and implementing decision support systems: A critique and a challenge.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 31 (4): 571–582.
MBIE (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Environment). “Development feasibility tool.” Accessed June 17, 2019. http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/housing-property/national-policy-statement-urban-development/guidance-on-evidence-and-monitoring-policies.
McDermott, P. 2016. Culture and capability in the New Zealand planning system. Report to the New Zealand Productivity Commission. Auckland, New Zealand: McDermott Consultants Ltd.
Miller, C. 2006. “New directions in New Zealand’s urban planning and research?” Urban Policy Res. 24 (3): 341–354.
Narayana, M. R. 2010. “Impact of economic globalization on urbanization.” India Q. 66 (1): 91–116.
Nault, E., C. Waibel, J. Carmeliet, and M. Andersen. 2018. “Development and test application of the UrbanSOLve decision-support prototype for early-stage neighborhood design.” Build. Environ. 137: 58–72.
New Zealand Legislation. 2018. Accessed March 16, 2020. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/.
Nutley, T., S. McNabb, and S. Salentine. 2013. “Impact of a decision-support tool on decision making at the district level in Kenya.” Health Res. Policy Syst. 11 (34): 1–8.
Pinelli, F., R. Nair, F. Calabrese, M. Berlingerio, G. Di Lorenzo, and M. L. Sbodio. 2016. “Data-driven transit network design from mobile phone trajectories.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 (6): 1724–1733.
Randall, T. A., C. J. Churchill, and B. W. Baetz. 2003. “A GIS-based decision support system for neighbourhood greening.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 30 (4): 541–563.
Reed, M. S., et al. 2013. “Participatory scenario development for environmental management: A methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands.” J. Environ. Manage. 128: 345–362.
Rizzoli, A. E., and W. J. Young. 1997. “Delivering environmental decision support systems: Software tools and techniques.” Environ. Modell. Software 12 (2–3): 237–249.
Rounsevell, M. D. A., and M. J. Metzger. 2010. “Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 1 (4): 606–619.
Rutledge, D., et al. 2007. “Development of spatial decision support systems to support long-term, integrated planning.” In MODSIM 2007 Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, edited by L. Oxley and D. Kulasiri, 308–314. Christchurch, New Zealand: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc.
Schetke, S., D. Haase, and T. Kötter. 2012. “Towards sustainable settlement growth: A new multi-criteria assessment for implementing environmental targets into strategic urban planning.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 32 (1): 195–210.
Schindler, M., R. Dionisio, and S. Kingham. 2018. “A multi-level perspective on a spatial data ecosystem: Needs and challenges among urban planning stakeholders in New Zealand.” Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastruct. Res. 13: 223–252.
SmartMap. 2019. “SmartMap realty—Property search.” Accessed June 17, 2019. http://smartmap.com.
Statistics New Zealand (StatsNZ). 2017. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://www.stats.govt.nz/.
Stevens, D., S. Dragicevic, and K. Rothley. 2007. “Icity: A GIS-CA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making.” Environ. Modell. Software 22 (6): 761–773.
Thompson, E. M., P. Greenhalgh, K. Muldoon-Smith, J. Charlton, and M. Dolník. 2016. “Planners in the future city: Using city information modelling to support planners as market actors.” Urban Plann. 1 (1): 79–94.
Thompson, M. 2015. “Interview with Allen Gunn of aspiration.” Opensource.com. Accessed September 26, 2018. https://opensource.com/open-organization/15/7/be-roadie-not-rock-star.
Timmermans, H. 2005. Decision support systems in urban planning. London: E & FN SPON.
Uran, O., and R. Janssen. 2003. “Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 27 (5): 511–526.
Vatrapu, R. K. 2009. “Towards a theory of socio-technical interactions.” In Vol. 5794 of European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2009): Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines, edited by U. Cress, V. Dimitrova, and M. Specht, 694–699. Berlin: Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
Vonk, G., and S. Geertman. 2008. “Improving the adoption and use of planning support systems in practice.” Appl. Spatial Anal. Policy 1: 153–173.
Vonk, G., S. Geertman, and P. Schot. 2005. “Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems.” Environ. Plann. A 37: 909–924.
Wang, Y., and Z. Zou. 2010. “Spatial decision support system for urban planning: Case study of Harbin City in China.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 136 (2): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:2(147).
White, R., I. Uljee, and G. Engelen. 2012. “Integrated modelling of population, employment and land-use change with a multiple activity-based variable grid cellular automaton.” Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 26 (7): 1251–1280.
Williamson, W., and B. Parolin. 2012. “Investigating E-planning in practice: An actor-network case study approach.” Int. J. E-Plann. Res. 1 (3): 68–86.
Williamson, W., and B. Parolin. 2013. “Application of socio-technical research methods in understanding the genesis and potential sustainability of planning support systems.” In Vol. 195 of Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development, edited by S. Geertman, F. Toppen, and J. Stillwell, 417–432. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography.
Xu, C., D. Haase, and S. Pauleit. 2018. “The impact of different urban dynamics on green space availability: A multiple scenario modeling approach for the region of Munich, Germany.” Ecol. Indic. 93: 1–12.
Yusuf, S., S. Evenett, and W. Wu. 2001. Facets of globalization: International and local dimensions of development. Rep. No. WDP415. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146Issue 2June 2020

History

Received: Sep 26, 2018
Accepted: Oct 23, 2019
Published online: Apr 3, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 3, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria Univ. of Wellington, Kelburn Parade, Wellington 6012, New Zealand (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-4510. Email: [email protected]
Rita Dionisio [email protected]
Lecturer, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Simon Kingham [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share