Case Studies
Dec 17, 2019

Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Urban–Rural Construction Land Transition and Rural–Urban Migrants in Rapid-Urbanization Areas of Central China

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146, Issue 1

Abstract

Rapid urbanization accompanied with socioeconomic transformation in China has resulted in significant changes in urban–rural construction land and human–land relationships. Understanding the spatiotemporal characteristics of urban–rural construction land transition (URCLT) and rural–urban migrants (RUMs) is significant for the coordinated development of urban and rural areas. This research analyzed the spatiotemporal characteristics of URCLT and its decoupling relationship with RUMs in a case study of Hubei Province, central China, for the period of 2009–2016. The results corroborate the following: (1) the rapid growth of urban construction land and slow growth of rural construction land have resulted in the increasing proportion of urban construction land, (2) changes in per capita construction land indicate that urban construction land use is not intensive, and the extensive use of rural construction land is serious, and (3) the decoupling type of rural construction land transition and rural out-migrants is dominated by strong decoupling, whereas that of urban construction land transition and urban in-migrants is dominated by expansive negative decoupling. The relationship between URCLT and RUMs is not coordinated in most areas of Hubei Province. Such results provide an important premise for constituting feasible policies for urban–rural construction land regulation and sustainable urbanization.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data and models generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research is financially supported by the Key Research Program of Henan Higher Education (Grant No. 19A630015), the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Program of Education Department of Henan Province (Grant No. 2019-ZZJH-047), and the Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Innovation Fund of Henan Agricultural University (Grant No. KJCX2019B06).

References

Aide, T. M., and H. R. Grau. 2004. “Ecology—Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems.” Science 305 (5692): 1915–1916. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103179.
Andersson, E., S. Brogaard, and L. Olsson. 2011. “The political ecology of land degradation.” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36 (1): 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-033110-092827.
Antrop, M. 2004. “Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe.” Landscape Urban Plann. 67 (1–4): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4.
Antrop, M. 2005. “Why landscapes of the past are important for the future.” Landscape Urban Plann. 70 (1–2): 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002.
Arayama, Y., and K. Miyoshi. 2004. “Regional diversity and sources of economic growth in China.” World Econ. 27 (10): 1583–1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00668.x.
Banski, J., and M. Wesolowska. 2010. “Transformations in housing construction in rural areas of Poland’s Lublin region-Influence on the spatial settlement structure and landscape aesthetics.” Landscape Urban Plann. 94 (2): 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.08.005.
Bell, S., S. Alves, E. S. D. Oliveira, and A. Zuin. 2010. “Migration and land use change in Europe: A review.” Living Rev. Landscape Res. 4 (2010): 2. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2010-2.
Brown, D. G., K. M. Johnson, T. R. Loveland, and D. M. Theobald. 2005. “Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000” Ecol. Appl. 15 (6): 1851–1863. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5220.
Cai, E., Y. Jing, Y. Liu, C. Yin, Y. Gao, and J. Wei. 2018. “Spatial-temporal patterns and driving forces of ecological-living-production land in Hubei Province, Central China.” Sustainability 10 (1): 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010066.
Cao, G., and L. Tao. 2011. “Rising role of inland regions in China’s urbanization in the 21st Century: The new trend and its explanation.” Acta Geog. Sin. 66 (12): 1631–1643. https://doi.org/10.11821/xb201112005.
Carr, D. 2009. “Population and deforestation: Why rural migration matters.” Prog. Hum. Geogr. 33 (3): 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508096031.
Carr, D. L., L. Suter, and A. Barbieri. 2005. “Population dynamics and tropical deforestation: State of the debate and conceptual challenges.” Popul. Environ. 27 (1): 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-005-0014-x.
Chan, K. W. 2016. “Urbanization and rural-urban migration in China since 1982—A new baseline.” Mod. China 20 (3): 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/009770049402000301.
Chen, R., C. Ye, Y. Cai, X. Xing, and Q. Chen. 2014. “The impact of rural out-migration on land use transition in China: Past, present and trend.” Land Use Policy 40 (Sep): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.003.
De Espindola, G. M., E. L. Neves Da Costa Carneiro, and A. C. Facanha. 2017. “Four decades of urban sprawl and population growth in Teresina, Brazil.” Appl. Geogr. 79 (Feb): 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.018.
DeMarco, M., and J. Matusitz. 2011. “The impact of central-place theory on Wal-Mart.” J. Hum. Behav. Social Environ. 21 (2): 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2011.542991.
Fang, C., and X. Lin. 2009. “The eco-environmental guarantee for China’s urbanization process.” J. Geog. Sci. 19 (1): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-009-0095-z.
Grau, H. R., and M. Aide. 2008. “Globalization and land-use transitions in Latin America.” Ecol. Soc. 13 (2): 16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02559-130216.
Hecht, S. B., and S. S. Saatchi. 2007. “Globalization and forest resurgence: Changes in forest cover in El Salvador.” Bioscience 57 (8): 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570806.
Holmes, J. 1985. “Policy issues concerning rural settlement in Australia’s pastoral zone.” Aust. Geog. Stud. 23 (1): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8470.1985.tb00475.x.
Jin, G., X. Deng, X. Chu, Z. Li, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Optimization of land-use management for ecosystem service improvement: A review.” Phys. Chem. Earth 101 (Oct): 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2017.03.003.
Jin, G., X. Deng, X. Zhao, B. Guo, and J. Yang. 2018. “Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River economic belt between 2005 and 2014.” J. Geog. Sci. 28 (8): 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1545-2.
Jin, Q. 1988. “The history and current trends of research on rural settlement geography in China.” Acta Geog. Sin. 43 (4): 311–317. https://doi.org/10.11821/xb198804003.
Jing, G., K. Chen, P. Wang, B. Guo, Y. Dong, and J. Yang. 2019. “Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China plain.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 141 (Apr): 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.004.
Kates, R. W., and T. M. Parris. 2003. “Long-term trends and a sustainability transition.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100 (14): 8062–8067. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231331100.
Kiss, E. 2000. “Rural restructuring in Hungary in the period of socio-economic transition.” GeoJournal 51 (3): 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017507328301.
Lambin, E. F., and P. Meyfroidt. 2010. “Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change.” Land Use Policy 27 (2): 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.003.
Lewis, C. A., and A. Z. Mrara. 1986. “Rural settlements, mission settlements and rehabilitation in Transkei.” GeoJournal 12 (4): 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262360.
Lin, X., Y. Wang, S. Wang, and D. Wang. 2015. “Spatial differences and driving forces of land urbanization in China.” J. Geog. Sci. 25 (5): 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-015-1186-7.
Liu, J., et al. 2014. “Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s.” J. Geog. Sci. 24 (2): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6.
Liu, Y., E. Cai, Y. Jing, J. Gong, and Z. Wang. 2018. “Analyzing the decoupling between rural-to-urban migrants and urban land expansion in Hubei Province, China.” Sustainability 10 (2): 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020345.
Liu, Y., T. Luo, Z. Liu, X. Kong, J. Li, and R. Tan. 2015. “A comparative analysis of urban and rural construction land use change and driving forces: Implications for urban–rural coordination development in Wuhan, Central China.” Habitat Int. 47 (Jun): 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.012.
Long, H. 2014. “Land consolidation: An indispensable way of spatial restructuring in rural China.” J. Geog. Sci. 24 (2): 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-014-1083-5.
Long, H., and T. Li. 2012. “The coupling characteristics and mechanism of farmland and rural housing land transition in China.” J. Geog. Sci. 22 (3): 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-012-0946-x.
Long, H., Y. Li, Y. Liu, M. Woods, and J. Zou. 2012. “Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by ‘increasing vs. decreasing balance’ land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages.” Land Use Policy 29 (1): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.04.003.
McDonald, R. I., R. T. Forman, and P. Kareiva. 2010. “Open space loss and land inequality in United States’ cities, 1990–2000.” PLoS One 5 (3): e9509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009509.
MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2010. Code for classification of urban construction land use and planning standards of development land. GB50137. Beijing: MHURD.
MLRC (Ministry of Land and Resource of China). 2007. Current land use condition classification. GB/T21010. Beijing: MLRC.
MLRC (Ministry of Land and Resource of China). 2016. Opinions on the establishment of a mechanism for linking the scale of urban construction land increase and the number of rural-to-urban migrants. Beijing: MLRC.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2005. “Decoupling: Illustrating some open questions on the production impact of different policy instruments.” OECD Pap. 5 (11): 61–102. https://doi.org/10.1787/oecd_papers-v5-art39-en.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2006. “Decoupling: A conceptual overview.” OECD Pap. 5 (11): 37. https://doi.org/10.1787/oecd_papers-v5-art37-en.
Ojima, D., E. Moran, W. Mcconnell, M. Stafford Smith, G. Laumann, J. Morais, and B. Young. 2005. Global land project: Science plan and implementation strategy. Stockholm, Sweden: IGBP Secretariat.
Oldfield, P. 2005. “Rural settlement and economic development in Southern Italy: Troia and its contado, c.1020 - c.1230.” J. Medieval Hist. 31 (4): 327–345.
Rudel, T. K. 1998. “Is there a forest transition? Deforestation, reforestation, and development.” Rural Sociol. 63 (4): 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00691.x.
Rudel, T. K., D. Bates, and R. Machinguiashi. 2002. “A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 92 (1): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00281.
Sadorsky, P. 2014. “The effect of urbanization and industrialization on energy use in emerging economies: Implications for sustainable development.” Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 73 (2): 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12072.
SBH (Statistics Bureau of Hubei). 2011. Hubei statistical yearbook 2010. Wuhan, China: China Statistics Press.
SBH (Statistics Bureau of Hubei). 2018. Hubei statistical yearbook 2017. Wuhan, China: China Statistics Press.
Seto, K. C., A. Reenberg, C. G. Boone, M. Fragkias, D. Haase, T. Langanke, P. Marcotullio, D. K. Munroe, B. Olah, and D. Simon. 2012. “Urban land teleconnections and sustainability.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (20): 7687–7692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117622109.
Song, W., and M. Liu. 2014. “Assessment of decoupling between rural settlement area and rural population in China.” Land Use Policy 39 (Jul): 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.002.
Stern, D. I., M. S. Common, and E. B. Barbier. 1996. “Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development.” World Dev. 24 (7): 1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0.
Tapio, P. 2005. “Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001.” Transp. Policy 12 (2): 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001.
Walters, B. B. 2017. “Explaining rural land use change and reforestation: A causal-historical approach.” Land Use Policy 67 (Sep): 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.008.
Wegren, S. K., D. J. O’Brien, and V. V. Patsiorkovsky. 2013. “The economics of rural households in Russia: Impact of village location.” Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 49 (2): 200–214. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.49.2.200.
Zhang, K. H., and S. F. Song. 2003. “Rural-urban migration and urbanization in China: Evidence from time-series and cross-section analyses.” China Econ. Rev. 14 (4): 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2003.09.018.
Zhou, G., Y. He, C. Tang, T. Yu, G. Xiao, and T. Zhong. 2013. “Dynamic mechanism and present situation of rural settlement evolution in China.” J. Geog. Sci. 23 (3): 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1025-7.
Zhu, Y., and L. Lin. 2016. “Studies on the temporal processes of migration and their spatial effects in China: Progress and prospect.” Sci. Geogr. Sin. 36 (6): 820–828. https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.06.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146Issue 1March 2020

History

Received: Jan 20, 2019
Accepted: Jul 22, 2019
Published online: Dec 17, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 17, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Enxiang Cai [email protected]
Lecturer, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural Univ., Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, PR China; Research Fellow, Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan Univ., 129 Luoyu Rd., Wuhan 430079, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Lecturer, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural Univ., Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, PR China; Research Fellow, Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural Univ., Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, PR China; Research Fellow, Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, PR China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3886-7147. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share