Technical Papers
Aug 6, 2019

Revisiting Publicness in Assessment of Contemporary Urban Spaces

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 145, Issue 4

Abstract

Public spaces have long defined the structure of cities and articulated the different private spaces where urban life unfolds. Over the past decades, profound asymmetries have emerged from the evolving social, economic, and spatial structures within urban areas. The growing role of private authorities in urban development and management has created new arenas for public life, changing the role of public spaces and the way society interacts with the city and the broader public sphere. Instead of attempting to understand public space through a specific thematic lens, the concept of publicness can explain the complex intricacies that justify its public nature, essential to clarifying this contemporary positioning. To properly address the current challenges of the public–private urban paradigm, the concept of publicness needs to combine distinct physical features, operation schemes, and management profiles. This paper presents a novel approach toward the use of publicness as the foundation for a space evaluation model, creating a tool to successfully integrate both new and existing spaces in the contemporary urban realm.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Portuguese National Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for their financial support.

References

Akkar, M. 2005. “The changing ‘publicness’ of contemporary public spaces: A case study of the Grey’s Monument Area, Newcastle upon Tyne.” Urban Des. Int. 10 (2): 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000138.
Amin, A. 2006. “The good city.” Urban Stud. 43 (5–6): 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600676717.
Atkinson, R. 2003. “Domestication by cappuccino or a revenge on urban space? Control and empowerment in the management of public spaces.” Urban Stud. 40 (9): 1829–1843. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000106627.
Benn, S., and G. Gaus. 1983. “The liberal conception of the public and private.” In Public and private in social life, edited by S. Benn and G. Gaus, 31–65. London: Croom Helm.
Bentley, I., S. McGlynn, and G. Smith. 1985. Responsive environments: A manual for designers. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Briffault, R. 1999. “A government for our time. Business improvement districts and urban governance.” Colum. L. Rev. 99: 365–477.
Burton, E., and L. Mitchell. 2006. Inclusive urban design: Streets for life. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Carmona, M. 2010. “Contemporary public space: Critique and classification, part one: Critique.” J. Urban Des. 15 (1): 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903435651.
Carmona, M. 2015. “Re-theorizing contemporary public space: A new narrative and a new normative.” J. Urbanism: Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustainability 8 (4): 373–405.
Carmona, M., and C. De Magalhães. 2006. “Public space management: Present and potential.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 49 (1): 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500373162.
Carmona, M., T. Heath, T. Oc, and S. Tiesdell. 2003. Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Carmona, M., and F. Wunderlich. 2013. Capital spaces. Abingdon: Routledge.
Carr, S., M. Francis, L. Rivlin, and A. Stone. 1992. Public space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. “Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3 (4): 339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(79)90229-7.
Cooper-Marcus, C., and C. Francis. 1998. “Post-occupancy evaluation.” In People places: Design guidelines for urban open space. Edited by C. Cooper-Marcus and C. Francis, 345–355. New York: Wiley.
Cullen, G. 1961. The concise townscape. New York: Reinhold.
Davis, M. 1992. “Fortress Los Angles: The militarization of urban space.” In Variations on a theme park: The New American City and the end of public space, edited by M. Sorkin, 221–264. New York: Noonday Press.
Dawes, J. 2008. “Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales.” Int. J. Market Res. 50 (1): 61–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106.
De Magalhães, C. 2010. “Public space and the contracting-out of publicness: A framework for analysis.” J. Urban Des. 15 (4): 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502347.
De Magalhães, C., and S. Trigo. 2017. “‘Clubification’ of urban public spaces? The withdrawal of the re-definition of the role of local government in the management of public spaces.” J. Urban Des. 22 (6): 738–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1336059.
Denscombe, M. 2010. The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. 4th ed. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Ellin, N. 1996. Postmodern urbanism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Flusty, S. 2001. “The banality of interdiction: Surveillance, control and the displacement of diversity.” Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 25 (3): 658–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00335.
Francis, M. 1987. “Urban open spaces.” In Vol. 1 of Advances in environment, behaviour, and design, edited by E. H. Zube and G. T. Moore, 71–106. New York: Springer.
Francis, M. 1989. “Control as a dimension of public space quality.” In Public places and spaces, edited by I. Altman and E. H. Zube, 147–172. New York: Plenum Press.
Fraser, N. 1992. “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.” In Habermas and the public sphere, edited by C. Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gehl, J. 2010. Cities for people. London: Island Press.
Gehl, J., and L. Gemzoe. 2001. New city spaces. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hinkin, T. R. 1998. “A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires.” Organ. Res. Methods 1 (1): 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106.
Howell, P. 1993. “Public space and the public sphere: Political-theory and the historical geography of modernity.” Environ. Plann. D: Soc. Space 11 (3): 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1068/d110303.
Imrie, R., and P. Hall. 2001. Inclusive design: Designing and developing accessible environments. London: Spon Press.
Imrie, R. F., and P. E. Wells. 1993. “Disablism, planning, and the built environment.” Environ. Plann. C: Government Policy 11 (2): 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1068/c110213.
Jacobs, A., and D. Appleyard. 1987. “Toward an urban design manifesto.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 53 (1): 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368708976642.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Kohn, M. 2004. Brave new neighbourhoods: The privatization of public spaces. London: Routledge.
Komorita, S. S., and W. Graham. 1965. “Number of scale points and the reliability of scales.” Educ. Psychol. Meas. 25 (4): 987–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446502500404.
Krier, R. 1979. Urban space. London: Academy Editions.
Langstraat, F., and L. Van Melik. 2013. “Challenging the ‘End of Public Space’: A comparative analysis of publicness in British and Dutch urban spaces.” J. Urban Des. 18 (3): 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.800451.
Lefebvre, H. 1996. “The right to the city.” In Writings on cities. Translated and edited by E. Kofman and E. Lebas, 147–159. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lofland, L. H. 1989. “Social-life in the public realm: A review.” J. Contemp. Ethnography 17 (4): 453–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124189017004004.
Lopes, M. N., and A. S. Camanho. 2013. “Public green space use and consequences on urban vitality: An assessment of European cities.” Social Indic. Res. 113 (3): 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0106-9.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and T. Banerjee. 1998. Urban design downtown: Poetics and politics of form. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Low, S., and N. Smith. 2006. The politics of public space. London: Routledge.
Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lynch, K. 1984. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Madanipour, A. 1996. Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Madanipour, A. 1999. “Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities?” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 26 (6): 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260879.
Madanipour, A. 2003. Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge.
Madanipour, A. 2004. “Marginal public spaces in European cities.” J. Urban Des. 9 (3): 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480042000283869.
Matell, M. S., and J. Jacoby. 1972. “Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties.” J. Appl. Psychol. 56 (6): 506–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033601.
Mitchell, J. 2001. “Business improvement districts and the ‘new’ revitalization of downtown.” Econ. Dev. Q. 15 (2): 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240101500201.
Montgomery, J. 1995. “Urban vitality and the culture of cities.” Plann. Pract. Res. 10 (2): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459550036649.
Montgomery, J. 1998. “Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design.” J. Urban Des. 3 (1): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418.
Németh, J. 2009. “Defining a public: The management of privately owned public space.” Urban Stud. 46 (11): 2463–2490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342903.
Németh, J., and J. Hollander. 2010. “Security zones and New York City’s shrinking public space.” Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 34 (1): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00899.x.
Németh, J., and S. Schmidt. 2007. “Toward a methodology for measuring the security of publicly accessible spaces.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 73 (3): 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708977978.
Németh, J., and S. Schmidt. 2011. “The privatization of public space: Modelling and measuring publicness.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 38 (1): 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36057.
Nulty, D. D. 2008. “The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done?” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 33 (3): 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231.
Oc, T., and S. Tiesdell. 1999. “The fortress, the panoptic, the regulatory and the animated: Planning and urban design approaches to safer city centres.” Landscape Res. 24 (3): 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426399908706563.
Preston, C. C., and A. M. Colman. 2000. “Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.” Acta Psychologica 104 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5.
Project for Public Spaces. 2000. How to turn a place around: A handbook for creating successful public spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
Rossi, A. 1966. The architecture of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rowe, C., and F. Koetter. 1978. Collage city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sennett, R. 1992. The fall of public man. London: Penguin Books.
Shaftoe, H. 2008. Convivial urban spaces: Creating effective public places. London: Earthscan.
Sorkin, M. 1992. “See you in Disneyland.” In Variations on a theme park: The New American City and the end of public space, edited by M. Sorkin, 205–232. New York: Hill and Wang.
Tibbalds, F. 2001. Making people-friendly towns: Improving the public environment in towns and cities. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Van Melik, R., I. Van Aalst, and J. Van Weesp. 2007. “Fear and fantasy in the public domain: The development of secured and themed urban space.” J. Urban Des. 12 (1): 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800601071170.
Van Melik, R., and E. van der Krabben. 2016. “Co-production of public space: Policy translations from New York City to the Netherlands.” Town Plann. Rev. 87 (2): 139–158.
Varna, G., and S. Tiesdell. 2010. “Assessing the publicness of public space: The star model of publicness.” J. Urban Des. 15 (4): 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502350.
Whyte, W. 1980. The social life of small urban spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
Whyte, W. 1988. City: Rediscovering the Centre. New York: Doubleday.
Worpole, K., and K. Knox. 2007. The social value of public spaces. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Zukin, S. 1995. The cultures of cities. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 145Issue 4December 2019

History

Received: Sep 19, 2018
Accepted: Feb 26, 2019
Published online: Aug 6, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 6, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Researcher, CITTA—Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Porto, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0790-3344. Email: [email protected]
Professors, CITTA—Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Porto, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1776-4985. Email: [email protected]
Paulo Pinho [email protected]
Professor, CITTA—Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Porto, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share