Technical Papers
Feb 10, 2017

Valuing Factors Influencing Bicycle Route Choice Using a Stated-Preference Survey

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 143, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a willingness-to-pay (WTP)–based approach to quantify a bicyclist’s perception toward a few key attributes related to bicycle route choice. To check for city-specific influence on bicycle route choice, two small-sized Indian cities, Kharagpur and Asansol with different sociodemographic characteristics have been chosen. A stated-preference (SP) survey is designed to develop multinomial logit (MNL) and random parameter logit (RPL) models for a complete dataset. Additionally, heterogeneity around the means of random parameters is investigated in RPL models with respect to socioeconomic factors, such as income, motorized two-wheeler (TW) ownership, and user type (choice/captive). Subsequently, WTP estimates are derived for key determinants influencing bicycle route choice, namely, road width, level of risk, route visibility, and bicycle journey time. In general, RPL models are observed to be statistically superior and able to represent the behavioral data better than MNL models. Results reveal that level of risk (measure of safety) is perceived as the top most attribute influencing bicyclist’s route choice irrespective of city characteristics, followed by route visibility and road width. Although modeled with income heterogeneity, bicycle journey time was the most valued bicycle journey time attribute among less-affluent users in Kharagpur. On the other hand, Asansol users valued bicycle journey time four to five times lesser and preferred safer routes than shorter routes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding from HUDCO, HSMI, Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, Government of India, to carry out this study. The authors wish to acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for their detailed and helpful comments for improvements of the manuscript.

References

Arasan, V. T., Rengaraju, V. R., and Rao, K. K. (1994). “Characteristics of trips by foot and bicycle modes in Indian city.” J. Transp. Eng., 283–294.
Basu, D., and Maitra, B. (2010). “Stated preference approach for valuation of travel time displayed as traffic information on a VMS board.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 214–224.
Cui, Y., Mishra, S., and Welch, T. (2014). “Land use effects on bicycle ridership: A framework for state planning agencies.” J. Transp. Geogr., 41, 220–228.
Das, S. S., Maitra, B., and Boltze, M. (2009). “Valuing travel attributes of rural feeder service to bus stop: Comparison of different logit model specifications.” J. Transp. Eng., 330–337.
De Aguiar, P. F., Bourguignon, B., Khots, M. S., Massart, D. L., and Phan-Than-Luu, R. (1995). “D-optimal designs.” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 30(2), 199–210.
Dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Bordagaray, M., and Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2014). “Modeling the effects of pro bicycle infrastructure and policies toward sustainable urban mobility.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 1–7.
Dill, J., and Carr, T. (2003). “Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: If you build them, commuters will use them.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1828, 116–123.
Dill, J., and Gliebe, J. (2008). “Understanding and measuring bicycling behavior: A focus on travel time and route choice.”, Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium, Portland, OR.
Dill, J., and Voros, K. (2007). “Factors affecting bicycling demand: Initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon region.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2031, 9–17.
Gatersleben, B., and Appleton, K. M. (2007). “Contemplating cycling to work: Attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 41(4), 302–312.
Greene, W. (2007). “NLOGIT student reference guide table of contents.” Econometric Software, Plainview, NY.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., and Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Hood, J., Sall, E., and Charlton, B. (2011). “A GPS-based bicycle route choice model for San Francisco, California.” Transp. Lett., 3(1), 63–75.
Hopkinson, P., and Wardman, M. (1996). “Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities.” Transp. Policy, 3(4), 241–249.
Hunt, J. D., and Abraham, J. (2007). “Influences on bicycle use.” Transportation, 34(4), 453–470.
Jain, H., and Tiwari, G. (2010). “Discrete route choice model for bicyclists in Pune, India.” Urban Transp. J., 9(2), 1–12.
JMP version 10 [Computer software]. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Koppelman, F. S., and Bhat, C. (2006). “A self-instructing course in mode choice modeling: Multinomial and nested logit models.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC.
Krizek, K. J. (2006). “Two approaches to valuing some of bicycle facilities’ presumed benefits.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 72(3), 309–320.
Krizek, K. J., Barnes, G., and Thompson, K. (2009). “Analyzing the effect of bicycle facilities on commute mode share over time.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 66–73.
Maitra, B., Dandapat, S., and Chintakayala, P. (2014). “Differences between the perceptions of captive and choice riders toward bus service attributes and the need for segmentation of bus services in urban India.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 1–8.
Maitra, B., Ghosh, S., Das, S. S., and Boltze, M. (2013). “Effect of model specification on valuation of travel attributes: A case study of rural feeder service to bus stop.” J. Transp. Lit., 7(2), 8–28.
Majumdar, B. B., Mitra, S., and Pareekh, P. (2015). “Methodological framework to obtain key factors influencing choice of bicycle as a mode.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2512, 110–121.
Moudon, A. V., et al. (2005). “Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 10(3), 245–261.
N-Logit [Computer software]. Econometric Software, Plainview, NY.
Phanikumar, C. V., and Maitra, B. (2006). “Valuing urban bus attributes: An experience in Kolkata.” J. Public Transp., 9(2), 69–87.
Phanikumar, C. V., and Maitra, B. (2010). “Modeling generalized cost of travel and its application for improvement of taxies in Kolkata.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 42–49.
Poorfakhraei, A., and Rowangould, G. M. (2015). “Estimating welfare change associated with improvements in urban bicycling facilities.” J. Transp. Eng., .
Pucher, J., Korattyswaropam, N., Mittal, N., and Ittyerah, N. (2005). “Urban transport crisis in India.” Transp. Policy, 12(3), 185–198.
Rodriguez, D., and Joo, J. (2004). “The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 9(2), 151–173.
Sener, I., Eluru, N., and Bhat, C. (2009). “An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas.” Transportation, 36(5), 511–539.
Shafizadeh, K., and Niemeier, D. (1997). “Bicycle journey-to-work: Travel behavior characteristics and spatial attributes.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1578, 84–90.
Stinson, M., and Bhat, C. (2003). “An analysis of commuter bicyclist route choice using a stated preference survey.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1828, 107–115.
Tilahun, N. Y., Levinson, D. M., and Krizek, K. J. (2007). “Trails, lanes, or traffic: The value of different bicycle facilities using an adaptive stated preference survey.” Transp. Res. Part A, 41(4), 287–301.
Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Triefenbach, F. (2008). “Design of experiments: The D-optimal approach and its implementation as a computer algorithm.” Bachelor’s thesis, Information and Communication Technology, Umea Univ., Dept. of Computing Science, Sweden.
Wilbur Smith Associates. (2008). “Study on traffic and transportation: Policies and strategies in urban areas in India.” Ministry of Urban Development, India.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 143Issue 3September 2017

History

Received: Feb 23, 2016
Accepted: Nov 17, 2016
Published online: Feb 10, 2017
Discussion open until: Jul 10, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bandhan Bandhu Majumdar, S.M.ASCE
Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India.
Sudeshna Mitra [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share