Technical Papers
Feb 1, 2016

Recreation Space or Urban Land Reserve? Land-Use Zoning Patterns and the Transformation of Open Space in Hong Kong

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 3

Abstract

Open space planning is a common issue in urban studies. Under development pressures and urbanization, open space is prone to manipulation and erosion by governments and developers to achieve material gains and parochial interests. This paper contributes to the ongoing discussions about open space development using Hong Kong as an empirical case. The vulnerability of open space and the flexible planning regulation in the use of open space land are highlighted through an examination of existing open space zoning patterns and the planning application data for land-use changes. It is argued that open space tends to act as public land reserves rather than serving the original planning intention of recreation under the current open space planning system. This empirical finding is useful for planners to reconsider the effectiveness of the open space planning system and open space protection.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the comments from the anonymous reviewers. This study is sponsored by the General Research Fund of Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Project No. 527910), Hong Kong Polytechnic University Research Grant (Project No. G-U606), and University of Hong Kong Postgraduate Scholarship.

References

Albert, G., Abo-Kalla, H., and Baron, M. (2011). “Transport and environmental variables and the impact of cultural differences on playground use.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 291–297.
Allen, J. (2006). “Ambient power: Berlin’s Potsdamer Platz and the seductive logic of public spaces.” Urban Stud., 43(2), 441–455.
Aspinall, P. A., Ward Thompson, C. S. A., Sugiyama, T., Brice, R., and Vickers, A. (2010). “Preference and relative importance for environmental attributes of neighbourhood open space in older people.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des., 37(6), 1022–1039.
Bae, H. (2011). “Urban stream restoration in Korea: Design considerations and residents’ willingness to pay.” Urban For. Urban Greening, 10(2), 119–126.
Baycan-Levent, T., and Nijkamp, P. (2009). “Planning and management of urban green spaces in Europe: Comparative analysis.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 1–12.
Berry, D. (1976). “Preservation of open space and the concept of value.” Am. J. Econ. Sociol., 35(2), 113–124.
Cheung, L. T. O. (2013). “Improving visitor management approaches for the changing preferences and behaviours of country park visitors in Hong Kong.” Nat. Resour. Forum, 37(4), 231–241.
Coutts, C. (2008). “Multiple case studies of the influence of land-use type on the distribution of uses along urban river greenways.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des., 35(3), 552–563.
Cybriwsky, R. (1999). “Changing patterns of urban public space.” Cities, 16(4), 223–231.
Freestone, R., and Nichols, D. (2004). “Realising new leisure opportunities for old urban parks: The internal reserve in Australia.” Landscape Urban Plann., 68(1), 109–120.
Giles-Corti, B., et al. (2005). “Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?” Am. J. Prev. Med., 28(2S2), 169–176.
Gómez, F., Jabaloyes, J., Montero, L., De Vicente, V., and Valcuende, M. (2011). “Green areas, the most significant indicator of the sustainability of cities: Research on their utility for urban planning.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 311–328.
Herrington, S., and Studtmann, K. (1998). “Landscape interventions: New directions for the design of children’s outdoor play environments.” Landscape Urban Plann., 42(2-4), 191–205.
Jim, C. Y. (1986). “The country parks programme and countryside conservation in Hong Kong.” Environmentalist, 6(4), 259–270.
Jim, C. Y. (1989). “Changing patterns of country-park recreation in Hong Kong.” Geogr. J., 155(2), 167–178.
Lindsey, G. (1999). “Use of urban greenways: Insights from Indianapolis.” Landscape Urban Plann., 45(2-3), 145–157.
Lindsey, G., and Nguyen, D. B. L. (2004). “Use of greenway trails in Indiana.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 213–217.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2003). “Children’s common grounds: A study of intergroup relations among children in public settings.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 69(2), 130–143.
Maruani, T. (2011). “The role of courts in open space conservation: Lessons from the Israeli experience.” Landsc. Urban Plann., 100(4), 364–368.
McConnachie, M. M., and Shackleton, C. M. (2010). “Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa.” Habitat Int., 34(2), 244–248.
Oh, K., and Jeong, S. (2007). “Assessing the spatial distribution of urban parks using GIS.” Landscape Urban Plann., 82(1–2), 25–32.
Planning Department. (2015). Hong Kong planning standards and guidelines, Hong Kong.
Renne, J. L., and Bennett, P. (2010). “Giving parks back to people: A transportation study of New Orleans City Park with implications for improving public health.” Local Environ., 15(9-10), 879–890.
Rietveld, P., and Wagtendonk, A. J. (2004). “The location of new residential areas and the preservation of open space: Experiences in the Netherlands.” Environ. Plann. A, 36(11), 2047–2063.
Samant, S. (2004). “Manifestation of the urban public realm at the water edges in India—A case study of the ghats in Ujjain.” Cities, 21(3), 233–253.
Schmidt, S. J. (2008). “The evolving relationship between open space preservation and local planning practice.” J. Plann. Hist., 7(2), 91–112.
Talen, E. (2010). “The spatial logic of parks.” J. Urban Des., 15(4), 473–491.
Tan, K. W. (2006). “A greenway network for Singapore.” Landscape Urban Plann., 76(1–4), 45–66.
Tang, B. S., and Wong, S. W. (2008). “A longitudinal study of open space zoning and development in Hong Kong.” Landscape Urban Plann., 87(4), 258–268.
Tian, Y., Jim, C. Y., and Tao, Y. (2012). “Challenges and strategies for greening the compact city of Hong Kong.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 101–109.
Town Planning Board. (2014). “Statutory planning portal.” 〈http://ozp.tpb.gov.hk/default.aspx〉 (Sep. 29, 2014).
Town Planning Office, Buildings and Lands Department. (1989). Hong Kong planning standards and guidelines, Hong Kong.
Tsou, K. W., Hung, Y. T., and Chang, Y. L. (2005). “An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities.” Cities, 22(6), 424–435.
van Dijk, T., and van der Wulp, N. (2010). “Not in my open space: Anatomy of neighbourhood activism in defence of land use conversion.” Landscape Urban Plann., 96(1), 19–28.
Vayona, A. (2011). “Investigating the preferences of individuals in redeveloping waterfronts: The case of the port of Thessaloniki–Greece.” Cities, 28(5), 424–432.
Wakefield, S. (2007). “Great expectations: Waterfront redevelopment and the Hamilton Harbour Waterfront Trail.” Cities, 24(4), 298–310.
Ward Thompson, C. (2002). “Urban open space in the 21st century.” Landscape Urban Plann., 60(2), 59–72.
Wong, K., and Domroes, M. (2005). “The visual quality of urban park scenes of Kowloon Park, Hong Kong: Likeability, affective appraisal, and cross-cultural perspectives.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des., 32(4), 617–632.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142Issue 3September 2016

History

Received: Oct 7, 2014
Accepted: Sep 11, 2015
Published online: Feb 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jul 1, 2016
Published in print: Sep 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Darren Man-wai Cheung, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Urban Planning and Design, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Rd., Hong Kong (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Bo-sin Tang
Professor, Dept. of Urban Planning and Design, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Rd., Hong Kong.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share