Technical Papers
Oct 12, 2015

Measuring Walk Access to Transit in Terms of Sidewalk Availability, Quality, and Connectivity

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 2

Abstract

Walking as the major transit access mode confers health benefits to the public while presenting planners with the challenge of overcoming walk-accessibility costs which deter mass-transit use. The literature indicates sidewalk quality, availability, and street network connectedness are crucial access factors in walking to transit stations. However, the literature has not yielded a pragmatic tool for planners to assess walk access to transit stations in these terms. This paper offers a sidewalk availability and quality index (SAQI) and a connectivity index (CI) which grant insight into the pedestrian-rider’s ability to access mass transit through the built environment. The methods are presented through an analysis of the Orange Line bus rapid transit (BRT) in the San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles. The analysis of the Orange Line using the SAQI and CI method determines which stops are least accessible to riders and indicates access solutions by identifying the overriding problem along the axes of quantity, quality, and design. Regression analysis concludes that there is a significant positive relationship between sidewalk connectedness and the use of public transportation, indicating the indices are useful as measures of walk-access costs and predictors of ridership.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, California State University, Northridge for funding this project.

References

1000 Friends of Oregon. (1993). “Making the land-use transportation air quality connection: The pedestrian environment.” Portland, OR.
Aultman-Hall, L., Roorda, M., and Baetz, B. (1997). “Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 10–17.
Axelson, P. W., Wong, K. M., and Kirschbaum, J. B. (1999). “Development of an assessment process to evaluate sidewalk accessibility.” 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Cervero, R., and Kockelman, K. (1997). “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design.” Trans. Res. Part D, 2(3), 199–219.
Crowley, D. F., and Shalaby, A. S. (2009). “Access walking distance, transit use, and transit-oriented development in North York City Center, Toronto, Canada.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 96–105.
Estupinan, N., and Rodríguez, D. A. (2008). “The relationship between urban form and station boardings for Bogota’s BRT.” Trans. Res. Part A, 42(2), 296–306.
Evans-Cowley, J. (2006). “Sidewalk planning and policies in small cities.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 71–75.
Foda, M. A., and Osman, O. A. (2010). “Using GIS for measuring transit stops accessibility considering actual pedestrian roads network.” J. Public Transp., 13(4), 23–40.
Guerra, K., Cervero, R., and Tishler, D. (2012). “Half-Mile circle: Does it represent transit station catchments?”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 101–109.
Gutiérreza, J., Cardozob, O. D., and García-Palomaresa, J. C. (2011). “Transit ridership forecasting at station level: An approach based on distance-decay weighted regression.” J. Transp. Geogr., 19(6), 1081–1092.
Handy, S., and Clifton, K. (2001). “Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Possibilities and practicalities.” J. Transp. Stat., 4(2/3), 67–78.
Handy, S., Clifton, K., and Fisher, J. (1998). “The effectiveness of land use policies as a strategy for reducing automobile dependence: A study of Austin neighborhoods.”, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
Hess, D. B. (2012). “Walking to the bus: Perceived versus actual walking distance to bus stops for older adults.” J. Transp., 39(2), 247–266.
Hess, D. B., and Russel, J. K. (2012). “Influence of built environment and transportation access on body mass index of older adults: Survey results from Erie County, New York.” J. Trans. Policy, 20, 128–137.
Hirsch, J. A., Moore, K. A., and Evenson, K. R. (2013). “Walk score® and transit score® and walking in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.” Am. J. Prev. Med., 45(2), 158–166.
Jiang, Y. P., Zegras, C, and Mehndiratta, S. (2012). “Walk the line: Station context, corridor type and bus rapid transit walk access in Jinan, China.” J. Transp. Geogr., 20(1), 1–14.
Maghelal, P. K. (2011). “Walking to transit: Influence of built environment at varying distances.” Inst. Transp. Eng., 81(2), 38–43.
McCormack, G., Friednereich, C., Sandalack, B., Giles-Corti, B., Doyle-Baker, P., and Shiell, A. (2012). “The relationship between cluster-analysis derived walkability and local recreational and transportation walking among Canadian adults.” Health Place, 18(5), 1079–1087.
Monteiro, F. B., and Campos, V. B. (2012). “A proposal of indicators for evaluation of the urban space for pedestrians and cyclists in access to mass transit station.” Procedia Social Behav. Sci., 54(4), 637–645.
Morency, C., Trépanier, M., and Demers, M. (2011). “Walking to transit: An unexpected source of physical activity.” J. Transp. Policy, 18(6), 800–806.
MTA (Metropolitan Transportation Authority). (2008). “San Fernando Valley North-South transit corridor regionally significant transportation investment study.” Los Angeles.
Muraleetharan, H. T. (2007). “Overall level of service of urban walking environment and its influence on pedestrian route choice behavior: Analysis of pedestrian travel in Sapporo, Japan.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 7–17.
Peiravian, F., Derrible1, S., and Ijaz, F. (2014). “Development and application of the pedestrian environment index (PEI).” J. Transp. Geogr., 39, 73–84.
Pikora, T. J., Giles-Corti, B., Knuinman, M. W., Bull, F. C., Jamrozik, K., and Donovan, R. J. (2006). “Neighborhood environmental factors correlated with walking near homes: Using SPACES.” Med Sci. Sports Exercise, 38(4), 708–714.
Rodriguez, D. A., Brisson, E. M., and Estupiñán, N. (2009). “The relationship between segment-level built environment attributes and pedestrian activity around Bogotá’s BRT stations.” Transp. Res. Part D, 14(7), 470–478.
Rodriguez, D. A., and Joo, J. (2004). “The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment.” Transp. Res. Part D, 9(2), 151–173.
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., and Frank, L. D. (2003). “Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures.” Ann. Behav. Med., 25(2), 80–91.
Schlossberg, M., and Brown, N. (2004). “Comparing transit-oriented development sites by walkability indicators.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 34–42.
Schroeder, P., and Wilbur, M. (2013). “2012 National survey of bicyclist and pedestrian attitudes and behavior.”, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
Sha, M. A., Lownes, N. E., Osleeb, J. P., and Bertolaccini, K. (2013). “A method to define public transit opportunity space.” J. Transp. Geogr., 28, 144–154.
Stoll, M. A. (1999). “Spatial job search, spatial mismatch, and the employment and wages of racial and ethnic groups in Los Angeles.” J. Urban Econ., 46(1), 129–155.
Sung, H., and Oh, J. (2011). “Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: Identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea.” Cities, 28(1), 70–82.
Surgeon General. (1999). “Health and physical activity.” National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Washi, R. A., Ross, N. A., and El-Geneidy, A. M. (2013). “Achieving recommended daily physical activity levels through commuting by public transportation: Unpacking individual and contextual influences.” Health Place, 23, 18–25.
Witten, K., et al. (2012). “Neighborhood built environment and transport and leisure physical activity: Findings using objective exposure and outcome measure in New Zealand.” Environ. Health Perspect., 120(7), 971–977.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142Issue 2June 2016

History

Received: Feb 20, 2014
Accepted: Jun 8, 2015
Published online: Oct 12, 2015
Discussion open until: Mar 12, 2016
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mintesnot Woldeamanuel [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, California State Univ., 18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, CA 91330 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Andrew Kent
Graduate Student, Dept. of Planning, Policy and Design, Univ. of California, 300 Social Ecology I., Irvine, CA 92697.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share