Technical Papers
Jun 12, 2015

Prioritizing Pedestrian Corridors Using Walkability Performance Metrics and Decision Analysis

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 1

Abstract

Recent sustainability initiatives have shown that targeting pedestrian infrastructure improvement programs can enhance walkability and reduce traffic volume. Smart growth planning supports the need not only to build additional nonmotorized facilities, but also to improve the planning, prioritization, and funding process. Identifying pedestrian infrastructure needs through the development of an index can resolve inconsistencies and inequities regarding funding sustainable transportation infrastructure. This research investigates how transportation planning agencies can improve the process of prioritizing pedestrian improvement projects through two objectives: (1) the development of the pedestrian corridor improvement index (PCII); and (2) the application of PCII to pathways in Union County, Pennsylvania, as a case study. The PCII integrates pedestrian performance metrics with the analytic hierarchy process to assist in the prioritization of pedestrian pathway improvements. In order to test the applicability and relevance of the index to a real world network, four pathways in Union County, Pennsylvania, are evaluated and recommendations on the implementation process are provided. The PCII serves as a tool for agencies to enhance the decision-making process for planning pedestrian improvement projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Jamie Hendry Sustainable Studies Fund and the Civil and Environmental Engineering Chiloro Fund at Bucknell University for supporting this research.

References

AASHTO. (2004). Guide for the planning, design, and operation of pedestrian facilities, 1st Ed., U.S. DOT, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2005). Roadway lighting design guide, U.S. DOT, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2011). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 6th Ed., U.S. DOT, Washington, DC.
Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada.
Bowman, B., Vecellio, R., and Haynes, D. (1994). “Strategies for increasing bicycle and pedestrian safety and use.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 105–114.
Carreno, M., Willis, A., and Stradling, S. (2002). “Quality of service for pedestrians: Closing the gaps in knowledge.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Traffic and Transportation Studies, ASCE, Reston, VA, 326–333.
City of Portland. (1998). “Portland pedestrian design guide.” Office of Transportation Engineering and Development-Pedestrian Transportation Program, 〈https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/84048〉 (May 15, 2014).
Currin, T. R. (2001). “Spot speed study: Determining roadway speeds.” Introduction to traffic engineering: A manual for data collection and analysis, Cengage Learning, Stamford, CT.
Durham BPAC (Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee). (2006). “Durhamwalks: Appendix 5.” Durham pedestrian path inventory field guide, 〈http://durhamnc.gov/ich/op/dot/documents/dwf_app05.pdf〉.
EPA. (2014). “Smart growth.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth〉.
Evans-Cowley, J. (2006). “Sidewalk planning and policies in small cities.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 71–75.
ExpertChoice. (2014). “Expert choice desktop 11.5.” 〈http://expertchoice.com/〉 (Jun. 1, 2014).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2012). “Toolbox for regional policy analysis report-case study: Orange county, CA.” U.S. DOT, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/tools/toolbox/orange_county/〉 (May 12, 2014).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2013). “Fact sheet—MAP-21: Moving ahead for progress in the 21st century.” U.S. DOT, 〈https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/tap.cfm〉 (May 12, 2014).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2014). “Non-motorized transportation pilot program: 2014 report.” U.S. DOT, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/ntpp/2014_report/page04.cfm〉 (May 12, 2014).
Google. (2014). “Google Maps.” Mountain View, CA, 〈https://www.google.com/maps〉 (Jun. 10, 2014).
Grant, J. L., and Tsenkova, S. (2012). “New urbanism and smart growth movements.” Int. Encyclopedia Hous. Home, 120–126.
IDOT (Illinois Department of Transportation). (2007). “Illinois state transportation plan, special report: Mobility and reliability.” 〈http://www.illinoistransportationplan.org/pdfs/mobility_reliability.pdf〉 (Jul. 10, 2014).
ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers). (2004). “Pedestrian safety at intersections (issue Brief 9).” 〈http://www.ite.org/technical/IntersectionSafety/Pedestrians.pdf〉 (Jul. 10, 2014).
Jang, K., Hyoung, P., and Sanghyeok, K. (2013). “Evaluation of pedestrian safety.”, 104–116.
Kang, L., Yingge, X., and Fred, M. (2013). “Statistical analysis of pedestrian perceptions of sidewalk level of service in the presence of bicycles.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 53, 10–21.
Kim, S., Sungjinn, P., and Jae, L. (2014). “Meso- or micro-scale? Environmental factors influencing pedestrian satisfaction.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 30, 10–20.
Kirschbaum, J. B. (1999). “Designing sidewalks and trails for access.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 〈https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/publications/sidewalks/〉 (Jun. 1, 2014).
Malczewski, J. (2006). “GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature.” Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci., 20(7), 703–726.
Mitchener, L. (2011). “Condition rating summary-sidewalks 2011.” City of Saskatoon, 〈http://www.saskatoon.ca/DEPARTMENTS/City%20Clerks%20Office/Documents/Reports%20and%20Publications/ConditionRatingSummary_Sidewalks2011.pdf〉 (Jun. 1, 2014).
Moudon, A. (2001). “Targeting pedestrian infrastructure improvements: A methodology to assist providers in identifying suburban locations with potential increases in pedestrian travel.” Washington State Transportation Center, Seattle.
Oswald, M., Burkhart, K., and Nicholson, M. (2015). “Evaluating the impact of rail-trails: A methodology for assessing travel demand and economic impacts.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp., 9(7), 509–519.
Oswald, M., and McNeil, S. (2010). “Rating sustainability: Transportation investments in urban corridors as a case study.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 177–185.
Oswald Beiler, M., and Treat, C. (2014). “Integrating GIS and AHP to prioritize transportation infrastructure using sustainability metrics.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 04014053.
PBIC (Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center). (2014). “ActiveTrans priority tool: A model methodology for prioritizing pedestrian and bicycle improvements on existing roads.” 〈http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/training/webinars_PBIC_LC_120414.cfm〉 (Feb. 12, 2015).
Randall, T. A., and Baetz, B. W. (2001). “Evaluating pedestrian connectivity for suburban sustainability.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 1–15.
Saaty, T. L. (1982). Decision making for leaders: The analytical hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world, Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, CA.
Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network process: Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks, Springer, New York.
Saelens, B., Sallis, J., and Frank, L. (2003). “Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures.” Ann. Behav. Med., 25(2), 80–91.
SEDA-COG (Susquehanna Economic Development Association-Council of Governments). (2009). “SEDA-COG region: Environmental justice areas.”, 〈http://sedacog.pacounties.org/transportation/Documents/environmental_justice_areas_poster.pdf〉.
Shah, M. (2010). “Rating pedestrian facility with P-index and the application of Google Maps.” Univ. Technology Malaysia, 〈http://www.sustainability.utm.my/cipd/files/2011/10/Rating-Pedestrian-Facility-With-P-Index-And-The-Application-Of-Google%C2%AE-Map.pdf〉 (Jul. 10, 2014).
Shi, G., Yuan, H., Cheng, J., and Huang, X. (2009). “Pedestrian safety consideration and improvement.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 899–904.
Sinnett, D., Williams, K., Chatterjee, K., and Cavill, N. (2011). Making the case for investment in the walking environment, Univ. of the West of England, Bristol and Cavill, Bristol, U.K.
Sloman, L., Cairns, C., Newson, C., Anable, J., Pridmore, A., and Goodwin, P. (2010). “The effects of Smarter Choice programmes in the sustainable travel towns: Full report.”, Dept. for Transport, Machynlleth, U.K.
Southworth, M. (2005). “Designing the walkable city.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 246–257.
Speck, J. (2012). Walkable city: How downtown can save America, one step at a time, North Point Press, New York.
Thomas, R. (2013). Right of way in the crosswalk: Legislative solutions to making the cars stop without entering the killing zone, America Walks.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2010). Highway capacity manual 2010, 5th Ed., National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Tresidder, M. (2005). “Using GIS to measure connectivity: An exploration of issues.” School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State Univ., Portland, OR, 〈http://web.pdx.edu/~jdill/Tresidder_Using_GIS_to_Measure_Connectivity.pdf〉.
Tumlin, J. (2012). Measuring pedestrian success. Sustainable transportation planning, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). “2010 U.S. census data.” 〈http://www.census.gov/〉 (Jun. 12, 2014).
Voigt, N. (2012). Transportation depth reference manual, Professional Publications, Belmont, CA.
WILMAPCO (Wilmington Area Planning Council). (2012). “Top pedestrian priority segments.” 〈http://www.wilmapco.org/pedpriority/Top_Pedestrian_Priority_Segments.pdf〉 (Nov. 5, 2013).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142Issue 1March 2016

History

Received: Nov 18, 2014
Accepted: Apr 10, 2015
Published online: Jun 12, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 12, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michelle R. Oswald Beiler, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell Univ., Lewisburg, PA 17837 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Brian Phillips, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Student, Bucknell Univ., Lewisburg, PA 17837. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share