Technical Papers
May 26, 2015

Potential of Carpooling among Unfamiliar Users: Case of Undergraduate Students at Istanbul Technical University

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper analyzes the passenger-carpooling potential among undergraduate students using a model for estimating choice based on combined revealed and stated preference data. The data are obtained from a survey performed at four campuses of Istanbul Technical University. The case in focus is carpooling as a passenger; carpooling as a driver is deliberately left out because of students’ lack of familiarity with it. The hypothetical passenger-carpooling scenarios lead to enquiries about the fee students are willing to pay and the distance they are willing to walk to a designated pick-up location. The estimation results show that females and frequent campus travelers are more likely to prefer passenger carpooling. The scenario analysis included in the paper reveals the prioritization of carpool fee over walking distance to pick-up locations among undergraduate students.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the two anonymous referees for their valuable comments, suggestions, and corrections, which helped improve the quality of this paper.

References

Akar, G., Flynn, C., and Namgung, M. (2012). “Travel choices and links to transportation demand management: Case study at Ohio State University.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 77–85.
Balsas, C. J. L. (2003). “Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses.” Transp. Policy, 10(1), 35–49.
Ben-Akiva, M., et al. (1994). “Combining revealed and stated preferences data.” Marketing Lett., 5(4), 335–349.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and applications to travel demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Morikawa, T. (1990). “Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions.” Transp. Res. Part A, 24(6), 485–495.
Bhat, C. R., and Castelar, S. (2002). “A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: Formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay area.” Transp. Res. Part B, 36(7), 593–616.
Bhattacharjee, D., Haider, S. W., Tanaboriboon, Y., and Sinha, K. C. (1997). “Commuters’ attitudes towards travel demand management in Bangkok.” Transp. Policy, 4(3), 161–170.
Boyd, B., Chow, M., Johnson, R., and Smith, A. (2003). “Analysis of effects of fare-free transit program on student commuting mode shares: BruinGo at University of California at Los Angeles.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 101–110.
Bradley, M. A., and Daly, A. J. (1997). “Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated preference and revealed preference information.” Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change, P. Stopher and M. Lee-Gosselin, eds., Pergamon, Oxford, 209–232.
Buliung, R. N., Soltys, K., Habel, C., and Lanyon, R. (2009). “Driving factors behind successful carpool formation and use.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 31–38.
Chan, N. D., and Shaheen, S. A. (2012). “Ridesharing in North America: Past, present, and future.” Transp. Rev., 32(1), 93–112.
Davis, S. C., Diegel, S. W., and Boundy, R. G. (2013). “Transportation energy data book: Edition 32.” 〈http://cta.ornl.gov/data/tedb32/Edition32_Full_Doc.pdf〉 (Apr. 23, 2014).
Deakin, E., Frick, K. T., and Shively, K. M. (2010). “Markets for dynamic ridesharing? Case of Berkeley, California.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 131–137.
Dulken, D. (1992). “The very model of a suburban community, what we can learn from the university campus.” Planning, 58(8), 24–25.
Eom, J. K., Stone, J. R., and Ghosh, S. K. (2009). “Daily activity patterns of university students.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 141–149.
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., and Nordlund, A. M. (2008). “Interrupting habitual car use: The importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use reduction.” Transp. Res. Part F, 11(1), 10–23.
European Environment Agency. (2010). “Occupancy rates of passenger vehicles.” 〈http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/occupancy-rates-of-passenger-vehicles/occupancy-rates-of-passenger-vehicles-1〉 (Apr. 23, 2014).
Fellows, N. T., and Pitfield, D. E. (2000). “An economic and operational evaluation of urban car-sharing.” Transp. Res. Part D, 5(1), 1–10.
Furuhata, M., Dessouky, M., Ordonez, F., Brunet, M.-E., Wang, X., and Koenig, S. (2013). “Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions.” Transp. Res. Part B, 57, 28–46.
Gardner, B., and Abraham, C. (2008). “Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis.” Transp. Res. Part F, 11(4), 300–311.
Handke, V., and Jonuschat, H. (2013). Flexible ridesharing: New opportunities and service concepts for sustainable mobility, Springer, Berlin.
Hensher, D. A., and Bradley, M. (1993). “Using stated response data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models.” Marketing Lett., 4(2), 139–151.
Hensher, D. A., Louviere, J., and Swait, J. (1999). “Combining sources of preference data.” J. Econometrics, 89(1–2), 197–221.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., and Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Huang, H.-J., Yang, H., and Bell, M. G. H. (2000). “The models and economics of carpools.” Ann. Reg. Sci., 34(1), 55–68.
Hunt, J. D., and McMillan, J. D. P. (1997). “Stated-preference examination of attitudes toward carpooling to work in Calgary.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 9–17.
Isler, E., and Hoel, L. A. (2004)., Center for Transportation Studies, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Jacobson, S. H., and King, D. M. (2009). “Fuel saving and ridesharing in the U.S.: Motivations, limitations, and opportunities.” Transp. Res. Part D, 14(1), 14–21.
Khattak, A., Wang, X., Son, S., and Agnello, P. (2011). “Travel by university students in Virginia: Is this travel different from travel by the general population?”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 137–145.
Khattak, A. J., and Yim, Y. (2004). “Traveler response to innovative personalized demand-responsive transit in the San Francisco Bay area.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 42–55.
Klöckner, C. A., and Friedrichsmeier, T. (2011). “A multi-level approach to travel mode choice: How person characteristics and situation specific aspects determine car use in a student sample.” Transp. Res. Part F, 14(4), 261–277.
Koppelman, F. S., and Sethi, V. (2000). “Closed-form discrete-choice models.” Handbook of transport modelling, D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, eds., Elsevier, Oxford, U.K., 211–227.
Lois, D., and Lopez-Saez, M. (2009). “The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: A structural equation modeling approach.” Transp. Res. Part A, 43(9–10), 790–799.
Loo, B. P. Y. (2002). “Role of stated preference methods in planning for sustainable urban transportation: State of practice and future prospects.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 210–224.
Louviere, J., Hensher, D. A., and Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McFadden, D. (1974). “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior.” Frontiers in economics, P. Zarembka, ed., Academic, New York, 105–142.
Miralles-Guasch, C., and Domene, E. (2010). “Sustainable transport challenges in a suburban university: The case of the autonomous university of Barcelona.” Transp. Policy, 17(6), 454–463.
Mokhtarian, P. L., and Salomon, I. (2001). “How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations.” Transp. Res. Part A, 35(8), 695–719.
Morikawa, T. (1994). “Correcting state dependence and serial correlation in the RP/SP combined estimation method.” Transportation, 21(2), 153–165.
Ortuzar, J. D., and Iacobelli, A. (1998). “Mixed modelling of interurban trips by coach and train.” Transp. Res. Part A, 32(5), 345–357.
Ortuzar, J. D., and Willumsen, L. G. (2001). Modelling transport, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Parkany, E. (1999). “Can high-occupancy/toll lanes encourage carpooling? Case study of carpooling behavior on the 91 express lanes.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 46–54.
Polydoropoulou, A., and Ben-Akiva, M. (2001). “Combined revealed and stated preference nested logit access and mode choice model for multiple mass transit technologies.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 38–45.
Steg, L. (2005). “Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and effective motives for car use.” Transp. Res. Part A, 29(2–3), 147–162.
Steg, L., Vlek, C., and Slotegraaf, G. (2001). “Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car.” Transp. Res. Part F, 4(3), 151–169.
Swait, J., and Louviere, J. (1993). “The role of scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models.” J. Marketing Res., 30(3), 305–314.
Swait, J., Louviere, J., and Williams, M. (1994). “A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice.” Transportation, 21(2), 135–152.
Teal, R. F. (1987). “Carpooling: Who, how and why.” Transp. Res. Part A, 21(3), 203–214.
Vanoutrive, T., et al. (2012). “What determines carpooling to workplaces in Belgium: Location, organisation, or promotion?” J. Transp. Geogr., 22, 77–86.
Wang, R. (2011). “Shaping carpool policies under rapid motorization: The case of Chinese cities.” Transp. Policy, 18(4), 631–635.
Wang, X., Khattak, A. J., and Son, S. (2012). “What can be learned from analyzing university student travel demand?”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 129–137.
Whitehead, J. C., Pattanayak, S. K., Van Houtven, G. L., and Gelso, B. R. (2008). “Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: An assessment of the state of the science.” J. Econ. Surv., 22(5), 872–908.
Zhou, J. (2012). “Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students.” Transp. Res. Part A, 46(7), 1013–1029.
Zhou, J. (2013). “Study of employee carsharing on the university campus.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 301–310.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142Issue 1March 2016

History

Received: Jul 8, 2014
Accepted: Mar 25, 2015
Published online: May 26, 2015
Discussion open until: Oct 26, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hüseyin Onur Tezcan [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share