Technical Papers
Feb 9, 2015

Modeling Bike Share Station Activity: Effects of Nearby Businesses and Jobs on Trips to and from Stations

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 1

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify correlates of bike station activity for Nice Ride Minnesota, a bike share system in the Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Area in Minnesota. The number of trips to and from each of the 116 bike share stations operating in 2011 was obtained from Nice Ride Minnesota. Data for independent variables included in the proposed models come from a variety of sources, including the 2010 U.S. Census; the Metropolitan Council, a regional planning agency; and the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Log-linear and negative binomial regression models are used to evaluate the marginal effects of these factors on average daily station trips. The models have high goodness of fit, and each of 13 independent variables is significant at the 10% level or higher. The number of trips at Nice Ride stations is associated with neighborhood sociodemographics (i.e., age and race), proximity to the central business district, proximity to water, accessibility to trails, distance to other bike share stations, and measures of economic activity. Analysts can use these results to optimize bike share operations, locate new stations, and evaluate the potential of new bike share programs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate the Bikes Belong Foundation for its financial support, and Mitch Vars of Nice Ride Minnesota, Tony Hull of Transit for Livable Communities, and Mary Ann Murphy of the University of Southern California for their help and support.

References

Coutts, C. (2009). “Multiple case studies of the influence of land-use type on the distribution of uses along urban river greenways.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 31–38.
DeMaio, P. (2009). “Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future.” J. Public Transp., 12(4), 41–56.
Dill, J. (2009). “Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure.” J. Public Health Policy, 30, S95–S110.
Fan, Y., Guthrie, A. E., and Levinson, D. M. (2012). “Impact of light rail implementation on labor market accessibility: A transportation equity perspective.” J. Transp. Land Use, 5(3).
Fishman, E., Washington, S., and Haworth, N. (2013). “Bike share: A synthesis of the literature.” Transp. Rev., 33(2), 148–165.
Frank, L. D., Andresen, M. A., and Schmid, T. L. (2004). “Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars.” Am. J. Preventive Med., 27(2), 87–96.
Funderburg, R. G., Nixon, H., Boarnet, M. G., and Ferguson, G. (2010). “New highways and land use change: Results from a quasi-experimental research design.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 44(2), 76–98.
García-Palomares, J. C., Gutiérrez, J., and Latorre, M. (2012). “Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: A GIS approach.” Appl. Geogr., 35(1), 235–246.
Goodman, A., Green, J., and Woodcock, J. (2014). “The role of bicycle sharing systems in normalising the image of cycling: An observational study of London cyclists.” J. Transp. Health, 1(1), 5–8.
Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., and Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). “How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning.” Am. J. Preventive Med., 23(2, Suppl. 1), 64–73.
Hankey, S., et al. (2012). “Estimating use of non-motorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, MN.” Landscape Urban Plann.
Horning, J., El-Geneiday, A., and Krizek, K. J. (2008). “Parcel level land use data acquisition and analysis for measuring non-auto accessibility.”, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation Research Services Section, Access to Destinations Study, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Jensen, P., Rouquier, J. B., Ovtracht, N., and Robardet, C. (2010). “Characterizing the speed and paths of shared bicycle use in Lyon.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 15(8), 522–524.
Joh, K., Nguyen, M. T., and Boarnet, M. G. (2012). “Can built and social environmental factors encourage walking among individuals with negative walking attitudes?” J. Plann. Educ. Res., 32(2), 219–236.
Krizek, K. J., Barnes, G., and Thompson, K. (2009). “Analyzing the effect of bicycle facilities on commute mode share over time.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 66–73.
Krykewycz, G. R., Puchalsky, C. M., Rocks, J., Bonnette, B., and Jaskiewicz, F. (2010). “Defining a primary market and estimating demand for major bicycle-sharing program in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 117–124.
Lin, J. R., and Yang, T. H. (2011). “Strategic design of public bicycle sharing systems with service level constraints.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev., 47(2), 284–294.
Lindsey, G., Wilson, J., Rubchinskaya, E., Yang, J., and Han, Y. (2007). “Estimating urban trail traffic: Methods for existing and proposed trails.” Landscape Urban Plann., 81(4), 299–315.
Long, J. S., and Freese, J. (2005). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Ed., Stata Press, College Station, TX.
Maurer, L. K. (2012). “Feasibility study for a bicycle sharing program in Sacramento, California.” 91st Annual Meeting on Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
MetroGIS. (2014). “MetroGis: Sharing information across boundaries.” 〈http//www.metrogis.org〉 (Jan. 9, 2015).
Nice Ride Minnesota. (2014). “Nice Ride Minnesota.” 〈https//www.nicerideMN.org〉 (Jan. 9, 2015).
Pucher, J., Buehler, R., and Seinen, M. (2011). “Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 45(6), 451–475.
Schoner, J. E., Harrison, A., Wang, X., and Lindsey, G. (2012). Sharing to grow: Economic activity associated with Nice Ride Bike share stations, Bikes Belong Foundation, Denver, CO.
Shaheen, S. A., Guzman, S., and Zhang, H. (2010). “Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 159–167.
Shaheen, S. A., Martin, E., Cohen, A., and Finson, R. (2012). “Public bikesharing in North America: Early operator and user understanding.” Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, CA.
Stinson, M., and Bhat, C. (2004). “Frequency of bicycle commuting: Internet-based survey analysis.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 122–130.
Underwood, S. K., Handy, S. L., Paterniti, D. A., and Lee, A. E. (2014). “Why do teens abandon bicycling? A retrospective look at attitudes and behaviors.” J. Transp. Health, 1(1), 17–24.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). “2010 Decennial Census.” 〈http://factfinder2.census.gov〉 (Dec. 16, 2014).
Wang, X., Lindsey, G., Hankey, S., and Hoff, K. (2014). “Estimating mixed-mode urban trail traffic using negative binomial regression models.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 140(1), 04013006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142Issue 1March 2016

History

Received: Jun 12, 2014
Accepted: Dec 5, 2014
Published online: Feb 9, 2015
Discussion open until: Jul 9, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sol Price School of Public Policy, Univ. of Southern California, 650 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Greg Lindsey [email protected]
Humphrey School of Public Affairs, Univ. of Minnesota–Twin Cities, 301 19th Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: [email protected]
Jessica E. Schoner [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota–Twin Cities, 500 Pillsbury Dr. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: [email protected]
Andrew Harrison [email protected]
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, 1 S. Van Ness Ave., San Francisco, CA 94103. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share