Technical Papers
Aug 18, 2014

Cross-Nested Joint Model of Travel Mode and Departure Time Choice for Urban Commuting Trips: Case Study in Maryland–Washington, DC Region

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 141, Issue 4

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to describe the simultaneous choice of travel mode and departure time by making use of a cross-nested logit structure that allows for the joint representation of interalternative correlation along the both choice dimensions. Traditional multinomial logit model and nested logit model are formulated respectively. The analysis uses the revealed preference data collected from Maryland-Washington, DC, regional household travel survey during 2007–2008 for commuting trips, considering more work-related characteristics than previous studies. A comparison of the different model results shows that the presented cross-nested logit structure offers significant improvements over multinomial logit and nested logit models. The empirical results of the analysis reveal significant influences on commuter joint choice behavior of travel mode and departure time. Moreover, a Monte Carlo simulation for two groups of scenarios arising from transportation policies, congestion pricing, and improvements to transit service during peak period is undertaken respectively to examine the impact of a change in car travel cost and transit travel time on the travel mode and departure time switching. The simulation results show that US$5 increase in car travel cost during peak period has a similar effect on reducing drive alone in peak hours as 30% saving in transit travel time but only half of the latter policy in the transit ridership increase.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper was partly supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Development Funding-Fundamental Research Plan (No. JCYJ20120615145601342, JCYJ20130325151523015), Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Council (No. JC201005260122 A), Key Laboratory of Eco Planning and Green Building, Ministry of Education (Tsinghua University, 2013U-6), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71173061). The writers would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments.

References

Abkowitz, M. D. (1981). “An analysis of the commuter departure time decision.” Transportation, 10(3), 283–297.
Badoe, D. A., and Miller, E. J. (1995). “Analysis of the temporal transferability of disaggregate work trip mode choice mode.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–11.
Bajwa, S., Bekhor, S., Kuwahara, M., and Chung, E. (2008). “Discrete choice modeling of combined mode and departure time.” Transportmetrica, 4(2), 155–177.
Bekhor, S., and Prashker, J. N. (2008). “GEV-based destination choice models that account for unobserved similarities among alternatives.” Transp. Res. Part B, 42(3), 243–262.
Bhat, C. R. (1997). “Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops.” Transp. Res. Part B, 31(1), 41–54.
Bhat, C. R. (1998a). “Accommodating flexible substitution patterns in multi-dimensional choice modeling: Formulation and application to travel mode and departure time choice.” Transp. Res. Part B, 32(7), 455–466.
Bhat, C. R. (1998b). “Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips.” Transp. Res. Part B, 32(6), 361–371.
Bhat, C. R., and Guo, J. (2004). “A mixed spatially correlated logit model: Formulation and application to residential choice modeling.” Transp. Res. Part B, 38(2), 147–168.
Bhat, C. R., and Sardesai, R. (2006). “The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice.” Transp. Res. Part B, 40(9), 709–730.
Bierlaire, M. (2002). “The network of GEV model.” Proc., 2nd Swiss Transport Research Conf., Verita, Switzerland.
Bierlaire, M. (2003). “BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models.” Proc., 3rd Swiss Transport Research Conf., Ascona, Switzerland.
Bierlaire, M. (2006). “A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model.” Ann. Oper. Res., 144(1), 287–300.
Börjesson, M. (2008). “Joint RP-SP data in a mixed logit analysis of trip timing decisions.” Transp. Res. Part E, 44(6), 1025–1038.
Cervero, R. (2002). “Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework.” Transp. Res. Part D, 7(4), 265–284.
Chin, A. T. (1990). “Influences on commuter trip departure time decisions in Singapore.” Transp. Res. Part A, 24(5), 321–333.
Chu, Y. L. (2009). “Work departure time analysis using dogit ordered generalized extreme value model.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 42–49.
Daly, A., and Bierlaire, M. (2006). “A general and operational representation of generalised extreme value models.” Transp. Res. Part B, 40(4), 285–305.
De Jong, G., Daly, A., Pieters, M., Vellay, C., Bradley, M., and Hofman, F. (2003). “A model for time of day and mode choice using error components logit.” Transp. Res. Part E, 39(3), 245–268.
De Palma, A., and Rochat, D. (2000). “Mode choices for trips to work in Geneva: An empirical analysis.” J. Transp. Geogr., 8(1), 43–51.
Ding, C., Xie, B., Wang, Y., and Lin, Y. (2014). “Modeling the joint choice decisions on urban shopping destination and travel-to-shop mode: A comparative study of different structures.” Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2014, 1–10.
Ewing, R., and Cervero, R. (2010). “Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis.” J. Am. Plann. Assn., 76(3), 265–294.
Gadda, S., Kockelman, K. M., and Damien, P. (2009). “Continuous departure time models: A Bayesian approach.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 13–24.
Galbraith, R. A., and Hensher, D. A. (1982). “Intra-metropolitan transferability of mode choice models.” J. Transp. Econ. Pol., 16(1), 7–29.
Hendrickson, C., and Plank, E. (1984). “The flexibility of departure times for work trips.” Transp. Res. Part A, 18(1), 25–36.
Hess, S., Daly, A., Rohr, C., and Hyman, G. (2007). “On the development of time period and mode choice models for use in large scale modelling forecasting systems.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 41(9), 802–826.
Hess, S., Fowler, M., Adler, T., and Bahreinian, A. (2012). “A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: Evidence from a cross-nested logit study.” Transportation, 39(3), 593–625.
Hess, S., and Polak, J. W. (2006). “Exploring the potential for cross-nesting structures in airport-choice analysis: A case-study of the greater London area.” Transp. Res. Part E, 42(2), 63–81.
Hess, S., Rose, J. M., and Hensher, D. A. (2008). “Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models.” Transp. Res. Part E, 44(5), 847–863.
Koppelman, F. S., and Wilmot, C. G. (1982). “Transferability analysis of disaggregate choice models.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 18–24.
Lawrence, C., Zhou, J. L., and Tits, A. (1997). “User’s guide for CFSQP version 2.5: A C code for solving (large scale) constrained nonlinear (minimax) optimization problems, generating iterates satisfying all inequality constraints.”, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD.
McFadden, D. (1978). “Modeling the choice of residential location.” A. Karlqvist, et al., eds., Spatial interaction theory and residential Location, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 75–96.
McFadden, D., and Train, K. (2000). “Mixed MNL models for discrete response.” J. Appl. Econ., 15(5), 447–470.
Mishra, S., Welch, T. F., and Chakraborty, A. (2014). “Experiment in megaregional road pricing using advanced commuter behavior analysis.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 04013007.
National Atlas of the United States. (2012). “National Atlas.gov.” 〈http://www.Nationalatlas.gov/mld/countyp.html〉 (Jul. 2012).
Papola, A. (2004). “Some developments on the cross-nested logit model.” Transp. Res. Part B, 38(9), 833–851.
Pels, E., Njegovan, N., and Behrens, C. (2009). “Low-cost airlines and airport competition.” Transp. Res. Part E, 45(2), 335–344.
Saleh, W., and Farrell, S. (2005). “Implications of congestion charging for departure time choice: Work and non-work schedule flexibility.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 39(7–9), 773–791.
Sener, I. N., Pendyala, R. M., and Bhat, C. R. (2011). “Accommodating spatial correlation across choice alternatives in discrete choice models: An application to modeling residential location choice behavior.” J. Transp. Geogr., 19(2), 294–303.
Small, K. A. (1981). “The scheduling of consumer activities: Work trips.” Am. Econ. Rev., 72(3), 467–479.
Tringides, C. A., Ye, X., and Pendyala, R. M. (2004). “Departure-time choice and mode choice for nonwork trips.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–9.
Vega, A., and Reynolds-Feighan, A. (2009). “A methodological framework for the study of residential location and travel-to-work mode choice under central and suburban employment destination patterns.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 43(4), 401–419.
Wen, C. H., and Koppelman, F. S. (2001). “The generalized nested logit model.” Transp. Res. Part B, 35(7), 627–641.
Yang, L., Zheng, G., and Zhu, X. (2013). “Cross-nested logit model for the joint choice of residential location, travel model, and departure time.” Habitat Int., 38, 157–166.
Zhang, M. (2004). “The role of land use in travel mode choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong.” J. Am. Plann. Assn., 70(3), 344–360.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 141Issue 4December 2015

History

Received: Jun 26, 2013
Accepted: Jun 27, 2014
Published online: Aug 18, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 18, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chuan Ding, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Automobile Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China; formerly, Ph.D. Candidate, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Urban Planning and Decision Making Simulation, Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology, HIT Campus Shenzhen Univ. Town, 518055, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Sabyasachee Mishra [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, 112D Engineering Science Building, 3815 Central Ave., Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152. E-mail: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Urban Planning and Decision Making Simulation, Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), HIT Campus Shenzhen Univ. Town, Shenzhen 518055, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Binglei Xie [email protected]
Associate Professor, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Urban Planning and Decision Making Simulation, Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), HIT Campus Shenzhen Univ. Town, Shenzhen 518055, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share