Technical Papers
Feb 14, 2014

Role of Urban Planning in Encouraging More Sustainable Lifestyles

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 141, Issue 1

Abstract

Where urban planning is used to promote environmental sustainability, it has traditionally focused on reducing emissions from housing and traffic. However, cities are increasingly being recognized as consumption centers of the global economy, as the origin of demand, and as the point of termination for complex economic supply chains. Based on results produced by a hybrid life-cycle assessment model, which attributed the end-to-end emissions of supply chains to end users, consumption that is not related to housing or ground transportation was found to account for 30% of regional greenhouse gas emissions on average. In highly urbanized areas, the figure was even higher, at 45%. Furthermore, a literature review indicated that most environmental assessment tools for local city-level and subcity-level urban planning are neither able to identify the environmental impacts of personal consumption nor the relationships between urban structures and personal consumption. Thus, this study concludes that there is an apparent gap between the needs and the means of the regional environmental management of urban areas.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Arikan, Y., et al. (2012). “Global protocol for community-scale GHG emissions (GPC), version 0.9–20 March 2012.” C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability, World Bank, UNEP, UN-HABITAT, World Resources Institute.
Baynes, T., Lenzen, M., Steinberger, J. K., and Bai, X. (2011). “Comparison of household consumption and regional production approaches to assess urban energy use and implications for policy.” Energy Pol., 39(11), 7298–7309.
Bithas, K. P., and Christofakis, M. (2006). “Environmentally sustainable cities: Critical review and operational conditions.” Sustainable Dev., 14(3), 177–189.
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) Green Design Institute. (2008). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) US 2002 industry benchmark model.” 〈http://www.eiolca.net〉 (Apr. 12, 2012).
Chi, G., and Stone, B. (2005). “Sustainable transport planning: Estimating the ecological footprint of vehicle travel in future years.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 170–180.
Churchill, C. J., and Baetz, B. W. (1999). “Development of decision support system for sustainable community design.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 17–35.
Conte, E., and Monno, V. (2012). “Beyond the buildingcentric approach: A vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 34, 31–40.
Crawford, R. (2011). Life cycle assessment in the built environment, Spon Press, London.
Daffara, P. (2011). “Rethinking tomorrow’s cities: Emerging issues on city foresight.” Futures, 43(7), 680–689.
El-Gafy, M. A., Abdelrazig, Y. A., and Abdelhamid, T. S. (2011). “Environmental impact assessment for transportation projects: Case study using remote-sensing technology, geographic information systems, and spatial modeling.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 153–158.
Fischer, J. M., and Amekudzi, A. (2011). “Quality of life, sustainable civil infrastructure, and sustainable development: Strategically expanding choice.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 39–48.
Geels, F. W. (2012). “A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies.” J. Transp. Geogr., 24, 471–482.
Grubler, A. (1998). Technology and global change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Heinonen, J. (2012). “The impacts of urban structure and the related consumption patterns on the carbon emissions of an average consumer.” Dissertation, Aalto Univ, Espoo, Finland.
Heinonen, J., and Junnila, S. (2011a). “A carbon consumption comparison of rural and urban lifestyles.” Sustainability, 3(8), 1234–1249.
Heinonen, J., and Junnila, S. (2011b). “Implications of urban structure on carbon consumption in metropolitan areas.” Environ. Res. Lett., 6(1), 014018.
Heinonen, J., and Junnila, S. (2011c). “Case study on the carbon consumption of two metropolitan cities.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16(6), 569–579.
Heinonen, J., Kyrö, R., and Junnila, S. (2011). “Dense downtown living more carbon intense due to higher consumption: A case study of Helsinki.” Environ. Res. Lett., 6(3), 034034.
Herring, H. (2006). “Energy efficiency—A critical view.” Energy, 31(1), 10–20.
Holden, E., and Linnerud, K. (2007). “The sustainable development area: Satisfying basic needs and safeguarding ecological sustainability.” Sustain. Dev., 15(3), 174–187.
Huesemann, M. H. (2003). “The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development.” Clean Technol. Environ. Pol., 5(1), 21–34.
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth—Economics for a final planet, Earthscan, London.
Larsen, H. N. (2011). “Developing consumption-based greenhouse gas accounts: The carbon footprint of local public service provision in Norway.” Dissertation, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Laurent, A., Olsen, S. I., and Hauschild, M. Z. (2012). “Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 46(7), 4100–4108.
Lenzen, M., Dey, C., and Foran, B. (2004). “Energy requirements of Sydney households.” Ecol. Econ., 49(3), 375–399.
Li, D., Zhu, J., Hui, E. C. M., Leung, B. Y. P., and Li, Q. (2011). “An emergy analysis-based methodology for eco-efficiency evaluation of building manufacturing.” Ecol. Indicat., 11(5), 1419–1425.
Lorek, S., and Fuchs, D. (2011). “Strong sustainable consumption governance—Precondition for a degrowth path?” J. Cleaner Prod., 38, 36–43.
Naess, P. (1995). “Central dimensions in a sustainable urban development.” Sustain. Dev., 3(3), 120–129.
Nino, T. D., and Baetz, B. W. (1996). “Environmental linkages between urban form and municipal solid waste management infrastructure.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 83–100.
Peters, G. P., and Hertwich, E. G. (2008). “CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(5), 1401–1407.
Polimeni, J. M., and Polimeni, R. I. (2006). “Jevons’ Paradox and the myth of technological innovation.” Ecol. Complex., 3(4), 344–353.
Ramaswami, A., Hillman, T., Janson, B., Reiner, M., and Thomas, G. (2008). “A demand-centered, hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(17), 6455–6461.
Säynäjoki, A., Heinonen, J., and Junnila, S. (2011). “An empirical evaluation of the significance of the carbon spike in the construction.” Proc., World Sustainable Building Conf., International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), 70–71.
Säynäjoki, E., Heinonen, J., Rantsi, J., and Junnila, S. (2012). “Improving eco-efficiency of the built environment—tools for local action.” Joint CIB W070, W092 and TG72 Int. Conf. Delivering Value to the Community, Cape Town, South Africa.
Schandl, H., and Turner, G. M. (2009). “The dematerialization potential of the Australian economy.” J. Ind. Ecol., 13(6), 863–879.
Schipper, L. (2000). “On the rebound: The interaction of energy efficiency, energy use and economic activity. An introduction.” Energy Pol., 28, 351–353.
Schipper, L., and Grubb, M. (2000). “On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries.” Energy Pol., 28, 367–388.
Schulz, N. B. (2010). “Delving into the carbon footprints of Singapore—Comparing direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions of a small and open economic system.” Energy Pol., 38, 4848–4855.
Seadon, J. K. (2010). “Sustainable waste management systems.” J. Cleaner Prod., 18(16–17), 1639–1651.
Simms, A., Johnson, V., and Chowla, P. (2010). Growth isn’t possible: Why we need a new economic direction, New Economics Foundation, London.
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., and Dikshit, A. K. (2012). “An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies.” Ecol. Indicat., 15(1), 281–299.
Spangenberg, J. H. (2010). “The growth discourse, growth policy and sustainable development: two thought experiments.” J. Cleaner Prod., 18(6), 561–566.
Statistics Finland. (2007). “The Finnish consumer survey 2006.” 〈http://www.stat.fi〉 (Dec. 15, 2009).
Su, B., and Ang, B. W. (2011). “Multi-region input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: The feedback effects.” Ecol. Econ., 71, 42–53.
Tukker, A., et al. (2009). “Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database.” Ecol. Econ., 68(7), 1928–1937.
Turner, G. M., and Baynes, T. (2010). “Soft-Coupling of national biophysical and economic models for improved understanding of feedbacks.” Environ. Pol. Gov., 20(4), 270–282.
Turner, K. (2009). “Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy.” Energy Econ., 31(5), 648–666.
Wagner, G. (2010). “Energy content of world trade.” Energy Pol., 38(12), 7710–7721.
Wallbaum, H., Krank, S., and Teloh, R. (2011). “Prioritizing sustainability criteria in urban planning processes: Methodology application.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 20–28.
Weber, C. L., and Matthews, H. S. (2008). “Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint.” Ecol. Econ., 66(2–3), 379–391.
Whiteman, G., de Vos, D. R., Chapin, F. S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Niemelä, J., and Forbes, B. C. (2011). “Business strategies and the transition to low-carbon cities.” Bus. Strat. Environ., 20(4), 251–265.
Wiedmann, T. (2009). “A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting.” Ecol. Econ., 69(2), 211–222.
Wiedmann, T., Wilting, H. C., Lenzen, M., Lutter, S., and Palm, V. (2011). “Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input–output analysis.” Ecol. Econ., 70(11), 1937–1945.
Winston, N. (2010). “Regeneration for sustainable communities? Barriers to implementing sustainable housing in urban areas.” Sustain. Dev., 18(6), 319–330.
Zagonari, F. (2011). “An optimization model for integrated urban planning: Development and application to Algeria’s Reghaia and Heraoua municipalities.” Environ. Manage., 47(5), 937–959.
Zhou, X., and Imura, H. (2011). “How does consumer behavior influence regional ecological footprints? An empirical analysis for Chinese regions based on the multi-region input–output model.” Ecol. Econ., 71, 171–179.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 141Issue 1March 2015

History

Received: Sep 6, 2012
Accepted: Dec 22, 2013
Published online: Feb 14, 2014
Discussion open until: Jul 14, 2014
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki [email protected]
Doctoral Candidate, Aalto Univ. School of Engineering, P.O. Box 15800, 00076, Aalto, Finland (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jukka Heinonen [email protected]
Aalto Univ. School of Engineering, P.O. Box 15800, 00076, Aalto, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]
Seppo Junnila [email protected]
Professor, Aalto Univ. School of Engineering, P.O. Box 15800, 00076, Aalto, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share