Experiment in Megaregional Road Pricing Using Advanced Commuter Behavior Analysis
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 140, Issue 1
Abstract
Worsening highway congestion is a challenge to megaregional competitiveness; changing regional geographies and development location decisions, among other factors, demand that public policy responses go beyond traditional demand-management approaches. Congestion-pricing has been suggested as a remedy. In this paper, the writers analyze the outcomes of multiple congestion-pricing approaches for the capital megaregion that spans the following five metropolitan planning organization regions: (1) Washington (District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia), (2) Baltimore (Maryland), (3) Wilmington (Delaware), (4) Fredericksburg (Virginia), and (5) Frederick (Maryland), in addition to counties in the adjoining states of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia in the United States. Using a megaregional travel-demand model, the writers incorporate different values-of-time (VOTs) for travelers under different conditions. However, unlike past approaches, the writers’ VOT estimates go beyond income categories and include trip purposes across a number of scenarios. The writers demonstrate that adding the trip purpose to congestion-price determination provides added insight both at the megaregional level and for individual subregions. The results of this paper show how highway users respond differently and (in some cases) in unexpected ways to congestion charges when trips in accordance with income and purpose are assigned a unique VOT. The findings reported in this paper provide engineers, planners, and policymakers with a new analytical approach to measuring traveler elasticity to tolls while demonstrating the complexity involved with road-pricing mechanisms. The writers conclude with implications for adopting this approach and ideas for implementing them in a complex institutional setup.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Amekudzi, A. A., Thomas-Mobley, L., and Ross, C. (2007). “Transportation planning and infrastructure delivery in major cities and megacities.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 17–23.
Barbour, E., and Teitz, M. B. (2006). Blueprint planning in California: Forging consensus on metropolitan growth and development, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco.
Bollens, S. A. (1997). “Fragments of regionalism: The limits of southern California governance.” J. Urban Aff., 19(1), 105–122.
Brownstone, D., Ghosh, A., Golob, T. F., Kazimi, C., and Van Amelsfort, D. (2003). “Drivers’ willingness-to-pay to reduce travel time: Evidence from the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project.” Transport. Res. A Pol. Prac., 37(4), 373–387.
Brownstone, D., and Small, K. A. (2005). “Valuing time and reliability: Assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations.” Transport. Res. A Pol. Prac., 39(4), 279–293.
Cervero, R. (2003). “Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: A path analysis.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 69(2), 145–163.
Chen, D. J., and Wen, Y.-H. (2013). “Effects of freeway mileage-based toll scheme on the short-range driver’s route choice behavior.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.,.
Christaller, W. (1966). Central places in southern Germany, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Cirillo, C., and Axhausen, K. W. (2006). “Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary.” Transport. Res. A Pol. Prac., 40(5), 444–457.
Dewar, M., and Epstein, D. (2007). “Planning for ‘megaregions’ in the United States.” J. Plann. Lit., 22(2), 108–124.
Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Downs, A. (2004). Still stuck in traffic: Coping with peak-hour traffic congestion, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Ewing, R., and Cervero, R. (2001). “Travel and the built environment: A synthesis.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 87–114.
Friedmann, J., and Weaver, C. (1979). Territory and function: The evolution of regional planning, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Gao, Q., Yan, Q., and Luo, Y. (2008). “Efficiency measurement of congestion pricing schemes improving network performance with data envelopment analysis.” Proc., Logistics, ASCE, Reston, VA, 3423–3429.
Giuliano, G. (1992). “An assessment of the political acceptability of congestion pricing.” Transportation, 19(4), 335–358.
Gunn, H. (2001). “Spatial and temporal transferability of relationships between travel demand, trip cost and travel time.” Transport. Res. E Logis. Transport. Rev., 37(2–3), 163–189.
Haney, D. G. (1967). “The value of time for passenger cars: A theoretical analysis and description of preliminary experiments.” Final Rep., Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, CA.
Hensher, D. A. (2001). “Measurement of the valuation of travel time savings.” J. Transport. Econ. Pol., 35(1), 71–98.
Hultkrantz, L., Mortazavi, R., and Hulkranz, L. (2001). “Anomalies in the value of travel-time changes.” J. Transport. Econ. Pol., 35(2), 285–299.
Im, H., Jin, H., Kim, W., and Chang, M. (2002). “A study of adjusted optimal congestion pricing with speed-flow relationship in the urban express way in Korea.” Traffic and transportation studies, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1407–1413.
Katz, B. (2000). Reflections on regionalism, B. Katz, ed., Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Keil, R., and Young, D. (2008). “Transportation: The bottleneck of regional competitiveness in Toronto.” Environ. Plann. C Govern. Pol., 26(4), 728–751.
Knaap, G. J., Bento, A., and Lowe, S. E. (2008). “Housing market effects of inclusionary zoning.” Housing affordability research and resources: An analysis of inclusionary zoning and alternatives, National Association of Home Builders, Washington, DC.
Leurent, F., and Wagner, N. (2009). “User equilibrium in a bottleneck under multipeak distribution of preferred arrival time.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 31–39.
Lisco, T. E. (1968). “Value of commuters travel time–A study in urban transportation.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–36.
Losch, A. (1954). The economics of location, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Mackie, P. J., Jara-Diaz, S., and Fowkes, A. S. (2001). “The value of travel time savings in evaluation.” Transport. Res. E Logis. Transport. Rev., 37(2–3), 91–106.
Mishra, S., Welch, T. F., Moeckel, R., Mahapatra, S., and Tadayon, M. (2013). “Development of Maryland statewide transportation model and its application in scenario planning.” Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting.
Mihyeon Jeon, C., Amekudzi, A., and Vanegas, J. (2006). “Transportation system sustainability issues in high-, middle-, and low-income economies: Case studies from Georgia (US), South Korea, Colombia, and Ghana.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 172–186.
National Research Council (NRC). (2009). “Driving and the built environment: The effects of compact development on motorized travel, energy use, and emissions.” Special Rep. 298, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Orfield, M. (1997). Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Rentziou, A., Milioti, C., Gkritza, K., and Karlaftis, M. (2011). “Urban road pricing: Modeling public acceptance.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 56–64.
Ross, C. L., and Woo, M. (2009). “Identifying megaregions in the United States: Implications for infrastructure investment.” Chapter 4, Megaregions: Planning for global competitiveness, C. L. Ross, ed., Island Press, Washington, DC, 53–82.
Sheffi, Y. (1985). Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Small, K. A. (1982). “The scheduling of consumer activities: Work trips.” Am. Econ. Rev., 72(3), 467–479.
Small, K. A., and Yan, J. (2001). “The value of ‘value pricing’ of roads: Second-best pricing and product differentiation.” J. Urban Econ., 49(2), 310–336.
Sullivan, E. C. (2002). “State Route 91 value-priced express lanes: Updated observations.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 37–42.
Teitz, M., and Barbour, E. (2007). “Megaregions in California: Challenges to planning and policy.” The Healdsburg research seminar on megaregions, Lincoln Institute on Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, 7–19.
Warner, S. (1962). Stochastic choice of mode in urban travel: A study in binary choice, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.
Weidner, T., Ducca, F., Moeckel, R., and Mishra, S. (2013). “Exercising a mega-region analysis framework in the Chesapeake Bay area.” Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 1–18.
Wheeler, S. (2009). “Regions, megaregions, and sustainability.” Regional Stud., 43(6), 863–876.
Wheeler, S. (2002). “The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 68(3), 267–278.
Womersley, M. (2006). “Smart growth, sprawl and climate change mitigation in the United States.” Smart growth and climate change: Regional development, infrastructure and adaptation, M. Ruth, ed., Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA.
Ye, L. (2013). “Urban transformation and institutional policies: A case study of mega-region development in China’s Pearl River Delta.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 292–300.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 140 • Issue 1 • March 2014
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 30, 2011
Accepted: Jul 17, 2013
Published online: Jul 19, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014
Discussion open until: May 12, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.