Technical Papers
May 15, 2013

Assessing the Transportation Needs of Low-Mobility Individuals: Case Study of a Small Urban Community in Utah

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 139, Issue 2

Abstract

Older adults, low-income individuals, and individuals with disabilities are generally considered “low-mobility” individuals, having less access to transportation options and often marginalized in the social environment of the community. This study assessed the transportation needs of low-mobility individuals using three dimensions: (1) travel characteristics, (2) social strength in terms of transportation assistance received from their social networks, and (3) accessibility to public transportation. A mixed survey method combining an in-person interview at the collaborating organizations and a mail-back survey were used. Results showed that older adults remain mobile and make more frequent short trips. The results also showed a much higher reliance on private vehicles among older adults and individuals with low income, whereas a much higher reliance on public transportation and much lower reliance on private transportation was found among individuals with disabilities. Individuals with disabilities were still active, as almost half of them travel to work frequently. However, the number of nonwork trips made by individuals with disabilities was significantly low. These findings indicated a positive relationship between transportation mode choices and social dependence with family and friends. Individuals with stronger family social ties were more likely to receive adequate help meeting their transportation needs. The accessibility analysis revealed that low-mobility individuals in Cache County, Utah, have difficulties accessing transit due to the long walking distances from their residences. These findings may be used to guide policy for improving public transportation and paratransit services to meet low-mobility individuals’ needs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the Utah Transportation Center at Utah State University (USU). We would like to thank the Center for Persons with Disabilities at USU, Cache Valley Transit District, the Bear River Association of Governments (BRAG), Cache Senior Citizen Center (CSCC), the English Language Center (ELC), Cache Employment and Training Center (CETC), Options for Independence, and Mr. Justin Wilson from the Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning (LAEP) at USU for their help in conducting the surveys. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the views of our sponsors.

References

Alsnih, R., and Hensher, D. (2003). “The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population.” Transp. Res. A, 37(10), 903–916.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Pub. L. No. 101-336, § 12101(a)(8), 104 Stat. 327, 329 (1990) (amended 2008).
Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., and Shah, Z. M. (2013). “Disabled pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting inclusive walking facilities on urban streets.” J. Transp. Eng., 139(2), 181–192.
Blumenberg, E., and Ong, P. (2001). “Cars, buses, and jobs: Welfare recipients and employment access in Los Angeles.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 22–31.
Brown, D., and Stommes, E. S. (2004). “Rural governments face public transportation challenges and opportunities.” Amber Waves, Economic Research Service, 2(1), 11.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). (2003a). “Transportation difficulties keep over half a million disabled at home.”, Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). (2003b). “Freedom to travel.”, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Cache Valley Transit District (CVTD). (2012). “Why CVTD is fare-free.” 〈http://www.cvtdbus.org/MIAboutCVTD/whyfree.php〉 (Aug. 20, 2012).
Carmien, S., Dawe, M., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., Kintsch, A., and Sullivan, J. F., Jr. (2005). “Socio-technical environments supporting people with cognitive disabilities using public transportation.” ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 12(2), 233–262.
Christensen, K. M. (2009). “Socially equitable community planning; including individuals with disabilities in the democratic association of place.” Rev. Disability Studies, 5(3), 49–52.
Dallmeyer, K. E., and Surti, V. H. (1976). “Transportation mobility analysis of the handicapped.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 40–45.
Duvarci, Y., and Yigitcanlar, T. (2007). “Integrated modeling approach for transportation disadvantaged.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 133(3), 188–200.
Fan, Y., and Khattak, A. (2012). “Time use patterns, lifestyles, and sustainability of nonwork travel behavior.” Int. J. Sustain. Transp., 6(1), 26–47.
Franklin, J., and Niemeier, D. (2007). “Discrete choice elasticities for elderly and disabled travelers between fixed-route transit and paratransit.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 31–36.
Freeman, P. N. (2009). “Ten years of World Bank action in transport: Evaluation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 15(4), 297–304.
Giuliano, G., and Narayan, D. (2003). “Another look at travel patterns and urban form: The US and Great Britain.” Urban Stud., 40(11), 2295–2312.
Handy, S. L., and Niemeier, D. A. (1997). “Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives.” Environ. Plann. A, 29(7), 1175–1194.
Khattak, A. J., and Yim, Y. B. (2004). “Traveler response to innovative personalized demand-responsive transit in the San Francisco Bay area.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 130(1), 42–55.
Lotfi, S., and Koohsari, M. J. (2011). “Neighborhood walkability in a city within a developing country.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 137(4), 402–408.
Lucas, K., and Currie, G. (2012). “Developing socially inclusive transportation policy: Transferring the United Kingdom policy approach to the State of Victoria?” Transportation, 39(1), 151–173.
Maynard, A. (2009). “Can measuring the benefits of accessible transport enable a seamless journey?” J. Transport Land Use, 2(2), 21–30.
Mehta, C. R., and Patel, N. (2010). IBM SPSS Exact Tests [Computer software]. SPSS, Inc., Chicago.
National Council on Disability. (2005). Access to transportation by people with disabilities: Illustrations of implementation from the United States, Washington, DC.
Ozbay, K., Ozmen, D., and Berechman, J. (2003). “Accessibility and economic development.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 129(2), 97–119.
Ozbay, K., Ozmen, D., and Berechman, J. (2006). “Modeling and analysis of the link betweenaccessibility and employment growth.” J. Transp. Eng., 132(5), 385–393.
Penfold, C., Cleghorn, N., Creegan, C., Neil, H., and Webster, S. (2008). “Travel behaviour, experiences and aspirations of disabled people.” Report for Dept. of Transport, United Kingdom, National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), London.
Perez, E., and Gordon, P. (1995). “Embracing diversity in the delivery of rehabilitation and related services.” Disability and diversity: New leadership for a new era, S. Walker, ed., President’s Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities and Howard Univ. Research and Training Center, Washington, DC.
Rosenbloom, S. (1993). “Transportation needs of the elderly population.” Clin. Geriatr. Med., 9(2), 297–310.
Rosenbloom, S. (2001). “Sustainability and automobility among the elderly: An international assessment.” Transportation, 28(4), 375–408.
Seekins, T., Arnold, N., and Ipsen, C. (2012). “Developing methods for grading the accessibility of a communality’s infrastructure.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 138(3), 270–276.
Seekins, T., Enders, A., Pepper, A., and Sticka, S. (2007). “Allocation and use of section 5310 funds in urban and rural America.” J. Public Transp., 10(1), 81–101.
Southworth, M. (2005). “Designing the walkable city.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 131(4), 246–257.
Stern, S. (1993). “A disaggregate discrete choice model of transportation demand by elderly and disabled people in rural Virginia.” Transport. Res. Pol. Pract., 27A(4), 315–327.
Transit Cooperative Research Program. (2011). Transit capacity and quality of service manual, 2nd Ed., Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. (2002). “Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility guidelines for buildings and facilities (as amended through September 2002).” U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011a). “2010 American community survey 1-year estimates.” 〈http://factfinder.census.gov/〉 (May 30, 2011).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011b). “2006–2010 American community survey 5-year estimates.” 〈http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t〉 (Oct. 1, 2012).
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003). “Transportation—Disadvantaged populations: Some coordination efforts among programs providing transportation services, but obstacles persist.” 〈http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03697.pdf〉 (May 30, 2011).
Wasfi, R., Levinson, D. M., and El-Geneidy, A. M. (2007). “Measuring the transportation needs of people with developmental disabilities.” Proc., 86th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
World Health Organization. (2011). “Definition of an older or elderly person.” 〈http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/index.html〉 (May 30, 2011).
Wu, W., Gan, A., Cevallos, F., and Hadi, M. (2011). “Multiobjective optimization model for prioritizing transit stops for ADA improvement.” J. Transp. Eng., 137(8), 580–588.
Yigitcanlar, T., Dodson, J., Gleeson, B., and Sipe, N. (2005). “Sustainable Australia: Containing travel in master planned estates.” Res. Monograph 9, Urban Research Program, Griffith Univ. Press, Brisbane, Australia.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 139Issue 2June 2013
Pages: 104 - 114

History

Received: Jun 2, 2012
Accepted: Nov 9, 2012
Published online: May 15, 2013
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sarawut Jansuwan [email protected]
S.M.ASCE
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4110. E-mail: [email protected]
Keith M. Christensen [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4005. E-mail: [email protected]
Anthony Chen [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4110 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share