Technical Papers
Feb 3, 2012

Role of Brownfield Developments in Reducing Household Vehicle Travel

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138, Issue 3

Abstract

The transportation sector is the second largest source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United State. Developing underutilized urban industrial sites with certain characteristics (i.e., close proximity to transit, job and services, low remediation cost, and high density) can potentially reduce the transportation sector’s impact on the environment by lowering vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) and related GHG emissions. This study examines the effect of residential brownfield developments on VKT reduction and the resulting costs (including the cost of driving time, fuel, and external air pollution costs) and further compares the resulting costs with the initial one-time cleanup cost of brownfield sites. Sixteen brownfield and conventional development sites were analyzed in Baltimore, Chicago, Minneapolis, and Pittsburgh. Travel demand models were used to estimate VKT differences among the developments. Air pollution valuation data were used to estimate external environmental cost differences. On average, residential brownfield developments reduce VKT by 52% compared to conventional greenfield developments. Also on average, brownfield developments result in a time and fuel cost reduction of 60% and an external environmental cost saving of 66%. Comparing these cost savings with the initial one-time cleanup cost of brownfields, it is shown that development density and the cost of remediation significantly affect the number of years required for the VKT cost savings to offset the remediation cost.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank colleagues Dr. Deborah Lange and Amy Nagengast and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. 0755672) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Brownfield Training Research and Technical Assistance Grant). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the National Science Foundation.

References

Allen, E., and Benfield, F. K. (2003). “Environmental characteristics of smart growth neighborhoods, phase II: Two Nashville neighborhoods.” Natural Resources Defense Council, New York, 〈http://www.nrdc.org/cities/smartgrowth/char/charnash.pdf〉 (Aug. 2010).
Altshuler, A., and Gomez Ibanez, J. (1993). Regulation for revenue: The political economy of land use exactions, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2008). “Primer on transportation and climate change.” 〈http://downloads.transportation.org/ClimateChange.pdf〉 (Aug. 2011).
Auld, R., Hendrickson, C., and Lange, D. (2010). “A life cycle assessment case study of a brownfield and a greenfield development: Cranberry Heights and Summerset Pennsylvania.” Proc., Business of Brownfields Conf., PA brownfields Conference, Pittsburgh.
Burchell, R. et al. (2005). Sprawl costs: Economic impacts of unchecked developments, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (CSI). (2009). Moving cooler: An analysis of transportation strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
Chester, M., Horvath, A., and Madanat, S. (2010). “Comparison of life-cycle energy and emissions footprints of passenger transportation in metropolitan regions.” Atmos. Environ., 44(8), 1071–1079.
City of Chicago. (2003). “Chicago brownfields initiative: Recycling our past, investing in our future.” 〈http://www.csu.edu/cerc/documents/ChicagoBrownfieldsInitiativeRecyclingOurPastInvestinginOurFuture.pdf〉 (Aug. 2011).
De Sousa, C. (2002). “Measuring the public costs and benefits of brownfield versus greenfield development in the Greater Toronto area.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Design, 29(2), 251–280.
De Sousa, C. (2005). “Policy performance and brownfield redevelopment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.” Prof. Geogr., 57(2), 312–327.
Dockins, C., Maguire, K., Simon, N., and Sullivan, M. (2004). “Value of statistical life analysis and environmental policy: A white paper.” 〈http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0483-01.pdf/$file/EE-0483-01.pdf〉 (Dec. 2010).
Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., and Chen, D. (2008). Growing cooler: The evidence on urban development and climate change, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2008). “Highway statistics.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/hss/index.htm〉 (Aug. 2010).
Federal surface and transportation policy and planning act of 2009, S. 1036, 11th Cong. (2009). 〈http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-1036〉 (Aug. 2010).
George Washington University (GWU). (2001). “Public policies and private decisions affecting the redevelopment of Brownfields: An analysis of critical factors, relative weights and areal differentials.” 〈http://www.gwu.edu/~eem/Brownfields〉 (Aug. 2010).
Gordon, P., and Richardson, H. (1997). “Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?” J. Amer. Plann. Assoc., 63(1), 95–106.
Great Communities Collaborative (GCC). (2009). “The benefits of compact development.” 〈http://greatcommunities.org/intranet/library/sites-tools/greatcommunities-toolkit/density.pdf〉 (Dec. 2010).
Greenberg, M. (2002). “Should housing be built on former brownfield site?” Am. J. Public Health, 92(5), 703–705.
Hagler Bailly Services, Inc. and Criterion Planners/Engineers. (1999). “The transportation and environmental impacts of infill versus greenfield development: A comparative case study analysis.” U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC.
Handy, S., Cao, X., and Mokhtarian, P. (2005). “Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport Environ., 10(6), 427–444.
Industrial Economics, Inc. (2003). Analysis of environmental and infrastructure costs associated with development in the Berkeley Charleston Dorchester region, Charleston, SC.
International Economic Development Council (IEDC). (1999). “Brownfields redevelopment: Performance evaluation.” Washington, DC.
Johnston, R. (2006). “Review of U.S. and European regional modeling studies of policies intended to reduce motorized travel, fuel use, and emissions.” Dept. Environmental Science and Policy, Univ. of California Davis, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Kaufman, D., and Cloutier, N. (2006). “The impact of small brownfields and greenspaces on residential property values.” J. Real Estate Finan. Econ., 33(1), 19–30.
Lange, D., and McNeil, S. (2004). “Clean it and they will come? Defining successful brownfield development.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 130(2), 101.
Lehr, J. H. (1997). Wiley’s remediation technologies handbook, The Heartland Institute, Chicago.
Leinberger, C. (2009). The option of urbanism: Investing in a new American dream, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Mashayekh, Y., Chester, M., Hendrickson, C. T., and Weber, C. L. (2011). “Costs of automobile air emissions in U.S. metropolitan areas.” Transportation Research Record 2233, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 120–127.
Matthews, H. S., and Lave, L. B. (2000). “Applications of environmental valuation for determining externality costs.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 34(8), 1390–1395.
Miller, H. J., and Shaw, S.-L. (2001). Geographic information systems for transportation: Principles and applications (Spatial information systems), Oxford University Press, New York, 248.
Missouri Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC). (2006). Hidden treasures: Value in brownfields, Statewide.
Muller, N. Z., and Mendelsohn, R. (2007). “Measuring the damages from air pollution in the U.S.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 54(1), 1–14.
Nagengast, A. (2011). “Commuting from US brownfield and greenfield residential development neighborhoods.” ASCE, 1-32, 〈http://www.eswp.com/brownfields/Present/Nagengast%205B.pdf〉 (Aug. 2011).
National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). (2009). 〈http://nhts.ornl.gov〉 (Aug. 2011).
National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Driving and the built environment: The effects of compact development on motorized travel, energy use, and CO2 emissions, Special report 298, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
National Research Council (NRC). (2010). Hidden costs of energy: Unpriced consequences of energy production and use, Research Council National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
O’Toole, R. (2009). “The myth of the compact city why compact development is not the way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.”, 〈http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa653.pdf〉 (Aug. 2011).
Paull, E. (2008). “The environmental and economic impacts of brownfields redevelopment.” Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.nemw.org/images/stories/documents/EnvironEconImpactsBFRedev.pdf〉 (Dec. 2010).
Persky, J., and Wiewel, W. (1996). “Central city and suburban development: Who pays and who benefits?” Great Cities Institute, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Rast, R. R. (1997). Environmental remediation estimating methods, R.S.Means, Kingston, MA.
Ross, M. (1994). “Automobile fuel consumption and emissions: Effects of vehicle and driving characteristics.” Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 19(1), 75–112.
RSMeans. (2010). “RSMeans cost estimation tools.” 〈http://rsmeans.reedconstructiondata.com/MeansCostWorks.aspx〉 (Aug. 2010).
Schrank, D., and Lomax, T. (2009). “2009 urban mobility report.” Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Schroeer, W. (1999). “Transportation and environmental analysis of the Atlantic steel development proposal.” Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Urban and Economic Development Division, Washington, DC.
Shammin, M. R., Herendeen, R. A., Hanson, M. J., and Wilson, E. J. H. (2010). “A multivariate analysis of the energy intensity of sprawl versus compact living in the U.S. for 2003.” Ecolog. Econ., 69(12), 2363–2373.
Terry, N., and Banuelos, G. (1999). Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water, Lewis Publication, Boca Raton, FL.
Transit Cooperative Research Program. (1998). “The costs of sprawl—Revisited.”, Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). “2000 decennial census.” 〈http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en〉 (Dec. 2010).
U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM). (2001). “Clean air/brownfields report. Environmental protection agency.” 〈http://usmayors.org/brownfields/CleanAirBrownfields02.pdf〉 (Dec. 2010).
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). (1995). “The technological reshaping of metropolitan America.”, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Energy, Argonne National Laboratory. (2008). “The greenhouse gas, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation (GREET) model.” 〈http://www.transportation.anl.gov/modeling_simulation/GREET〉 (Aug. 2010).
U.S. Department of Energy/Energy Information Agency. (2008). “Annual energy outlook Rep. # DOE/EIA-0383.” 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/pdf/0383%282010%29.pdf〉 (Dec. 2010).
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD). (2010). “HUD aggregated USPS administrative data on address vacancies.” 〈http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/usps.html〉 (Dec. 2010).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001a). “Comparing methodologies to assess transportation and air quality impacts of brownfields and infill development, development, community, and environment division.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001b). “EPA remediation technology cost compendium year 2000.”, IEC and Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). “Quantifying emissions impacts of brownfields and infill development.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2003). “MOBILE6 vehicle emission. Modeling software.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/otaq/m6.htm.〉 (Dec. 2010).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2006). Solving environmental problems through collaboration: The Atlantic steel case study, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). “Brownfields and land revitalization.” 〈http://epa.gov/brownfields/about.htm〉 (Aug. 2011).
U.S Environmental Protection Agency. (2011). “Air and water quality impacts of brownfields redevelopment.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2004). “Brownfield redevelopment. Stakeholders report that EPA’s program helps to redevelop sites, but additional measures could complement agency efforts.” 〈http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0594.pdf〉 (Aug. 2010).
Wang, X., and vom Hofe, R. (2007). Research Methods in urban and regional planning, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138Issue 3September 2012
Pages: 206 - 214

History

Received: Feb 24, 2011
Accepted: Jan 30, 2012
Published online: Feb 3, 2012
Published in print: Sep 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yeganeh Mashayekh [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dept. of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Chris Hendrickson
Hon.M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890.
H. Scott Matthews
A.M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Dept. of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share