Perceptions of Pedestrians and Shopkeepers in European Medium-Sized Cities: Study of Guimarães, Portugal
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138, Issue 1
Abstract
Planning pedestrian environments requires assumptions about how pedestrians will respond to characteristics of the walking environment in city centers. European city centers, especially medieval ones, have been more and more pedestrianized in the last two decades. Two major groups, shopkeepers and pedestrians profit from this enlargement of public space. The perception of shopkeepers is to attract more buyers from walkways and from adjacent places in the city centers. At the same time, the perception of pedestrians is to walk on pleasant and peaceful way without confronting other pedestrians in a chaotic situation. This paper considers the perceptions of shopkeepers and pedestrians in a medium-sized Portuguese city center using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model. A field survey was conducted in January 2010 to summarize different perceptions of using sidewalks and to know the responses of shopkeepers and pedestrians. Both were interviewed during the field survey. Results show that there are several interesting issues, such as short-term parking on walkways to buy goods from the adjacent shops or illegal encroachment of sidewalks because of goods or propaganda displayed to attract more buyers to the shops. These issues need to be considered for planning a better walkway environment in the Guimarães city center that has a long tradition of walking since medieval times.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge support by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia under grant no. UNSPECIFIEDSFRH/BPD/45762/2008. Authors are also thankful to undergraduate civil engineering 1st-year students for extending their cooperation in field and observation surveys.
References
Al-Azzawi, M., and Raeside, R. (2007). “Modeling pedestrian walking speeds on sidewalks.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 133(3), 211–219.
Amistad, F. T. (2010). “Assessment of the pedestrianization policy in Vigan City: UNESCO World Heritage Site.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 136(1), 11–22.
Balsas, C. J. L. (2007). “City centre revitalization in Portugal: A study of Lisbon and Porto.” J. Urban Design, 12(2), 231–259.
Beatty, J., Coletta, T., and Rogan, R. (2009). Investigation of the overall traffic reducing effect of closing sections of Nørrebrogade, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worchester, MA.
Chin, G. K. W., Van Niel, K. P., Giles-Corti, B., and Knuiman, M. (2008). “Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data.” Prev. Med., 46(1), 41–45.
Chu, X., Guttenplan, M., and Baltes, M. R. (2004). “Why people cross where they do: The role of street environment.” J. Trans. Res. Board, 1878, 3–10.
Ehrenfeucht, R., and Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2007). “Constructing the sidewalks: Municipal government and the production of public space in Los Angeles, California, 1880–1920.” J. Hist. Geogr., 33(1), 104–124.
European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON). Monitoring Committee. (2006). ESPON Atlas: Mapping the structure of European territory, Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning, Bonn, Germany.
Evans-Cowley, J. (2006). “Sidewalk planning and policies in small cities.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 132(2), 71–75.
Heath, T. (2001). “Revitalizing cities: Attitudes towards city-center living in the United Kingdom.” J. Plann. Educ. Res., 20(4), 464–475.
Humpel, N., Marshall, A. L., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., and Owen, N. (2004). “Changes in neighbourhood walking are related to changes of perceptions of environmental attributes.” Ann. Behav. Med., 27(1), 60–67.
Islam, M. S., Rahaman, K. R., and Ahmed, S. J. (2008). “‘Demand of participants’ or ‘supply of opportunities’: Measuring accessibility of activity places based on time geographic approach.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 134(4), 159–165.
Hine, J. (1996). “Pedestrian travel experiences: Assessing the impact of traffic on behaviour and perceptions of safety using an in-depth interview technique.” J. Transp. Geogr., 4(3), 179–199.
Landis, B. W., Vattikuti, V. R., Ottenberg, R. M., McLeod, D. S., and Guttenplan, M. (2001). “Modeling the roadside walking environment: Pedestrian level of service.” J. Trans. Res. Board, 1773, 82–88.
Laxman, K. K., Rastogi, R., and Chandra, S. (2010). “Pedestrian flow characteristics in mixed traffic condition.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 136(1), 23–33.
Lee, B. J., Jang, T. Y., Wang, W., and Namgung, M. (2009). “Design criteria for an urban sidewalk landscape considering emotional perception.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 135(4), 133–140.
Lourenço, J. M. (1986). Os Gabinetes Técnicos Locais e o seu âmbito de actuação, CCRN, Porto, Portugal (in Portuguese).
McIntyre, C., and Parfitt, M. K. (1998). “Decision support system for residential land development site selection process.” J. Archit. Eng., 4(4), 125–131.
Municipio de Guimarães. (2010). “Municipio de Guimarães.” 〈http://www.cm-guimaraes.pt/PageGen.aspx?WMCM_PaginaId=4194〉 (Mar. 22, 2010).
Petritsch, T. A., et al., (2006). “Pedestrian level-of-service model for urban arterial facilities with sidewalks.” J. Trans. Res. Board, 1982, 84–89.
Rahaman, K. R., Ohmori, N., and Harata, N. (2006). “Evaluation of the roadside walkway environment of Dhaka City.” East Asia Society of Transport Study, 5, East Asia Society of Transport, Tokyo, 1751–1766.
Ramanathan, R. (2001). “A note on the use of the analytical hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment.” J. Environ. Manage., 63(1), 27–35.
Randall, T. A., and Baetz, B. W. (2001). “Evaluating pedestrian connectivity for suburban sustainability.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 127(1), 1–15.
Saaty, T. L., Peniwati, K., and Shang, J. S. (2007). “The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story.” Math. Comput. Model., 46(7–8), 1041–1053.
Sarkar, S., and Andreas, M. (2004). “Drivers’ perception of pedestrians’ right and walking environment.” J. Trans. Res. Board, 75–82.
Sisiopiku, V. P., Zhang, X., and Virkler, M. R. (2002). “Pedestrian level of service and quality of operations assessment methods.” 81st TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Southworth, M. (2005). “Designing the walkable city.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 131(4), 246–257.
Vieira, J., Moura, F., and Viegas, J. M. (2007). “Transport policy and environmental impacts: The importance of Multi-instrumentality in policy integration.” Transp. Policy, 14(5), 421–432.
Walk 21. (2002). “Walk 21 to liveable cities.” 3rd Conf. Proc. from San Sebastian,Spain, Gloucestershire, UK.
Zacharias, J. (2001). “Pedestrian behaviour and perception in urban walking environments.” J. Plan. Lit., 16(3), 3–18.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138 • Issue 1 • March 2012
Pages: 26 - 34
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 15, 2010
Accepted: Jun 2, 2011
Published online: Jun 4, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.