Technical Papers
May 17, 2016

Minimizing Illegal Overweight Truck Frequencies through Strategically Planned Truck Inspection Operations

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 9

Abstract

Over the past two decades, heavy truck traffic volumes and cargo weights have been steadily increasing due to economic growth and improved transportation system efficiency. These changes are producing an exponential increase in the damage caused to highway pavements and bridges. A disproportionate amount of highway damage is caused by extremely heavy trucks, many of which are illegally exceeding existing truck weight limits. To control the number of illegal overweight trucks, many states have installed fixed truck weighing stations on main highways and have deployed specially trained state police units that perform random roadside inspections to verify the safe operation of trucks and their compliance with the applicable legal weight limits. However, a preliminary study of police roadside inspections shows no correlation between the regions of high enforcement operations and those where overweight trucks are most frequent. Such random deployment of enforcement teams reduces the efficiency of the effort at a time when resources for such activities are in short supply. To help optimize the efficiency of the enforcement process, this paper investigates the possibility of developing a tool that utilizes available weigh-in-motion (WIM) data to plan truck traffic enforcement operations in a manner that minimizes the number of illegal overweight vehicles around a state. The proposed approach is consistent with the concept well known to sociologists and criminologists as the broken windows principle. The principle has been extensively used in many large U.S. cities to help reduce the level of crime. The implementation of the proposed methodology is demonstrated using a large truck database collected in New York State. The examples provided in this paper demonstrate that the implementation of the proposed approach will help reduce the numbers of illegal overweight trucks, which can result in a reduction of New York State’s expenditures on pavement and bridge repair and maintenance by an amount ranging from $16.0 to $53.2 million per year excluding the amount collected as fines.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support provided by the New York State Department of Transportation through the Project NYSDOT C-08-13 “Effect of Overweight Vehicles on NYSDOT Infrastructure.” The findings and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NYSDOT.

References

A&I FMCSA (Analysis & Information online Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration). (2015). “Analysis and information online, crash statistics map tool.” 〈http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov//mapping/CrashStatistics/default_crash.aspx〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
Bailey, T. C., and Gatrell, A. C. (1995). Interactive spatial data analysis, Longman, New York.
Barron, C. J., Jessup, E. L., and Casavant, K. L. (1994). “An evaluation of county and city weight and enforcement road weight enforcement efforts in the State of Washington.”, Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Olympia, WA.
Blower, D., Green, P. E., and Matteson, A. (2010). “Condition of trucks and truck crash involvement: Evidence from the large truck crash causation study.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2194, 21–28.
Cambridge Systematics. (2009). “Wisconsin truck size and weight study.” Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation, Madison, WI.
Corman, H., and Mocan, N. (2002). “Carrots, sticks and broken windows.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.
Cunagin, W., Mickler, W. A., and Wright, C. (1997). “Evasion of weight-enforcement stations by trucks.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1570, 181–190.
Dey, K. C., Chowdhury, M., Pang, W., Putman, B. J., and Chen, L. (2014). “Estimation of pavement and bridge damage costs caused by overweight trucks.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2411, 62–71.
DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles). (2015). “2014-2015 New York state executive budget, transportation.” 〈http://openbudget.ny.gov/spendingForm.html〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
Econometrica. (2007). “Roadside inspection costs.” Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (1997). “Federal highway cost allocation study.”, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2006). “FBF bridge formula weight.”, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2007). “Commercial motor vehicle size and weight enforcement in Europe.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2008). “The freight story 2008.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2011). “TS&W final report.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/tswstudy/Vol3-Chapter3.pdf〉.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2013). “Annual state certifications of size and weight enforcement on federal-aid highways, as prescribed under CFR Part 657.” 〈http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/nat_freight_stats/docs/13factsfigures/table3_09.htm〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
Fiorillo, G., and Ghosn, M. (2014). “Procedure for statistical categorization of overweight vehicles in a WIM database.” J. Transp. Eng., 04014011.
FMCSA (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration). (2015). “Large truck crash causation study, summary tables.” 〈http://www.ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/LTCCS/〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
FMCSA (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration). (2015). “Large truck crash causation study, summary tables.” 〈http://www.ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/LTCCS/〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
Ghosn, M., Parker, N., Fiorillo, G., Gayovyy, V., Getso, T., and Ahmed, S. (2015). “Effect of overweight vehicles on NYSDOT infrastructure.”, New York State Dept. of Transportation, Albany, NY.
Grenzeback, L. R., Stowers, J. R., and Boghani, A. B. (1988). “Feasibility of a national heavy-vehicle monitoring system.”, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Harcourt, B. E., and Ludwig, J. (2006). “Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment.” Univ. Chicago Law Rev., 73, in press.
Huang, J., and Chan, C.-Y. (2012). “Investigation of truck traffic versus placement of inspection facilities for enforcement of overweight trucks in California.” 91st Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Laman, J. A., and Nowak, A. S. (1997). “Site-specific truck loads on bridges and roads.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp., 123(2), 119–133.
Miller, G. S. (2015). “New York traffic tickets.” 〈http://newyorktraffictickets.com/trucking-tickets-overweight-fines〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
NYSDMV (New York State Department of Motor Vehicles). (2013). “Motor vehicle crash statistics.” 〈http://dmv.ny.gov/about-dmv/statistical-summaries〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
NYSDOT (New York State Department of Transportation). (2011). “Divisible load overweight permits, a customer guide.” 〈https://www.dot.ny.gov/portal/page/portal/nypermits〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
NYS V&T Law. (2015). “New York state vehicle and traffic law: Title III, Article 10, Section 385.” 〈http://law.onecle.com/new-york/vehicle-traffic/VAT0385_385.html〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
Prozzi, J., et al. (2012). “Oversize/overweight vehicle permit fee study.” Texas Dept. of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office, Austin, TX.
Ramseyer, C. C., Nghiem, A. X., and Swyden, D. P. (2008). “Investigation of cost effective truck weight enforcement.”, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
RITA (Research and Innovative Technology Administration). (2014b). “National transportation statistics.” 〈http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_22.html〉 (Oct. 10, 2015).
Short, M. B., et al. (2008). “A statistical model of criminal behavior.” Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 18, 1249–1267.
Straus, S. H., and Semmens, J. (2006). “Estimating the cost of overweight vehicle travel on Arizona highways.” Arizona Dept. of Transportation, Phoenix.
Taylor, B., Bergan, A., Lindgren, N., and Berthelot, C. (2000). “The importance of commercial vehicle weight enforcement in safety and road asset management.” Traffic Technology Int. January 2000, Annual Review, UKIP Media & Events, Dorking, Surrey, U.K., 234–237.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (1990). “Truck weight limits—Issues and options.”, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
URS (United Research Services). (2005). “Minnesota statewide commercial vehicle weight compliance strategic plan.” Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2004). “New York: 2002 economic census—Vehicle inventory use survey.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Wadsworth, H. M. (1990). Handbook of statistical methods for engineers and scientists, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wilson, J. Q., and Kelling, G. L. (1982). “Broken windows and police and neighborhood safety.” Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142Issue 9September 2016

History

Received: Oct 19, 2015
Accepted: Mar 3, 2016
Published online: May 17, 2016
Published in print: Sep 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Oct 17, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graziano Fiorillo, Ph.D., S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, City College of New York, CUNY, New York 10031 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Michel Ghosn, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, City College of New York, CUNY, New York 10031. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share