Existing Bridge Formulas for Truck-Weight Regulation from International Jurisdictions and Resulting Load Stresses on Single-Span Bridges
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper identifies and characterizes existing bridge formulas from international regions and presents the results of an analysis of the allowable gross vehicle weights and bridge load stress effects on single-span bridges resulting from these formulas. This is done to provide insight into this method of regulating truck size and weight to identify influencing factors and considerations for future decisions regarding the creation of new bridge formulas, or modification of existing ones. It is found that bridge formulas vary significantly in terms of the level of restrictiveness of allowable loads and imposed load effects due to the design criteria used in their development including truck configurations, bridge design methods, design loads, and allowable load rating. Bridge formulas should be designed to limit the imposed stresses on bridges based on criteria suitable to a jurisdiction’s truck fleet and infrastructure characteristics in order to adequately regulate truck sizes and weights. Many issues may result from the implementation of an unsuitable bridge formula for the infrastructure and transportation characteristics of a jurisdiction in terms of the design overstress criteria and additional axle spacing and weight limits. The unintended, and possibly undesirable, outcomes of implementation of a bridge formula must be monitored and resolved for safety, dynamic performance, and infrastructure impacts. With the continuously changing infrastructure and truck transportation characteristics, bridge formulas must be reevaluated and updated to ensure the adequacy of limit weights.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Bernard Jacob and Dr. Franziska Schmidt from the French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Development, and Networks (IFSTTAR) for their contributions to this research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for the financial support.
References
Argawal, A., and Billing, J. (1986). “The effect of Ontario’s weight regulations on commercial vehicle design.” 2nd Int. Symp. on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Austroads. (1994). “Review of axle spacing/mass schedule for general access and restricted access vehicle.” Sydney, Australia.
Battelle Team. (1995). “Comprehensive truck size and weight study, working paper 4: Bridges and truck size and weight regulations.” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Contractor, Y. J. (2005). “Evaluation of a new bridge formula for regulation of truck weights.” Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Ghosn, M. (2000). “Development of truck weight regulations using bridge reliability model.” J. Bridge Eng., 293–303.
James, R., Noel, J., Furr, H., and Bonnilla, F. (1986). “Proposed new truck weight limit formula.” J. Struct. Eng., 1589–1604.
Luskin, D., and Walton, C. (2001). “Effects of truck size and weights on highway infrastructure and operations: A synthesis report.” Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, TX.
NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement). (1997). “Harmonization of vehicle weight and dimension regulations within NAFTA partnership.”, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. DOT, Washington DC.
New Zealand Minister of Transport. (2002). “Land transport rule: Vehicle dimensions and mass-Rule 41001.” Land Transport Safety Authority of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Nordengen, P. A. (1998). “A new era of overloading control in South Africa.” 5th Int. Symp. on Heavy Vehicle Weight and Dimensions, International Forum for Road Transport Technology (IFRTT).
O’Connor, C., and Shaw, P. (2000). Bridge loads: An international perspective, Spon Press, New York.
OECD/International Transport Forum. (2011). “Moving freight with better trucks: Improving safety, productivity, and sustainability.” OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre, Paris, France.
Pearson, B. (1998). “Review of axle spacing mass schedules.” National Road Transport Commission of Australia, Mitcham, Victoria, Australia.
Pollux [Computer software]. Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris, France.
Sweatman, P., Prem, H., Ramsay, E., and Lambert, J. (1999). “Performance based standards for heavy vehicles in australia-field of performance measures.” National Road Transport Commission, Melbourne, Australia.
TERNZ Transport Research. (2010). “The development of pro-forma over-dimension vehicle parameters.” New Zealand Transport Agency, Auckland, New Zealand.
Transport Republic of South Africa. (2010). TRH 11-dimensional and mass limitations and other requirements for abnormal load vehicles, 8th Ed., Pretoria, South Africa.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (1990). “Truck weight limits: Issues and options.”, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
U.S. DOT (U.S. Dept. of Transportation). (2000). “Comprehensive truck size and weight study.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Woodrooffe, J. (2006). “Federal bridge formula: How it influences vehicle dynamic behavior.” Int. Symp. on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Univ. of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.
Woodrooffe, J., Sweatman, P., Middleton, D., James, R., and Billing, J. (2010). “Review of Canadian experience with the regulation of large commercial motor vehicles.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 14, 2013
Accepted: Aug 18, 2015
Published online: Oct 14, 2015
Published in print: Jan 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Mar 14, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.