Case Study of an Alternative Merging Sign Design for Temporary Traffic Control in Work Zones
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 1
Abstract
Signage plays an important role in work zones to provide guidance to drivers under changed conditions. This study investigated the safety effect of an alternative merge sign configuration in a freeway work zone. In this alternative configuration, the graphical-only lane closed sign from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) was compared against a MERGE/arrow sign on one side and a Right Lane Closed sign on the other side. Although the graphical-only MUTCD signage for work zones has been in use for several years, it is not known if the signage recommended by the MUTCD offers the highest safety for all jurisdictions. The study measured driver behavior characteristics including speeds and open lane occupancies. The measurements were taken at a work zone on Interstate 70 in Missouri. The study found that the open lane occupancy upstream of the merge sign was higher for the test sign in comparison to the MUTCD sign. The occupancy values at different distances between the merge sign and the taper were similar for both signs. The test sign had 11% more traffic in the open lane upstream of the merge sign. In terms of safety, it is desirable for vehicles to occupy the open lane as far upstream from the taper as possible to avoid conflicts due to the lane drop. The analysis of speed characteristics did not reveal substantial differences between the two sign configurations. The 85th percentile speeds with the MUTCD sign were only 1.6 and 3.2 kph (1 and 2 mph) lower than the test sign at the merge sign and taper locations, respectively. In considering all the aforementioned performance measures, the alternative sign configuration was not superior, but performed equal to the MUTCD sign configuration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful for the assistance provided by MoDOT staff members Dan Smith, Jason Sommerer, and Julie Stotlemeyer for coordinating field data collection sites. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of Henry Brown and Sawyer Breslow, who helped with data collection, and Zach Osman, who assisted with data processing and analysis.
References
Beacher, A., Fontaine, M., and Garber, N. (2005). “Field evaluation of late merge traffic control in work zones.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 32–41.
Coe, R. (2002). “It’s the effect size, stupid. What effect size is and why it is important.” Annual Conf. of the British Educational Research Association, Univ. of Exeter, England.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Federal Highway Administration. (2009). “Manual of uniform traffic control devices.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Feldblum, E. G. (2005). “Alternative merge sign at signalized intersections.”, Connecticut Dept. of Transportation, CT.
Heaslip, K., Schrock, S., Wang, M., Rescot, R., Bai, Y., and Brady, B. (2010). “A closed-course feasibility analysis of temporary rumble strips for use in short-term work zones.” J. Transp. Saf. Secur., 2(4), 299–311.
Hou, Y., Sun, C., and Edara, P. (2012). “Statistical test for 85th and 15th percentile speeds with asymptotic distribution of sample quantiles.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 47–53.
Ishak, S., Qi, Y., and Rayaprolu, P. (2012). “Safety evaluation of joint and conventional lane merge configurations for freeway work zones.” Traffic Inj. Prev., 13(2), 199–208.
Milton, J. S., and Arnold, J. C. (2007). Introduction to probability and statistics, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 319–325.
Srinivasan, S., Carrick, G., Zhu, X., Heaslip, K., and Washburn, S. (2008). “Analysis of crashes in freeway work zone queues: A case study.”, Transportation Research Center, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Sun, C., Edara, P., and Ervin, K. (2011). “Elevated-risk work zone evaluation of temporary rumble strips.” J. Transp. Saf. Secur., 3(3), 157–173.
TXDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). (2001). “Traffic data and analysis manual.” 〈http://onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/txdotmanuals/tda/tda.pdf〉 (Sep. 5, 2013).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142 • Issue 1 • January 2016
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 28, 2015
Accepted: Jul 14, 2015
Published online: Sep 10, 2015
Published in print: Jan 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Feb 10, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.