Empirical Analysis of a Generalized Linear Multianticipative Car-Following Model in Congested Traffic Conditions
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 6
Abstract
This paper empirically investigates the multianticipative car-following behavior using a multiple linear regression approach. Two important aspects of the multiple linear regression of a modified generalized linear multianticipative car-following model are addressed, namely, multicollinearity between explanatory variables and the serial correlation of time series data, which have not been taken into account by previous studies. This paper analyzes the multianticipative car-following behavior using the next generation simulation (NGSIM) trajectory data. Specifically, the following issues are discussed: reaction time estimation, multicollinearity diagnosis, serial correlation test, model selection, and parameter estimation. Preliminary results show that a driver in extremely congested traffic conditions is able to react to the stimuli of the first, second, and even third leader with respect to the relative speed and the stimuli of the first or the second leader with respect to the desired space. It is reascertained that a driver is more perceptual to speed difference than to desired space behavior in extremely congested traffic conditions. Moreover, it is observed that a driver in less congested traffic conditions only reacts to the stimuli of the first leader with respect to both the relative speed and desired distance. Therefore, it is empirically believed that the stimuli perceived by a driver may be different in different traffic conditions with respect to multianticipative car-following behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Part of this work was supported by the research grant from the University of Missouri research board. Special thanks are due to NGSIM program for providing the trajectory data sets. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented in this paper.
References
Ahmed, K. I. (1999). “Modeling drivers’ acceleration and lane changing behavior.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Aycin, M. F., and Benekohal, R. F. (1998). “Linear acceleration car-following model development and validation.” Transportation Research Record 1644, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 10–19.
Aycin, M. F., and Benekohal, R. F. (2001). “Stability and performance of car-following models in congested traffic.” J. Transp. Eng., 2–12.
Aycin, M. F., and Benekohal, R. F. (2004). “Performance of the generalized car-following model obtained from macroscopic flow relationships in simulating field data.” Proc., 83rd TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board of the National Academics, Washington, DC, 1–20.
Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A., and Sugiyama, Y. (1995). “Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation.” Phys. Rev., 51(2), 1035–1042.
Basnayake, C., and Lachapelle, G. (2006). “Driver response analysis in car-following scenarios using differential global positioning system.” Proc., 85th TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board of the National Academics, Washington, DC, 1–12.
Benekohal, R. F., and Treiterer, J. (1988). “CARSIM: Car following model for simulation of traffic in normal and stop-and-go conditions.” Transportation Research Record 1194, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 99–111.
Bexelius, S. (1968). “An extended model for car-following.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2(1), 13–21.
Bham, G. H., and Benekohal, R. F. (2004). “A high fidelity traffic simulation model based on car-following and cellular automata concepts.” Transp. Res. Part C, 12(1), 1–32.
Bierley, R. L. (1963). “Investigation of an inter vehicle spacing display.” Highway Res. Rec., 25, 58–75.
Brackstone, M., and McDonald, M. (1999). “Car-following: A historical review.” Transp. Res. F, 2(4), 181–196.
Brockfeld, E., Kühne, R. D., and Wagner, P. (2004). “Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic flow models.” Proc., 83rd TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board of the National Academics, Washington, DC, 1–20.
Chandler, R. E., Herman, R., and Montrol, E. W. (1958). “Traffic dynamics: Studies in car-following.” Oper. Res., 6(2), 165–184.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. D., and Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science, 3rd Ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Daou, A. (1964). “The distribution of headway in a platoon.” Oper. Res., 12(2), 360–361.
Durbin, J., and Watson, G. S. (1951). “Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression.” Biometrika, 37(1–2), 409–428.
Edie, L. (1961). “Car-following and steady state theory for non-congested traffic.” Oper. Res., 9(1), 66–76.
Eissfeldt, N., and Wagner, P. (2003). “Effects of anticipatory driving in a traffic flow model.” Eur. Phys. J. B, 33(1), 121–129.
Farhi, N., Haj-Salem, H., and Lebacque, J. P. (2012). “Multi-anticipative piecewise-linear car-following model.” Transportation Research Record 2315, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 100–109.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1980). “Development and testing of INTRAS, a microscopic freeway simulation model, Vol. I: Program design, parameter calibration and freeway dynamics component development.”, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Fox, P., and Lehman, F. G. (1967). “Safety in car-following. A computer simulation.” Newark College of Engineering, Newark, NJ, 173–190.
Fuller, W. A. (1996). Introduction to statistical time series, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Gazis, D. C., Herman, R., and Potts, R. B. (1959). “Car-following theory of steady state flow.” Oper. Res., 7(4), 499–505.
Gazis, D. C., Herman, R., and Rothrey, R. W. (1961). “Non-linear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow.” Oper. Res., 9(4), 545–567.
Gipps, P. G. (1981). “A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation.” Transp. Res. Part B, 15(2), 105–111.
Green, M. (2000). “‘How long does it take to stop?’ Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times.” Transp. Hum. Factors, 2(3), 195–216.
Helly, W. (1959). “Simulation of bottlenecks in single lane traffic flow.” Proc., Symp. on Theory of Traffic Flow, Research Laboratories, General Motors, New York, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 207–238.
Herman, R., and Rothery, R. W. (1962). “Microscopic and macroscopic aspects of single lane traffic flow.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. Jpn., 5(2), 74–95.
Hoogendoorn, S. P., Ossen, S., and Schreuder, M. (2006). “Empirics of multi-anticipative car-following behavior.” Transportation Research Record 1965, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 112–120.
Jiang, R., Wu, Q., and Zhu, Z. (2001). “Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory.” Phys. Rev. E, 64(1), 017101.
Kim, T., Lovell, D. J., and Park, Y. (2007). “Empirical analysis of underlying mechanisms and variability in car-following behavior.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–19.
Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A., and Schreckenberg, M. (2001). “Human behavior as origin of traffic phases.” Phys. Rev. E, 65(1), 015101.
Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A., and Schreckenberg, M. (2002). “Single-vehicle data of highway traffic: Microscopic description of traffic phases.” Phys. Rev. E, 65(5), 056133.
Lee, H. K., Barlovic, R., Schreckenberg, M., and Kim, D. (2004). “Mechanical restriction versus human overreaction triggering congested traffic states.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(23), 238702.
Lenz, H., Wagner, C. K., and Sollacher, R. (1999). “Multi-anticipative car-following model.” Eur. Phys. J. B, 7(2), 331–335.
Ma, X., and Andréasson, I. (2006). “Driver reaction time estimation from real car-following data and application in GM-type model evaluation.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–23.
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., and Vining, G. G. (2001). Introduction to linear regression analysis, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Newell, G. F. (1961). “Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car-following.” Oper. Res., 9(2), 209–229.
Ozaki, H. (1993). “Reaction and anticipation in the car-following behavior.” Proc., 12th Int. Symp. on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, Elsevier Science, Saint Louis, MO.
Ranjitkar, P., Nakatsuji, T., Azuta, Y., and Gurusinghe, G. S. (2003). “Stability analysis based on instantaneous driving behavior using car-following data.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 140–151.
Rockwell, T. H., and Treiterer, J. (1968). “Sensing and communication between vehicles.”, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC.
Tilch, B., and Helbing, D. (2000). “Evaluation of single vehicle data in dependence of the vehicle-type, lane, and site.” Traffic and Granular Flow 99, Springer, Berlin, 333–338.
Treiber, M., Kesting, A., and Helbing, D. (2006). “Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models.” Physica A, 360(1), 71–88.
U.S. Dept. of Transportation (USDOT)-FHWA. (2013). “US Highway 101 Dataset.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/07030/index.cfm〉 (Nov. 20, 2013).
Wang, T., Gao, Z. Y., and Zhao, X. M. (2006). “Multiple velocity difference model and its stability analysis.” Acta Phys. Sin., 55(2), 634–640 (in Chinese).
Zhang, X., and Bham, G. H. (2007). “Estimation of driver reaction time from detailed vehicle trajectory data.” Proc., 18th IASTED Int. Conf. on Modeling and Simulation, ACTA Press, Anaheim, CA, 574–579.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 11, 2013
Accepted: Jan 28, 2014
Published online: Mar 19, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Aug 19, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.