Improved Operational Performance Assessment for Two-Lane Highway Facilities
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 6
Abstract
Historically, two-lane highways served primarily as uninterrupted flow connectors between major population centers. Increasingly, however, population growth in areas between the major population centers along these highways is reaching levels such that occasional signalized intersections are commonly present. Given increasing congestion along these routes, particularly as a result of increased signalization, transportation engineers need methods and tools to analyze highway performance. The current analysis methodology contained in the commonly used highway capacity manual (HCM) for two-lane highways is limited in scope to completely uninterrupted-flow facilities. Furthermore, the spacing of signalized intersections along a two-lane highway is typically great enough such that the urban streets analysis methodology of the HCM is not applicable. Until recently, a simulation tool did not exist that could model the combination of two-lane highway segments and signalized intersections. This capability is now incorporated in the corridor simulation (CORSIM) microscopic traffic simulation program. This study uses the updated version of CORSIM to develop an analytical methodology for two-lane highway facilities (i.e., the combination of two-lane highway segments and signalized intersections). This study is a follow-up to a similar one conducted in 2009 at the University of Florida. However, a major distinction is that the previous study had to use a hybrid simulation approach [TWO-lane PASsing and CORridor SIMulation (TWOPAS and CORSIM)] whereas this study used the improved version of CORSIM that provides a unified and more accurate simulation approach. Although many similarities exist in the results for this study and the preceding one, several differences in model structures and coefficients were identified in this study. The service measure percent delay was retained for its efficacy in assessing operations on complex two-lane highway facilities (particularly those with signalized intersections), but this paper presents new percent delay-based level-of-service criteria thresholds. This paper also provides additional guidance for facility segmentation in situations in which a speed limit reduction is applied in the vicinity of a signalized intersection.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Al-Kaisy, A., and Durbin, C. (2008). “Evaluating new methodologies for estimating performance on two-lane highways.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 35(8), 777–785.
Al-Kaisy, A., and Freedman, Z. (2010). “Estimating performance on two-lane highways: Case study validation of a new methodology.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 72–79.
Al-Kaisy, A., and Karjala, S. (2010). “Car-following interaction and the definition of free-moving vehicles on two-lane rural highways.” J. Transp. Eng., 925–931.
Dixon, M. P., Kyte, M., and Sarepalli, S. S. (2003). “Effects of upstream signalized intersections on two-lane highway operations.” 〈http://www.ltrc.lsu.edu/TRB_82/TRB2003-002075.pdf〉 (Aug. 23, 2010).
Li, J., and Washburn, S. S. (2011). “Implementing two-lane highway simulation modeling into CORSIM.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, Stockholm, Sweden, 293–305.
Oregon Department of Transportation. (2010). “Modeling performance indicators on two-lane rural highways: The Oregon experience.” Facility Analysis and Simulation Team, Transportation Development Div., 〈http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TPAU/docs/A_Background/ModelingPerf.pdf〉 (Sep. 19, 2011).
Romana, M. G., and Pérez, I. (2006). “Measures of effectiveness for level-of-service assessment of two-lane roads: An alternative proposal using a threshold speed.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 56–62.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2007a). “Approved corrections and changes for the highway capacity manual 2000.” 〈http://www.ahb40.org/system/datas/40/original/Approved_Corrections_to_HCM_2000_Nov_2007.pdf〉 (Aug. 20, 2012).
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2007b). “Research needs statements: Effects of operational treatments on two-lane highway traffic operations.” 〈http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13427〉 (Aug. 20, 2012).
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010). “Highway capacity manual 2010.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Van As, C. (2006). The development of an analysis method for the determination of level of service of two-lane undivided highways in South Africa, South African National Roads Agency Limited, Pretoria, South Africa.
Yu, Q., and Washburn, S. S. (2009). “Operational performance assessment for two-lane highway facilities.” J. Transp. Eng., 197–205.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 3, 2013
Accepted: Jan 28, 2014
Published online: Mar 17, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Aug 17, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.