Performance of Granitic, Shale, and Limestone Forest Road Aggregates Subjected to Repeated Loading
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 4
Abstract
This study compared the performance of three aggregate layers, commonly used in the construction of unbound forest roads in Ireland, when they were subjected to repeated loading in a new large-scale test rig. These layers comprised: (1) a layer of uncrushed, granitic, sandy gravel-a good quality road aggregate, (2) a layer of shale-a poor quality aggregate, and (3) a layer of crushed limestone–an excellent quality aggregate with a wet mix macadam (WMM) grading–on top of a poor quality shale subbase layer. The repeated load testing rig was designed and constructed to test different surface or completion layering thicknesses of the aggregates over a common formation or subgrade material of silty sandy soil. This testing was achieved by surface loading the aggregates through a 200-mm-diameter rubber pad-attached to a hydraulic actuator on the test rig-for up to 150,000 load applications. The subgrade pressures and surface deflections were measured at applied stresses of 500, 750, and 1,000 kPa. The good quality granitic aggregate performed much better than the poor quality shale aggregate under the repeated loading and is suitable as a completion material for use in unbound forest roads. The shale aggregate can be used in unbound forest roads as a subbase material.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was partly funded by the Council for Forest Research and Development (COFORD) under the operational Programme for Agriculture, Road Development and Forestry, supported by EU structural funds. Financial support was also obtained from Coillte Teoranta. The authors would like to express their appreciation to the late Dr. John Mulqueen, NUI, Galway.
References
Boudali, M., and Robert, C. (1997). “Détermination en laboratoire du module réversible des matériaux de fondations.” Transport Québec, Receuil des communications 32 Congrès de l’AQTR, Tome 2, 107–128.
British Standard Institution (BSI). (1990a). “Method of test for soils for civil engineering purposes.”, London.
British Standard Institution (BSI). (1990b). “Methods for sampling and testing mineral aggregates, sands and fillers.”, London.
Davitt, J. (1982). “Repeated load tests on simulated gravel pavements from three sources in Ireland.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Dawson, A. R., Paute, J. L., and Thom, N. H. (1993). “Mechanical characteristics of unbound materials as a function of condition.” Proc., European Symp. on Flexible Pavements, A. Gomes Correia, ed., Taylor & Francis, 35–44.
Douglas, R. A. (1997). “Heavy load, low tire pressure rutting of unbound granular pavements.” J. Transp. Eng., 357–363.
Evdorides, H. T., and Snaith, M. S. (1996). “A knowledge-based analysis process for road pavement condition assessment.” Proc., ICE Trans., 117, 202–210.
Giroud, J. P., Ah-Line, C., and Bonaparte, R. (1985). “Design of unpaved roads and trafficked areas with geogrids.” Polymer grid reinforcement, Thomas Telford, London, 116–127.
Giroud, J. P., and Han, J. (2004a). “Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. II. Calibration and applications.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 787–797.
Giroud, J. P., and Han, J. (2004b). “Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. I. Development of design method.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 775–785.
Giroud, J. P. (1981). “Geotextile-reinforced unpaved road design.” J. Geotech. Eng., 107(9), 1233–1254.
Hammitt, G. M. (1970). “Thickness requirement for unsurfaced roads and airfields, bare base support, project 3782-65.”, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Hopkins, T. C., Beckham, T. L., and Sun, C. (2007). “Resilient modulus of compacted crushed stone aggregate bases.”, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Kennedy, C. K. (1985). “In-situ testing of unbound aggregates.” Proc., Symp. on Unbound Aggregates in Roads, Univ. of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K., 63–68.
LabVIEW 8.0. [Computer software]. National Instruments, Austin, TX.
Lekarp, F., Isacsson, U., and Dawson, A. (2000). “State of the art: I: Resilient response of unbound aggregates.” J. Transp. Eng., 66–75.
Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. N., and Khalaj, O. (2007). “Laboratory tests of small-scale HDPE pipes buried in reinforced sand under repeated load.” Geotextiles Geomembranes, 26(2), 145–163.
Rodgers, M., Hayes, G., and Healy, M. G. (2009). “Cyclic loading tests on sandstone and limestone shale aggregates used in unbound forest roads.” Constr. Build. Mater., 23(6), 2421–2427.
SIGMA/W. [Computer software]. GEO-SLOPE International, AB, Canada.
Simonsen, E., and Isacsson, U. (1999). “Thaw weakening of pavement structures in cold regions.” Cold Regions Sci. Tech., 29(2), 135–151.
Zakaria, M., and Lees, G. (1996). “Rutting characteristics of unbound aggregate layers.” Constr. Build. Mater., 10(3), 185–189.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140 • Issue 4 • April 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 22, 2013
Accepted: Dec 10, 2013
Published online: Jan 23, 2014
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jun 23, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.