Abstract

This study investigated the accuracy improvement of the gravimetric geoid model in Turkey using densified grids of the gravity anomalies with the least-squares modification of the Stokes integral with additive corrections (LSMSA) method. In LSMSA computations of the geoid models, the surface gravity anomalies, which were derived from the complete Bouguer anomaly grid data set by forward modeling the topographic masses, were used. In the computations, in addition to the original 5′-resolution (9  km) Bouguer anomaly data set, its densified versions to 1′-resolution (2  km) also were used. The densification of the gravity grids was carried out using both planar- and spherical-type complete Bouguer anomalies. Thus, the effects of both gravity grid densification and the applied approximation for the Bouguer reduction process in gravity gridding on the geoid model accuracies were examined in order. The Bouguer gravity reductions were carried out using classical formulas for the planar approximation, whereas the gravimetric terrain corrections from the high-resolution SRTM2gravity global model were employed for the spherical approximation in numerical tests. The calculated geoid models were validated at 100 homogeneously distributed GPS/leveling (GPS means Global Positioning System) benchmarks over the country. In the tests, the geoid undulations derived from the models also were compared with the observations at six tide gauge stations along the coastlines. The latter provided an additional check for the assessment of the models’ compatibility at the coastal boundaries. In conclusion, the accuracy of the best geoid model solution (8.6 cm by means of the standard deviation of geoid undulation differences at GPS/leveling benchmarks) was achieved using 1′-resolution gravity anomalies restored from the spherical complete Bouguer anomalies in Turkey.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The terrestrial gravity data used in this study is proprietary or confidential in nature and may be provided only with restrictions. The GPS/leveling data and tide gauge observations used in the study are confidential in nature and may be provided only with restrictions by the responsible data provider institution (General Directorate of Mapping). The calculated best geoid model in the study is available at https://www.isgeoid.polimi.it/Geoid/Europe/Turkey/turkey2021_g.html in the Geoid Models Repository of the International Service for Geoid (ISG). The SRTM2Gravity data set is available at http://ddfe.curtin.edu.au/models/SRTM2gravity2018/. The global geopotential model (XGM2019e) used in the study is freely available from the database of the International Center for Global Gravity Field Models (ICGEM) of the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) (http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/). DTU13 models are available at https://ftp.space.dtu.dk/pub/DTU13. The other models and codes generated in the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this article constitutes a part of the first author’s Ph.D. thesis study at the Graduate School of Istanbul Technical University (ITU). This study was funded by ITU General Research Project with Protocol no. MGA-2018-41592, and carried out as a part of the project. The authors acknowledge Hirt et al. (2019) for the SRTM2gravity high-resolution global model data. The GRAVSOFT program was used in gravity data interpolation and terrain correction computation. Geoid computations with the LSMSA method were carried out using ITU-GRG software. The figures were created using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) software (Wessel et al. 2019). The best-performing geoid model calculated in this study is available online from the Geoid Repository of the International Service for the Geoid (Reguzzoni et al. 2021). The authors thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable efforts and suggestions.

References

Abbak, R. A., B. Erol, and A. Ustun. 2012a. “Comparison of the KTH and remove–compute–restore techniques to geoid modelling in a mountainous area.” Comput. Geosci. 48: 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.05.019.
Abbak, R. A., L. E. Sjöberg, A. Ellmann, and A. Ustun. 2012b. “A precise gravimetric geoid model in a mountainous area with scarce gravity data: A case study in central Turkey.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 56 (4): 909–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-011-9001-0.
Ågren, J., and L. E. Sjöberg. 2014. “Investigation of gravity data requirements for a 5 mm-quasigeoid model over Sweden.” In Gravity, geoid and height systems, 143–150. New York: Springer.
Ågren, J., L. E. Sjöberg, and R. Kiamehr. 2009. “The new gravimetric quasigeoid model KTH08 over Sweden.” J. Appl. Geod. 3 (3): 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1515/JAG.2009.015.
Andersen, O., P. Knudsen, and L. Stenseng. 2015. “The DTU13 MSS (mean sea surface) and MDT (mean dynamic topography) from 20 years of satellite altimetry.” In Vol. 144 of Proc., Int. Association of Geodesy Symp., edited by S. Jin and R. Barzaghi. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_182.
Arslan, S. 2016. “Geophysical regional gravity maps of Turkey and its general assessment.” Bull. Miner. Res. Explor. 2016 (153): 203–222.
Ayan, T. 1976. “Astrogeodätische Geoidberechnung für das Gebiet der Türkei.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Geodätisches Institut Universität Fridericiana Karlsruhe.
Ayan, T. 1978. “Türkiye geoidi.” Harit. Derg. 85: 5–17.
Ayhan, M. E. 1993. “Geoid determination in Turkey (TG-91).” Bull. Géodésique 67 (1): 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00807293.
Ayhan, M. E., et al. 2002. “Türkiye Ulusal Temel GPS Ağı-1999 (TUTGA-99A).” Harit. Derg. 145: 1–14.
Barthelmes, F. 2013. Definition of functionals of the geopotential and their calculation from spherical harmonic models. Berlin: GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences.
Ellmann, A. 2005a. “Computation of three stochastic modifications of Stokes’s formula for regional geoid determination.” Comput. Geosci. 31 (6): 742–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.01.008.
Ellmann, A. 2005b. “Two deterministic and three stochastic modifications of Stokes’s formula: A case study for the Baltic countries.” J. Geod. 79 (1–3): 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0438-1.
Ellmann, A., S. Märdla, and T. Oja. 2020. “The 5 mm geoid model for Estonia computed by the least squares modified Stokes’s formula.” Surv. Rev. 52 (373): 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2019.1583848.
Erol, B., M. S. Işık, and S. Erol. 2020. “Assessment of gridded gravity anomalies for precise geoid modeling in Turkey.” J. Surv. Eng. 146 (3): 05020005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000317.
Featherstone, W. E., and M. C. Dentith. 1997. “A Geodetic approach to gravity data reduction for geophysics.” Comput. Geosci. 23 (10): 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00092-7.
Featherstone, W. E., J. D. Evans, and J. G. Olliver. 1998. “A Meissl-modified Vaníček and Kleusberg kernel to reduce the truncation error in gravimetric geoid computations.” J. Geod. 72 (3): 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050157.
Forsberg, R. 1984. A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modelling. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ.
Fotopoulos, G. 2013. “Combination of heights.” In Geoid determination: Theory and methods, edited by F. Sansò and M. G. Sideris, 517–544. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74700-0_11.
Gürkan, O. 1978. Astrojeodezik ağların deformasyonu ve Türkiye I. Derece triyangülasyon ağı. Trabzon, Türkiye: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.
Hammer, S. 1939. “Terrain corrections for gravimeter stations.” Geophysics 4 (3): 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440495.
Heiskanen, W. A., and H. Moritz. 1967. Physical geodesy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Hirt, C., M. Yang, M. Kuhn, B. Bucha, A. Kurzmann, and R. Pail. 2019. “SRTM2gravity: An ultrahigh resolution global model of gravimetric terrain corrections.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 (9): 4618–4627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082521.
Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., and H. Moritz. 2006. Physical geodesy. Vienna, Austria: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33545-1.
Işık, M. S., and B. Erol. 2016. “Geoid determination using GOCE-based models in Turkey.” In Proc., EGU General Assembly. Munich, Germany: European Geosciences Union.
Işık, M. S., B. Erol, S. Erol, and F. F. Sakil. 2021. “High-resolution geoid modeling using least squares modification of Stokes and Hotine formulas in Colorado.” J. Geod. 95 (5): 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01501-z.
Jarvis, A. H. I., A. Reuter, A. Nelson, and E. Guevara. 2008. “Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4.” Accessed February 11, 2022. https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org.
Kiahmehr, R. 2006. “Hybrid precise gravimetric geoid model for Iran based on recent GRACE and SRTM data and the least squares modification of Stokes’s formula.” J. Phys. Earth Space 32 (1): 7–23.
Kılıçoğlu, A. 2002. “Updated Turkish Geoid TG99A (in Turkish). Güncelleştirilmiş Türkiye Jeoidi 1999 (TG99A).” In Proc., Tectonics and Geodetic Networks Workshop, Scientific Meeting of TNGC, TUJK, 153–166. Istanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi Univ.
Kılıçoğlu, A., A. Direnç, H. Yıldız, M. Bölme, B. Aktuğ, M. Simav, and O. Lenk. 2011. “Regional gravimetric quasi-geoid model and transformation surface to national height system for Turkey (THG-09).” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 55 (4): 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-010-9023-z.
Kılıçoğlu, A., O. Firat, and C. Demir. 2005. “Observations and methods used in the computation of new Turkish geoid (TG-03).” In Proc., Geoid and Vertical Datum Workshop, Scientific Meeting of TNGC. Ankara, Turkey: General Directorate of Mapping.
Meissl, P. 1971. Preparation for the numerical evaluation of second order Molodenskii type formulas. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ.
Molodensky, M., V. Eremeev, and M. Yurkina. 1962. Methods for study of the external gravity field and figure of the Earth. Jerusalem, Israel: Israel Program for Scientific Translations.
Paul, M. K. 1973. “A method of evaluating the truncation error coefficients for geoidal height.” Bull. Géodésique 110 (1): 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521951.
Reguzzoni, M., et al. 2021. “Open access to regional geoid models: The International Service for the Geoid.” Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13 (4): 1653–1666. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1653-2021.
Sakil, F. F., S. Erol, A. Ellmann, and B. Erol. 2021. “Geoid modeling by the least squares modification of Hotine’s and Stokes’ formulae using non-gridded gravity data.” Comput. Geosci. 156 (Nov): 104909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104909.
Sánchez, L., and M. G. Sideris. 2017. “Vertical datum unification for the International Height Reference System (IHRS).” Geophys. J. Int. 209 (2): ggx025. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx025.
Simav, M. 2020. “Results from the first strapdown airborne gravimetry campaign over the Lake District of Turkey.” Surv. Rev. 53 (380): 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2020.1826140.
Simav, M., D. Becker, H. Yıldız, and M. Hoss. 2020. “Impact of temperature stabilization on the strapdown airborne gravimetry: A case study in Central Turkey.” J. Geod. 94 (4): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01369-5.
Simav, M., A. Türkezer, E. Sezen, S. Akyol, M. İnam, A. Cingöz, O. Lenk, and A. Kılıçoğlu. 2011. “Data quality control and management system of Turkish sea level monitoring network.” [In Turkish.] Harit. Derg. 1 (145): 15–28.
Simav, M., H. Yıldız, A. Direnç, and A. Türkezer. 2013. “Terrestrial gravity measurements towards Turkish height system modernization.” In Vol. 15 of Proc., EGU General Assembly Conf. Abstracts, 12260. Munich, Germany: European Geosciences Union.
Sjöberg, L. E. 1980. “Least squares combination of satellite harmonics and integral formulas in physical geodesy.” Gerlands Beitr. Geophys. 89 (5): 371–377.
Sjöberg, L. E. 1981. “Least squares combination of satellite and terrestrial data in physical geodesy.” Ann. Geophys. 37 (1): 25–30.
Sjöberg, L. E. 1984. “Least squares modification of Stokes’ and Venning-Meinesz’ formulas by accounting for truncation and potential coefficients errors.” Manuscripta Geod. 9: 209–229.
Sjöberg, L. E. 1991. “Refined least squares modification of Stokes’ formula.” Manuscripta Geod. 16 (6): 367–375.
Sjöberg, L. E. 2003a. “A general model for modifying Stokes’ formula and its least-squares solution.” J. Geod. 77 (7–8): 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0346-1.
Sjöberg, L. E. 2003b. “A solution to the downward continuation effect on the geoid determined by Stokes’ formula.” J. Geod. 77 (1–2): 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0306-1.
Sjöberg, L. E. 2004. “A spherical harmonic representation of the ellipsoidal correction to the modified Stokes formula.” J. Geod. 78 (3): 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-004-0378-1.
TUDES (Turkish National Sea Level Monitoring Network). 2021. “Turkish national sea level monitoring system—Türkiye Ulusal Deniz Seviyesi İzleme Ağı.” Accessed November 23, 2021. https://tudes.harita.gov.tr/?lang=us.
Vanicek, P., and L. E. Sjöberg. 1991. “Reformulation of Stokes’s theory for higher than second-degree reference field and modification of integration kernels.” J. Geophys. Res. 96 (B4): 6529–6539. https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB02782.
Vaniček, P., and A. Kleusberg. 1987. “The Canadian geoid-stokesian approach.” Manuscripta Geod. 12: 86–98.
Wessel, P., J. F. Luis, L. Uieda, R. Scharroo, F. Wobbe, W. H. F. Smith, and D. Tian. 2019. “The generic mapping tools version 6.” Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 20 (11): 5556–5564. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515.
Wong, L., and R. Gore. 1969. “Accuracy of geoid heights from modified Stokes kernels.” Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 18 (1): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1969.tb00264.x.
Woollard, G. P. 1980. “The new gravity system: Changes in international gravity base values and anomaly values.” Geophysics 44 (8): 1352–1366. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441012.
Yıldız, H., O. Firat, M. Simav, and Y. Ünver. 2006. “The high resolution geoid model for Turkey, TG-07.” In Vol. 18 of Proc., Int. Symp. of the Int. Gravity Field Service (IGFS), Gravity Field of the Earth, Program & Abstract Book, 28. Ankara, Turkey: General Directorate of Mapping.
Yıldız, H., R. Forsberg, J. Ågren, C. Tscherning, and L. Sjöberg. 2012. “Comparison of remove-compute-restore and least squares modification of Stokes’ formula techniques to quasi-geoid determination over the Auvergne test area.” J. Geod. Sci. 2 (1): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-011-0024-9.
Yıldız, H., M. Simav, E. Sezen, İ. Akpınar, Y. A. Akdoğan, A. Cingöz, and O. A. Akabalı. 2021. “Determination and validation of the Turkish Geoid Model-2020 (TG-20).” Boll. Di Geofis. Teor. Ed Appl. 62 (3): 495–512.
Zingerle, P., R. Pail, T. Gruber, and X. Oikonomidou. 2020. “The combined global gravity field model XGM2019e.” J. Geod. 94 (7): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01398-0.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 148Issue 3August 2022

History

Received: Jul 7, 2021
Accepted: Dec 26, 2021
Published online: Mar 16, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 16, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1769-4451. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-8267. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0854-788X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Accuracy assessment of the SRTM2gravity high-resolution topographic gravity model in geoid computation, Survey Review, 10.1080/00396265.2023.2183332, (1-11), (2023).
  • Geoid modeling with least squares modification of Hotine’s integral using gravity disturbances in Turkey, Earth Science Informatics, 10.1007/s12145-022-00843-2, 15, 3, (1889-1904), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share