Technical Papers
Aug 8, 2022

Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering under Changing Climate Conditions: General Framework and Performance of Single-Family Houses in the US

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 10

Abstract

The US Gulf and Atlantic coasts are often struck by severe hurricanes that cause massive economic and life losses. Climate change and structural aging are expected to exacerbate the risk associated with hurricane hazards. Appropriate methodologies are needed to assess and mitigate these effects through improved design and retrofit solutions that rigorously account for the associated uncertainties, such as performance-based engineering methodologies. This paper extends the performance-based hurricane engineering (PBHE) framework to account for the hazard nonstationarity induced by climate change effects. The newly extended nonstationary PBHE framework was implemented by performing a loss analysis on a benchmark low-rise single-family house over a 50-year design service life, for which climate change effects were accounted for by using a recently developed predictive model for hurricane wind speed distributions. The effects of different modeling assumptions and solution approaches (including approximate estimates, time discretization, interpolation techniques, and models for annual discount rates), different locations, and different climate change scenarios on the means and standard deviations of the total losses were investigated. The performance comparison of different storm mitigation strategies was also performed as an application example. In general, the proposed methodology provides consistent results under different modeling assumptions; however, the modeling assumptions for the annual discount rates can affect significantly the results. Based on the analysis results and within the limitations of the present implementation of the nonstationary performance-based hurricane engineering framework, climate change effects are generally significant, with estimated increases contained between 13.2% and 38.1% for the total loss means, and between 2.5% and 12.4% for the standard deviations of the total losses for the benchmark structure at the reference location of Pinellas Park, Florida. The extended nonstationary PBHE framework was able to identify the optimal retrofit strategy in terms of costs and benefits for any given combination of structures, residential developments, locations, and climate scenarios. The proposed nonstationary PBHE framework represents an advancement in performance-based engineering because it provides a rigorous approach to account for climate change effects. This framework has immediate practical applications, such as those shown in this paper, and could be further extended to other natural and human-made hazards.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge partial support for this research by the University of California Office of the President (UCOP) Lab Fees Program through Award LFR-20-651032. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring agency.

References

Alphonso, T. C., and M. Barbato. 2014. “Experimental fragility curves for aluminum storm panels subject to windborne debris impact.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 134 (Nov): 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.08.010.
Angus, J. E. 1994. “Probability integral transform and related results.” SIAM Rev. 36 (4): 652–654. https://doi.org/10.1137/1036146.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., E. Sanz-Ablanedo, R. Soetanto, M. C. González-Cruz, G. D. Larsen, and A. Cerezo-Narváez. 2020. “Duration and cost variability of construction activities: An empirical study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (1): 04019093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001739.
Barbato, M., F. Petrini, V. U. Unnikrishnan, and M. Ciampoli. 2013. “Performance-based hurricane engineering (PBHE) framework.” Struct. Saf. 45 (Nov): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.07.002.
Bisadi, V., and J. E. Padgett. 2015. “Explicit time-dependent multi-hazard cost analysis based on parameterized demand models for the optimum design of bridge structures.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 30 (7): 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12131.
Bjarnadottir, S., Y. Li, and M. G. Stewart. 2011. “A probabilistic-based framework for impact and adaptation assessment of climate change on hurricane damage risks and costs.” Struct. Saf. 33 (3): 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.02.003.
Bradley, B. A., D. S. Lee, R. Broughton, and C. Price. 2009. “Efficient evaluation of performance-based earthquake engineering equations.” Struct. Saf. 31 (1): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.03.003.
Ciampoli, M., F. Petrini, and G. Augusti. 2011. “Performance-based wind engineering: Towards a general procedure.” Struct. Saf. 33 (6): 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.07.001.
Conte, J. P., and Y. Zhang. 2007. “Performance based earthquake engineering: Application to an actual bridge-foundation-ground system.” In Proc., 12th Italian National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–18. Rome: Associazione Nazionale Italiana di Ingegneria Sismica.
Cui, W., and L. Caracoglia. 2016. “Exploring hurricane wind speed along US Atlantic coast in warming climate and effects on predictions of structural damage and intervention costs.” Eng. Struct. 122 (Sep): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.003.
Datin, P. L., D. O. Prevatt, and W. Pang. 2011. “Wind-uplift capacity of residential wood roof-sheathing panels retrofitted with insulating foam adhesive.” J. Archit. Eng. 17 (4): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000034.
Decò, A., and D. M. Frangopol. 2011. “Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards.” J. Risk Res. 14 (9): 1057–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.571789.
Dixon, C. R., F. J. Masters, D. O. Prevatt, and K. R. Gurley. 2014. “Wind uplift resistance of artificially and naturally aged asphalt shingles.” J. Archit. Eng. 20 (4): B4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000158.
Dong, Y., and Y. Li. 2016. “Reliability of roof panels in coastal areas considering effects of climate change and embedded corrosion of metal fasteners.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 2 (1): 04015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000851.
El Khoury Antoun, J. 2018. “Multi-hazard performance assessment of high-rise buildings.” M.S. thesis, Dep. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ.
Ellingwood, B. R., D. V. Rosowsky, Y. Li, and J. H. Kim. 2004. “Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (12): 1921–1930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921).
Emanuel, K. 2005. “Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years.” Nature 436 (7051): 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03906.
Esmaeili, M., and M. Barbato. 2021. “Predictive model for hurricane wind hazard under changing climate conditions.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 22 (3): 04021011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000458.
FEMA. 2012. HAZUS-MH 2.1 hurricane model technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gurley, K., J. P. Pinelli, C. Subramanian, A. Cope, L. Zhang, and J. Murphree. 2005. Predicting the vulnerability of typical residential buildings to hurricane damage. Miami: International Hurricane Research Center, Florida International Univ.
Huang, Z., D. V. Rosowsky, and P. R. Sparks. 2001. “Long-term hurricane risk assessment and expected damage to residential structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74 (3): 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00086-2.
ICC (International Code Council). 2011. 2010 Florida building code—Residential. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Building Commission.
IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2022. “Interest rates, discount rate for United States [INTDSRUSM193N].” Accessed March 6, 2022. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INTDSRUSM193N.
Jalayer, F., and C. A. Cornell. 2003. A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor design (DCFD) seismic formats. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Lee, C., and E. B. Lee. 2017. “Prediction method of real discount rate to improve accuracy of life-cycle cost analysis.” Energy Build. 135 (Jan): 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.020.
Lee, K. H., and D. V. Rosowsky. 2005. “Fragility assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions.” Eng. Struct. 27 (6): 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.12.017.
Li, Q., C. Wang, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2015. “Time-dependent reliability of aging structures in the presence of non-stationary loads and degradation.” Struct. Saf. 52 (Jan): 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.10.003.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2006. “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct. 28 (7): 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005.
Li, Y., and M. G. Stewart. 2011. “Cyclone damage risks caused by enhanced greenhouse conditions and economic viability of strengthened residential construction.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 12 (1): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000024.
Liel, A. B., and G. G. Deierlein. 2013. “Cost-benefit evaluation of seismic risk mitigation alternatives for older concrete frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 29 (4): 1391–1411. https://doi.org/10.1193/030911EQS040M.
Lin, N., J. D. Holmes, and C. W. Letchford. 2007. “Trajectories of wind-borne debris in horizontal winds and applications to impact testing.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (2): 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:2(274).
Lin, N., and E. Vanmarcke. 2008. “Windborne debris risk assessment.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 23 (4): 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.01.010.
Liu, P. L., and A. Der Kiureghian. 1986. “Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 1 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(86)90033-0.
Lopez, J. M., D. B. Roueche, and D. O. Prevatt. 2020. “Wind resistance and fragility functions for wood-framed wall sheathing panels in low-rise residential construction.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (8): 04020139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002653.
NIST. 2016. “Extreme wind speed data sets: Hurricane wind speeds.” Accessed March 12, 2022. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/winds/hurricane.htm.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2021. “Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters.” Accessed August 20, 2021. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/.
Pant, S., and E. J. Cha. 2018. “Effect of climate change on hurricane damage and loss for residential buildings in Miami-Dade County.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (6): 04018057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002038.
Petrini, F., M. Ciampoli, and M. Barbato. 2010. “Performance-based design of tall buildings under wind action.” In Proc., 2010 Structures Congress & North American Steel Construction Conf. (NASCC 2010). Reston, VA: ASCE.
Plotner, S. C., C. Babbitt, A. C. Charest, C. Elsmore, and J. Gomes. 2017. Building construction costs with RSMeans data. Greenville, SC: Gordian RSMeans Data.
Porter, K. A. 2003. “An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, 1–8. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
Porter, K. A., A. S. Kiremidjian, and J. S. LeGrue. 2001. “Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its use in performance evaluation.” Earthquake Spectra 17 (2): 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586176.
Shdid, C. A., A. Mirmiran, T. L. Wang, D. Jimenez, and P. Huang. 2011. “Uplift capacity and impact resistance of roof tiles.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 16 (3): 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000081.
Soong, T. T. 2004. Fundamentals of probability and statistics for engineers. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Stewart, M. G., D. V. Rosowsky, and Z. Huang. 2003. “Hurricane risks and economic viability of strengthened construction.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 4 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(12).
Stocker, T. F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. M. B. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley. 2013. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of IPCC the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stuckley, A., and R. Carter. 2001. Perforation threshold speeds of windborne debris for various wall and above ground shelter concepts. Lubbock, TX: Wind Engineering Research Center, Texas Tech Univ.
Sutter, D., D. DeSilva, and J. Kruse. 2009. “An economic analysis of wind resistant construction.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 97 (3–4): 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.01.002.
Tofallis, C. 2015. “A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66 (8): 1352–1362. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.103.
Unnikrishnan, V. U., and M. Barbato. 2013. “Performance-based hurricane risk assessment with application to wind and windborne debris hazards.” In Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR 2013. Leiden, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Unnikrishnan, V. U., and M. Barbato. 2015. “Performance-based comparison of different design alternatives and retrofit techniques for residential buildings subjected to hurricane hazards.” In Proc., 2015 Structures Congress, 1596–1607. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Unnikrishnan, V. U., and M. Barbato. 2016. “Performance-based comparison of different storm mitigation techniques for residential buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (6): 04016011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001469.
Unnikrishnan, V. U., and M. Barbato. 2017. “Multihazard interaction effects on the performance of low-rise wood-frame housing in hurricane-prone regions.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (8): 04017076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001797.
van de Lindt, J. W., and T. N. Dao. 2009. “Performance-based wind engineering for wood-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (2): 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(169).
Van Dyke, J., and P. Hu. 1989. “Determinants of variation in calculating a discount rate.” Energy 14 (10): 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(89)90093-5.
Wang, C., Q. Li, L. Pang, A. Zou, and L. Zhang. 2016. “Hurricane damage assessment for residential construction considering the non-stationarity in hurricane intensity and frequency.” Acta Oceanolog. Sin. 35 (12): 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0828-7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 10October 2022

History

Received: Nov 1, 2021
Accepted: May 9, 2022
Published online: Aug 8, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 8, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, One Shields Ave., 2209 Academic Surge, Davis, CA 95616. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-8719. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, One Shields Ave., 3149 Ghausi Hall, Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-8191. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share