Abstract

This paper proposes a hybrid technique to solve the inverse problem of damage localization and severity estimation in beam structures. The first phase of the method involves the use of influence lines (ILs) to extract information about the damage location. Then, a genetic algorithm (GA), representing the core of the whole procedure, uses static parameters as displacements and rotations at a few points to evaluate the bending stiffness along the structure by updating a finite-element model. The information obtained in the first phase is used in the second phase for (1) reducing the number of design variables of the GA and the consequent computational time; and (2) improving the accuracy of GA solutions because it allows a suitably trained neural network to select proper values for the coefficients of the proposed cost function in the genetic algorithm. The procedure is applied to a test problem, a simply supported, prestressed concrete railway bridge located in northern Italy. Numerical experiments are also conducted to test the procedure when the beam length and geometric properties vary.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abiodun, O. I., A. Jantan, A. E. Omolara, K. V. Dada, N. A. Mohamed, and H. Arshad. 2018. “State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey.” Heliyon 4 (11): e00938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938.
Allemang, R. J. 2003. “The modal assurance criterion—Twenty years of use and abuse.” Sound Vib. 37 (8): 14–23.
Au, F. T. K., Y. S. Cheng, L. G. Tham, and Z. Z. Bai. 2003. “Structural damage detection based on a micro-genetic algorithm using incomplete and noisy modal test data.” J. Sound Vib. 259 (5): 1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5116.
Azimi, M., A. D. Eslamlou, and G. Pekcan. 2020. “Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of the—Art review.” Sensors 20 (10): 2778. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102778.
Azzara, R. M., A. De Falco, M. Girardi, and D. Pellegrini. 2017. “Ambient vibration recording on the Maddalena Bridge in Borgo a Mozzano (Italy): Data analysis.” Ann. Geophys. 60 (4): S0441. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7159.
Bao, Y., and H. Li. 2020. “Machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring.” In Structural health monitoring. London: SAGE.
Bazzucchi, F., L. Restuccia, and G. A. Ferro. 2018. “Considerations over Italian road bridge infrastructure safety after the Polcevera viaduct collapse: Past errors and future perspectives.” Frattura e Integrita Strutturale 2018 (12): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.46.37.
Bergstra, J., and Y. Bengio. 2012. “Random search for hyper-parameter optimization.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13: 281–305.
Bién, J., K. Jakubowski, T. Kamiński, J. Kmita, P. Kmita, P. J. S. Cruz, and M. Maksymowicz. 2007. “Railway bridge defects and degradation mechanisms.” In Sustainable bridges: Assessment for future traffic demands and longer lives, Wroclaw, 2007, edited by J. Bién, L. Elfgren, and J. Olofsson. Bristol, UK: The Open University and Jisc.
Buezas, F. S., M. B. Rosales, and C. P. Filipich. 2011. “Damage detection with genetic algorithms taking into account a crack contact model.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 78 (4): 695–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.008.
Chen, Z., Q. Cai, Y. Lei, and S. Zhu. 2014. “Damage detection of long-span bridges using stress influence lines incorporated control charts.” Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57 (9): 1689–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5623-0.
Chen, Z. W., L. Zhao, J. Zhang, Q. L. Cai, J. Li, and S. Zhu. 2021. “Damage quantification of beam structures using deflection influence line changes and sparse regularization.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 24 (9): 1997–2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433221992482.
Chiaia, B., G. Marasco, G. Ventura, and C. Zannini Quirini. 2020. “Customised active monitoring system for structural control and maintenance optimization.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 10 (2): 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00382-8.
Chou, J. H., and J. Ghaboussi. 2001. “Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection.” Comput. Struct. 79 (14): 1335–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00027-X.
Clemente, P. 2020. “Monitoring and evaluation of bridges: Lessons from the Polcevera Viaduct collapse in Italy.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 10 (2): 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00384-6.
Curadelli, R. O., J. D. Riera, D. Ambrosini, and M. G. Amani. 2008. “Damage detection by means of structural damping identification.” Eng. Struct. 30 (12): 3497–3504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.024.
De Sitter, W. R. 1984. “Costs of service life optimization ‘The law of fives’.” In Proc., CEB-RILEM Workshop on Durability of Concrete Structures, 131–134. Lausanne, Switzerland: Comité Euro-International du Béton.
Eiben, A. E., and S. K. Smit. 2011. “Parameter tuning for configuring and analyzing evolutionary algorithms.” Swarm Evol. Comput. 1 (1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2011.02.001.
Farrar, C. R., and K. Worden. 2012. Structural health monitoring: A machine learning perspective. New York: Wiley.
Fayed, H. A., and A. F. Atiya. 2019. “Speed up grid-search for parameter selection of support vector machines.” Appl. Soft Comput. 80 (Jul): 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.037.
Flah, M., I. Nunez, W. Ben Chaabene, and M. L. Nehdi. 2020. “Machine learning algorithms in civil structural health monitoring: A systematic review.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 28 (4): 2621–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09471-9.
Hao, H., and Y. Xia. 2002. “Vibration-based damage detection of structures by genetic algorithm.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 16 (3): 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:3(222).
Hassanat, A., K. Almohammadi, E. Alkafaween, E. Abunawas, A. Hammouri, and V. B. S. Prasath. 2019. “Choosing mutation and crossover ratios for genetic algorithms—a review with a new dynamic approach.” Information 10 (12): 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10120390.
He, R.-S., and S.-F. Hwang. 2006. “Damage detection by an adaptive real-parameter simulated annealing genetic algorithm.” Comput. Struct. 84 (31–32): 2231–2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.031.
He, R.-S., and S.-F. Hwang. 2007. “Damage detection by a hybrid real-parameter genetic algorithm under the assistance of grey relation analysis.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20 (7): 980–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2006.11.020.
Huang, Q., J. Mao, and Y. Liu. 2012. “An improved grid search algorithm of SVR parameters optimization.” In Proc., 2012 IEEE 14th Int. Conf. on Communication Technology, 1022–1026. New York: IEEE.
Iannacone, L., P. Francesco Giordano, P. Gardoni, and M. Pina Limongelli. 2021. “Quantifying the value of information from inspecting and monitoring engineering systems subject to gradual and shock deterioration.” In Structural health monitoring. London: SAGE.
Jenkins, C. H., L. Kjerengtroen, and H. Oestensen. 1997. “Sensitivity of parameter changes in structural damage detection.” Shock Vib. 4 (89): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1155/1997/807239.
Jung, D. S., and C. Y. Kim. 2013. “Finite element model updating of a simply supported skewed PSC I-girder bridge using hybrid genetic algorithm.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (3): 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0599-z.
Kaloop, M. R., J. W. Hu, and E. Elbeltagi. 2016. “Evaluation of high-speed railway bridges based on a nondestructive monitoring system.” Appl. Sci. 6 (1): 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6010024.
Khatir, A., M. Tehami, S. Khatir, and M. Abdel Wahab. 2016. “Multiple damage detection and localization in beam-like and complex structures using co-ordinate modal assurance criterion combined with firefly and genetic algorithms.” J. Vibroengineering 18 (8): 5063–5073. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.17026.
Lacidogna, G., G. Piana, F. Accornero, and A. Carpinteri. 2020. “Multi-technique damage monitoring of concrete beams: Acoustic emission, digital image correlation, dynamic identification.” Constr. Build. Mater. 242 (20): 118114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118114.
Magalhães, F., and A. Cunha. 2011. “Explaining operational modal analysis with data from an arch bridge.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 25 (5): 1431–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.08.001.
Maksymowicz, M., P. J. S. Cruz, J. Bień, and R. Helmerich. 2006. Concrete railway bridges: Taxonomy of degradation mechanisms and damages identified by NDT methods. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Megson, T. H. G. 2019. Structural and stress analysis. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Meruane, V., and W. Heylen. 2011. “A hybrid real genetic algorithm to detect structural damage using modal properties.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 25 (5): 1559–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.020.
Mirjalili, S., J. S. Dong, A. S. Sadiq, and H. Faris. 2020. “Genetic algorithm: Theory, literature review, and application in image reconstruction.” In Nature-inspired optimizers, 69–85. Berlin: Springer.
Moughty, J. J., and J. R. Casas. 2017. “A state of the art review of modal-based damage detection in bridges: Development, challenges, and solutions.” Appl. Sci. 7 (5): 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7050510.
Nakkiran, P., G. Kaplun, Y. Bansal, T. Yang, and B. Barak, and I. Sutskever. 2021. “Deep double descent: Where bigger models and more data hurt.” J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp. 2021 (12): 124003.
Nguyen, V. H., S. Schommer, S. Maas, and A. Zürbes. 2016. “Static load testing with temperature compensation for structural health monitoring of bridges.” Eng. Struct. 127 (Nov): 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.018.
Nobahari, M., and S. M. Seyedpoor. 2011. “Structural damage detection using an efficient correlation-based index and a modified genetic algorithm.” Math. Comput. Modell. 53 (9–10): 1798–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.058.
Pontes, F. J., G. F. Amorim, P. P. Balestrassi, A. P. Paiva, and J. R. Ferreira. 2016. “Design of experiments and focused grid search for neural network parameter optimization.” Neurocomputing 186 (Apr): 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.061.
Ramadhan, M. M., I. S. Sitanggang, F. R. Nasution, and A. Ghifari. 2017. “Parameter tuning in random forest based on grid search method for gender classification based on voice frequency.” In DEStech transactions on computer science and engineering. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtcse/cece2017/14611.
Reynders, E., R. Pintelon, and G. De Roeck. 2008. “Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 22 (4): 948–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.10.009.
Roselli, I., M. Malena, M. Mongelli, N. Cavalagli, M. Gioffrè, G. De Canio, and G. de Felice. 2018. “Health assessment and ambient vibration testing of the ‘Ponte delle Torri’ of Spoleto during the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 8 (2): 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0268-5.
Salawu, O. S. 1997. “Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: A review.” Eng. Struct. 19 (9): 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-6.
Sanayei, M., J. E. Phelps, J. D. Sipple, E. S. Bell, and B. R. Brenner. 2012. “Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite-element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000228.
Schwarz, B. J., and M. H. Richardson. 1999. “Experimental modal analysis.” CSI Reliab. Week 35 (1): 1–12.
Shekar, B. H., and G. Dagnew. 2019. “Grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and classification of microarray cancer data.” In Proc., 2019 2nd Int. Conf. on Advanced Computational and Communication Paradigms (ICACCP), 1–8. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCP.2019.8882943.
Singh, R. K., V. K. Panchal, and B. K. Singh. 2018. “A review on genetic algorithm and its applications.” In Proc., Second Int. Conf. on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT), 376–380. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGCIoT.2018.8753030.
Štimac, I., A. Mihanović, and I. Kožar. 2006. “Damage detection from analysis of displacement influence lines.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Bridges, 1001–1008. Trieste, Italy: World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.
Sun, L., Z. Shang, Y. Xia, S. Bhowmick, and S. Nagarajaiah. 2020. “Review of bridge structural health monitoring aided by big data and artificial intelligence: From condition assessment to damage detection.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (5): 04020073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002535.
Syarif, I., A. Prugel-Bennett, and G. Wills. 2016. “SVM parameter optimization using grid search and genetic algorithm to improve classification performance.” Telkomnika 14 (4): 1502. https://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v14i4.3956.
Tibaduiza Burgos, D. A., R. C. Gomez Vargas, C. Pedraza, D. Agis, and F. Pozo. 2020. “Damage identification in structural health monitoring: A brief review from its implementation to the use of data-driven applications.” Sensors 20 (3): 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030733.
Toh, G., and J. Park. 2020. “Review of vibration-based structural health monitoring using deep learning.” Appl. Sci. 10 (5): 1680. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051680.
Tonnoir, B., C. Carde, and D. Banant. 2018. “Curvature: An indicator of the mechanical condition of old prestressed concrete bridges.” Struct. Eng. Int. 28 (3): 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1490585.
Wu, C., P. Wu, J. Wang, R. Jiang, M. Chen, and X. Wang. 2022. “Critical review of data-driven decision-making in bridge operation and maintenance.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18 (1): 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1833946.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: Jul 29, 2021
Accepted: Jan 26, 2022
Published online: Jun 28, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino 10129, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-8947. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino 10129, Italy; Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, PR China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-0203. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino 10129, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino 10129, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-6091. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Effects of Symmetry Restriction on the Antenna Gain Optimized Using Genetic Algorithms, Symmetry, 10.3390/sym15030658, 15, 3, (658), (2023).
  • Machine learning approach to the safety assessment of a prestressed concrete railway bridge, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10.1080/15732479.2022.2119581, (1-15), (2022).
  • Risk-Informed and Life-Cycle Analyses of Structures and Infrastructures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003495, 148, 12, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share