Technical Papers
Oct 23, 2021

Macromodeling Approach and Robustness Enhancement Strategies for Steel Frame Buildings with Composite Slabs against Column Loss

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

This study presents a numerical assessment of the behavior of seismically designed steel frame buildings against ground floor column loss. In the designed prototype buildings, moment frames with beam-to-column rigid connections and concentric X-bracing frames resist the lateral force, whereas the steel-concrete composite floor slabs resist the gravity load. Macromodels are used to capture the building response when removing ground floor columns. The macromodels are built with a reduced modeling approach, in which the concrete damage and the local steel fracture behavior are accurately considered. The macromodeling approach is calibrated by high-fidelity models and validated by composite floor test. The validated macromodels are used to investigate the effect of column loss location, total number of floors, floor slab, beam-to-column connection type, adjacent span, and steel brace on the collapse resistance of prototype buildings. To account for sudden column failure, an energy-based approach is used to convert the quasi-static response curves to dynamic response curves. The structural robustness is derived by comparing each column failure case’s dynamic ultimate capacities with corresponding design requirements. Structural robustness enhancement strategies for steel frame buildings under progressive collapse scenarios are summarized and discussed. Moreover, a retrofitted moment-resisting connection with steel strands is proposed to enhance the steel frame buildings’ robustness by providing a second line of defense.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all of the data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research work in this paper was sponsored by the State Key Laboratory of Diaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (Tongji University, No. SLDRCE19-A-03) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51378380).

References

Alashker, Y., S. El-Tawil, and F. Sadek. 2010. “Progressive collapse resistance of steel-concrete composite floors.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (10): 1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000230.
Alashker, Y., H. Li, and S. El-Tawil. 2011. “Approximations in progressive collapse modeling.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (9): 914–924. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000452.
ASCE. 2017. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bao, Y., J. A. Main, and S. Y. Noh. 2017. “Evaluation of structural robustness against column loss: Methodology and application to RC frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (8): 04017066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001795.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1-8: Design of joints. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures, part 1-7: General actions—Accidental actions. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CPNI (Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure). 2011. Review of international research on structural robustness and disproportionate collapse. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
Ding, Y., X. Song, and H. T. Zhu. 2017. “Probabilistic progressive collapse analysis of steel-concrete composite floor systems.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 129 (Feb): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.11.009.
DoD (Department of Defense). 2016. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. Washington, DC: DoD.
Fu, F. 2009. “Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (6): 1269–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.02.001.
Fu, F. 2010. “3-D nonlinear dynamic progressive collapse analysis of multi-storey steel composite frame buildings—Parametric study.” Eng. Struct. 32 (12): 3974–3980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.09.008.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2016. Alternate path analysis & design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance. Washington, DC: GSA.
Hadjioannou, M., S. Donahue, E. B. Williamson, and M. D. Engelhardt. 2018. “Large-scale experimental tests of composite steel floor systems subjected to column loss scenarios.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (2): 04017184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001929.
Hoffman, S. T., and L. A. Fahnestock. 2011. “Behavior of multi-story steel buildings under dynamic column loss scenarios.” Steel Compos. Struct. 11 (2): 149–168. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2011.11.2.149.
Izzuddin, B. A., A. G. Vlassis, A. Y. Elghazouli, and D. A. Nethercot. 2008. “Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss—Part I: Simplified assessment framework.” Eng. Struct. 30 (5): 1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011.
Johnson, E. S., J. E. Meissner, and L. A. Fahnestock. 2016. “Experimental behavior of a half-scale steel concrete composite floor system subjected to column removal scenarios.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (2): 04015133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001398.
Kang, S. B., K. H. Tan, H. Y. Liu, X. H. Zhou, and B. Yang. 2017. “Effect of boundary conditions on the behaviour of composite frames against progressive collapse.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 138 (Nov): 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.005.
Khandelwal, K., and S. El-Tawil. 2011. “Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis.” Eng. Struct. 33 (9): 2653–2661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.013.
Kwasniewski, L. 2010. “Nonlinear dynamic simulations of progressive collapse for a multi-story building.” Eng. Struct. 32 (5): 1223–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.048.
Li, H., and S. El-Tawil. 2014. “Three-dimensional effects and collapse resistance mechanisms in steel frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A4014017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000839.
Li, L., W. Wang, Y. Chen, and Y. Lu. 2013. “Experimental investigation of beam-to-tubular column moment connections under column removal scenario.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 88 (Sep): 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.05.017.
Li, L., W. Wang, Y. Chen, and Y. Lu. 2015. “Effect of beam web bolt arrangement on catenary behaviour of moment connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 104 (Jan): 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.09.016.
Main, J. A. 2014. “Composite floor systems under column loss: Collapse resistance and tie force requirements.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000952.
Main, J. A., and F. Sadek. 2012. Robustness of steel gravity frame systems with single-plate shear connections. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2010. Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: MOHURD.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2017. Standard for design of steel structures. Beijing: MOHURD.
Qiao, H., Y. Yang, and J. Zhang. 2018. “Progressive collapse analysis of multistory moment frames with varying mechanisms.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (4): 04018043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001192.
Qin, X., W. Wang, Y. Chen, and Y. Bao. 2015. “Experimental study of through diaphragm connection types under a column removal scenario.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 112 (Sep): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.05.022.
Sadek, F., S. El-Tawil, and H. Lew. 2008. “Robustness of composite floor systems with shear connections: modeling, simulation, and evaluation.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (11): 1717–1725. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:11(1717).
Sadek, F., J. A. Main, H. S. Lew, S. D. Robert, V. P. Chiarito, and S. El-Tawil. 2010. An experimental and computational study of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
Sagiroglu, S., and M. Sasani. 2014. “Progressive collapse-resisting mechanisms of reinforced concrete structures and effects of initial damage locations” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (3): 04013073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000854.
Starossek, U. 2009. Progressive collapse of structures. London: Thomas Telford.
Starossek, U., and M. Haberland. 2011. “Approaches to measures of structural robustness.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (7–8): 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.501562.
Wang, J., W. Wang, and Y. Bao. 2020. “Full-scale test of a steel-concrete composite floor system with moment-resisting connections under a middle-edge column removal scenario.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (5): 04020067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002630.
Wang, J., W. Wang, Y. Bao, and D. Lehman. 2021. “Numerical investigation on progressive collapse resistance of steel-concrete composite floor systems.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 17 (2): 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1733622.
Wang, J., W. Wang, D. Lehman, and C. Roeder. 2019a. “Effects of different steel-concrete composite slabs on rigid steel beam-column connection under a column removal scenario.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 153 (Feb): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.025.
Wang, J., W. Wang, and X. Qian. 2019b. “Progressive collapse simulation of the steel-concrete composite floor system considering ductile fracture of steel.” Eng. Struct. 200 (Dec): 109701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109701.
Wang, W., C. Fang, X. Qin, Y. Chen, and L. Li. 2016. “Performance of practical beam-to-SHS column connections against progressive collapse.” Eng. Struct. 106 (Jan): 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.040.
Yang, B., and K. H. Tan. 2013. “Robustness of bolted-angle connections against progressive collapse: Experimental tests of beam-column joints and development of component-based models.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (9): 1498–1514. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000749.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: Aug 20, 2020
Accepted: Aug 11, 2021
Published online: Oct 23, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 23, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Junjie Wang [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-465X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Improving structural robustness of steel frame buildings by enhancing floor deck connections, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107842, 204, (107842), (2023).
  • Enhanced progressive collapse resistance of bolted beam-to-column connections with ductile stainless steel components, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115337, 275, (115337), (2023).
  • Structural robustness evaluation of steel frame buildings with different composite slabs using reduced-order modeling strategies, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107371, 196, (107371), (2022).
  • Strengthening and retrofitting techniques to mitigate progressive collapse: A critical review and future research agenda, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114274, 262, (114274), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share