Technical Papers
Sep 3, 2021

The Weakness of Robustness

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

Having a sufficient degree of robustness is generally believed to be an essential property of a safe structure. However, there is a lot of confusion about the exact meaning of the word as well as the way how this criterion should be interpreted in various circumstances. Of course, the notion has been translated into quite a number of codified rules that can be prescribed by authorities and can be dealt with by designers. Although there is some basic logic in the rules, the background is quite weak. Many studies focus on the structural behavior under extreme conditions, but relatively little research is done on the underlying effectivity and cost efficiency of the applied safety measures. Given the large epistemic uncertainties involved, the reluctance to deal with such issues is understandable. Nevertheless this paper aims at discussing these aspects and making them more prominent on the research agendas.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or codes were generated or used during the study.

References

Abboudt, N., M. Levy, D. Tennant, J. Mould, H. Levine, S. King, C. Ekwueme, A. Jain, and G. Hart. 2003. “Anatomy of a disaster: A structural investigation of the World Trade Center collapses.” In Proc., 3rd Forensic Engineering Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40692(241)36.
ABCB (Australian Buildings Code Board). 2016. Structural robustness handbook. Canberra, Australia: ABCB.
Adam, J. M., F. Parisi, J. Sagaseta, and X. Lu. 2018. “Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century.” Eng. Struct. 173 (Oct): 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082.
Adblast. 2014. Advanced design methods for BLAST loaded steel structures. Aachen, Germany: Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (RWTH).
Arup Group and Great Britain. 2011. Review of international research on structural robustness and disproportionate collapse. London: Dept. for Communities and Local Government.
ASCE. 2005. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-5. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2011. Blast protection of buildings. ASCE/SEI 59-11. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Canisius, T. G., J. Baker, and D. Diamantidis. 2011. COST Action TU0601—Structural robustness design for practising engineers. Brussels, Belgium: COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006a. Actions on structures: Accidental actions. Eurocode 1, EN 1991-1-7. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006b. Basis of structural design. Eurocode, EN 1990. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). 2011. Structural robustness design for practising engineers. COST Action TU0601. Brussels, Belgium: COST.
Czujko, J. 2001. Design of offshore facilities to resist gas explosion hazard, engineering handbook. Sandvika, Norway: CorrOcean ASA.
Dusenberry, D. O. 2003. “General considerations for blast-resistant design of facilities.” In Proc., 2003 ASCE/SEI Structures Congress and Exposition: Engineering Smarter, edited by L. N. Lowes, and G. R. Miller, 527–539. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Eibl, J. 1989. “Fragen zum Nachweis der Tragsicherheit bei Berücksichtigung, nichtlinearer Stoffgesetze.” In Tagung “Sicherheit von Bauwerken—Günter Breitschaft Symposium”. Berlin, Märtz: Eigenverlag des Institut für Bautechnik.
Eldukair, Z. A., and B. M. Ayyub. 1991. “Analysis of recent U.S. structural and construction failures.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 5 (1): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1991)5:1(57).
Ellingwood, B. 1987. “Design and construction error effects in structural reliability.” J. Struct. Eng. 113 (2): 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:2(409).
Ellingwood, B. R. 2002. “Load and resistance factor criteria for progressive collapse design.” In Prevention of progressive collapse. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences.
Ellingwood, B. R. 2008. “Structural reliability and performance-based engineering.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 161 (4): 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2008.161.4.199.
Faber, M. H., M. A. Maes, D. Straub, and J. Baker. 2006. “On the quantification of robustness of structures.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 25th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 79–87. New York: ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2006-92095.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2011. Buildings and infrastructure protection series reference manual to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA.
fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2012. fib Bulletin 63. Design of precast concrete structures against accidental actions. Lausanne, Switzerland: fib.
Fischer K., and M. H. Faber. 2012. “The LQI acceptance criterion and human compensation costs for monetary optimization: Discussion note.” In Proc., LQI Symp. Kongens Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.
Griffiths, H., A. Pugsley, and O. A. Saunders. 1968. Report of the inquiry into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point, Canning Town: Presented to the Minister of Housing and Local Government. London: HM Stationery Office.
Imam, B. M., and M. K. Chryssanthopoulos. 2007. Failure statistics for metallic bridges. Brussels, Belgium: COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).
ISO. 2015. General principles on reliability for structures. ISO 2394. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
ISO. 2020. Bases for design of structures: Accidental actions. ISO 10252. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
Izzuddin, B. A., and D. A. Nethercot. 2009. “Design-oriented approaches for progressive collapse assessment: Load-factor vs. ductility-centred methods.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2009: Don’t Mess with Structural Engineers: Expanding Our Role, 1–10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
JCSS (Joint Committee on Structural Safety). 2008. Risk assessment in engineering: Principles, system representation and risk criteria, edited by M. H. Faber. JCSS.
Leyendecker, E. V., and E. Burnett. 1976. The incidence of abnormal loading in residential buildings. Washington, DC: US National Bureau of Standards.
Nathwani, J. S., N. C. Lind, and M. D. Pandey. 2009. Engineering decisions for life quality: How safe is safe enough? Springer series in reliability engineering. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Rackwitz, R. 2002. “Optimization and risk acceptability based on the life quality index.” Struct. Saf. 24 (2–4): 297–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00029-2.
Schneider J., and A. Vrouwenvelder. 2017. Introduction to safety and reliability of structures. Zürich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Starossek, U. 2018. Progressive collapse of structures. 2nd ed. London: ICE Publishing/Thomas Telford.
Starossek U., and M. Haberland. 2008. “Measures of structural robustness: Requirements & applications.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2008: Crossing Borders. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Stewart, M. G. 2008. “Cost effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies for protection of buildings against terrorist attack.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 22 (2): 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:2(115).
Stewart, M. G., and R. E. Melchers. 1985. Human error in structural reliability. IV: Efficiency in design checking. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Monash Univ.
Swain, A. D., and H. E. Guttman. 1983. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Vrouwenvelder, T. 2000. “Stochastic modelling of extreme action events in structural engineering.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 15 (1): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00014-4.
Vrouwenvelder, T. 2005. “Eurocode 1, Part 1.7, Accidental actions.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR 2005). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid 2008. Onzekere veiligheid: Verantwoordelijkheden rond fysieke veiligheid. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Mar 30, 2021
Accepted: Jul 21, 2021
Published online: Sep 3, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 3, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ton Vrouwenvelder [email protected]
Professor Emeritus of Engineering, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Delft 2628 CK, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Progressive Collapse Analysis of the Champlain Towers South in Surfside, Florida, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12485, 150, 1, (2024).
  • Twenty Years of Advances in Disproportionate Collapse Research and Best Practices since 9/11/2001, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12056, 149, 2, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share