Technical Papers
Aug 7, 2021

Terrorism Risks and Economic Assessment of Infrastructure Protection against Progressive Collapse

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Existing infrastructure has proven to be resilient and robust against car and truck bombings. The impacts of terrorist attacks are often overstated, and the tragic events of 9/11 appear to be more of an aberration than a harbinger of worse to come. A case study describes fatality risks from progressive collapse caused by a large truck bomb, and then assesses probabilistic costs and benefits of design measures mandated by the United States to mitigate against progressive collapse for new federal government buildings. It was found that disproportionate collapse is a rare event, and there have been no fatalities from disproportionate collapse or other structural damage in Western countries in the 20 years since the tragic events of 9/11. Clearly, a specific threat involving a massive and larger than expected vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (VBIED) attack can lead to blast-resistant strengthening for buildings to be justified and cost-effective. However, the likelihood of nonspecific threats will need to exceed 2.5×104 per building per year for structural strengthening against progressive collapse to be cost-effective. This is equivalent to an average of six VBIED threats against large federal buildings per year, and that the threat involves a VBIED large enough to potentially cause progressive collapse. Policing and intelligence measures to warn or prevent terrorist attacks are likely to be a more cost-effective countermeasure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The support of the Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP210101487 is gratefully acknowledged. The author greatly appreciates his discussions and collaboration with Professor John Mueller and Dr Michael Netherton.

References

Abdelwahed, B. 2019. “A review on building progressive collapse, survey and discussion.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 11 (Dec): e00264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00264.
AICE (American Institute of Chemical Engineers). 2009. Guidelines for developing quantitative safety risk criteria. Hoboken, NJ: Center for Chemical Process Safety, AICE, Wiley.
ASCE. 2003. The Pentagon building performance report. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Asprone, D., F. Jalayer, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi. 2010. “Proposal of a probabilistic model for multi-hazard risk assessment of structures in seismic zones subjected to blast for the limit state of collapse.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.002.
Beck, A. T., L. R. Ribeiro, and M. Valdebenito. 2020. “Risk-based cost-benefit analysis of frame structures considering progressive collapse under column removal scenarios.” Eng. Struct. 225 (Dec): 111295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111295.
Byfield, M. P., W. Mudalige, C. Morison, and E. Stoddart. 2014. “A review of progressive collapse research and regulations.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 167 (8): 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.12.00023.
Corley, W. G., P. F. Mlakar, M. A. Sozen, and C. H. Thornton. 1998. “The Oklahoma City bombing: Summary and recommendations for multihazard mitigation.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 12 (3): 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1998)12:3(100).
Ellingwood, B. R. 2006. “Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 (4): 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(315).
Ellingwood, B. R. 2007. “Strategies for mitigating risk to buildings from abnormal load events.” Int. J. Risk Assess. Manage. 7 (6–7): 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2007.014662.
Ellingwood, B. R., R. Smilowitz, D. O. Dusenberry, D. Duthinh, H. S. Lew, and N. J. Carino. 2007. Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings. NISTIR 7396. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Dept. of Commerce.
El Sayed, M., M. Campidelli, W. El-Dakhakhni, and M. Tait. 2016. “Simplified framework for blast-risk-based cost-benefit analysis for reinforced concrete-block buildings.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (4): 04015077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000767.
Fletcher, K. C. 2011. “Aviation security: Case for risk-based passenger screening.” Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Univ. Circle Monterey.
GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2006. Combating terrorism: Determining and reporting federal funding data. Washington, DC: GAO.
Garrick, B. J., et al. 2004. “Confronting the risks of terrorism: Making the right decisions.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 86 (2): 129–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.04.003.
Grant, M. J., and M. G. Stewart. 2012. “A systems model for probabilistic risk assessment of improvised explosive device attack.” Int. J. Intell. Defence Support Syst. 5 (1): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDSS.2012.053664.
Grant, M. J., and M. G. Stewart. 2015. “Probabilistic risk assessment for improvised explosive device attacks that cause significant building damage.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (5): B4014009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000694.
Grant, M. J., and M. G. Stewart. 2019. “Postal IEDs and risk assessment of work health and safety considerations for postal workers.” Int. J. Risk Assess. Manage. 22 (2): 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2019.101272.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2016. General Services Administration alternate path analysis & design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance. Washington, DC: GSA.
Guikema, S., and T. Aven. 2010. “Assessing risk from intelligent attack: A perspective on approaches.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95 (5): 478–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.12.001.
HSE (Health & Safety Executive). 2013a. “HSE principles for cost benefit analysis (CBA) in support of ALARP decisions.” Accessed February 5, 2021. https://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarpcba.htm.
HSE (Health & Safety Executive). 2013b. “Risk analyses or ‘predictive’ aspects of COMAH safety reports guidance for explosives sites.” Accessed February 6, 2021. https://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/assessexplosives/step5.htm.
HSE (Health & Safety Executive). 2020. “Cost benefit analysis (CBA) checklist.” Accessed March 23, 2020. https://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarpcheck.htm.
ISO. 2015. General principles on reliability for structures. ISO 2394. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2020. General principles on risk assessment of systems involving structures. ISO13824. Geneva: ISO.
JCSS (Joint Committee on Structural Safety). 2019. “Assessment of risk reduction strategies for terrorist attacks on structures.” Accesssed February 10, 2021. https://www.jcss-lc.org/publications/raie/JCSS_ARRSTAS_Final.pdf.
Kelliher, D., and K. Sutton-Swaby. 2012. “Stochastic representation of blast load damage in a reinforced concrete building.” Struct. Saf. 34 (1): 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.08.001.
Kenney, M. 2010. “Dumb’ yet deadly: Local knowledge and poor tradecraft among Islamist militants in Britain and Spain.” Stud. Conflict Terrorism 33 (10): 911–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.508508.
Le, J-L., and B. Xue. 2014. “Probabilistic analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures against progressive collapse.” Eng. Struct. 76 (Oct): 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.016.
Little, R. G. 2007. “Cost-effective strategies to address urban terrorism: A risk management approach.” In The economic costs and consequences of terrorism, edited by H. W. Richardson, P. Gordon, and J. E. Moore II, 98–115. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Marchand, K. A., and D. J. Stevens. 2015. “Progressive collapse criteria and design approaches improvement.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (5): B4015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000706.
Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2011. Terror, security, and money: Balancing the risks, benefits, and costs of homeland security. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2012. “The terrorism delusion: America’s overwrought response to September 11.” Int. Secur. 37 (1): 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00089.
Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2014. “Evaluating counterterrorism spending.” J. Econ. Perspect. 28 (3): 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.237.
Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2016. Chasing ghosts: The policing of terrorism. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 1992. Guidelines and discount rates for benefit-cost analysis of federal programs (revised). Washington, DC: OMB.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 2003. Washington, DC: OMB.
Pate-Cornell, E., and S. Guikema. 2002. “Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: A systems analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures.” Mil. Oper. Res. 7 (4): 5–23.
Robinson, L. A., J. K. Hammitt, J. E. Aldy, A. Krupnick, and J. Baxter. 2010. “Valuing the risk of death from terrorist attacks.” J. Homeland Secur. Emergency Manage. 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1626.
Rothschild, C., L. McLay, and S. D. Guikema. 2012. “Adversarial risk analysis with incomplete information: A level-k approach.” Risk Anal. 32 (7): 1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01701.x.
Sandler, T., and W. Enders. 2005. “Transnational terrorism: An economic analysis.” In The economic impact of terrorist attacks, edited by H. W. Richardson, P. Gordon, and J. E. Moore II, 11–34. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Sezen, H., B. I. Song, and K. A. Giriunas. 2014. “Progressive collapse testing and analysis of a steel frame building.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 94 (Mar): 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.11.002.
Song, B. I., and H. Sezen. 2013. “Experimental and analytical progressive collapse assessment of a steel frame building.” Eng. Struct. 56 (11): 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.050.
Song, X. 2020. “Parameterized fragility analysis of steel frame structure subjected to blast loads using Bayesian logistic regression method.” Struct. Saf. 87 (Nov): 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102000.
Stevens, D., B. Crowder, D. Sunshine, K. Marchand, R. Smilowitz, E. Williamson, and M. Waggoner. 2011. “DoD research and criteria for the design of buildings to resist progressive collapse.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (9): 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000432.
Stewart, M. G. Forthcoming. “Simplified reliability-based load design factors for explosive blast loading, weapons effects, and its application to collateral damage estimation.” J. Def. Model. Simul. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512920977737.
Stewart, M. G. 2008. “Cost-effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies for protection of buildings against terrorist attack.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 22 (2): 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:2(115).
Stewart, M. G. 2010. “Risk-informed decision support for assessing the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism protective measures for infrastructure.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 3 (1): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2009.09.001.
Stewart, M. G. 2011. “Life-safety risks and optimisation of protective measures against terrorist threats to infrastructure.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (6): 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902726023.
Stewart, M. G. 2017. “Risk of progressive collapse of buildings from terrorist attacks: Are the benefits of protection worth the cost?” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (2): 04016093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000954.
Stewart, M. G. 2019. “Reliability-based load factors for airblast and structural reliability of RC columns for protective structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (5): 634–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1566389.
Stewart, M. G., B. R. Ellingwood, and J. Mueller. 2011. “Homeland security: A case study in risk aversion for public decision-making.” Int. J. Risk Assess. Manage. 15 (5–6): 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2011.043690.
Stewart, M. G., and J. Li. 2021. “Risk-based assessment of blast-resistant design of ultra-high performance concrete columns.” Struct. Saf. 88 (Jan): 102030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102030.
Stewart, M. G., and R. E. Melchers. 1997. Probabilistic risk assessment of engineering systems. London: Chapman & Hall.
Stewart, M. G., and J. Mueller. 2014. “Terrorism risks for bridges in a multi-hazard environment.” Int. J. Prot. Struct. 5 (3): 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1260/2041-4196.5.3.275.
Stewart, M. G., and J. Mueller. 2020. “Terrorism risks, chasing ghosts, and infrastructure resilience.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 5 (1–2): 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2018.1448664.
Stewart, M. G., and M. D. Netherton. 2019. “A probabilistic risk-acceptance model for assessing blast and fragmentation safety hazards.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 191 (Nov): 106492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.05.004.
Thöns, S., and M. G. Stewart. 2019. “On decision optimality of terrorism risk mitigation measures for iconic bridges.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 188 (Aug): 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.049.
Thöns, S., and M. G. Stewart. 2020. “On the cost-efficiency, significance and effectiveness of terrorism risk reduction strategies for buildings.” Struct. Saf. 85 (Jul): 101957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101957.
UFC (United Facilities Criteria). 2014. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. UFC 3-340-02. Washington, DC: UFC, Dept. of Defense.
UFC (United Facilities Criteria). 2016. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03. Washington, DC: UFC, Dept. of Defense.
Yasseri, S. 2003. “Probabilistic cost-benefit analysis for blast resistant design.” FABIG Newsl. 34 (Jan): 9–13.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Feb 19, 2021
Accepted: Jun 9, 2021
Published online: Aug 7, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor and Director, Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability, Univ. of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2038, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-6533. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Twenty Years of Advances in Disproportionate Collapse Research and Best Practices since 9/11/2001, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12056, 149, 2, (2023).
  • Reliability-based design and robustness for blast-resistant design of RC buildings, Advances in Structural Engineering, 10.1177/13694332221087341, 25, 7, (1402-1412), (2022).
  • Strengthening and retrofitting techniques to mitigate progressive collapse: A critical review and future research agenda, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114274, 262, (114274), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share