Abstract

The coastal region of China is exposed to severe typhoon threats and suffers significant casualties as well as economic losses due to seven to eight landed storms every year. This study developed a geographically weighted regression (GWR) circular subregion algorithm that considers the spatial variation characteristics of typhoon storms to map extreme-typhoon wind speeds. The continuously varying coefficient maps for typhoon-tracking, intensity, and wind field parameter recursive models are determined in the simulation domain using the best track data set from the Japan Meteorological Agency and geographically weighted regression. By introducing a genesis parameter model, each model module is validated independently or together by comparing the records in the best track data set in various circular subregions. The effects of the size of the circular subregion on the convergence of the typhoon wind hazard curve are investigated at two sites before an appropriate size is recommended. Extreme typhoon wind speeds of 10 coastal cities are modeled using the present model coupled with a well-developed analytical wind field model. Several factors that potentially contribute to the remarkable differences between this research and code suggestions as well as other studies are discussed. The estimated return period values of the annual maximum typhoon wind speed at 1,079 grid points in the coastal region of China are interpolated to achieve wind hazard contour maps. Several new findings regarding the spatial characteristics of extreme typhoon winds speed along the coastal region of China are examined.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC0809600, 2018YFC0809604), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678451, 51778495), the Shanghai Pujiang Program (20PJ1413600), and the China Scholarship Council, as well as the technical support of Palmetto Cluster at Clemson University.

References

Adler, R. F. 2005. “Estimating the benefit of TRMM tropical cyclone data in saving lives.” In Proc., 15th Conf. on Applied Climatology. Boston: American Meteorological Society.
ASCE/SEI. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chen, Y., and Z. Duan. 2018. “A statistical dynamics track model of tropical cyclones for assessing typhoon wind hazard in the coast of southeast China.” J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn. 172 (Jan): 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.014.
Cui, W., and L. Caracoglia. 2016. “Exploring hurricane wind speed along US Atlantic coast in warming climate and effects on predictions of structural damage and intervention costs.” Eng. Struct. 122 (Sep): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.003.
Cui, W., and L. Caracoglia. 2019. “A new stochastic formulation for synthetic hurricane simulation over the North Atlantic Ocean.” Eng. Struct. 199 (Nov): 109597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109597.
Darling, R. W. R. 1991. “Estimating probabilities of hurricane wind speeds using a large-scale empirical model.” J. Clim. 4 (10): 1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004%3C1035:EPOHWS%3E2.0.CO;2.
Dvorak, F. V. 1975. “Tropical cyclone intensity analysis and forecasting from satellite imagery.” Mon. Weather Rev. 103 (5): 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1975)103%3C0420:TCIAAF%3E2.0.CO;2.
Fang, G., et al. 2018a. “A novel analytical model for wind field simulation under typhoon boundary layer considering multi-field correlation and height-dependency.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 175 (Apr): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.019.
Fang, G., et al. 2018b. “Reconstruction of radial parametric pressure field near ground surface of landing typhoons in Northwest Pacific Ocean.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 183 (Dec): 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.10.020.
Fang, G., W. Pang, L. Zhao, P. Rawal, S. Cao, and Y. Ge. 2021. “Toward a refined estimation of typhoon wind hazards: Parametric modeling and upstream terrain effects.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 209 (Feb): 104460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104460.
Fang, G., L. Zhao, S. Cao, L. Zhu, and Y. Ge. 2020a. “Estimation of tropical cyclone wind hazards in coastal regions of China.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 20 (6): 1617–1637. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1617-2020.
Fang, G., L. Zhao, X. Chen, J. Cao, S. Cao, and Y. Ge. 2020b. “Normal and typhoon wind loadings on a large cooling tower: A comparative study.” J. Fluid Struct. 95 (May): 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102938.
FEMA. 2015. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Hurricane Model, HAZUS®-MH2.1, technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Feng, J., and D. Chen. 1995. “Analyses of climatic characteristics accompanying sudden intensity changes in offshore tropical cyclones in China.” [In Chinese.] J. Trop. Meteorol. 11 (1): 35–42.
Fotheringham, A. S., C. Brundson, and M. Charlton. 2002. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Fotheringham, A. S., M. E. Charlton, and C. Brunsdon. 1998. “Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis.” Environ. Plann. A 30 (11): 1905–1927. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301905.
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research. 2006. Met office HadISST 1.1—Global sea-ice coverage and sea surface temperature (1870–2017). Didcot, UK: NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre.
Holland, G. J. 1980. “An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes.” Mon. Weather Rev. 108 (8): 1212–1218. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108%3C1212:AAMOTW%3E2.0.CO;2.
Hong, H., S. Li, and Z. Duan. 2016. “Typhoon wind hazard estimation and mapping for coastal region in mainland China.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 17 (2): 04016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000210.
Huang, W., and J. Sun. 2018. “Prediction of typhoon design wind speed with Cholesky 62 decomposition method.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 27 (11): e1480. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1480.
JMA (Japan Meteorological Agency). 2017. “RSMC Tokyo-Typhoon Center, best track data.” Accessed June 1, 2018. https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/besttrack.html.
Knapp, K. R., et al. 2010. “The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS): Unifying tropical cyclone data.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91 (3): 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1.
LeSage, J. P. 1999. The theory and practice of spatial econometrics. Toledo, OH: Univ. of Toledo.
Li, S., and H. Hong. 2015a. “Observations on a hurricane wind hazard model used to map extreme hurricane wind speed.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 04014238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001217.
Li, S., and H. Hong. 2015b. “Use of historical best track data to estimate typhoon wind hazard at selected sites in China.” Nat. Hazards 76 (2): 1395–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1555-z.
Li, S., and H. Hong. 2016. “Typhoon wind hazard estimation for China using an empirical track model.” Nat. Hazards 82 (2): 1009–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2231-2.
Liu, F. 2014. “Projections of future US design wind speeds due to climate change for estimating hurricane losses.” Ph.D. dissertation. Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ.
Ministry of Communications of the People’s Republic of China. 2004. Wind-resistant design specification for highway bridges. Beijing: China Communications Press.
Mo, H. M., H. P. Hong, and F. Fan. 2015. “Estimating the extreme wind speed for regions in China using surface wind observations and reanalysis data.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 143 (Aug): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.04.005.
National Standards Committee. 2012. Load code for the design of building structures. GB 50009-2012. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
Richard, W. R., V. F. Banzon, and NOAA CDR Program. 2008. NOAA optimum interpolation 1/4 Degree daily sea surface temperature (OISST) analysis, version 2. Asheville, NC: National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Environmental Information.
Schreck, C. 2012. “IBTRACS: Tropical cyclone best track data: Expert user guidance.” Accessed June 1, 2018. https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/ibtracs-tropical-cyclone-best-track-data.
Simiu, E., and R. H. Scanlan. 1996. Wind effects on structures: Fundamentals and applications to design. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Song, J. J., Y. Wang, and L. Wu. 2010. “Trend discrepancies among three best track data sets of western North Pacific tropical cyclones.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115 (12): 27. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013058.
Vickery, P. J. 2005. “Simple empirical models for estimating the increase in the central pressure of tropical cyclones after landfall along the coastline of the United States.” J. Appl. Meteorol. 44 (12): 1807–1826. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2310.1.
Vickery, P. J., F. J. Masters, and M. D. Powell. 2009b. “Hurricane hazard modeling: The past, present, and future.” J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn. 97 (7): 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.05.005.
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, and L. A. Twisdale. 2000. “Simulation of hurricane risk in the U.S. using empirical track model.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1222).
Vickery, P. J., and L. A. Twisdale. 1995. “Prediction of hurricane wind speeds in the United States.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (11): 1691–1699. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:11(1691).
Vickery, P. J., and D. Wadhera. 2008. “Statistical models of Holland pressure profile parameter and radius to maximum winds of hurricanes from flight-level pressure and H*wind data.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 47 (10): 2497–2517. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1837.1.
Vickery, P. J., D. Wadhera, and J. Galsworthy. 2010. “Ultimate wind load design gust wind speeds in the United States for use in ASCE-7.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (5): 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000145.
Vickery, P. J., D. Wadhera, L. A. Twisdale, and F. M. Lavelle. 2009a. “U.S. hurricane wind speed risk and uncertainty.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (3): 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:3(301).
Wu, F., and G. Huang. 2019. “Refined empirical model of typhoon wind field and its application in China.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (11): 04019122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002422.
Xiao, Y., Z. Duan, and Y. Xiao. 2011. “Typhoon wind hazard analysis for Southeast China coastal regions.” Struct. Saf. 33 (4): 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.04.003.
Ying, M., E. J. Cha, and H. J. Kwon. 2011. “Comparison of three western North Pacific tropical cyclone best track data sets in a seasonal context.” J. Meteorol. Soc. Jap. 89 (3): 211–224. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2011-303.
Zhao, L., A. Lu, and L. Zhu. 2013. “Radial pressure profile of typhoon field near ground surface observed by distributed meteorologic stations.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 122 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.009.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: May 21, 2020
Accepted: Apr 30, 2021
Published online: Jul 26, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 26, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4034-0478. Email: [email protected]
Weichiang Pang, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7489-923X. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-4856. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Probabilistic Gust Factor Model of Typhoon Winds, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11997, 150, 1, (2024).
  • A Stochastic Tropical Cyclone Intensity Model for Wind Hazard Assessment Using the Geographically Weighted Summary Statistic Method, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11838, 150, 2, (2024).
  • Aerodynamic and Aerostatic Performance of a Long-Span Bridge with Wide Single Box Girder Installed with Vertical and Horizontal Stabilizers, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11925, 149, 8, (2023).
  • Field Measurements of Wind Microclimate at the Vehicle Level on a Bridge Deck under Typical Canyon Terrain, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5875, 28, 4, (2023).
  • Aerodynamic Force Distribution Characteristics around a Double-Slotted Box Girder of a Long-Span Bridge during Vortex-Induced Vibration, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001977, 28, 1, (2023).
  • Simplified models for uncertainty quantification of extreme events using Monte Carlo technique, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108935, 230, (108935), (2023).
  • Does safer housing save lives? An analysis of typhoon mortality and dwellings in the Philippines, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103433, 84, (103433), (2023).
  • Evaluating the Increasing Trend of Strength and Severe Wind Hazard of Philippine Typhoons Using the Holland-B Parameter and Regional Cyclonic Wind Field Modeling, Sustainability, 10.3390/su15010535, 15, 1, (535), (2022).
  • Flutter Fragility Analysis of Long-Span Bridges Based on 3D Typhoon Model Using Geographically Weighted Regression, IABSE Congress, Nanjing 2022: Bridges and Structures: Connection, Integration and Harmonisation, 10.2749/nanjing.2022.1775, (1775-1783), (2022).
  • Life-Cycle Assessment of Long-Span Bridge’s Wind Resistant Performance Considering Multisource Time-Variant Effects and Uncertainties, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003388, 148, 8, (2022).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share