Technical Papers
Jul 27, 2021

Probabilistic Model for Remaining Fatigue Life Estimation of Bridge Components

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Structural health monitoring provides a measurement-informed quantitative and systematic framework to better assess the state of fatigue in aging infrastructure. In this paper, a general methodology for probabilistic modeling of fatigue damage accumulation is presented from a structural health monitoring perspective, which allows for estimating the remaining fatigue life from strain measurements. The method presented uses a damage-sensitive feature derived from the Palmgren–Miner rule—a commonly used measure in fatigue analysis and design—as a surrogate for degradation and probabilistically models the process of degradation. A Bayesian approach is employed to estimate the parameters of this degradation model, and the remaining fatigue life is predicted using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. In the simplified case of constant stress amplitude, an analytical solution for the fatigue life has been derived. Moreover, techniques are presented to account for various challenges such as the lack of structural health monitoring data (SHM) for the initial unmonitored period and the absence of the continuous monitoring program. The main contribution of the paper is to develop a probabilistic degradation modeling framework using a damage-sensitive feature derived from the Miner rule for the prediction of the remaining fatigue life of critical bridge components. A numerical case study is presented to demonstrate the proposed methodology, and the major challenges of its implementation in the field are demonstrated through illustrations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

AASHTO. 1990. Guide specifications for fatigue evaluation of existing steel bridges, 1–16. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2010. Highway safety manual, 10. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ahmad, M., and A. K. Sheikh. 1984. “Bernstein reliability model: Derivation and estimation of parameters.” Reliab. Eng. 8 (3): 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-8174(84)90020-9.
Baek, S. H., S. S. Cho, and W. S. Joo. 2008. “Fatigue life prediction based on the rainflow cycle counting method for the end beam of a freight car bogie.” Int. J. Automot. Technol. 9 (1): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-008-0012-y.
Baptista, C., A. Reis, and A. Nussbaumer. 2017. “Probabilistic S-N curves for constant and variable amplitude.” Int. J. Fatigue 101 (Aug): 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.022.
Byers, W. G., M. J. Marley, J. Mohammadi, R. J. Nielsen, and S. Sarkani. 1997. “Fatigue reliability reassessment procedures: State-of-the-art paper.” J. Struct. Eng. 123 (3): 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:3(271).
Edwards, G., and L. A. Pacheco. 1984. “A Bayesian method for establishing fatigue design curves.” Struct. Saf. 2 (1): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(84)90005-5.
Farreras-Alcover, I., M. K. Chryssanthopoulos, and J. E. Andersen. 2015. “Regression models for structural health monitoring of welded bridge joints based on temperature, traffic and strain measurements.” Struct. Health Monit. 14 (6): 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921715609801.
Farreras-Alcover, I., M. K. Chryssanthopoulos, and J. E. Andersen. 2017. “Data-based models for fatigue reliability of orthotropic steel bridge decks based on temperature, traffic and strain monitoring.” Int. J. Fatigue 95 (Feb): 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.019.
Frangopol, D. M., A. Strauss, and S. Kim. 2008. “Bridge reliability assessment based on monitoring.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (3): 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:3(258).
Gebraeel, N., A. Elwany, and J. Pan. 2009. “Residual life predictions in the absence of prior degradation knowledge.” IEEE Trans. Reliab. 58 (1): 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2008.2011659.
Guida, M., and F. Penta. 2010. “A Bayesian analysis of fatigue data.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.001.
Guo, T., and Y.-W. Chen. 2011. “Field stress/displacement monitoring and fatigue reliability assessment of retrofitted steel bridge details.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 18 (1): 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.09.014.
Karandikar, J. M., N. H. Kim, and T. L. Schmitz. 2012. “Prediction of remaining useful life for fatigue-damaged structures using Bayesian inference.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 96 (Dec): 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.09.013.
Klemenc, J., and M. Fajdiga. 2012. “Estimating S–N curves and their scatter using a differential ant-stigmergy algorithm.” Int. J. Fatigue 43 (Oct): 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.02.015.
Kwon, K., and D. M. Frangopol. 2010. “Bridge fatigue reliability assessment using probability density functions of equivalent stress range based on field monitoring data.” Int. J. Fatigue 32 (8): 1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.002.
Leonetti, D., J. Maljaars, and H. H. B. Snijder. 2017. “Fitting fatigue test data with a novel S-N curve using frequentist and Bayesian inference.” Int. J. Fatigue 105 (Dec): 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.024.
Li, M., and G. Jia. 2020. “Bayesian updating of bridge condition deterioration models using complete and incomplete inspection data.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (3): 04020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001530.
Liu, M., D. M. Frangopol, and K. Kwon. 2010. “Fatigue reliability assessment of retrofitted steel bridges integrating monitored data.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.003.
Liu, X.-W., D.-G. Lu, and P. C. J. Hoogenboom. 2017. “Hierarchical Bayesian fatigue data analysis.” Int. J. Fatigue 100 (Jul): 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.043.
Liu, Y., and S. Mahadevan. 2005. “Probabilistic fatigue life prediction of multidirectional composite laminates.” Compos. Struct. 69 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.012.
Liu, Y., and S. Mahadevan. 2007. “Stochastic fatigue damage modeling under variable amplitude loading.” Int. J. Fatigue 29 (6): 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.009.
Lovejoy, S. C. 2003. “Determining appropriate fatigue inspection intervals for steel bridge members.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (2): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:2(66).
Madanat, S., R. Mishalani, and W. H. W. Ibrahim. 1995. “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (2): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:2(120).
Madsen, H. O. 1985. “Bayesian fatigue life prediction.” In Probabilistic methods in the mechanics of solids and structures, 395–406. Berlin: Springer.
Ni, Y. Q., X. W. Ye, and J. M. Ko. 2010. “Monitoring-based fatigue reliability assessment of steel bridges: Analytical model and application.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (12): 1563–1573. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000250.
Ntzoufras, I. 2011. Vol. 698 of Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS. New York: Wiley.
Paris, P., and F. Erdogan. 1963. “A critical analysis of crack propagation laws.” J. Basic Eng. 85 (4): 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3656900.
Perrin, F., B. Sudret, M. Pendola, and E. De Rocquigny. 2007. “Comparison of Markov chain Monte-Carlo simulation and a FORM-based approach for Bayesian updating of mechanical models.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP10. London: Taylor & Francis.
Rathod, V., O. P. Yadav, A. Rathore, and R. Jain. 2012. “Reliability-based design optimization considering probabilistic degradation behavior.” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 28 (8): 911–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1281.
Scherer, W. T., and D. M. Glagola. 1994. “Markovian models for bridge maintenance management.” J. Transp. Eng. 120 (1): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1994)120:1(37).
Sun, Q., H.-N. Dui, and X.-L. Fan. 2014. “A statistically consistent fatigue damage model based on miner’s rule.” Int. J. Fatigue 69 (Dec): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.006.
Wilkins, E. W. C. 1956. “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” In Colloquium on Fatigue/Colloque de Fatigue/Kolloquium über Ermüdungsfestigkeit, 321–332. Berlin: Springer.
Zarrin-Ghalami, T., and A. Fatemi. 2013. “Cumulative fatigue damage and life prediction of elastomeric components.” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 36 (3): 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01720.x.
Zheng, X., and J. Wei. 2005. “On the prediction of P–S–N curves of 45 steel notched elements and probability distribution of fatigue life under variable amplitude loading from tensile properties.” Int. J. Fatigue 27 (6): 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.001.
Zhou, Y. E. 2006. “Assessment of bridge remaining fatigue life through field strain measurement.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (6): 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:6(737).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Sep 28, 2020
Accepted: Apr 27, 2021
Published online: Jul 27, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 27, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Khandwa Rd., Simrol, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 453 552, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0884-709X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Fatigue Life Assessment of a Steel Railway Bridge with Pot-PTFE Bearing, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1299, 29, 1, (2024).
  • Risk–Reward Share Allocation under Different Integrated Project Delivery Relational Structures: A Monte-Carlo Simulation and Cooperative Game Theoretic Solutions Approach, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13181, 150, 4, (2024).
  • Sparse Bayesian Identification of Temperature-Displacement Model for Performance Assessment and Early Warning of Bridge Bearings, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003354, 148, 6, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share