Abstract

This data paper reviews the experimental research on fully restrained beam-to-column connections for steel moment-resisting frames (MRFs) over the last 50  years worldwide and presents an experimental database consisting of 100 tests with an emphasis on those exhibiting inelastic panel zone behavior. The collected data, which is organized in a consistent format, includes full digitized histories of the local panel zone shear force–shear distortion as well as the global force–displacement hysteretic diagrams of each experiment. In most cases the original data was only available in paper format. The gathered dataset suggests that the existing panel zone models that are currently used for the seismic design of steel MRFs deviate, in some cases considerably, from the measured response quantities of an actual panel zone. These involve the panel zone stiffness and shear resistance at selected inelastic shear distortions of interest to the engineering profession. The assembled inelastic panel zone database provides ranges in which post-Northridge beam-to-column connections, which exhibit considerable inelastic deformations within the panel zone web, may achieve lateral drift demands larger than 4% without experiencing premature fracture. The assembled dataset constitutes an important source for validation of continuum finite-element models that could aid the simulation-based engineering design of steel MRF beam-to-column connections designed with a balanced design approach. The database is made available to the engineering and research communities through a publicly available data repository.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The developed database along with the data extraction MATLAB procedures and the validated high-fidelity continuum finite-element model presented in this data paper are publicly available in the Zenodo data repository (doi: https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3689756, Skiadopoulos and Lignos 2020).

Acknowledgments

This study is based on work supported by a Nippon Steel Corporation collaborative grant as well as an EPFL internal grant for the first author. The financial support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to sincerely thank Prof. Ahmed Elkady from University of Southampton for the invaluable contribution to the data interpretation, Mr. Hammad El-Jisr (doctoral assistant at EPFL) for providing collected data on composite steel beam subassembly tests and Prof. Bozidar Stojadinovic from ETH-Zürich, for providing test data for the development of the inelastic panel zone database. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of sponsors.

References

AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). 2010a. Design recommendations for composite construction. 2nd ed. Tokyo: AIJ.
AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). 2010b. Recommendation for limit state design of steel structures. 3rd ed. Tokyo: AIJ.
AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). 2012. Recommendations for design of connections in steel structures. [In Japanese.]. Tokyo: AIJ.
AISC (American Institute for Steel Construction). 2016a. Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. ANSI/AISC 358-16. Chicago: AISC.
AISC (American Institute for Steel Construction). 2016b. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341-16. Chicago: AISC.
AISC (American Institute for Steel Construction). 2016c. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-16. Chicago: AISC.
AWS (American Welding Society). 2016. Structural welding code-seismic supplement. AWS D1.8/D1.8M:2016. Miami, FL: AWS.
Barsom, J. M., M. Johnson, and B. Mohr. 2000. Evaluation of mechanical properties in full-scale connections and recommended minimum weld toughness for moment resisting frames. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Braconi, A., M. Finetto, and H. Degee. 2013. Optimising the seismic performance of steel and steel-concrete structures by standardising material quality control (OPUS). Luxembourg: European Commission.
Brandonisio, G., A. De Luca, and E. Mele. 2012. “Shear strength of panel zone in beam-to-column connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 71: 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.11.004.
Castro, J. M., A. Y. Elghazouli, and B. A. Izzuddin. 2005. “Modelling of the panel zone in steel and composite moment frames.” Eng. Struct. 27 (1): 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.09.008.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004a. Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. EN 1994-1-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004b. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-8: Design of joints. EN 1993-1-8. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chi, B., and C.-M. Uang. 2002. “Cyclic response and design recommendations of reduced beam section moment connections with deep columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(464).
Chi, W. M., G. G. Deirlein, and A. Ingraffea. 1997. Finite element fracture mechanics investigation of welded beam-column connections. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Ciutina, A. L., and D. Dubina. 2008. “Column web stiffening of steel beam-to-column joints subjected to seismic actions.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (3): 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:3(505).
D’Aniello, M., R. Tartaglia, S. Costanzo, and R. Landolfo. 2017. “Seismic design of extended stiffened end-plate joints in the framework of eurocodes.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 128 (Jan): 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.09.017.
Del Caprio, M., G. Mosqueda, and D. Lignos. 2014. Hybrid simulation of the seismic response of a steel moment frame building structure through collapse. Buffalo, NY: Univ. of Buffalo.
Del Caprio, M., G. Mosqueda, and D. G. Lignos. 2016. “Seismic performance of a steel moment frame subassembly tested from the onset of damage through collapse.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (10): 1563–1580. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2743.
El Jisr, H., A. Elkady, and D. G. Lignos. 2019. “Composite steel beam database for seismic design and performance assessment of composite-steel moment-resisting frame systems.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (6): 3015–3039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00564-w.
Elkady, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2014. “Modeling of the composite action in fully restrained beam-to-column connections: Implications in the seismic design and collapse capacity of steel special moment frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (13): 1935–1954. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2430.
Elkady, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2018. “Improved seismic design and nonlinear modeling recommendations for wide-flange steel columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (9): 04018162. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002166.
El-Tawil, S., E. Vidarsson, T. Mikesell, and S. K. Kunnath. 1999. “Inelastic behavior and design of steel panel zones.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (2): 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:2(183).
Engelhardt, M. D., and A. S. Husain. 1993. “Cyclic-loading performance of welded flange-bolted web connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 119 (12): 3537–3550. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3537).
Engelhardt, M. D., M. J. Venti, G. T. Fry, S. L. Jones, and S. D. Holliday. 2000. Behavior and design of radius cut reduced beam section connections. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
FEMA. 1997. Connection test summaries. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000. State of the art report on connection performance. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fielding, D. J., and J. S. Huang. 1971. “Shear in steel beam-to-column connections.” Weld. J. 50 (7): 313–326.
Ghobarah, A., R. M. Korol, and A. Osman. 1992. “Cyclic behavior of extended end-plate joints.” J. Struct. Eng. 118 (5): 1333–1353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1333).
Hajjar, J. F., R. T. Leon, M. A. Gustafson, and C. K. Shield. 1998. “Seismic response of composite moment-resisting connections. II: Behavior.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (8): 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(877).
Jin, J., and S. El-Tawil. 2005. “Evaluation of FEMA-350 seismic provisions for steel panel zones.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (2): 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:2(250).
Johnson, M. Q. 1997. Evaluation of the effect of welding procedures on the mechanical properties of FCAW-S and SMAW weld metal used in construction of seismic moment frames. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Jones, S. L., T. Fry Gary, and D. Engelhardt Michael. 2002. “Experimental evaluation of cyclically loaded reduced beam section moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(441).
Kanvinde, A. M. 2017. “Predicting fracture in civil engineering steel structures: state of the art.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (3): 03116001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001704.
Kim, D.-W., C. Blaney, and C.-M. Uang. 2015. “Panel zone deformation capacity as affected by weld fracture at column kinking location.” Eng. J. 53 (1): 27–46.
Kim, K. D., and M. D. Engelhardt. 2002. “Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 58 (5–8): 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00079-7.
Kim, S.-Y., and C.-H. Lee. 2017. “Seismic retrofit of welded steel moment connections with highly composite floor slabs.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 139: 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.010.
Kolmogorov, A. 1933. “Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distributione.” Giornale dell’ Instituto Italiano delgi Attuari 4 (1): 83–91.
Kosarieh, A. H., and F. Danesh. 2016. “Effects of panel zone yielding on seismic behavior of welded-flange-plate connections.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 14 (10): 2805–2825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9915-6.
Krawinkler, H. 1978. “Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames.” Eng. J. 15 (3): 82–91.
Krawinkler, H., V. V. Bertero, and E. P. Popov. 1971. Inelastic behavior of steel beam-to-column subassemblages. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Lee, C. H., S. W. Jeon, J. H. Kim, and C. M. Uang. 2005a. “Effects of panel zone strength and beam web connection method on seismic performance of reduced beam section steel moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (12): 1854–1865. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1854).
Lee, D., S. C. Cotton, R. J. Dexter, J. F. Hajjar, Y. Ye, and S. D. Ojard. 2002. Column stiffener detailing and panel zone behavior of steel moment frame connections. Minneapolis: Institute of Technology Univ. of Minnesota.
Lee, D., S. C. Cotton, J. Hajjar, R. J. Dexter, and Y. Ye. 2005b. “Cyclic behavior of steel moment-resisting connections reinforced by alternative column stiffener details I. Connection performance and continuity plate detailing.” Eng. J. 42 (4): 189–214.
Lee, D., S. C. Cotton, J. F. Hajjar, R. J. Dexter, and Y. Ye. 2005c. “Cyclic behavior of steel moment-resisting connections reinforced by alternative column stiffener details II. Panel zone behavior and doubler plate detailing.” Eng. J. 42 (4): 215–238.
Lemaitre, J., and J. L. Chaboche. 1990. Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leon, R. T., J. F. Hajjar, and M. A. Gustafson. 1998. “Seismic response of composite moment-resisting connections. I: Performance.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (8): 868–876. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(868).
Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. 2012. Sidesway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations. Technical Rep. No. 177. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Lin, K. C., K. C. Tsai, S. L. Kong, and S. H. Hsieh. 2000. “Effects of panel zone deformations on cyclic performance of welded moment connections.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE). Auckland, NZ: New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Lu, L. W., J. M. Ricles, C. Mao, and J. W. Fisher. 2000. “Critical issues in achieving ductile behaviour of welded moment connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 55 (1–3): 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00092-9.
Malley, J. O. 1998. “SAC steel project: Summary of phase 1 testing investigation results.” Eng. Struct. 20 (4–6): 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00033-3.
Mao, C., J. Ricles, L. W. Lu, and J. Fisher. 2001. “Effect of local details on ductility of welded moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (9): 1036–1044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1036).
Miller, D. K. 2017. AISC steel design guide 21 welded connections—A primer for engineers. 2nd ed. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction.
NSF (National Science Foundation). 2004. “Network for earthquake engineers simulation—Special report.” Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/nees/NetworkforEarthquakeEngineeringSimulation_SR.pdf.
Popov, E. P., N. R. Amin, J. J. C. Louie, and R. M. Stephen. 1985. “Cyclic behavior of large beam-column assemblies.” Earthquake Spectra 1 (2): 203–238. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585263.
Popov, E. P., and R. B. Pinkney. 1969. “Cyclic yield reversal in steel building connections.” J. Struct. Div. 95 (3): 327–353.
Qi, L., J. Paquette, M. Eatherton, R. Leon, T. Bogdan, N. Popa, and E. Nunez. 2018. “Analysis of fracture behavior of large steel beam-column connections.” In Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures (ASCCS). València, Spain: Universitat Politècnica València. https://doi.org/10.4995/ASCCS2018.2018.7122.
Rahiminia, F., and H. Namba. 2013. “Joint panel in steel moment connections, part 1: Experimental tests results.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 89 (Oct): 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.002.
Rice, R. H. 1968. “A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks.” J. Appl. Mech. 35 (2): 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3601206.
Ricles, J. M., J. W. Fisher, L.-W. Lu, and E. J. Kaufmann. 2002. “Development of improved welded moment connections for earthquake-resistant design.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 58 (5–8): 565–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00095-5.
Ricles, J. M., C. Mao, L.-W. Lu, and J. W. Fisher. 2000. Development and evaluation of improved details for ductile welded unreinforced flange connections. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Ricles, J. M., X. Zhang, L.-W. Lu, and J. W. Fisher. 2004. Development of seismic guidelines for deep-column steel moment connections. ATLSS Rep. No. 04-13. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ.
Sato, A., J. Newell, and C.-M. Uang. 2007. Cyclic testing of bolted flange plate steel moment connections for special moment frames. San Diego: Univ. of California.
Schneider, S. P., and I. Teeraparbwong. 2000. Bolted flange plate connections. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Shapiro, S. S., and R. S. Francia. 1972. “An approximate analysis of variance test for normality.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 67 (337): 215–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481232.
Shapiro, S. S., and M. B. Wilk. 1965. “An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples).” Biometrika 52 (3–4): 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591.
Shin, S. 2017. “Experimental and analytical investigation of panel zone behavior in steel moment frames.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Shin, S., and M. D. Engelhardt. 2013. “Experimental study on panel zone behavior in steel moment resisting frames.” In Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Steel Structures. Jeju, Korea: Korean Society of Steel Construction.
Skiadopoulos, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2020. “Inelastic panel zone database.” Zenodo. open access repository. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3689756.
Slutter, R. G. 1981. Tests of panel zone behavior in beam-column connections. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ.
Smirnov, N. 1939. “Sur les ecarts de la courbe de distribution empirique.” Matematicheskii Sbornik 48(1): 3–26.
Soliman, A. A., O. A. Ibrahim, and A. M. Ibrahim. 2018. “Effect of panel zone strength ratio on reduced beam section steel moment frame connections.” Alexandria Eng. J. 57 (4): 3523–3533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.07.017.
Sousa, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2018. On the inverse problem of classic nonlinear plasticity models. Technical Rep. No. 231968. Lausanne, Switzerland: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
Stojadinović, B., S. C. Goel, K.-H. Lee, A. G. Margarian, and J.-H. Choi. 2000. “Parametric tests on unreinforced steel moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (1): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(40).
Tsai, K. C., and W. Z. Chen. 2000. “Seismic responses of steel reduced beam section to weak panel zone moment joints.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA), 279–286. Montreal: A.A. Balkema.
Tsai, K. C., and E. P. Popov. 1988. Steel beam-column joints in seismic moment resisting frames. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Uang, C.-M., Q.-S. K. Yu, S. Noel, and J. Gross. 2000. “Cyclic testing of steel moment connections rehabilitated with RBS or welded haunch.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (1): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(57).
Young, B. W. 1972. “Residual stresses in hot-rolled members.” In Proc., Int. Colloquium on Column Strength, Int. Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 25–38. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 4April 2021

History

Received: Mar 1, 2020
Accepted: Oct 27, 2020
Published online: Jan 19, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andronikos Skiadopoulos, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Doctoral Assistant, Dept. of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Station 18, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Station 18, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0682-4660. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share