Cyclic Behavior of Steel Double-Channel Built-Up Components with a New Lateral-Torsional-Buckling Prevention Detail
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 8
Abstract
Current standards require that, for moment-resisting frames, the strength degradation of a beam–column connection should not reduce flexural strength measured at a drift angle of 0.04 rad to less than 80% of the nominal flexural strength, . This requirement is generally sufficient for special moment-resisting frames (SMFs) to prevent collapse due to instability. However, in other seismic force-resisting systems (SFRSs), such as special truss moment frames (STMFs), the chord members within the predefined yielding panel, referred to as a special segment, experience a much larger member rotation. The rotational capacity and ductility of a steel member are controlled by the interaction of three instabilities: flange local buckling (FLB), web local buckling (WLB), and lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). In this study, a new connection detail was developed which uses a center gusset plate and horizontal stitches to prevent global lateral-torsional buckling of double-channel built-up sections, thereby enhancing rotational capacity. For deeper channel sections, web stiffeners can be used to separate WLB and FLB and thus minimize their interaction. Component testing was carried out on members with various sizes of double-channel sections, as well as a reduced beam section (RBS). The test results showed that the new detailing allows double-channel (C310) sections to achieve a member rotation of 0.09 rad (0.065-rad moment frame story drift angle) with more than 80% of the nominal flexural strength. As a result, double-channel built-up sections are able to provide sufficient ductility to prevent the structures they support from deforming into a strength-degrading range under major earthquakes, which makes them a good candidate for STMFs and for potential use in other seismic force-resisting systems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, under Award No. 0936563, and the American Institute of Steel Construction. Steel was partly donated by Falcon Steel Company, Haltom City, Texas. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting agencies.
References
AISC. 2001. Manual of steel construction: Load and resistance factor design. 3rd ed. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2010. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341-10. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2016a. Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. ANSI/AISC 358-16. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2016b. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341-16. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2017. Steel construction manual. 15th ed. Chicago: AISC.
Barsom, J., and S. T. Rolfe. 1999. Fracture and fatigue control in structures: Applications of fracture mechanics, 516. 3rd ed. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bruneau, M., C. M. Uang, and R. Sabelli. 2011. Ductile design of steel structures, 905. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Goel, S. C., and S.-H. Chao. 2008. Performance-based plastic design: Earthquake-resistant steel structures, 261. Country Club Hills, IL: International Code Council.
Jiansinlapadamrong, C., S. Simasathien, T. Okazaki, and S.-H. Chao. 2017. “Cyclic loading performance of full-scale special truss moment frame with innovative details for high seismic activity.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake (16WCEE). Tokyo, Japan: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Kim, T., A. S. Whittaker, A. S. J. Gilani, and V. V. Bertero. 2002. “Experimental evaluation of plate-reinforced steel moment-resisting connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(483).
Nakashima, M., D. Liu, and I. Kanao. 2003. “Lateral-torsional and local instability of steel beams subjected to cyclic loading.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 3 (3): 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1308).
Okazaki, T., D. Liu, M. Nakashima, and M. D. Engelhardt. 2006. “Stability requirements for beams in seismic steel moment frames.” J. Struct. Eng 132 (9): 1334–1342. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:9(1334).
Parra-Montesinos, G., S. Goel, and K. Kim. 2006. “Behavior of steel double-channel built-up chords of special truss moment frames under reversed cyclic bending.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (9): 1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:9(1343).
Simasathien, S., C. Jiansinlapadamrong, and S.-H. Chao. 2017. “Seismic behavior of special truss moment frame with double hollow structural sections as chord members.” Eng. Struct. 131 (Jan): 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.001.
Uang, C. M., and C.-C. Fan. 2001. “Cyclic stability criteria for steel moment connections with reduced beam section.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (9): 1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1021).
Yu, Q. S., C. Gilton, and C. M. Uang. 2000. Cyclic response of RBS moment connections: Loading sequence and lateral bracing effects. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 31, 2017
Accepted: Feb 28, 2018
Published online: Jun 15, 2018
Published in print: Aug 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 15, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.