Global Size Optimization of Statically Determinate Trusses Considering Displacement, Member, and Joint Constraints
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 2
Abstract
Realistic truss design optimization problems are often governed by practical constraints. Because of the complexity of these constraints, usually only member constraints are taken into account during the optimization, and joint constraints are accounted for in a manual postprocessing step. This paper proposes a method to account for joint constraints in the global discrete size optimization of a steel truss structure. The design of an N-type truss girder is considered first without and then with the joint constraints specified in the Eurocode. To guarantee global optimality in both cases, the optimization problem is reformulated as a mixed-integer linear program. A statically determinate analysis model is adopted so as to ensure that all joint constraints can be reformulated as linear functions. If the joint constraints are not considered in the optimization, a design is obtained where the joints need additional strengthening. This can be done by manually selecting heavier sections, which often leads to a suboptimal result, or by strengthening the joints (e.g., by means of stiffening plates), which has a serious effect on the fabrication cost. If the joint constraints are considered in the optimization, they are automatically satisfied by the final design. The weight of this design is about 15% higher than in the first case. This shows that the joint constraints have a significant effect on the optimal design. If the joint constraints are accounted for in a suboptimal way (e.g., by manually selecting heavier sections), the additional weight may be even higher. Taking into account joint constraints in the optimization leads to a cost reduction at two levels: in terms of engineering cost (no manual postprocessing step is needed) and fabrication cost (using unnecessarily heavy sections and joint strengthening are avoided).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ArcelorMittal. (2015). “ArcelorMittal sections and merchant bars.” Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg, 〈http://amsections.arcelormittal.com//products-services/products-ranges.html〉 (Apr. 7, 2015).
Arora, J., and Wang, Q. (2005). “Review of formulations for structural and mechanical system optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 30(4), 251–272.
Balling, R. (1991). “Optimal steel frame design by simulated annealing.” J. Struct. Eng., 1780–1795.
Camp, C., Bichon, B., and Stovall, S. (2005). “Design of steel frames using ant colony optimization.” J. Struct. Eng., 369–379.
Camp, C., Pezeshk, S., and Guozhong, C. (1998). “Optimized design of two-dimensional structures using a genetic algorithm.” J. Struct. Eng., 551–559.
European Committee for Standardization. (2005a). “Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.” Brussels, Belgium.
European Committee for Standardization. (2005b). “Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-8: Design of joints.” Brussels, Belgium.
Gandomi, A., Yang, X., and Alavi, A. (2011). “Mixed variable structural optimization using firefly algorithm.” Comput. Struct., 89(23), 2325–2336.
Grossmann, I., Voudouris, V., and Ghattas, O. (1992). “Mixed-integer linear programming reformulations for some nonlinear discrete design optimization problems.” Recent advances in global optimization, C. Floudas and P. Pardalos, eds., Princeton University Press, NJ, 478–512.
Gurobi Optimization. (2013). “Gurobi optimizer reference manual.” 〈http://www.gurobi.com/documentation/5.6/reference-manual〉 (Aug. 12, 2014).
Haftka, R. (1985). “Simultaneous analysis and design.” AIAA J., 23(7), 1099–1103.
Mela, K. (2013). “Mixed variable formulations for truss topology optimization.” Ph.D. thesis, Tampere Univ. of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Mela, K., and Koski, J. (2013). “Distributed loads in truss topology optimization.” Proc., 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, International Society for Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Germany.
Mueller, K., Liu, M., and Burns, S. (2002). “Fully stressed design of frame structures and multiple load paths.” J. Struct. Eng., 806–814.
Patnaik, S., Gendy, A., Berke, L., and Hopkins, D. (1998). “Modified fully utilized design (MFUD) method for stress and displacement constraints.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 41(7), 1171–1194.
Patnaik, S., and Hopkins, D. (1998). “Optimality of a fully stressed design.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 165(1–4), 215–221.
Rajeev, S., and Krishnamoorthy, C. (1992). “Discrete optimization of structures using genetic algorithms.” J. Struct. Eng., 1233–1250.
Rasmussen, M., and Stolpe, M. (2008). “Global optimization of discrete truss topology design problems using a parallel cut-and-branch method.” Comput. Struct., 86(13), 1527–1538.
Razani, R. (1965). “Behavior of fully-stressed design of structures and its relationship to minimum-weight design.” AIAA J., 3(12), 2262–2268.
Sonmez, M. (2011). “Discrete optimum design of truss structures using artificial bee colony algorithm.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 43(1), 85–97.
Stolpe, M. (2007). “On the refomulation of topology optimization problems as linear or convex quadratic mixed 0-1 programs.” Optim. Eng., 8(2), 163–192.
Stolpe, M., and Svanberg, K. (2003). “Modelling topology optimization problems as linear mixed 0-1 programs.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 57(5), 723–739.
Thanedar, P., and Vanderplaats, G. (1995). “Survey of discrete variable optimization for structural design.” J. Struct. Eng., 301–306.
van Eldik, C. (2006). Wegwijzer constructiestaal, Zoetermeer Bouwen met staal, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.
Venter, G., and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. (2003). “Particle swarm optimization.” AIAA J., 41(8), 1583–1589.
Wardenier, J., Kurobane, Y., Packer, J., Dutta, D., and Yeomans, N. (1992). Design guide for circular hollow section (CHS) joints under predominantly static loading, CIDECT and TÜV Rheinland, Köln, Germany.
Wardenier, J., Kurobane, Y., Packer, J., van der Vegte, G., and Zhao, X.-L. (2008). Design guide for circular hollow section (CHS) joints under predominantly static loading, CIDECT and LSS, Dortmund, Germany.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 15, 2014
Accepted: Jun 18, 2015
Published online: Aug 14, 2015
Discussion open until: Jan 14, 2016
Published in print: Feb 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.