Technical Papers
May 21, 2015

Framework for Incorporating Probabilistic Building Performance in the Assessment of Community Seismic Resilience

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 8

Abstract

A framework is presented for incorporating probabilistic building performance limit states in the assessment of community resilience to earthquakes. The limit states are defined on the basis of their implications to postearthquake functionality and recovery. They include damage triggering inspection, occupiable damage with loss of functionality, unoccupiable damage, irreparable damage, and collapse. Fragility curves are developed linking earthquake ground motion intensity to the probability of exceedance for each of the limit states. A characteristic recovery path is defined for each limit state on the basis of discrete functioning states, the time spent within each state, and the level of functionality associated with each state. A building recovery function is computed accounting for the uncertainty in the occurrence of each recovery path and its associated limit state. The outcome is a probabilistic assessment of recovery of functionality at the building level for a given ground motion intensity. The effects of externalities and other socioeconomic factors on building-level recovery and ways to incorporate these in the framework are discussed. A case study is presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed framework to model the postearthquake recovery of the shelter-in-place housing capacity of an inventory of residential buildings. This type of assessment can inform planning and policy decisions to manage the earthquake risk to residential housing capacity of communities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their feedback. This research was partially supported by the John Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, the Engineering Diversity Fellowship, and the Diversifying Academia Recruiting Excellence (DARE) Fellowship at Stanford University. The computational models run for this study used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. OCI-1053575 (Allocation: TG-BCS130008).

References

BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). (2000). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, IS 1893, New Delhi, India.
Boore, D. M., and Atkinson, G. M. (2008). “Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 99–138.
Bruneau, M., et al. (2003). “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.
Burton, H. V. (2014). “A rocking spine for enhanced seismic performance of infill frames.” Ph.D. dissertation Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Burton, H. V., and Deierlein, G. G. (2014). “Simulation of seismic collapse in nonductile reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infills.” J. Struct. Eng., A4014016.
Cimellaro, G., Christovasilis, I., Reinhorn, A., De Stefano, A., and Kirova, T., (2010a). “L’Aquila earthquake of April 6, 2009, in Italy: Rebuilding a resilient city to withstand multiple hazards.”, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Cimellaro, G., Reinhorn, A., and Bruneau, M., (2010b). “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Eng. Struct., 32(11), 3639–3649.
Cimellaro, G., Reinhorn, A., and Bruneau, M. (2011). “Performance-based metamodel for healthcare facilities.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(11), 1197–1217.
Comerio, M. (2006). “Estimating downtime in loss modeling.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 349–365.
Cornell, A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000). “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., and Emrich, C. T. (2010). “Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions.” J. Homeland Secur. Emerg. Manage., 7(1).
EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute). (2011). “The M6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquake of February 22, 2011.” Special Earthquake Rep. Oakland, CA.
FEMA. (1999). “HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methodology.” Technical Manuals I, II, and III, Prepared by the National Institute of Building Sciences for FEMA, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2009). “Quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
FEMA. (2012). “Seismic performance assessment of buildings.”, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
Jayaram, N., and Baker, J. W. (2009). “Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38, 1687–1708.
Krawinkler, H., and Deierlein, G. (2013). “Challenges towards achieving earthquake resilience through performance based earthquake engineering.” Chapter 1, Performance-based seismic engineering: Vision for an earthquake resilient society, M. Fischinger, ed., Springer, New York.
Krawinkler, H., Miranda, E., Bozorgnia, Y., and Bertero, V. V. (2004). “Performance-based earthquake engineering.” Chapter 9, Earthquake engineering: From engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, CRC, FL.
Mieler, M., Stojadinovic, B., Budnitz, R., Comerio, M., and Mahin, S. (2014). “A framework for linking community-resilience goals to specific performance targets for the built environment.” Earthquake Spectra, in press.
Miles, S. B. (2014). “Modeling and visualizing infrastructure-centric community disaster resilience.” Proc., 10th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, AK.
Miles, S. B., and Chang, S. E. (2003). “Urban disaster recovery: A framework and simulation model.”, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Miles, S. B., and Chang, S. E. (2006). “Modeling community recovery from earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 439–458.
Miles, S. B., and Chang, S. E. (2007). “A simulation model of urban disaster recovery and resilience: Implementation for the 1994 Northridge earthquake.”, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Miles, S. B., and Chang, S. E. (2011). “ResilUS: A community based disaster resilience model.” Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 38(1), 36–51.
Mitrani-Reiser, J. (2007). “An ounce of prevention: Probabilistic loss estimation for performance-based earthquake engineering,” Ph.D. dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
Moehle, J., and Deierlein, G. G. (2004). “A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 679.
OpenSees [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Poland, C. (2009). “The resilient city: Defining what San Francisco needs from its seismic mitigation polices.” 〈http://www.spur.org/initiative/resilient-city〉 (Feb. 1, 2009).
Ramirez, C. M., and Miranda, E. (2012). “Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(11), 1477–1493.
Silva, V., Crowley, H., Pagani, M., Monelli, D., and Pinho, R. (2012). “Development and application of OpenQuake, an open source software for seismic risk assessment.” Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 4917.
Twigg, J. (2009). Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community: A guidance note, 2nd Ed., Disaster Risk Reduction Interagency Coordination Group, London.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142Issue 8August 2016

History

Received: Nov 6, 2013
Accepted: Mar 12, 2015
Published online: May 21, 2015
Discussion open until: Oct 21, 2015
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Henry V. Burton, M.ASCE [email protected]
Asistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 5732 E Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Gregory Deierlein, F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., 439 Panama Mall, Bldg. 540 Room 118, Blume Center, Stanford, CA 94305.
David Lallemant, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., 439 Panama Mall, Bldg. 540 Room 118, Blume Center, Stanford, CA 94305.
Ting Lin, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Marquette Univ., Engineering Hall Room 209, 1637 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53233.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share