Technical Papers
Mar 9, 2015

Sustainability Metrics for Performance-Based Seismic Bridge Response

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 8

Abstract

Previous performance-based earthquake engineering investigations on highway bridges focused on repair cost and repair time metrics. These are primarily related to economic life-cycle cost analysis decision-making strategies for evaluating the vulnerability of bridges. However, environmental impacts considered during life-cycle assessment are also of interest. A methodology for quantifying the sustainability of bridge designs using carbon footprint as the performance metric is presented. Point estimates of the carbon footprint, repair cost, and repair time are used to compute resilience of several bridge-ground scenarios. Several multispan reinforced concrete highway overpass bridges in California from previous studies were selected for study because post-earthquake probabilistic repair cost and time data are already available. It is demonstrated that the disaggregation of the structure into performance groups, or components that are repaired together, and the probabilistic methodology previously employed lend themselves to the additional computations for carbon footprint. The performance groups and material quantities that drive the major contributions to carbon footprint as opposed to economic costs are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1201195.

References

Aviram, A., Mackie, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B. (2008). “Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr., 7(4), 395–402.
Basoz, N., and Mander, J. (1999). “Enhancement of the highway transportation lifeline module in HAZUS.” National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC.
BEA. (2002). “Benchmark input-output data.” U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 〈http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm〉 (Sep. 10, 2013).
Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D., Ummenhofer, T., and Zinke, T. (2014). “Resilience and sustainability of civil infrastructure: Toward a unified approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 04014004.
Bradley, B. A., Cubrinovski, M., Dhakal, R. P., and MacRae, G. A. (2010). “Probabilistic seismic performance and loss assessment of a bridge-foundation-soil system.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 30(5), 395–411.
Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute. (2013). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA).” 〈http://www.eiolca.net/index.html〉 (Sep. 10, 2013).
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., and Bruneau, M. (2010). “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Eng. Struct., 32(11), 3639–3649.
Deco, A., Bocchini, P., and Frangopol, D. M. (2013). “A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(10), 1469–1487.
Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M., and Saydam, D. (2013). “Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(10), 1451–1467.
Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M., and Saydam, D. (2014). “Sustainability of highway bridge networks under seismic hazard.” J. Earthquake Eng., 18(1), 41–66.
Durham, M., Durfee, E., and Keoleian, G. (2009). “CSS factsheets, carbon footprint.” Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1–2.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2008). “Global greenhouse gas emissions data.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html〉 (Sep. 10, 2013).
GHG Protocol Initiative. (2011). “Guidance for calculating scope 3 emissions.” 〈http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/tools/GHGProtocolGuidanceforCalculatingScope3Emissions-DRAFTAugust2011.pdf〉 (Sep. 10, 2013).
Ghosh, J., Tapia, C., and Padgett, J. E. (2011). “Life-cycle analysis of embodied energy for aging bridges subject to seismic hazards.” Applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering, M. Faber, J. Köhler, and K. Nishijima, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 562–569.
Hendrickson, C. T., Lester, B. L., and Matthews, H. S. (2006). Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: An input-output approach, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Hillman, T., and Ramaswami, A. (2010). “Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight U.S. cities.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44(6), 1902–1910.
Huang, Y., Hakim, B., and Zammataro, S. (2013). “Measuring the carbon footprint of road construction using CHANGER.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 14(6), 590–600.
Huang, Y. A., Lenzen, M., Weber, C. L., Murray, J., and Matthews, H. S. (2009a). “The role of input–output analysis for the screening of corporate carbon footprints.” Econ. Syst. Res., 21(3), 217–242.
Huang, Y. A., Weber, C. L., and Matthews, H. S. (2009b). “Categorization of scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(22), 8509–8515.
IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change). (2007). “Climate change 2007: The physical science basis.” Energy environment, S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller, eds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 433–440.
IPCC Working Group I. (2001). “Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Summary for policymakers. A report of working group 1.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2–17.
Ketchum, M., Chang, V., and Shantz, T. (2004). “Influence of design ground motion level on highway bridge cost.” PEER Lifelines Project Number 6D01 Rep., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Kijewski-Correa, T., and Taflanidis, A. A. (2012). “The Haitian dilemma: Can sustainability and hazard resilience be achieved?” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 10(3), 765–771.
Kitzes, J., et al. (2009). “A research agenda for improving national ecological footprint accounts.” Ecol. Econ., 68(7), 1991–2007.
Kucukvar, M., and Tatari, O. (2013). “Towards a triple bottom line sustainability assessment of the U.S. construction industry.” Int. J. Life Cycle Ass., 18(5), 958–972.
Leontief, W. (1970). “Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input-output approach.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 52(3), 262–271.
Mackie, K., Wong, J.-M., and Stojadinovic, B. (2008). “Integrated probabilistic performance-based evaluation of benchmark reinforced concrete bridges.”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Mackie, K. R., Lu, J., and Elgamal, A. (2012). “Performance-based earthquake assessment of bridge systems including ground-foundation interaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 42, 184–196.
Mackie, K. R., Wong, J.-M., and Stojadinovic, B. (2010). “Post-earthquake bridge repair cost and repair time estimation methodology.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(3), 281–301.
Mackie, K. R., Wong, J.-M., and Stojadinovic, B. (2011). “Bridge damage and loss scenarios calibrated by schematic design and cost estimation of repairs.” Earthquake Spectra, 27(4), 1127–1145.
Matthews, H. S., Hendrickson, C. T., and Weber, C. L. (2008). “The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries.” Env. Sci. Technol, 42(16), 5839–5842.
McDaniels, T., Chang, S., Cole, D., Mikawoz, J., and Longstaff, H. (2008). “Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: Characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation.” Global Environ. Change, 18(2), 310–318.
Melanta, S., Miller-Hooks, E., and Avetisyan, H. G. (2013). “Carbon footprint estimation tool for transportation construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 547–555.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(6), 823–839.
NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). (2010). “U.S. life cycle inventory database: Transport, train, diesel powered.”.
Onat, N. C., Kucukvar, M., and Tatari, O. (2014). “Scope-based carbon footprint analysis of US residential and commercial buildings: An input–output hybrid life cycle assessment approach.” Build. Environ., 72, 53–62.
OpenSees v2.4.5 [Computer software]. 〈http://opensees.berkeley.edu/〉.
Padgett, J. E., Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(5), 711–725.
Pandey, D., Agrawal, M., and Pandey, J. S. (2011). “Carbon footprint: Current methods of estimation.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 178(1–4), 135–160.
Rose, A. (2011). “Resilience and sustainability in the face of disasters.” Environ. Inno. Soc. Trans., 1(1), 96–100.
Sharrard, A. L. (2007). “Greening construction processes using an input-output-based hybrid life cycle assessment model.” Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA.
Sharrard, A. L., Matthews, H. S., and Ries, R. J. (2008). “Estimating construction project environmental effects using an input-output-based hybrid life-cycle assessment model.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 327–336.
Suh, S., et al. (2004). “System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(3), 657–664.
Turner, B., II (2010). “Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science?” Global Environ. Change, 20(4), 570–576.
Vitousek, P. M. (1994). “Beyond global warming: Ecology and global change.” Ecology, 75(7), 1861.
Weber, C. L., and Matthews, H. S. (2008). “Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(10), 3508–3513.
Wiedmann, T., and Minx, J. (2008). “A definition of ‘Carbon footprint’.” Ecological economics research trends, C. C. Pertsova, ed., Nova Science Publishers, New York, 1–11.
Wiedmann, T. O., Lenzen, M., and Barrett, J. R. (2009). “Companies on the scale: Comparing and benchmarking the sustainability performance of businesses.” J. Ind. Ecol., 13(3), 361–383.
Zhang, H., Lepech, M. D., Keoleian, G. A., Qian, S., and Li, V. C. (2010). “Dynamic life-cycle modeling of pavement overlay systems: Capturing the impacts of users, construction, and roadway deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 299–309.
Zhou, H., Wang, J., Wan, J., and Jia, H. (2010). “Resilience to natural hazards: A geographic perspective.” Nat. Hazards, 53(1), 21–41.
Zinke, T., Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D. M., and Ummenhofer, T. (2013). “Combining resilience and sustainability in infrastructure projects.” Life-cycle and sustainability of civil infrastructure systems, A. Strauss, D. M. Frangopol, and K. Bergmeister, eds., Taylor and Francis, U.K., 2450–2457.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142Issue 8August 2016

History

Received: Nov 6, 2013
Accepted: Jan 23, 2015
Published online: Mar 9, 2015
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2015
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin R. Mackie, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2450 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Murat Kucukvar
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Sehir Univ., Istanbul 34662, Turkey.
Omer Tatari, A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2450.
Ahmed Elgamal, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0085.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share