Technical Papers
Dec 3, 2014

First-Order Reliability Approach to Quantify and Improve Building Portfolio Resilience

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 8

Abstract

The concept of disaster-resilient communities has gained considerable acceptance and attention over the past decade, requiring the assessment of not only the monetary losses surrounding a hazard, but also the complex, time-dependent factors that influence community resilience. This paper presents an analytical, reliability-based approach to quantify seismic resilience based on the robustness and restoration rapidity of a portfolio of buildings following an earthquake event. The reliability problem is formulated using random variables to describe the spatially correlated seismic intensity, structural response, and duration of posthazard recovery for predefined building combinations within a portfolio. Based on these random variables, the first-order reliability method (FORM) is used as a basis to develop a new algorithm to evaluate a probability distribution of resilience for a suite of spatially distributed buildings. In addition, sensitivity measures are computed within FORM and used to prioritize cost-effective mitigation strategies to increase portfolio resilience. This assessment puts prehazard retrofit and posthazard restoration measures into a common preposterior framework to determine the most optimal allocation of resources to improve resilience given budgetary constraints. Preliminary results indicate that prehazard retrofit is often most cost-effective for increasing resilience; however, posthazard restoration efficiency is more cost-effective for achieving high resilience thresholds characterized by longer return periods.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Keith Porter at the University of Colorado for many useful conversations regarding this research and for providing building inventory data. Additional thanks to Charlie Kircher with Kircher & Associates for providing building height distribution information. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF), grant number CMMI 1063790. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of NSF.

References

Abrahamson, N., and Silva, W. (2008). “Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 67–97.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). (1985). “Earthquake damage evaluation data for California.”, Redwood City, CA.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). (2010). “Here today—Here tomorrow: The road to earthquake resilience in San Francisco.”, Redwood City, CA.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). “Correlation of response spectral values for multicomponent ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96(1), 215–227.
Bonstrom, H. (2013). “A first-order reliability approach to building portfolio loss estimation and mitigation prioritization.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Bonstrom, H., and Corotis, R. B. (2014). “Optimizing portfolio loss reduction using a first-order reliability method sensitivity analysis.” J. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., in press.
Boore, D. M., and Atkinson, G. M. (2008). “Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 99–138.
Bruneau, M., et al. (2003). “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.
Bruneau, M., and Reinhorn, A. (2007). “Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(1), 41–62.
Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y. (n.d.). Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Berkeley, CA.
CAPSS (Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety). (2008). Committee advisory meeting summary, San Francisco.
Chang, S. E., and Shinozuka, M. (2004). “Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra, 20(3), 739–755.
Chiou, B.-J., and Youngs, R. R. (2008). “An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 173–215.
Cimellaro, G. P., and Arcidiacono, V. (2013). “Resilience-based design for urban cities.” Resilience and urban risk management, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 127–141.
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., and Bruneau, M. (2010a). “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Eng. Struct., 32(11), 3639–3649.
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., and Bruneau, M. (2010b). “Seismic resilience of a hospital system.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 6(1–2), 127–144.
Cimellaro, G. P., and Solari, D. (2014). “Considerations about the optimal period range to evaluate the weight coefficient of coupled resilience index.” Eng. Struct., 69, 12–24.
Comerio, M., Landis, J., and Rofe, Y. (1994). Post disaster residential rebuilding, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
CRSI (Community Resilience System Initiative). (2011). Community resilience system initiative (CSRI) steering committee final report: A roadmap to increased community resilience, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (1994). Typical costs for seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2003). Building a disaster-resistant university, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors, Washington, DC.
Gilbert, S. W. (2010). Disaster resilience: A guide to the literature, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Gaithersburg, MD.
Goda, K., and Hong, H. P. (2008). “Estimation of seismic loss for spatially distributed buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(4), 889–910.
Hurtado, J. E. (2012). “Dimensionality reduction and visualization of structural reliability problems using polar features.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 29, 16–31.
Idriss, I. M. (2008). “An NGA empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 217–242.
Jayaram, N., and Baker, J. W. (2008). “Statistical tests of the joint distribution of spectral acceleration values.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98(5), 2231–2243.
Jayaram, N., and Baker, J. W. (2010). “Efficient sampling and data reduction techniques for probabilistic seismic lifeline risk assessment.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39, 1109–1131.
Kafali, C., and Grigoriu, M. (2004). Fragility based rehabilitation decision analysis, Student Research Accomplishments, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Kircher, C. A. (2003). “Earthquake loss estimation methods for welded steel moment-frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 19(2), 365–384.
Kircher, C. A., Seligson, H. A., Bouabid, J., and Morrow, G. C. (2006). “When the big one strikes again—Estimated losses due to a repeat of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(S2), 297–339.
Lee, R., and Kiremidjian, A. S. (2007). “Uncertainty and correlation for loss assessment of spatially distributed systems.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(4), 753–770.
Liel, A., Corotis, R. B., Sutton, J., Camata, G., Spacone, E., and Holtzman, R. (2013). “Perceptions of decision-making roles and priorities affecting rebuilding after disaster: The example of L’Aquila, Italy.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(3), 843–868.
Loth, C., and Baker, J. W. (2012). “A spatial cross-correlation model of spectral accelerations at multiple periods.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(3), 397–417.
Mahsuli, M., and Haukaas, T. (2013). “Sensitivity measures for optimal mitigation of risk and reduction of model uncertainty.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 117, 9–20.
Mann, N. R., Schafer, R. E., and Singpurwalla, N. D. (1974). Methods for statistical analysis of reliability and life data, Wiley, New York.
Melchers, R. E. (1999). Structural reliability analysis and prediction, Wiley, New York.
Miles, S. B., and Chang, S. E. (2006). “Modeling community recovery from earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 439–458.
Miller, M., Baker, J. W., Lim, H. W., Song, J., and Jayaram, N. (2011). “A FORM-based analysis of lifeline networks using a multivariate seismic intensity model.” 11th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP), Taylor and Francis, London.
National Academies (U.S.). (2012). Disaster resilience: A national imperative, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences). (2002). A guide to using HAZUS For mitigation, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences). (2012). “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model HAZUS-MH 2.1 technical manual.” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
Olsen, A. H., and Porter, K. A. (2011). “What we know about demand surge: Brief summary.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 62–71.
Ouyang, M., and Dueñas-Osorio, L. (2012). “Time-dependent resilience assessment and improvement of urban infrastructure systems.” Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci., 22(3), 033122.
Ouyang, M., Dueñas-Osorio, L., and Min, X. (2012). “A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems.” Struct. Saf., 36–37, 23–31.
Park, J., Bazzurro, P., and Baker, J. W. (2007). “Modeling spatial correlation of ground motion intensity measures for regional seismic hazard and portfolio loss estimation.” 10th Int. Conf. on Application of Statistic and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP10), Taylor and Francis, London.
Renschler, C. S., Frazier, A. E., Arendt, L. A., Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., and Bruneau, M. (2010). “Developing the ‘PEOPLEs’ resilience framework for defining and measuring disaster resilience at the community scale.” Proc., 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto.
Rosenblatt, M. (1952). “Remarks on a multivariate transformation.” Ann. Math. Stat., 23(3), 470–472.
Tierney, K., and Bruneau, M. (2007). “Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: A key to disaster loss reduction.” TR News, 250, 14–17.
United Nations. (2005). Report of the world conference on disaster reduction, Inter-Agency secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR), Geneva.
Wang, M., and Takada, T. (2005). “Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions.” Earthquake Spectra, 21(4), 1137–1156.
Zobel, C. W., and Khansa, L. (2014). “Characterizing multi-event disaster resilience.” Comput. Operat. Res., 42, 83–94.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142Issue 8August 2016

History

Received: Nov 1, 2013
Accepted: Oct 29, 2014
Published online: Dec 3, 2014
Discussion open until: May 3, 2015
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Holly Bonstrom
Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0428.
Ross B. Corotis, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Denver Business Challenge Professor of Engineering, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0428 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share