Reinforced Concrete Force Visualization and Design Using Bilinear Truss-Continuum Topology Optimization
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 4
Abstract
A new force visualization and design tool employing hybrid topology optimization is introduced for RC and prestressed concrete structural members. The optimization scheme couples a minimum compliance (maximum stiffness) objective function with a hybrid truss-continuum ground structure that can generate a strut-and-tie model for any general concrete member, loading, and set of boundary conditions. The truss ground structure represents discrete steel reinforcing bars (tensile load paths) that can be sized based on axial forces output directly by the optimization routine, whereas the continuum elements simulate concrete compression struts. This separation of compressive and tensile load-carrying elements is achieved through bilinear elastic models with an orthotropic constitutive relationship for the continuum. Examples are provided demonstrating the potential value of the optimization tool to RC design. Reinforcing layouts that can minimize cracking and reduce steel quantities when compared with traditional designs are provided for a prismatic beam, a hammerhead pier, a stepped beam with a cutout, and the local anchorage zone of a prestressed concrete block. A minimum length scale constraint is employed to control complexity of the strut-and-tie topology, accommodating design solutions that balance material savings, structural performance, and constructability.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) IGERT Program (DGE-0801471) and Grant No. CMMI-0928613. Their support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank Krister Svanberg for providing the MMA optimizer code.
References
AASHTO. (1994). AASHTO LRFD bridge specifications, 1st Ed., Washington, DC.
Achtziger, W. (1996). “Truss topology optimization including bar properties different for tension and compression.” Struct. Optim., 12(1), 63–74.
Ali, M. A., and White, R. N. (2001). “Automatic generation of truss model for optimal design of reinforced concrete structures.” ACI Struct. J., 98(4), 431–442.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2002). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, ACI 318-02, Farmington Hills, MI.
Amir, O., and Bogomolny, M. (2011). “Topology optimization for conceptual design of reinforced concrete structures.” Proc., 9th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Shizuoka, Japan.
Arora, J. (1997). Guide to structural optimization, 90th Ed., ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, New York.
Bendsøe, M. P. (1989). “Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem.” Struct. Optim., 1, 193–202.
Bendsøe, M. P., Ben-Tal, A., and Zowe, J. (1994). “Optimization methods for truss geometry and topology design.” Struct. Optim., 7(3), 141–159.
Bendsøe, M. P., and Sigmund, O. (2003). Topology optimization: Theory, methods, and applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Biondini, F., Bontempi, F., and Malerba, P. G. (1999). “Optimal strut-and-tie models in reinforced concrete structures.” CAMES, 6(3), 279–293.
Bogomolny, M., and Amir, O. (2012). “Conceptual design of reinforced concrete structures using topology optimization with elastoplastic material modeling.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 90(13), 1578–1597.
Bruggi, M. (2009). “Generating strut-and-tie patterns for reinforced concrete structures using topology optimization.” Comp. Struct., 87(23–24), 1483–1495.
Cai, K. (2011). “A simple approach to find optimal topology of a continuum with tension-only or compression-only material.” Struct. Multidisciplin. Optim., 43(6), 827–835.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Technical Committee A23.3. (1984). Design of concrete structures CAN3-A23.3-M84, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario.
Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D. (1980). “Shear and torsion design of prestressed and non-prestressed concrete beams.” J. Prestressed Concr. Inst., 25(5), 32–100.
Comité Euro-International du Béton. (1993). CEB-FIP model code 1990, Thomas Telford Services, Ltd, London.
Darwin, D., and Pecknold, D. A. (1977). “Nonlinear biaxial stress-strain law for concrete.”J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 103(2), 229–241.
Guest, J. K. (2009). “Topology optimization with multiple phase projection.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 199(1-4), 123–135.
Guest, J. K., Asadpoure, A., and Ha, S. (2011). “Eliminating beta-continuation from Heaviside projection and density filter algorithms.” Struct. Multidisciplin. Optim., 44(4), 443–453.
Guest, J. K., Prevost, J. H., and Belytschko, T. (2004). “Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 61(2), 238–254.
Kuchma, D., Yindeesuk, S., Nagle, T., Hart, J., and Lee, H. H. (2008). “Experimental validation of strut-and-tie method for complex regions.” ACI Struct. J., 105(5), 578–589.
Kwak, H.-G., and Noh, S.-H. (2006). “Determination of strut-and-tie models using evolutionary structural optimization.” Eng. Structures, 28(10), 1440–1449.
Leu, L.-J., Huang, C.-W., Chen, C.-S., and Liao, Y.-P. (2006). “Strut-and-tie design methodology for three-dimensional reinforced concrete structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(6), 929–938.
Liang, Q. Q., Xie, Y. M., and Steven, G. P. (2000a). “Optimal topology design of bracing systems for multistory steel frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(7), 823–829.
Liang, Q. Q., Xie, Y. M., and Steven, G. P. (2000b). “Topology optimization of strut-and-tie models in reinforced concrete structures using an evolutionary procedure.” ACI Struct. J., 97(2), 322–330.
MacGregor, J. G. (1992). Reinforced concrete: Mechanics and design, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Marti, P. (1980). “On plastic analysis of reinforced concrete.” Rep. No. 104, Institute of Structural Engineers, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maute, K., Schwarz, S., and Ramm, E. (1998). “Adaptive topology optimization of elastoplastic structures.” Struct. Optim., 15(2), 81–91.
Mijar, A. R., Swan, C. C., Arora, J. S., and Kosaka, I. (1998). “Continuum topology optimization for concept design of frame bracing systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 124(5), 541–550.
Moen, C. D., and Guest, J. K. (2010). “Reinforced concrete analysis and design with truss topology optimization.” Proc. of the Third Int. fib Congress and Exhibition, Washington, D.C, 1–11.
Mörsch, E. (1909). Concrete-steel construction, E. P. Goodrich, translator, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Nagarajan, P., and Pillai, T. M. M. (2008). “Analysis and design of simply supported deep beams using strut and tie method.” Adv. Struct. Eng., 11(5), 491–499.
Ohsaki, M., and Swan, C. C. (2002). “Topology and geometry optimization of trusses and frames.” Recent advances in optimal structural design, S. A. Burns, ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, 97–123.
Ritter, W. (1899). “Die Bauweise Hennebique.” Schweizerische Bauzeitung, 33(7), 59–61.
Rozvany, G. I. N. (1996). “Some shortcomings of Michell’s truss theory.” Struct. Optim., 12(4), 244–250.
Schlaich, J., Schaefer, K., and Jennewein, M. (1987). “Toward a consistent design of structural concrete.” PCI J., 32(3), 74–150.
Sigmund, O., and Petersson, J. (1998). “Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima.” Struct. Optim., 16, 68–75.
Stromberg, L. L., Beghini, A., Baker, W. F., and Paulino, G. H. (2012). “Topology optimization for braced frames: Combining continuum and beam/column elements.” Eng. Struct., 37, 106–124.
Svanberg, K. (1987). “The method of moving asymptotoes—a new method for structural optimization.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 24, 359–373.
Swan, C. C., and Kosaka, O. (1997). “Voigt-Reuss topology optimization for structures with nonlinear elastic material behaviors.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 40(20), 3785–3814.
Victoria, M., Querin, O. M., and Martí, P. (2011). “Generation of strut-and-tie models by topology design using different material properties in tension and compression.” Struct. Multidisc. Optim. J., 44(2), 247–258.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 139 • Issue 4 • April 2013
Pages: 607 - 618
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 20, 2011
Accepted: Jul 26, 2012
Published online: Aug 11, 2012
Published in print: Apr 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.