Technical Papers
Nov 26, 2021

Operation Optimization of Multiroute Cyclic Natural Gas Transmission Network under Different Objectives

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13, Issue 1

Abstract

Natural gas transmission networks (NGTNs) are the main facility connecting upstream gas sources and downstream consumers. For a cyclic NGTN with multiple gas transmission routes, different gas transportation schemes will affect not only the energy consumption of the system but also the pipeline transportation costs paid by consumers. In this paper, three operation optimization models are established to determine the optimal operating state of a multiroute cyclic NGTN under different scenarios. The three mathematical models correspond to three different objective functions: minimize the cost of compressor energy consumption, minimize the expense of pipeline transportation, and minimize the sum of the two expenses. The decision variables of the models include the pipeline flow rate, the number of operating compressors, and the outlet pressure of the compressors. In addition, a series of linear and nonlinear constraints of nodes, pipelines, and compressors is also proposed to guarantee the feasibility of solutions. The operation optimization problem is solved by the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS), and the effectiveness of this method is tested on a small double-route cyclic NGTN and a large three-route cyclic NGTN. The results show that the developed optimization model is able to find optimal solutions under different models. In the cyclic network, the difference in the flow distribution of gas transmission routes is the key factor affecting the optimization result. In addition, compared with the compressor energy consumption cost minimization objective, the pipeline transportation expense minimization objective can create greater economic benefits for consumers. In the two network cases, consumers can save 14.51 and 59.18×104 RMB. Finally, optimizing the two objectives at the same time makes it possible to achieve an effective balance between them.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51704253).

References

Amosa, M. K., and T. Majozi. 2016. “GAMS supported optimization and predictability study of a multi-objective adsorption process with conflicting regions of optimal operating conditions.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 94 (Nov): 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.08.014.
Bernal, D. E., S. Vigerske, F. Trespalacios, and I. E. Grossmann. 2020. “Improving the performance of DICOPT in convex MINLP problems using a feasibility pump.” Optim. Methods Software 35 (1): 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10556788.2019.1641498.
Borraz-Sanchez, C., and D. Haugland. 2011. “Minimizing fuel cost in gas transmission networks by dynamic programming and adaptive discretization.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 61 (2): 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.012.
BP (British Petroleum). 2019. BP energy outlook: 2019 edition. London: BP.
Chebouba, A., F. Yalaoui, A. Smati, L. Amodeo, K. Younsi, and A. Tairi. 2009. “Optimization of natural gas pipeline transportation using ant colony optimization.” Comput. Oper. Res. 36 (6): 1916–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2008.06.005.
da Silva Alves, F., J. N. M. de Souza, and A. L. H. Costa. 2016. “Multi-objective design optimization of natural gas transmission networks.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 93 (Oct): 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.06.006.
Demissie, A., W. Zhu, and C. T. Belachew. 2017. “A multi-objective optimization model for gas pipeline operations.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 100 (May): 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.02.017.
Fasihizadeh, M., M. V. Sefti, and H. M. Torbati. 2014. “Improving gas transmission networks operation using simulation algorithms: Case study of the National Iranian Gas Network.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 20 (Sep): 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.07.018.
Jin, L., and A. K. Wojtanowicz. 2010. “Optimization of large gas pipeline network—A case study in China.” J. Can. Pet. Technol. 49 (4): 36–43. https://doi.org/10.2118/136345-PA.
Kashani, A. H. A., and R. Molaei. 2014. “Techno-economical and environmental optimization of natural gas network operation.” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92 (11): 2106–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.02.006.
Li, C., W. Jia, Y. Yang, and X. Wu. 2011. “Adaptive genetic algorithm for steady-state operation optimization in natural gas networks.” J. Software 6 (3): 452–459. https://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.6.3.452-459.
Liu, E., L. Lv, Y. Yi, and P. Xie. 2019. “Research on the steady operation optimization model of natural gas pipeline considering the combined operation of air coolers and compressors.” IEEE Access 7 (Jun): 83251–83265. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924515.
Percell, P., and M. Ryan. 1987. “Steady state optimization of gas pipeline network operation.” In Proc., 19th PSIG Annual Meeting. Houston, TX: Pipeline Simulation Interest Group.
Rios-Mercado, R. Z., and C. Borraz-Sanchez. 2015. “Optimization problems in natural gas transportation systems: A state-of-the-art review.” Appl. Energy 147 (Jun): 536–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.017.
Rodriguez, D. A., P. P. Oteiza, and N. B. Brignole. 2013. “Simulated annealing optimization for hydrocarbon pipeline networks.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (25): 8579–8588. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie400022g.
Rodriguez, G. H., L. G. Pibouleau, C. A. Pantel, and S. Domenech. 2010. “Optimization of gas transmission networks under energetic and environmental considerations.” Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng. 8 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.2083.
Rose, D., M. Schmidt, M. C. Steinbach, and B. M. Willert. 2016. “Computational optimization of gas compressor stations: MINLP models versus continuous reformulations.” Math. Methods Oper. Res. 83 (3): 409–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-016-0533-5.
Su, H., E. Zio, J. Zhang, X. Li, L. Chi, L. Fan, and Z. Zhang. 2019. “A method for the multi-objective optimization of the operation of natural gas pipeline networks considering supply reliability and operation efficiency.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 131 (Dec): 106584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106584.
Sun, C., V. Uraikul, C. Chan, and P. Tontiwachwuthikul. 2000. “An integrated expert system/operations research approach for the optimization of natural gas pipeline operations.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 13 (4): 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(00)00022-1.
Tabkhi, F., L. Pibouleau, G. Hernandez-Rodriguez, C. Azzaro-Pantel, and S. Domenech. 2010. “Improving the performance of natural gas pipeline networks fuel consumption minimization problems.” AIChE J. 56 (4): 946–964. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12011.
Üster, H., and Ş. Dilaveroğlu. 2014. “Optimization for design and operation of natural gas transmission networks.” Appl. Energy 133 (Nov): 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.042.
Wolf, D., and Y. Smeers. 2000. “The gas transmission problem solved by an extension of the simplex algorithm.” Manage. Sci. 46 (11): 1454–1465. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1454.12087.
Wong, P., and R. Larson. 1968. “Optimization of natural-gas pipeline systems via dynamic programming.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 13 (5): 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1968.1098990.
Wu, X., C. Li, Y. He, and W. Jia. 2018. “Operation optimization of natural gas transmission pipelines based on stochastic optimization algorithms: A review.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2018 (Jan): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1267045.
Wu, X., C. Li, W. Jia, and Y. He. 2014. “Optimal operation of trunk natural gas pipelines via an inertia-adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 21 (Nov): 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.07.028.
Zhang, X., C. Wu, and L. Zuo. 2016. “Minimizing fuel consumption of a gas pipeline in transient states by dynamic programming.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 28 (Jan): 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.11.035.
Zheng, Z., and C. Wu. 2012. “Energy optimization of gas pipelines via an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm.” Pet. Sci. 9 (1): 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-012-0187-8.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13Issue 1February 2022

History

Received: May 16, 2021
Accepted: Oct 8, 2021
Published online: Nov 26, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 26, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4071-509X. Email: [email protected]
Guangchuan Liang [email protected]
Professor, Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Student, Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Operation Optimization of Natural Gas Pipe Network Considering Energy Metering, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1616, 15, 3, (2024).
  • Analyzing the Effects of Injecting Gaseous Hydrocarbons Heavier Than Methane into a Gas Trunkline in Dynamic Mode, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000670, 13, 4, (2022).
  • Energy Consumption Optimization Model of Large Parallel Natural Gas Pipeline Network: Using Compressors with Multiple Operating Modes, Energy & Fuels, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c02929, 37, 1, (774-784), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share